Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: L'Equipe Claims He's Coming To Chelsea On Five Year Deal

Redskins QB Debacle: A Potential Answer

Redskins Nation is in a state panic. This quarterback debacle has robbed the Burgundy and Gold fanbase of too much for too long. It has been beaten to death by blogs, reporters, news stories, and everything in between. Hordes of fans argue for Peyton, RGIII, Trading down, Flynn...

The arguments that follow usually pose the same questions. Why would Peyton want to be a Redskin? Why should we mortgage our future for an injured superstar...again? Why should we sell the farm for a position that WON'T immediately place the Redskins in contention for the playoffs? Why wouldn't we go after that franchise guy?

One question is rarely asked, though. Is there a way to acquire a veteran quarterback, one that is an improvement over Grossman, and still draft a franchise rookie?

Star-divide

Redskins fans, I give you Kyle Orton. Before you stop reading, I ask that you hear my logic (read) and consider the scenarios for which Orton may be the best thing for the Redskins.

In 2009, as a Bronco, Orton threw 336 passes for over 3,800 yards, 21 touchdowns and 12 interceptions.

In 2010, again as a Bronco, Kyle Orton threw for 20 touchdowns, 9 interceptions, and 3,600+ yards.. Through 13 games. The Broncos went 4-12, and Orton was criticized for his play.

In 2011 Orton played 5 games before handing over the gavel to Tim Tebow, and held numbers similar to Rex Grossman. Moving to the Chiefs, he was again discarded for ‘Ineffective' play. Why? Why spend money on him if you aren't willing to give him a chance?

The Redskins have been burned many-a-time in free agency, and fans are skeptical to even go back. You can't have that attitude, not with your back against a wall. Signing Orton short term (well within the realm of possibility) while drafting a signal-caller the same year, may be exactly what the Redskins need.

You are Bruce Allen/Mike Shanahan, you know you have Rex, who knows the offense. You also know that he averages not just two picks per game, but two picks per game at the very worst moments. You also know that Orton will be floating in the wind this offseason, and easily protects the ball better. What do you do?

Well, first you ask yourself some questions.

How much is Orton going to cost? The answer to that is very little. Orton is just looking for his chance to shine again. He has drawn the short straw and could be given nearly the same contract (Probably less) than Rex was given this year.

What if Orton doesn't work out, or is just as ineffective as he was in 2011? The answer to that question lies in one of your top two draft choices. Your rookie signal-caller. All the while Orton is under-center, you're grooming this rookie to take over, and suddenly a lower-tier starter is your backup. Behind your rookie.

Lastly...

Who starts the beginning of the season? This question is answered by the time-honored tradition of competition. If your rookie comes in and shines better than Orton from the get-go, guess what? He's your starter. If he needs work (likely scenario) you coach him. It's the coaches bread and butter to..well... coach.

This decision can basically be simplified to pros and cons:

_________________________________________________________________________

Pros

You have a proven-effective QB that can start the season, knows a west-coast offense, and isn't as likely to turn the ball over.

You are able to spend less money (Than signing Peyton or Flynn) for use on other positions.

You still remain able to draft whoever...and I mean whoever... you like. Be it RGIII, Ryan Tannehill, even Kirk Cousins if you like him, because you still have a starting quarterback to sit in while he learns.

You are able to fix OTHER holes on both the offensive side and defensive. Offensive WILL take priority this offseason, and hopefully they address the items that will allow any QB to thrive. WR, OL

You allow your future backup (Orton) time with the offense to become acquainted.

You successfully address multiple aspects of the poor depth, all while maintaining an exit strategy.

Cons

Orton may legitimately be at the end of his road

You may not be able to have your rookie ready (Depending on where you draft him)

The use of valuable (even if little) money on a QB still hits the purse, holding you back from addressing some positions

_________________________________________________________________________

When conversations arise about how to adjust the signal-caller situation, Kyle Orton's name is almost required to be brought in. I'm sure I'm not the only one (Redskins Front Office Included) to take this route.

