clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

Will LaRon Landry start?

New, comments

One of the big questions this offseason has been whether or not Gregg Williams will break from tradition and allow LaRon Landry to start from the get-go. Carlos Rogers and Sean Taylor, like Landry, were defensive backs taken in the first round by the Redskins, and they had to wait a few games before they earned a starting spot on the roster. However, as Gary Fitzgerald notes at the Official Site, Landry showed up at Tennessee starting opposite Sean Taylor. At the risk of over-analyzing what could very well be a meaningless gesture, was this a precursor of things to come? Do we see LaRon opposite Taylor in week 1? (I hope so.)

I guess a lot of that will depend on how he plays through the preseason; so far so good:

Midway through the first quarter, Landry blitzed Kerry Collins, forcing the Titans' veteran quarterback to hurry a throw. As Landry leveled a hard, clean hit, Collins' pass fell incomplete.

Redskins coaches want the Taylor-Landry combination to get plenty of work this preseason so that they can get acclimated to each other's style of play.

LaRon Landry has an advantage that Sean Taylor didn't, notably, Sean Taylor. The veteran Sean Taylor. Entering his fourth year in the league, Taylor knows -- or should -- this defense inside and out.   That's a great luxury considering Taylor is just 24 years old, which should remind us, as Ryan O'Halloran does, that Taylor entered the league young.

[Quick aside: I'm of the philosophy that durability is more a function of physical sacrifice than of age, at a minimum age isn't the exclusive factor. Does the fact that he joined the league so young mean we'll enjoy him playing at peak performance for longer or is the age irrelevant (or less relevant) than the amount of time he spends on the field? Something to consider.]

Anyways, Taylor has the confidence of the coaching staff and has established himself as the face of the defense. I would guess without knowing that the staff is much more likely to trust LaRon Landry, especially given his natural talent, opposite Sean Taylor than they would have, say, Sean Taylor opposite Matt Bowen or Andre Lott (or whoever was starting safety back in 2004). The point being, the team has a far more established player to bring Landry along from the start.

I vote yes, start him from the beginning. 2006's privation of turnovers was scary enough for me to want a player as talented as Landry, as capable of getting after opposing quarterbacks and laying fumblelicious hits in the secondary, from day one. We need those turnovers and can ill-afford a repeat of last year's turnover drought.