Poll: Do you want Dre Bly?
First the results from our last Poll: Who would you take at #6?
Michigan DT Alan Branch 28 votes - 32 %
Arkansas DE Jamaal Anderson 26 votes - 30 %
Clemson DE Gaines Adams 25 votes - 29 %
Louisville DT Amobi Okoye 7 votes - 8 %
Alan Branch wins, though I suspect that's just because Jamaal Anderson and Gaines Adams were splitting the Defensive End Vote. Overall DE picked up nearly 60% from Hogs Haven reader(s).
Jason La Canfora has intimated that the guy the Redskins really like is actually the one few of you chose: 19 year old DT Amobi Okoye.
And how might a trade down happen? One of a few ways involves new Denver Bronco Dre Bly, who we're currently trying to secure away from them for some kind of complicated, possibly convoluted trade situation.
The big question is, do you even want Dre Bly? I'm fairly comfortable with a Shawn Springs, Fred Smoot, and Carlos Rogers Defensive Back unit as even when Springs goes down with injury we'll still have some semi-reliable starters on the field -- as opposed to, say, Kenny Wright or Mike Rumph. But I'd also be fine with a Dre Bly, Fred Smoot, and Carlos Rogers unit as that's of comparable quality without the major injury inevitability concern.
So do you want Dre Bly? Keep Springs? Both? Vote and then post your comments below.
0 recs |
4 comments
Comments
There are a few problems here...
He can do the same things with Springs/Smoot/Rogers, well until Springs has his yearly breakdown. And only until Springs' contract is up. Then Smoot becomes the #1 CB... something I'm not sure how I feel about. My initial reaction is "Yikes" but it could be worse... like last year, when the #1 was Rogers.
With Rogers as the de facto #3, behind Smoot and Bly/Springs, I think this defense could do very well. Someday he'll make a great #2 CB, but I'm not convinced he'll ever be that #1 CB for this (or any other) team.
The more this Bly things goes on and the more crazy situations that are thrown out, the less I like it. If it was a straight #6 for Bly and picks, then I could handle it. But then to turn around and package Springs and some of those picks to move up again in the first round... I don't think I like the team playing draft board elevator.
by TexSkins on Mar 8, 2007 11:31 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Really?
by Skin Patrol on Mar 8, 2007 12:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I guess my point is...
He's very talented and gets better with every game. In his thrid year, he should come into his own. But given the choice, I'd put him on the #3 reciever and let Smoot (#2) and Springs/Bly (#1) take the other guys.
Think about this possibility: having Bly and Springs. Do you know of a better #4 CB than Rogers? Or a better #3 than Smoot?
Or, moving Springs to S... having your pass coverage S (Springs), 3 top quality CBs (Bly, Smoot and Rogers) to go with the hard hitting, run-stopping, punter-killing-machine that is Sean Taylor. That's a total upgrade from a year ago.
by TexSkins on Mar 8, 2007 12:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Not yet sold
My big thing against Rogers as a #4 is that you take his development back a year and virtually guarantee that he finishes his career outside of Washington.
And the problem with Springs is that the team has already reached the conclusion that he isn't worth his salary; and I tend to agree. As injury prone as he is, it simply isn't worth it to pay him 7-8.5M a year, which is where his cap hit is headed. If it makes sense for us to even think about cutting or trading him when it would actually cost us a few hundred grand to do so, that doesn't bode well for him as a 'Skin in '08 when it will save us over 2M to cut/trade him.
And with a guy who can't stay on the field, his value decreases drastically. Perhaps an additional year is good because he can increase his value substantially by being on the field, but I wonder if it's now or never -- Shanahan seems to like him, we're pursuing Bly, let's trade him to an interested party while there is still an interested party.
That's just my opinion... I'd be fine if Springs remained a Redskin, as I think the addition of Smoot already solves the major problem of keeping a Kenny Wright or Mike Rumph type player off the field.
by Skin Patrol on Mar 8, 2007 12:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs

by 