I, personally, am sold on Orton being a Redskin. I think it gives us the best chance for addressing the signal-caller slot without giving up our first-born.

Check out my website: Here

Comment 177 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Skins will still sign a fa

such as Orton to play caretaker…

When I was a kid, my father told me, "Never hit anyone in anger, unless you're absolutely sure you can get away with it." -Russell Ziskey

by Redskin44 on Feb 8, 2012 7:04 PM EST up reply actions  

The only question that Kyle Orton is the answer to is

Who has the world’s worst neck beard.

@Callahan_9 on the twitter machine.

by Diesel44 on Feb 8, 2012 7:20 PM EST up reply actions  

haha

+1

R.I.P JVP 1926-2012

by Tiller56 on Feb 9, 2012 7:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Thank goodness someone has sense

The Skins must get RG3. This years 1st, 2nd and next years 1st. Whatever make it happen. We are not going to pull a diamond out of the rough in 2nd round. Kyle Orton is not going to morph into Joe Montana.

by Kuruption on Feb 8, 2012 11:32 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree with Babu

"Marge, it takes two to lie. One to lie and one to listen." --Homer Simpson

by Kevin Ewoldt on Feb 8, 2012 6:11 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

I'd live with Orton as a temp stop-gap

Even if we didn’t get RG3 this offseason, I’d rather go with Orton, plus a developmental QB in the draft, and shoot for one of the top guys next year.

If we went down this road, I’d like to see a WR, or CB drafted in RD 1, anOT(Potter is my favorite) in round 2, and a center in Rd 3.

I may goive Big Brock a look as a developmental guy in the later rounds.

R.I.P JVP 1926-2012

by Tiller56 on Feb 8, 2012 6:11 PM EST reply actions  

"shoot for one of the top guys next year"

Does that mean shoot for a 3 win season, or expect to trade the farm moving up next year as opposed to doing it now?

by DCrez on Feb 8, 2012 6:12 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

There could be up to 5 guys next year

who are all first rd types. I’m sure we can land one.

R.I.P JVP 1926-2012

by Tiller56 on Feb 8, 2012 6:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes

I look at Bray, Barkley, Jones, Wilson and Murray. Now I’m sure not every one of these guy will enter, but with good years, they all could.

R.I.P JVP 1926-2012

by Tiller56 on Feb 8, 2012 6:17 PM EST up reply actions  

It's easy to say that now.

Jake Locker was supposed to be the unquestioned #1 a couple years ago.

There will be two, maybe three first rounders next year.

I see it as more cushion for the pushin'

by iH8dallas on Feb 8, 2012 6:18 PM EST via mobile up reply actions   1 recs

True

and it all depends what kind of year they have, and who enters early. I think you can count on at least 3 top guys.

R.I.P JVP 1926-2012

by Tiller56 on Feb 8, 2012 6:20 PM EST up reply actions  

We were saying the same thing about this draft a couple months ago

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Feb 8, 2012 6:21 PM EST up reply actions  

any old one will do?

really what I love about the whole “i talked to haslett” snafu was (if true) it confirmed that Shanny does not look at this the way so many fans seems to….namely as a case of “we should just draft some olineman and then get whatever qb is available”

there are never many LEGIT qb’s out there…..you can’t pass on one under the assumption you can just draft another later. Most all the guys being mentioned (Foles, Jones, etc) will probably suck. That’s just the probability of it.

by DCrez on Feb 8, 2012 6:18 PM EST up reply actions  

+ 1

Odds are the third, fourth and so on QBs taken will not be franchise guys. Backups, but not a perennial Probowler.

I see it as more cushion for the pushin'

by iH8dallas on Feb 8, 2012 6:23 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

This year, I agree H8

but next year may be a tad bit different.

R.I.P JVP 1926-2012

by Tiller56 on Feb 8, 2012 6:25 PM EST up reply actions  

based on what?

Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Feb 8, 2012 8:03 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

An algorithm that Jamarcus Russell has been working on

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Feb 8, 2012 8:08 PM EST up reply actions  

The history of the National Football League.

I see it as more cushion for the pushin'

by iH8dallas on Feb 8, 2012 8:41 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

What about the history of the Washington Redskins?

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Feb 8, 2012 8:46 PM EST up reply actions  

We've had like 2, 3 if you count Theismann franchise QBs since 1932.

What else do you want to know?

I see it as more cushion for the pushin'

by iH8dallas on Feb 8, 2012 8:53 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

5. We've had 5 franchise and since 1932

The problem is that includes Joey and he’s number 5. And one of them Eddie Labaron.

We did have two at the same time, though.

No Danny, Nooooooo - Tom Landry, 1982., and Washington Redskins fans, 1999-

by BillWard on Feb 8, 2012 10:10 PM EST via mobile up reply actions   1 recs

Bill Ward, I love you

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Feb 8, 2012 10:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Ahh, the gay artist

@Callahan_9 on the twitter machine.

by Diesel44 on Feb 9, 2012 12:16 AM EST up reply actions  

I haven’t heard any mention of Geno Smith as possible 1st rounder. He mobile, makes all the throws and takes care of the ball.

by future is now on Feb 9, 2012 12:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Honestly DC

this is what I struggle the most with, and prob the biggest reason I want to move up for RG3 this year and just get it over with.

Does that mean shoot for a 3 win season, or expect to trade the farm moving up next year as opposed to doing it now?

R.I.P JVP 1926-2012

by Tiller56 on Feb 8, 2012 6:16 PM EST up reply actions  

I can't agree more

I hope to hell we are not picking in the top 10 again next year, so, that is why i’m pro trade-up this year.

R.I.P JVP 1926-2012

by Tiller56 on Feb 8, 2012 6:21 PM EST up reply actions  

*What's- sticky keys..

Hopefully Rodskin will bump into him again

@Callahan_9 on the twitter machine.

by Diesel44 on Feb 8, 2012 7:29 PM EST up reply actions  

im sure it cant be good...

he got beat out by both rex grossmen and tim tebow. if not sure i would want orton if he played here for free

by munson21502 on Feb 8, 2012 8:05 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree 100%

Orton is a slight upgrade who at the very least is a lot less prone to turnovers. But can Shanahan afford to go another year without getting his QB?

by aFan4Life on Feb 9, 2012 8:44 AM EST up reply actions  

Last time I'll say it,

We’re trading up with Shanny’s boy Fisher for RG3. I’ll then shit my pants, take a jagerbomb t o the face and dance with my dog.

Kyle Orton. That’s rich.

I see it as more cushion for the pushin'

by iH8dallas on Feb 8, 2012 6:14 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Speaking of dogs H8

I’m finally getting my Frenchton(French Bulldog/Boston Terrier) this weekend. We adopted him from a shelter in Kentucky.

R.I.P JVP 1926-2012

by Tiller56 on Feb 9, 2012 7:49 AM EST up reply actions  

I have no problem with Orton IF we draft a guy in the 2nd or 3rd

Or we can trade Brandon Banks for Pat Devlin

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Feb 8, 2012 6:15 PM EST reply actions  

Not return kicks very well and he upper decked my toilets

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Feb 8, 2012 6:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Shhhhh....

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Feb 8, 2012 6:45 PM EST up reply actions  

drafting a guy in the 2nd or 3rd rd is a waste cause they are noting more than Back ups or younger Kyle Orton types not a Franchise QB in any of them. you might as well pick a potential starter in those rounds and take a project in the 4th or later.

by Highspeed30 on Feb 8, 2012 6:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Yep no one has ever found a good QB past the 1st round

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Feb 8, 2012 6:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Not saying that they did not

just looking at the guys that are in this draft and none of them are going to amount to much more than back ups. So taking a guy in the 2nd or 3rd would be a complete waste, especially if you gonna go pick a guy next year as well in the 1st.

by Highspeed30 on Feb 8, 2012 6:36 PM EST up reply actions  

You still need a good backup in this league, so why not groom one?

