Hogs Haven: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: World Soccer Digest for Soccer Fans!

Redskins 2007 Draft Preview: Please trade down

First: Hail Redskins has an exhaustive Mock Draft Board updated daily with predicted Redskins picks. The intelligent consensus is that the Redskins will select either a CB (Leon Hall) or a DT (Alan Branch) or a DE (Gaines Adams or Quentin Moses).

Second, as many of you remember from the TJ Duckett fiasco, a "Trade Value Chart" drove the outcome of the trade. We essentially traded a certain amount of "Draft points" to Atlanta for TJ Duckett, and they gave those to Denver for Lelie. You can view the actual "Trade Value Chart" here, here, and here. In general the value of a pick declines rapidly in the 1st round. As an example, the difference between the 1st and 2nd pick is about equivalent to the 16th and 32nd pick.

What's important:

There is no consensus on the best Defensive End in the draft. Gaines Adams (Clemson) has an edge on Quentin Moses (Georgia) but not by much. With Jamaal Anderson entering the 2007 draft, there is an abundance of Defensive Ends available this year. We could easily get someone to fill our needs lower than the 6th pick. A pass-rushing defensive end is, in my opinion, our greatest need right now.

DT Alan Branch is a solid pick at #6. Some boards have him higher, and he is the consensus best DT in this year's draft. He also might not be available. Furthermore DT is not nearly as much a need as End. Kedric Golston really came alive last year, and we still have both Cornelius Griffin and Big Joe Salave'a. Anthony Montgomery is a reliable backup. Even given all that, I think that if we are going to select anyone with the 6th pick, it should be Branch. A rookie DT is far more likely to get quality playing time in our defensive system than a defensive end or, especially, a cornerback.

Leon Hall (Michigan) is as close to a consensus best CB as exists. Still he's a stretch at #6 and we could easily trade down to fill two needs at once. He is not projected to be gone earlier than #6 and we could pick him up later. Better yet, we could trade down and get a very quality DE in Moses, Anderson, or Adams and pick up a defensive back on day 1 in a Draft-day trade.

We are in kind of a pickle. If Alan Branch falls to us we might be inclined to take him, though I think DE and DB are both bigger needs than an interior lineman at this point. If Hall falls to us at #6 (and he will) we'd have to stretch to get him. I don't think anyone knows whether Quentin Moses is better than Gaines Adams is better than Jamaal Anderson etc. at Defensive End, so drafting any one of those three would be a rush at #6. We also were the 31st defense in 2006 and have exactly one first day pick. We need more.

  1. There is a possibility that Calvin Johnson is available with the 6th pick. Someone below us will want him.
  2. Moving from the 6th pick to the 10th-16th pick will net us 300-600 "Value Points". At a minimum, depending on their draft position, this is worth a 3rd round pick. More likely it is worth a 2nd round pick. A move from 6th to 16th would be worth more than the 1st pick of the 2nd round (and we could also get a 4th round pick!).
  3. Our greatest need (DE) happens to be abundant in this year's draft, especially on the top end. We could still pick up a quality Defensive End and likely starter with the 16th-32nd pick in the 1st round.
Given 1-3, I think that it is in our best interests to trade down. Whomever is available at #6 is important, but not because we want them. If Calvin Johnson is still around (and even if he isn't), we could trade down with the Rams so they could get him or Jarrett. They'd owe us around their 2nd Round Draft pick, and we could fill two needs with one pick (either Moses, Adams, or Anderson will be available with the Rams 12th pick). Then we get a CB in the 2nd round as well.

The above is just one (complicated) scenario that I want readers to start banging their heads against. I want to hear all possible draft scenarios you can think of in the coming weeks so that we can evaluate our best Draft Day strategy. I am morally convinced that trading down is the proper strategy for a team with multiple needs and few draft picks, especially given the makeup of this year's incoming class. An abundance of Defensive Ends (our main need, or at least one of them) affords us the opportunity to move down while still getting a quality player. If Calvin Johnson falls to #6, our phone will be ringing.

Thoughts?

0 recs  |  Comment 3 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

First of all,
I can't see Johnson falling past both OAK and DET, 2 teams that love big talented WR prospects.

Secondly, I could see a few S prospects coming up on the radar, especially if the team falls to the 10-16 range.  I'm not all opposed to that idea, plus that means Springs stays at CB.  But, if you want to move Springs to S in that ball haking, Ed Reed without the massive hits mold, then that might be another idea.  I think he'd be a good wingman for Taylor, and it might help the team actually get a turnover or two.

I just can't see the team NOT drafting at the DL, especially some guy who is known as a pass rusher.  That is a glaring weakness/need that should be addressed, because other than Golston (a steal for being a 6th rounder) none of the top 3 at DT or DE are younger than 30.

by TexSkins on Jan 9, 2007 5:14 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Calvin Johnson
is not projected to fall to us, but it isn't because of Detroit or Oakland. Detroit absolutely will not/cannot pick another WR in the first round. I honestly  cannot see that happening.

Oakland is getting a QB.

But still, even if neither of them get him, we could still easily end up without Johnson at #6. This limits what we can do, but I still think we're in a position to trade down. Someone will want Branch or Jarrett or whomever is available with this pick. If the trade offer is there I think we absolutely should take it.

by Skin Patrol on Jan 9, 2007 5:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

People said DET couldn't do it again this year..
but they did.  To be honest, I think they'll finally wise up and take QB Quinn after OAK falls in love with QB Russell from LSU.

Browns need help all over that isn't WR.

Tampa needs a lot.  They could go WR (I think Gruden will) or they could start the rebuilding of their defense.

ARI needs defense or OL.

All these things say that if TB passes on Johnson, he could fall.  But I think there will be a lot of interest in this pick even if he doesn't fall.  This is prime real estate in this draft, especially given the needs of the teams picking 1-5.

by TexSkins on Jan 9, 2007 5:24 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email hogshaven@gmail.com
Start posting about the Redskins »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Sidney-harbour-australia_small
Positivity week!!!
Small
Cerrato Owes Campbell an Apology...And I Have Written It

Recent FanPosts

Small
Friday Fandomonium
Sidney-harbour-australia_small
Skins History
Skinsdallas_small
We have a player of the week......
Cooley_small
COWGIRLS hate WEEK!!!!!
Img_1768_small
Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Redskins Name Case
Small
So this is what winning feels like. I remember now!
Lavarr_small
My Dream Overhaul
Bottleboyavatar_small
do you think somebody might be using a voodoo doll?
Small
Joe Bugel is no E. F. Hutton ...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

SPONSORS


Managers

Superbowl_small KevinE

Riggins_small Ken Meringolo

H2_logo_b_small Sugar

Authors

Hogshaven_small Skin Patrol