Clinton Portis looks familiar
Carrying this team to the playoffs, perhaps? The defense splits the game ball with CP, he of the 126 yards on 25 carries (over 5 YPC) and a touchdown, they of holding the Giants to 10 points. Admittedly, help arrived in the form of chronic dropsies by the Giants but even with some of those catches it isn't obvious that New York scores 23 points. We'll do this offense this morning, the defense later.
Quarterback: Todd Collins set a record by going 10 years and 2 days without a start, the longest start-drought in NFL history. And while he didn't play the best game, the good guys won. The important stat here is that although he wasn't completing more than a 1/3rd of his passes, he was moving the ball semi-efficiently when he did complete them. On 8 of 25 he managed just 166 yards, but that's still 6.64 YPA. Eli, by comparison, went 18/52 for 184 yards: 3.55 YPA. I also felt that was an abnormally high amount of passes to call given the weather.
Offensive Line: Couldn't be happier. Somehow without the help of two starting linemen in Randy Thomas and Jon Jansen, both on IR, we held the sack happiest defense in the entire NFL to just two sacks. This also despite Todd Collins not being the most fleet of foot qb we've seen. More crucial than that, though, were the holes they opened up on our way to a 153 yard rushing decision.
Running Backs: Enough cannot be said about CP's performance, which I thought was personified by a run in the first half. I forget when, exactly, it happened, but it was a draw that Portis received less than a second before a Giants defender was on top of him. Portis calmly spun, made that guy miss, and then drove forward strong. Instead of resorting to dance moves after a great spin, he ran efficiently past one defender and then over the rest, picking up around 8-9 yards on a play that just as easily could have been a one yard loss. With the weather what it was, those 8-9 yards mattered, because 3rd and longs were nearly impossible to convert. And of course dap goes to Ladell Betts on a 14 yard touchdown run where he, too, looked just mean lowering his shoulders and forcing the ball into the endzone. Outstanding effort by both those guys. Mike Sellers: 19 yard catch.
Wide Receivers: There's only 8 catches so not a lot to go on, and we too dropped a few good passes. That said, the story here was that the catches mattered. S. Moss led both teams in receiving yards and receptions, but it was Santana who made the game with 3 catches for 75 yards (25 YPC). Very impressive 36 yard catch, and pass, on the sideline after a drop in the middle of the field. Had the pass been any lower it would have been deflected or intercepted. Moss deserves all the credit in the world for letting the ball get to him and not playing defense on it, he has about the best eye for where a football is going to be as any player I've seen. No other Redskins receiver caught a pass yesterday.
Tight Ends: Todd Yoder had a frustrating false start penalty but otherwise played fine. He had a 30 yard reception. Chris Cooley had two big catches for 19 and 15 yards respectively.
Was it offensive? In some instances. I'd just as soon watch our running game flourish in a win than see us pass the ball well and move downfield effectively just to see us lose a game in the final moments. Any fan who claims to prefer close games to grinding it out over a division rival disagrees strongly with me. Nothing pleases me more than watching the Redskins hold a lead and grind the opponent down by bleeding them to death. What's important is that we're still alive and kicking and ready for Minnesota next week. Be sure to root against the Saints.
Elsewhere: More to come from Curly R, Greg at Hog Heaven says the D won us the game and recognizes the performance of Reed Doughty (10 tackles!), something up with Al Saunders this offseason?, Queen Latifah loves Portis, etc. Check the blogroll for more.
0 recs |
18
comments
Comments
Is this true?
by CptChaosSidekick on Dec 17, 2007 11:49 AM EST 0 recs
Yes.
Giants lose out they are 9-7. We win out we are 9-7. Division tie breakers, per NFL.com:
- 1. Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games between the clubs). - Wash. We won one, they won one.
- 2. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the division. - Wash assuming we win out. Both teams would be 3-3.
- 3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games. - Common games are division, both 3-3, plus our AFC East games, + NFC North games. The Giants lost to Green Bay (like us) beat Miami (like us) beat Detroit (like us) lost to Minnesota (which won't be like us if we win) beat Chicago (like us) and then will ostensibly lose games to New England (like us) and Buffalo (like us). The Minnesota game is the difference maker, and we'd hold that tie breaker over them with an ever so slightly better record against common opponents.
by Skin Patrol on
Dec 17, 2007 2:40 PM EST
up
0 recs
Just to clarify this....