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Feb 8, 2012 6:39 PM EST up reply actions  

I am ok with grooming a good back up

just not with my 2nd or 3rd rd pick, those are suppose to be starters in 2 years not career backups or special teams players.

BJ Coleman Chattanooga could be groomed as a back up
Kirk Cousins could be groomed as a back up
Jacory Harris could be groomed as a back up
Chandler Harnish could be groomed as a back up

and none of them would cost a 2nd or 3rd round pick.

by Highspeed30 on Feb 8, 2012 6:46 PM EST up reply actions  

i know that is why i would take a flier on one of these guys vs Foles,Tannehill or Weeden in earlier in the 2nd /3rd. To me there is not much difference in talent between them and Coleman,Cousins,Harnish

by Highspeed30 on Feb 8, 2012 6:50 PM EST up reply actions  

In college there was a huge difference and their potential is starting QB material

There is a 2-3 round talent difference, that is huge.

Redskins @RGIII - 2012

by Copious 1 on Feb 8, 2012 7:10 PM EST up reply actions  

that is in some years but none of those 3 will be more than back ups

by Highspeed30 on Feb 8, 2012 10:46 PM EST up reply actions  

how do you know?

Tannehill and Weeden are probably more talented than any QB’s taken in the last 3 years with the exception of Newton, Stafford and Bradford.

Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Feb 8, 2012 10:53 PM EST up reply actions  

time will tell, but i know Kellen clemens, Josh McCown, Charlie Frye type of QB’s when i see them. these are NOT viable options as starting QB’s if Jones and Barkley would have entered the draft there is no way either of them is picked before them, they are back up type of QB’s PERIOD

by Highspeed30 on Feb 8, 2012 11:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Mark Sanchez, Josh Freeman, Jimmy Clausen,Jake Locker, Christian Ponder, Andy Dalton, Colin Kaepernick, Ryan Mallet are all better prospects in the last 3 years than Tannehill/Weeden in fact i would take Tyrod Taylor over those 2.

Tannehill = Blaine Gabbert
Weeden = Greg McElroy

by Highspeed30 on Feb 8, 2012 11:20 PM EST up reply actions  

worst comparisons ever...

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Feb 9, 2012 7:11 AM EST up reply actions  

Was just kidding about Weeden to McElroy but Tannehill= Gabbert is on point

by Highspeed30 on Feb 9, 2012 7:38 AM EST up reply actions  

Their style of play couldn't be any more different

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Feb 9, 2012 8:33 AM EST up reply actions  

You lost me at Jacory Harris

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Feb 8, 2012 6:52 PM EST up reply actions  

that is the same way i feel about Tannehill /Fole/Weeden combo as prospects nothing more than back ups see Kellen Clemens,Josh Mccown,Chad Henne, Charlie Frye, Trent Edwards, etc……

by Highspeed30 on Feb 8, 2012 6:59 PM EST up reply actions  

I will take that bet

Cousins wont get picked before the 4th rd, and Weeden should not get picked before 4th either but he may go in the 3rd but not before 3.

by Highspeed30 on Feb 8, 2012 10:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Cousins will be at least has the possibility of being a 3rd rounder

Here, fixed it for you

R.I.P JVP 1926-2012

by Tiller56 on Feb 9, 2012 7:54 AM EST up reply actions  

According to you Rex is the greatest backup QB in the universe.

We need a starter, not a backup.

I see it as more cushion for the pushin'

by iH8dallas on Feb 8, 2012 7:00 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Rex is also a 30+ year old FA. If you know whats going to happen then why comment?

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Feb 8, 2012 7:09 PM EST up reply actions  

To prove how much smarter I am than everybody else.

On another note, anything new with Rodskinsgate?

