Hogs Haven: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

Putting Adam Archuleta behind us (not in Coverage, of course)

Official Word should be released later today pending a physical, or whatever else needs to happen for players to officially move forward. Hogs Haven is ready to officially move on as well.

This morning's Post gets the final word:

The Washington Redskins agreed to trade Adam Archuleta to the Chicago Bears yesterday for a late-round draft pick, NFL sources said, one year after making him the highest-paid safety in league history. The deal, which was contingent on a few routine procedural matters, was not confirmed by either team last night but is expected to be announced today.
The bad news is that the Washington Redskins will now have a 4M dead cap space hit going into '07, per the article:
Had the Redskins executed the option and kept Archuleta as a reserve (behind starters Pierson Prioleau and Sean Taylor), he would have cost them $2.4 million against the salary cap; by dealing him, he likely will count $4 million in dead cap space, pending any other possible contract restructurings, but will be off the team's books after 2007.
That 4M should come as some surprise to many Redskins fans, as it was widely reported that Adam Archuleta had upwards of 9M in guaranteed money remaining on his contract, which is typically paid out in trades or cuts. That 9M was mitigated to 4M, thankfully, by the Chicago Bears:
The Redskins and Archuleta agreed to postpone his original deadline of March 12 to receive his bonus payment in order to facilitate a trade, and the Bears, whose coach, Lovie Smith, has a strong relationship with the safety from their time together in St. Louis, ultimately agreed to pick up that $5 million payment as part of the deal, sources said, beating today's new deadline for the option.
Which partially explains why a former first rounder is traded for a 6th rounder. Archuleta's trade value went down significantly with the attendant 5M in guaranteed money we unloaded on the Bears.

Jason La Canfora speaks more candidly on the subject in his Blog, though most of what he says is also mentioned in his Post article. We've taken a near 4M dead cap hit on a guy who would have only cost the team 2.4M in '07 to keep. That's a net loss of 1.6M that needs explaining. First, it was suggested that many in the organization viewed Archuleta as the source on a damningly critical Tom Friend article earlier in the year where much of our dirty laundry was aired. Second, something about a surgery?

There were also concerns after, sources said, Arch had minor surgery on his ankle in San Francisco this offseason by a specialist he found on his own. He had a bone spur removed and people in Arch's camp have told some they believe the player had an overlooked small stress fracture perhaps; the Redskins were unsure the surgery was necessary at first, if at all, and was just one of a bunch of issues the sides didn't seem to agree on (although that's often the case between players and teams in the NFL in 2007. That's the way it goes).
Finally, though Archuleta would have cost the team 1.6M less to keep on the team in '07 than to release him, the 2.4M we'd pay him was predicated on an excercised option worth 5M in guaranteed money paid out over a 5 year period. The Washington Redskins likely viewed that 5M as money poorly spent (given the various concerns) and they would have regarded Chicago's deal as a way to avoid paying that extra 5M. In other words, the team thought it was money saved; we'd have to pay Archuleta the 4M in dead cap space no matter what (eventually). Had he stayed in Washington, we also would have had to pay him an additional 5M plus whatever base salaries he accumulates over the years. Whether 4M in dead space in '07 is a worthwhile trade for 9M over a number of years -- accompanied ostensibly by some on-field production -- I leave to my reader(s).

How do we put this behind us? The 4M Archuleta will cost is off the books in '07, per the Post article. Although we're now down to three safeties, various sources are suggesting that Omar Stoutmire will be rejoining this Redskins defense. That development deserves its own post, so I won't waste words on it here.

Credit is due to John Mullin of the Chicago Tribune who called this development over a month ago. His take on the trade here. I repeatedly told John I didn't think the deal would go down if only because the 9M we'd have to pay to make it work was simply too much. He was right. I was wrong (for the right reasons! We didn't lose 9M).

