And even then both are not considered "franchise prospects" and it's not even close. Luck is at 3.64 while Griffin is at 3.44. I thought their scores would be a lot closer together and also a lot closer to being in the "franchise" prospect score at 4.0 and above. I didn't look too hard, but if Luck was the "best' prospect analysts have seen since Peyton Manning how come his score is so low?

I think the whole thing is bull crap. What are your thoughts?

SI Grades