I see it as more cushion for the pushin'

by iH8dallas on Feb 8, 2012 7:28 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Highspeed30 - re "Not saying..."

“None of them are going to amount to much more than backups”. You can’t possibly know that – it is just an opinion, and many disagree with you. For one thing, some of the key things that go into making a top NFL quarterback are the intangibles – things that cannot be judged well in college play. Like being driven workaholics, with an almost insane drive to be great, So you could be right, but you can’t just dismiss Tannehill, Foles and Weeden as journeymen. If Shanahan thinks one of them is his “quarterback of the future”, I’d be willing to let him find out.

by Donnio1234 on Feb 9, 2012 12:03 AM EST up reply actions  

Shanahan dont have time for projects

I think Shanahan think they can win now, so I dont see them looking to groom a QB with such low potential. Tannehill,Foles, or Weeden may end up starting some games for a team but at the end of the day they will be no more than game managers, or back ups, but none have the potential to be a Franchise QB or “quaterback of the future”

by Highspeed30 on Feb 9, 2012 7:47 AM EST up reply actions  

when i say that i dont think 29 year old rookies

qualify as quaterback of the future, fo the most part it takes time to adjust to the NFL game most good rookies take a least a season to get adjusted. I think overall as a prospect I would not be interested and a lot of teams wont be interested cause of his age. plus i think he will have trouble with NFL defenses and pressure

by Highspeed30 on Feb 9, 2012 8:18 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, Orton would be OK, but getting a top young prospect is the key

and could even be RG3. Getting Orton does not cramp their style at all – he just gives us a better “bridge” than Rex. Same for Peyton, except that in his case, they would not want to spend the picks to move up for RG3, so the young one would be Tannehill, Foley, Weeden or somebody else that Shanahan really liked.

by Donnio1234 on Feb 8, 2012 7:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Blasphemy, Brandon Banks is worth more than Pat Devlin

I’d only let him go for a 2014 7th RD pick.

@Callahan_9 on the twitter machine.

by Diesel44 on Feb 8, 2012 7:22 PM EST up reply actions  

There won't be another "lost" season waiting for a rookie QB.

If any season was a tank job it was the season Grossman and Beck are your starters. Then we won 5 games (doh!)

They could tank it next season, but they would be fired.

I see it as more cushion for the pushin'

by iH8dallas on Feb 8, 2012 6:21 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

All do respect

what is this lost year crap. If we trade up fro RG3II, do you really think this team will be good next year?

When I was a kid, my father told me, "Never hit anyone in anger, unless you're absolutely sure you can get away with it." -Russell Ziskey

by Redskin44 on Feb 8, 2012 7:06 PM EST up reply actions  

With all "due" respect, YES!

I see it as more cushion for the pushin'

by iH8dallas on Feb 8, 2012 7:13 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

based on

we were a few really bad rex games and 3 starts of john beck away from being 8-8.

i agree, and also thought last year was a planned losing season. the last lose i got pissed about last year was the eagles game after the bye.. it looked like the staff planned that lose. and i thought to myself. ok i can take a really bad season to get a top pick for a chance at a franchise qb.

by munson21502 on Feb 8, 2012 8:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Yep they were the only problem with the squad

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Feb 8, 2012 8:15 PM EST up reply actions  

A lifetime of watching every Redskins game.

And noticing puds at QB.

I see it as more cushion for the pushin'

by iH8dallas on Feb 8, 2012 8:43 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

not good necessarily, but better

why is it folks so focused on not “mortgaging the future” wont look past RG3s rookie season? Trading up to get Griffin is not based on whether we will be good in his first year.

by DCrez on Feb 8, 2012 11:47 PM EST up reply actions  

There are frequent discussions as to whether a QB makes other players on the team better. If RGIII

makes other players on the offense better (your point), then the priorities for 2013 team building should be more focused toward those needs. An 8-8 season would still put the team in about the mid spot in the draft order (even if the 2013 1st round pick is traded) and the team should be able to keep it’s full 7 picks in 2014.
The franchise QB is tough to finagle within a short time frame.

by Jefferson1935 on Feb 9, 2012 3:44 PM EST up reply actions  

it's really a no brainer

we had some of the worst QB play in the league last year and RG III has much more potential than either Beck or Grossman.

by aFan4Life on Feb 9, 2012 8:49 AM EST up reply actions  

No Orton please, I would rather keep Rex.