If Archuleta is off the books in '07 the only thing we pay towards him now is the around 4M we owe him in guaranteed money that counts against this year's cap. After that, the team is done with Adam Archuleta. Overall value of The Highest Paid Safety Contract in NFL History: 5.595M. I don't say that nearly as defensively as that may sound; for over five and a half million dollars the Redskins got 7 starts, 60 tackles, 1 sack, 0 interceptions, 1 pass defensed. Not a bargain by any means, but a mistake I'm happy to put to bed.

A quick search of "Archuleta" on Hogs Haven reveals no fewer than 68 posts (!!!) many of them devoted exclusively to that subject. I'm moving on, though I encourage reader(s) to post their own concluding thoughts in the comments section or diaries. I wish him well in Chicago as he remained professional throughout his time in Washington (unless he was the source for that Tom Friend article).

One final stab at the team who picked him up, and Windy City Gridiron would be a great place to discuss the ramifications of this for both teams. Da Bears will pay Adam Archuleta at least as much as we paid him. Whether they get more value for him than we did is up to that team, though I can't imagine how they could get less. He is a liability in coverage.

Happy trails, Adam Archuleta.

Updated Blogroll: Redskins Insider. Hog Heaven. Running Redskins. AOL Fanhouse. Redskins Huddle. Harry Hog. Windy City Gridiron.

0 recs  |  Comment 5 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I suppose you could say
The Skins basically paid 1.6M for a conditional 6th round pick...
Bleeding Green Nation Philadelphia Eagles Blog

by JasonB on Mar 21, 2007 10:26 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

That's a good way of putting it
though I don't think that's a very flattering one for the 'Skins. If a 6th round pick even makes the team (which they don't) they certainly wouldn't cost 1.6M against any team's cap on a given year.

The most optimistic I can put it is that the Redskins got a 6th round pick while getting the Bears to pick up 5M in guaranteed money the Redskins had no interest in paying Archuleta to ride the bench for a few years.

I don't think I can view this as a net win for the 'Skins, but I want to think of it as damage control. Burgundy Colored Glasses, and all that.

by Skin Patrol on Mar 21, 2007 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Obviously
nothing official, but I have heard mixed takes on how the Bears will use him.  

One source that I just posted, said he will be our starting strong safety, so they don't have to rely on injury prone Brown, another said he would situational for us and be used for pass rushing and run coverage.

by WCG on Mar 21, 2007 10:28 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I think
given how he performed for the Redskins, that you're better off with the 2nd option. His strength was not coverage and he was a total liability last year when we ran him as a deep safety in a Cover-2 scheme. I understand the Bears run a Cover-2.

by Skin Patrol on Mar 21, 2007 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well...
in the Tampa 2 style defense, you need a strong safety to come up and play the run, make the big hits over the middle, and be an all around presence, sort of the Bob Sanders/John Lynch role that I think AA could do quite well in.

Problem is that the Redskins, who don't play exactly the same scheme, already have that guy in Sean Taylor.   A 6th rounder seems a bit low, but I think it's better for everyone involved to just move on.

Good luck AA... just not against the Skins.

by TexSkins on Mar 21, 2007 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email hogshaven@gmail.com
Start posting about the Redskins »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Thefalcoholic_small
Ask The Falcoholic!
Small
2010 Draft - Offensive Line
Small
The 2010 Redskins offense
Small
D-line, Cartwright make Skins worth watching

Recent FanPosts

Lavarr_small
Uniform Change
H2_logo_b_small
Looks Like Hunter the Punter Out For Sunday
Small
Riggo or Blache...
Lavarr_small
3-4 Defense
Small
Need some help guys, going to the game next week.
Skinsdallas_small
Riggins slams Snyder, again, on Inside the NFL:
Small
A Project for you all, I think this will be interesting
The-three-stooges-football_small
Nickname needs to go
Small
Fred Davis, I like the sound of this

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Mile High Report
Scouting Terrence Cody
Battle Red Blog
Ryan Moats Will Start Against The Colts
Bleeding Green Nation
Harbaugh: Andy Reid has ruined the Cowboys' decade

SPONSORS


Managers

Superbowl_small KevinE

Riggins_small Ken Meringolo

H2_logo_b_small Sugar

Authors

Hogshaven_small Skin Patrol