Alan Branch's stock is plummeting
I only mention this because per the Mock Draft Database, 38% of Mock Drafts have us selecting Alan Branch. I don't want to place too heavy an emphasis on Mock Drafts, or "Big Boards", but some of the people in the know seem to think Alan Branch isn't all he's cracked out to be. And perhaps there is some reason in the Wisdom of the Masses. Which is fine with me because I don't think we should select at #6 anyways and if we did I'd just as soon take a DE to improve our pass rush. Just me.
First, per Tony Pauline at CNNSI.com:
Whether or not this drastically influences your thoughts on the Redskins at #6 will depend entirely on how reliable you think Mel Kiper and other talking Draft heads are. Knock yourselves out in the comments section (slow day).
0 recs |
3
comments
Comments
Branch is a good player...
The Skins need another DT. But they need a DE who gets to the QB more. I would think that they draft a DT at some point in the draft, maybe another 6th rounder that they hope turns out to be the 2007 version of Golston.
In any case, some team in the 12-24 range will be glad they drafted Branch. And glad they don't have to pay him top money.
by TexSkins on Mar 23, 2007 3:06 PM EDT 0 recs
Just my thoughts
by PennSkinsFan on Mar 24, 2007 10:23 PM EDT 0 recs
I hope you're right
Reader(s), make sure you stop by War Cry! for more of PennSkinsFan's thoughts.
by Skin Patrol on
Mar 25, 2007 11:59 AM EDT
up
0 recs