Orton both sucks and blows (see his time in Chicago and Denver post McDaniels)

Read numerous reports that he is not a leader (i.e. same problem Romo has at least perception-wise)

Redskins @RGIII - 2012

by Copious 1 on Feb 8, 2012 6:25 PM EST reply actions  

Maybe John Beck's leadership will rub off on him

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Feb 8, 2012 6:27 PM EST up reply actions  

You mean...

1.) Take the snap
2.) Look at the rush
3.) Add several more steps to your drop
4.) Piss on yourself
5.) Take the sack
6.) Stand up shell shocked

REPEAT

Redskins @RGIII - 2012

by Copious 1 on Feb 8, 2012 6:47 PM EST up reply actions  

haha +1

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Feb 8, 2012 8:09 PM EST up reply actions  

We could see a new, more aggressive Beck in camp

Shanahan could just tell him to don’t worry about turnovers, just come out firing. He psyched himself out last time, actually sort of self-destructed (not unlike Copious’ post below). After all, he wouldn’t have anything to lose. But he might not get the chance – could get cut very early – especially if Rex is re-signed.

by Donnio1234 on Feb 8, 2012 7:15 PM EST up reply actions  

FACEPALM

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Feb 8, 2012 7:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Somebody get to Donnio's house and make sure he hasn't mixed alcohol and painkillers.

That shit was ridiculous.

I see it as more cushion for the pushin'

by iH8dallas on Feb 8, 2012 7:26 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Well, I thought John deserved a kind word or two

Whenever an opinion is unanimous, I like to throw in an alternate view, just to see how solid it is. Beck is still on the team, I think.
Actually, I generally supported Rex over Beck last year, mainly because I thought that Rex could stop turning the ball over so much. But he turned out to be like figure skater Sasha Cohen – talented but prone to making mistakes.
Incidentally, I’m for trading up for RG3 if possible this year (something few have mentioned – it may not be possible – if Cleveland or St Louis want him, there’s nothing we can do to stop them).

by Donnio1234 on Feb 9, 2012 12:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Not sure Rex’s intangibles matter much when he lacks talent in all areas. Orton would be a clear talent upgrade.

by HogtieJim on Feb 8, 2012 6:52 PM EST up reply actions  

This is still not saying much

there are not many QB’s in the NFL who couldn’t out play Rex

R.I.P JVP 1926-2012

by Tiller56 on Feb 9, 2012 10:09 AM EST up reply actions  

I’d be alright with it if we draft a second guy that should probably sit and grow rather than play right away.

Orton would be an instant upgrade over Rex. Sure the intrigue of Peyton is there, but why in the hell would he want to come here? I think it’s less of an option than people think.

Still not on the trade up bandwagon, at least not until they do it.

by Brutus89 on Feb 8, 2012 6:29 PM EST reply actions  

second round guy*

by Brutus89 on Feb 8, 2012 6:31 PM EST reply actions  

you would be better off getting a 4th rd or later guy

The gap in talent between the “2nd rd guys” and the rest of the field is not that great. you might as well get a OT in the 2nd and draft BPA in the first Claiborne, Richardson, or Blackmon although i would look to trade back if blackmon fell to me at #6 pick up another 2nd and 2013 #1

by Highspeed30 on Feb 8, 2012 6:40 PM EST up reply actions  

I think guys like Foles or Tannehill have higher ceilings than the Osweiler’s or Kirk Cousins’ of the draft. If someone like Claiborne or Reiff is available at 6, I’d think long and hard, but you’re right, I’d probably prefer to trade back. I think the weapons at wideout in this draft are deep.

by Brutus89 on Feb 8, 2012 6:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Its not a ideal solution or even a good solution, but unless you are one of the Grossman propagandist around here it is clearly a immediate upgrade. Orton at least has a chance at a positive TD to INT ratio while Grossman has none. Doubt it will be enough to get the Redskins to the playoffs but lowering the amount of turnovers has to be a priority for the Redskins this off-season or they have no chance at any consistent success.

