Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ellenberger vs. Sanchez Heats Up, Hughes Talks Retirement

It is time.

Update [2006-11-13 17:31:8 by Skin Patrol]: Confirmation per this article.

After being inactive for 27 games as a pro, Jason Campbell will start Sunday in Tampa Bay, replacing embattled veteran Mark Brunell. "I'm going to make this move and basically it's to hope we can get more production," said Coach Joe Gibbs. "[Mark] understands. I'm sure he doesn't agree about it."

Update [2006-11-13 17:5:57 by Skin Patrol]: Joe Gibbs just announced a change at QB. Jason Campbell will start for the Washington Redskins this coming Sunday, backed up by Brunell, backed up by Collins. The link for the press conference is here. Click "LIVE Broadcast: Watch Now".

Perhaps it was time October 15th when we lost to the then 0-5 Tennessee Titans. If not then, surely it was time in the final quarter of the Colts game, where we hopelessly flailed through the final minutes of the game with Mark Brunell, chasing nothing.

And now there should be little debate as to who the quarterback in Washington needs to be pronto. Jason Campbell should immediately take over offensive duties for Mark Brunell.

First, let's partition out some blame. Claming that JC deserves the start over Brunell is not an attempt by me to ignore the multitude of faults on this football team. The QB does not play defense, does not give up big passing plays, does not fail to stop the run, does not fail to place pressure on an opposing QB. Mark Brunell is not to fault for Nick Novak's missed field goals (although his intentional grounding did take us out of range yesterday) or Derrick Frost's punts.

What we know is that a very poor Redskins defense held the best offense in the league to 21 points, or over a field goal less than they've averaged all season. We know the defense did all that despite a freak fumble that ultimately went for a touchdown, and despite a potential fumble call on the two yard line going the other way. This defense was outplayed, but it was not routed.

Offensively we scored 3 points, which is exactly how many points this offense scored against Dallas at Texas Stadium, and the New York Football Giants.

What we know about this football team is that it's barely a 3 win team. By all indications we could more easily have been 1-8 given a Jacksonville OT coin flip or Dallas successfully kicking a field goal that is likely a 90% success rate play. Despite all that, the Redskisn approach the QB decision as if changing the person under center is equivalent to giving up on this season. But what are we giving up on? A 3-6 team that, by all indications, couldn't win 7 games a year let alone the next 7 we'd need to win for a Wildcard spot?

The only decision that is correspondent to "giving up" is refusing to make the changes necessary towards winning. Repeatedly throwing this offense into games against quality opponents with Mark Brunell is simply refusing to acknowledge that the season has already gone horribly, depressingly sour. Whatever we might hope for as fans -- a 7 win stretch to carry us into the playoffs for instance -- is simply untenable. Or at least untenable given the current personnel.

Despite all the criticisms the 700 page playbook has received, has there been any doubt that much of it is mute not because of conceptual fault but because it cannot possibly account for endless dumpout passes to running backs in the flats? Can Mark Brunell accurately throw the ball down the field far enough to make the 700 pages work?

We have an amazingly talented offense. Santana Moss, who was hampered by injury this Sunday, is still one of the best receivers in the league. Brandon Lloyd and Antwaan Randle-El have not shined this year, but they haven't been given many opportunities to do so either. Ladell Betts, our backup running back, is 2 receptions short of Lloyd and ARE's combined total.

How can a passing offense with Moss, ARE, Lloyd, and Chris Cooley be ranked 22nd in the league? Our rushing offense has been outstanding. Despite playing so many games from behind, the Redskins are 8th in Rushing Yards Per Game and 6th in YPC. How on earth can such a talented offense, with such a respectable run game, average a miserable 4.1 yards per pass against Philly?

At the end of last year if you had told me that the Redskins would be 30th ranked defense and the 22nd ranked passing offense in the league, I would've been more shocked by the former. But our cellar dwelling defensively is at least attributable to a profusion of causes. Injuries, combined with poor personnel decisions (we would have been better off with Ryan Clark than Adam Archuleta) have turned a stalwart defense into a very bad one. But there is no magic pill to cure our entire defense; replacing Warrick Holdman with Rocky McIntosh will not instantly transform this into the 2005 defense.

But where we've seen positional downgrades on defense we've seen the exact opposite on offense. Brandon Lloyd and Antwaan Randle-El are unquestionable talent upgrades over the people they replaced. No one, offensively, became so old over the course of last year to decline significantly (well, maybe one person did). Al Saunders has achieved more success with less tools elsewhere. Given the state of change on this team perhaps the 22nd ranked passing defense is both more shocking and unacceptable than our dismal defense.

All of which points clearly and unequivocally to one thing; Mark Brunell cannot lead this offense. One must wonder what on earth it would take for Brunell to be successful again. What receivers could Redskins fans realistically expect to have? If he cannot succeed with so much talent at our skill positions, who could he succeed with?

Enter Jason Campbell. He has an arm, and the legs to make plays when the pocket breaks down and to stand firm and deliver when it doesn't. He can put the ball places on the field Brunell is either incapable or unwilling to throw to. His mere presence increases drastically the amount of offensive options we have on any given down as teams are forced to defend against more than just the run and the dump pass.

