We still don't feel strongly for draft picks
I read it first at The Redskin Report so he gets my hat tip towards the Redskins Insider who confirms:
Kendall, who has endured a rocky relationship with Jets management in recent years, is a smart, capable veteran who can replace departed free agent Derrick Dockery. He can play all three interior positions but the Redskins have an immediate need at left guard, with tackle Todd Wade struggling to make the transition to that position, and relying on reserve Mike Pucillo in that spot in last week's preseason game.
And the fallout:
I understand the move. This is necessity driven by what the coaching staff sees on the offensive line, and I'd rather lose a draft pick than lose Jason Campbell to injury down the line (pun intended) because we can't protect him. If they think Pete Kendall can do the job then so be it. Count on backlash if he doesn't, as this is the quintessential mortgaging of the future for the present as Pete the youngster (he's just 34, yuck yuck yuck) isn't going to be a long-term fix at this position, and neither is one of either our 4th or 5th round pick in 2009. Or our 4th rounder in '08 thanks to TJ Duckett.
Speaking of TJ Duckett, he was brought in at RB as a result of injuries when it turned out we didn't need him at all. He cost us a 3rd and a 4th, much more than Pete Kendall, but let's still hope that's the last comparison made between those two players. If it turns out that Kendall isn't the player the staff thought he was, that he wasn't as necessary as they thought, that it turned out we overreacted to injury, it wouldn't be the first time. Just sayin'.
AOL Fanhouse, Jets Trade Pete Kendall to Redskins
Riggo's Rag, Help for the Line?
Mister Irrelevant, Skins Trade Pick for 34 Year-Old Guard
0 recs |
4 comments
Comments
Though I don't know this guy...
The team still needs to draft for the O-Line, especially the G spot, but this guy could be a (relatively) cheap fix.
by TexSkins on Aug 23, 2007 1:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
As you said
Obviously we needed Kendall otherwise the LG position may have tanked the entire line. But the real problem is that our GM thought Wade, Pucillo and/or Whitley would definitely be able to fill in.
Well, none of them could, and now we're trading away picks again.
It's like Gibbs is incapable of learning nuanced lessons, or looking at the big picture in any way.
sigh.
by smutsboy on Aug 23, 2007 1:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This trade needed to be done.
Even at 34 he should give us at least 2 good years and that gives us time to find a replacement through the draft.
Wade can move back to tackle and can challenge Jansen for a starting spot or at the very least be a solid backup.
And we now have solid depth behind Kendall with Pucillo
by BritishRedskin on Aug 23, 2007 6:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Good Analysis
For your sake I hope he has better luck keeping Campbell healthy than he did Pennington!
by Wilbert Montgomery on Aug 24, 2007 8:24 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 