With a weak FA crop and very few NFL ready young QBs, it is a legitimate option.
However it would be vital to grab one of these raw QBs in the second round so the Skins could at least have the potential to reach even better QB play in the future.

by HogtieJim on Feb 8, 2012 6:39 PM EST reply actions  

As some have said, I could live with Orton as a stopgap

I also have a strong belief the Shanny’s are positioning themselves for the QB corp next year.

by 2up2down on Feb 8, 2012 6:42 PM EST reply actions  

I don't know if they can afford to do that

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Feb 8, 2012 6:44 PM EST up reply actions  

I think Shanahan has the same aura Gibbs had to Snyder. For better or for worst, I think Snyder will wait 5 years as Shanahan told him before hiring him.

by 2up2down on Feb 8, 2012 6:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Coach Joe had a winning season in his first two years

And two playoff appearances in four years… Shanahan hasn’t been that successful

The world looks mighty different when you're peeking out your belly button

by Skins Fan '77 on Feb 9, 2012 10:59 AM EST up reply actions  

I really don’t believe that at all. Shanny knows he has to win sometime soon in the next few years. He is looking for anything that can upgrade the position this year and give the Skins a better chance of winning immediately.

by HogtieJim on Feb 8, 2012 6:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Shanahan is one of if not the highest paid coach in the league.

They could pay me $5 million per year to win 5 games.

He can’t risk playing “Who’s That QB” with the Redskins next year.

I see it as more cushion for the pushin'

by iH8dallas on Feb 8, 2012 6:56 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Ya, he is basically painted himself into a corner

He blew it the first year, and Berkeley’s decision to stay in school will probably be the nail in the coffin.
Unless of course our owner has learned something… what are the odds?

The world looks mighty different when you're peeking out your belly button

by Skins Fan '77 on Feb 9, 2012 11:02 AM EST up reply actions  

Let's say 7 QBs are drafted.

One or two will be good, two might be backups and the rest will be on practice squads or selling real estate in their college town.

I see it as more cushion for the pushin'

by iH8dallas on Feb 8, 2012 7:05 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Folks are evaluating Orton based on Denver

Evaluate his Chicago numbers.

Redskins @RGIII - 2012

by Copious 1 on Feb 8, 2012 7:11 PM EST reply actions  

You already have to go back a full season to see 16 games.

Why go back 3? The point is, he put up good numbers his first two in Denver. They were losing because the team as a whole was bad.

Author: Hogs Haven
Founder: The Burgundy Warpath

by Ronnie Adkins on Feb 8, 2012 7:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes w/ McDaniels.

Tebow, Cassel, Orton, Brady…. All looked better with McDaniels.

Redskins @RGIII - 2012

by Copious 1 on Feb 8, 2012 8:39 PM EST via Android app up reply actions  

ummmmm really?

Tebow looked better with McDaniels? How So?

Cassel? His best year was under Weis.

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Feb 8, 2012 8:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Here we go again.