We have just seven games remaining on this schedule and will need to win each one of them to make the postseason (which is essentially a pipe dream at this point). Refusing to shake up this team is commensurate with giving up on the season, and the fans. There is exactly one position on a football team whereas a dramatic shift can permeate the entire team's performance and transform a losing attitude into a winning one.

Either admit that you made a horrible decision in bringing Jason Campbell to this football team or give the kid a chance to operate one of the most talented and well coached offenses in the National Football League. If Jason Campbell's time isn't now it is never and we all might as well prepare ourselves for Mark Brunell/Todd Collins in 2007.

It is time. Give us Jason Campbell.

Comment 8 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

If anything
The fact that team traded extra picks to move up and take Campbell is a compelling enough reason to put him out there.

Would the team be sitting any other 1st round pick at this point?

Not that I want to be helping out the Redskins... but not starting Campbell right now sets the team back TWO full years. One way or another a QB in his first year is going to take some lumps. He's going to make mistakes and he's going to cost his team games. So you can start Campbell now in a season that's already lost and let him take those lumps this year... or you can start him next year and likely write off next season as you develop a young QB.

A first year starter is not going to win you the NFC East next year. A second year starter with a good pedigree and a half an NFL season's worth of experience under his belt... well who knows? Donovan McNabb and Eli Manning both took big steps and got their teams into the playoffs in their 2nd year.

Bleeding Green Nation Philadelphia Eagles Blog

by JasonB on Nov 13, 2006 2:44 PM EST reply actions  

Alternatively
if he isn't the future then the sooner we know that the sooner we can prepare to build this offense around someone else. If we have to draft a new quarterback that sucks, and we'll suffer for it. But better to accept a mistake and take the licks for it than suffer needlessly for an extra year because your "QB of the future" didn't get enough gametime experience to evaluate properly.

I worry that we'll be in the exact same place this time next year that we are now. It sure feels like 2004 right now.

by Skin Patrol on Nov 13, 2006 2:51 PM EST up reply actions  

I hate to agree but
Of course it would be better for my Eagles if Washington keeps Brunell in and gives late game snaps to 35-year old Todd Collins, all while Jason Campbell's contract ticks away.

I think Jason nails it. If Campbell does not get into live games until next year, that season will be another step back for the Redskins franchise while a young QB adjusts to the speed of NFL defenses. And if it turns out he can't make the jump, then Washington will go another year before even identifying a potential QB of the future.

Right now that seems to be Gibbs' plan. Does Snyder deserve the blame for this too? It just makes no sense at all from the standpoint of planning for the future.

by Dire Radiant on Nov 13, 2006 3:57 PM EST reply actions  

well according to ESPN....
the jason campbell era has just started....maybe it will turn out as well for you as the romo era in dallas...

i would advise starting brunell against the cowboys though....as apparently, he loves to play us.....but, i guess, as long as you have cooley, who loves to score TDs against us, it really won't matter who you start....

by Tuna Helper on Nov 13, 2006 4:46 PM EST reply actions  

And Vincent...
who loves to block field goals.

And Taylor, who loves to get 15 yard penalties whenever he's around the ball...

And Novak, who loves missing field goals and getting second chances...

by TexSkins on Nov 13, 2006 5:15 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm eating my words on Tony Romo so far
When he threw 3 INT's in that Monday night game I was glad to welcome the Tony Romo era in Dallas. Unfortunately, since then he's looked like the real deal. I guess now we'll see if Washington can bottle some of that same magic.

by Dire Radiant on Nov 13, 2006 6:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Call me
When Romo beats a team over .500

Lot's of QBs look good against the Cardinals and Redskins. He played decent against a Carolina in the midst of a very disappointing season.

The one good team he's played was the Giants and he threw 3 picks.

Bleeding Green Nation Philadelphia Eagles Blog

by JasonB on Nov 13, 2006 9:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email hogshaven@gmail.com

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Arnold-schwarzenegger-kindergarten-cop_small
Trading Up Is Not The Solution. Here's why.
Super_47_small
I Ran Into Jim Haslett and We Talked QB Draft, Manning, Trading Up
Images_small
SB Nation 2012 NFL Mock Draft

Recent FanPosts

Small
Whats so good about Tannehill?
Small
Who will we be pursuing this FA 2012?
Small
I'm Torn...
Small
Manning to Texans
Orange_moon_at_nationals_park_small
Solve QB; I almost don't care how!
Small
Are we Really Mortgaging the future with a trade up for RG3?
Redskins2_small
Rocky McIntosh to Rams?
Desert_small
The GM's plan to turn it around in 2012
Pcinoz_1__small
2012 Salary Cap Position
Small
Does RG3 Start from Day 1?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Superbowl_small Kevin Ewoldt

Riggins_small Ken Meringolo

Editors

Fb_small Parks Smith

Chalkboard_football-opt403x300o00s403x300_small UkRedskin

Washington_redskins_helmet_small Redskins News

Authors

Badshirt2__2__small fatpickle

Paterno_tribute_small Tiller56

Small Steve Shoup

Defaukt_small HTTR4LIFE

Hh_small Ronnie Adkins