But since "us winning out" means "we beat Minnesota", we would beat them in a tiebreaker head-to-head. So we would go into the playoffs along with the 'Aints.
by zknower on
Dec 17, 2007 5:06 PM EST
up
0 recs
Taking shots down field were key
I like what Landry is doing. The past few games he has laid some wood and is getting a ST type rep, but he needs to watch the penalties after the good hits. Its going to be interesting to see what we do in the offseason with the safety positions.
O line looked great last night, although im not sure why. Heyer may be vastly underrated and a star in the making.
Hope Rocky can come back we will need him for the Minnesota run game. I still say we have possibly the best 3 set of linebackers at least in the NFC with Fletch, Rocky and Marcus. They have been hiding our d lines deficincies all year.
Great win though. On to the dome.
by Sincethebeginning on Dec 17, 2007 12:11 PM EST 0 recs
good win indeed
Question: is there any scenario in which the Skins and the Saints both make the playoffs?
by Blitzburgh on Dec 17, 2007 3:00 PM EST 0 recs
See above
by zknower on
Dec 17, 2007 5:13 PM EST
up
0 recs
Did i hear Gibbs right?
Its unbelievable how many starters are out since the start of the season. Never seen anything like this. If this is true i think it really puts our chances on less than a limb. Rocky is really underrated. He was approaching 100 tackles this year.
by Sincethebeginning on Dec 17, 2007 5:18 PM EST 0 recs
yes..
:)
by Redskinette on
Dec 17, 2007 6:19 PM EST
up
0 recs
Jasno just posted
Every little glimmer of hope we get like last nights win seems to be doused by a double shot of the opposite word of hope, whatever that is.
Maybe we should just forfeit the rest of the season just so we have some players left for next year. We still have at least 2 games left to. I guess its safe to ask who's next?
Is their anyone who doesnt have either ligament damage or hamstring or groin tears on this team. This is just so disappointing not only for this year but next year already.
by Sincethebeginning on Dec 17, 2007 6:40 PM EST 0 recs
What?
by BlackOps on
Dec 17, 2007 9:13 PM EST
up
0 recs
Not really
This isnt an injury where you can play at 80 or 90 %. When they are considered 100% he may be worked very slowly back into the lineup. Rogers may be back for late second half of next season. But what type of chance do they want to take with him. I'm sure they wont take any chances.
So how effective can he actually be next year. Come back to early and they run the chance at career ending re injuries.
One more thing to consider. Rogers was a #1 pick and Mcintosh we traded up to get and was almost a first rounder also. We are missing some very high picks and what amounts to some of our best talent on the field. I would hope they would take no chances with these guys.
How they replace these guys i have no idea.
by Sincethebeginning on
Dec 17, 2007 9:41 PM EST
up
0 recs
He'll play
by Skin Patrol on
Dec 17, 2007 11:20 PM EST
up
0 recs
That sucks...
P.S. Does anyone think Plaxico Burress looks like an overgrown Flava Flave?
P.P.S. - Does anyone think Todd Collins looks like Conan O'Brien?
by Romans12 on
Dec 17, 2007 9:14 PM EST
up
0 recs
Heres some perspective on what we lost
This year: Rocky Briggs
Tackles 87 89
Sacks 3 2
For fum. 3 2
Rocky is listed at 14 games but he went out in the first quarter so its really like 13 games and Briggs is listed at 12 games and thats not including tonight at minnesota. So there is basically a 1 game difference. I think H. B. is a very capable LB. But he wont be Rocky.
Make no mistake about it we will feel his loss.
by Sincethebeginning on
Dec 17, 2007 10:08 PM EST
up
0 recs
Just sayin
by BlackOps on Dec 17, 2007 9:12 PM EST 0 recs
Hey!
by thatguyben on Dec 18, 2007 2:12 PM EST 0 recs
I
by Skin Patrol on
Dec 18, 2007 3:59 PM EST
up
0 recs






