clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

Washington Redskins 3rd Down Efficiency Against New York Giants

The NFC East provides some fantastic match ups every season, and last year was no different. The Redskins and Giants battled out twice and split the winnings. One of the key factors in both games was the Redskins third down conversion rate. Here we break down everything you could want to know about both the Redskins third down offense and the Giants third down defense.


Over the past few days, I went back and watched every Redskins third down against the Giants last season, both home and away games. I wanted to get a look at both the Redskins offensive and Giants defensive tendencies on the most important down in the NFL, third. Having played two games against each other, it gave me a good opportunity to collect a bigger sample size and see how tendencies might have changed from the first game to the second.

I kept tally of a number of different categories, including: down and distance, quarter, personnel group, quarterback positioning, formation alignment, motions, defensive look pre-snap, run or pass, coverage scheme, play notes and the result of the play. I put them all together in this table, keeping the two games separate.


(Click to enlarge)

That's obviously a lot of information being thrown at you all at once, so here are some of the more interesting things I took out of it.

Conversion Rate

The Redskins only converted 6/13 (46%) third down attempts in the first game in New York, but managed 4/8 (50%) back home in Washington. That's a combined 10/21 (48%) converted third down attempts. For some comparison, the Patriots lead the NFL in 2012 for third down conversion rate, with 49% of their attempts being converted for first downs. The Redskins, for the season, averaged a 36% conversion rate, ranking 20th in the NFL.

Personnel Groups

The Redskins used just three personnel groups on third down; U, Tiger and Zebra. Zebra was the most frequently used (12 times), but that's probably because seven of the 21 third down attempts came from 10 or more yards, making the third receiver most useful than a second tight end or running back. Zebra saw all the snaps of third and six or more. That personnel group only managed to convert four of the 12 attempts they had, but the Redskins did manage to convert a couple of fourth downs after getting in range on third down.

The U group saw six third downs, mostly on short yard situations where the Redskins ran the ball, making use of the extra fullback and tight end as blockers. They converted four of six attempts, three of which came on the exact same play.


It's a rare power run, involving the tight end heavy side of the line, in this case, the left, to all crash down inside. That allows the right guard, Chris Chester to pull around from his spot and act as a lead blocker for Alfred Morris.


Fullback Darrel Young will take on the defensive end and kick him outside. Chester comes around on his pull and meets an incoming linebacker.


Chester is able to maintain the block long enough for Morris to get through the hole and pick up the first down.

The Redskins used that play three times over the course of the two games, and were successful converting on all three attempts.

Interestingly, the Redskins most successful conversion group, Tiger, only saw the field three times, all in the first game at the Giants. They were successful in converting two of three attempts, but never saw the field on third downs in the second game.

But clearly, the Redskins liked to have two tight ends on the field on third down when possible, be it with U or Tiger personnel groups. That should mean plenty of snaps for Fred Davis, Logan Paulsen, Niles Paul and rookie Jordan Reed.

Pre-Snap Looks

This was one of the most interesting parts of this study. The Giants showed a single-high-safety look on 8/13 third down plays in the first meeting, but only 3/8 third downs in the second game. Single-high-safety looks will generally mean the defense is running one deep safety with man coverage underneath, or Cover 3.

Whereas, New York showed two deep safety looks 5/13 snaps in the first game, and 5/8 snaps in the return game. Two deep safety looks can mean a couple of different things, like Cover 2, two-deep man under, quarters coverage or Tampa 2 among others.

This may have been a deliberate move by the Giants, having seen the Redskins burn the Cowboys safeties the week before. They might have wanted to be conservative and make sure that they had two safeties deep on third downs to stop them getting burnt. After all, they have great pass-rushers all along that four-man defensive line and hardly need a fifth rusher. But this could have also been a matter of the game situation, with four of the Redskins third down attempts in the second game being from 10 or more yards away.

Post-Snap Coverage

The Giants didn't try too hard to disguise their looks. They only had three of the 21 total third down attempts where they showed one look pre-snap and switched to a different coverage post snap. In New York, the Giants showed a two deep look but switched to single-high, man coverage after the snap. They twice showed a two deep safety look but rotated their safeties and ran Cover 3 after the snap, once in both games.

On those three disguised coverages, the Redskins failed to convert. However, when you watch those plays, one was a third and 10, one was a third and 17 (which the Redskins gained 15 yards and converted on fourth and two), and the final one was a third and four which Pierre Garcon dropped a pass on this play. So make of that what you will.

One intriguing move the Giants definitely made deliberately was to run Tampa 2 coverage in the second game. They didn't run it at all in the first game, but used it four times in the second.

But for the most part, the Giants ran the look they showed. The Redskins converted 2/5 passing plays against Cover 3; 1/2 passing plays against Cover 2, 1/3 passing plays against single-high man-under and 1/4 passing plays against Tampa 2.

What's interesting is to see how the Giants used their coverages in relation to yards needed for the first down. Here's a table to show just that.


Again, this plays into the idea the Giants defense played for the situation. In two-five yard situations, the Redskins could realistically run or pass the ball. So the Giants reacted with one deep safety, allowing that extra safety in the box to help support the run if need be. But the further away from the first down the Redskins were, the more the Giants would use two deep safeties.

Pass or Run

We'll end on something we all knew before you started reading this post. The Redskins were most effective when they were able to run the ball. They converted 5/7 third down attempts when they were able to run the ball. That means they were only able to convert 5/14 passing attempts for first downs. That's something the Redskins and Robert Griffin III will have to improve on going forward.