Why do we have such dumb ideas of getting everyones elses garbage again ? What is wrong with getting our guy in RG3 and start him day 1 and stop getting these second rate QBs from other teams ? Dont you wanna win games ? Stop the stupid merry go round and get our franchise QB while we are this high in the draft . It seems that we are the only idiots that keep getting everyone elses garbage , have we not been down this road before getting bums for QBs for our team? Its funny how just about every other teams when they need a QB they breakdown and get a QB from the draft . It seems everyone always crys about getting a good defensive linemen with your first round pick or some other pick whether its a defensive back or offensive linemen , but what i find that is so funny is when we need a good QB it seems everyone wants to get a stupid FA QB from another team that is not worth a shit . Not everyone here wants a FA QB but most of you do . So my question is this why shouldnt we make it a priorty to get a very good QB from the draft that can last for 15 years ? It amazes me you can spend a high draft pick on any other position for our team but you dont want to spend a first round on a good QB ? What sense does that make ? The QB position is one of our most needed things on this team but yet you want to bring in people from other teams that are not worth shit or only has a few years left so what sense does this make? Then on top of it we are back to square one again looking for another QB to train and it keeps being the problem with our team . Just use our first pick and draft up to settle our biggest problem and draft RG3 and we wont have to look for a QB every year like we have for the past 20 years .

by washingtonwin on Feb 8, 2012 7:15 PM EST reply actions  

Here we go again

Thats exactly what I thought before I read your comment. More power to you, bro. Drive on

Author: Hogs Haven
Founder: The Burgundy Warpath

by Ronnie Adkins on Feb 8, 2012 7:16 PM EST up reply actions  

OK so whats wrong.

With getting a good QB in the first round trading up?

by washingtonwin on Feb 8, 2012 7:18 PM EST up reply actions  

We aren't just a quarterback away from being good.

The good thing about Orton, though, is you can STILL get RGIII. If you would have read the whole article, I said that.

Author: Hogs Haven
Founder: The Burgundy Warpath

by Ronnie Adkins on Feb 8, 2012 7:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Why not

Just put RG3 in there to learn like cam newton instead of wasting time ? bacause RG3 is ready to be a pro now not later . Let him learn on the job and get the exp under his belt . Plus yes i do think we are a QB and maybe a few players away from being a very good team and if we do get RG3 and he starts from the get go we will win at least 10 games to start not to mention he will be the rookie of the year . So set back and watch if he starts .

by washingtonwin on Feb 8, 2012 7:26 PM EST up reply actions  

I think that would be that plan

but what if we didn’t land RG3? At least Orton, albiet a slight one, is an upgrade over Rex, and may do a better job of holding the fort down.

R.I.P JVP 1926-2012

by Tiller56 on Feb 9, 2012 8:01 AM EST up reply actions  

Are u afraid to get a good QB

I take it you like these worthless QBs we have had for the last 20 years .

by washingtonwin on Feb 8, 2012 7:21 PM EST reply actions  

That's probably the dumbest question ever

Why would anybody be afraid of getting a good QB? It’s basically the same as asking “Are you afraid of dating a super hot girl?”

Author: Hogs Haven
Founder: The Burgundy Warpath

by Ronnie Adkins on Feb 8, 2012 7:24 PM EST up reply actions  

The fans seem to be afraid of getting a good QB,

Or rather they think the risk outweighs the reward.

I see it as more cushion for the pushin'

by iH8dallas on Feb 8, 2012 7:30 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Well I'm of the mindset that a QB makes this team much better.

There is another group that thinks you build up everything around the QB and you can plug and play the position (like Gibbs.)

I see it as more cushion for the pushin'

by iH8dallas on Feb 8, 2012 7:47 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I think some are just afraid of the whole trading up

If it is at reasonable cost, I’m all for it. I’m certainly not giving up too much though.

R.I.P JVP 1926-2012

by Tiller56 on Feb 9, 2012 8:03 AM EST up reply actions  

Its because everytime you turn around .

You wanna get a stupid FA for a QB instead of drafting a good QB.

by washingtonwin on Feb 8, 2012 7:28 PM EST reply actions  

Question ronnie.

How many QBs have we had in 20 years ? 23 right? so why keep adding to the number 23 and get a QB for 15 years instead of adding to the number 23 .

by washingtonwin on Feb 8, 2012 7:32 PM EST reply actions  

What if we can't trade up for RGIII ??

We don’t have two first rd. picks (& one of those picks is 4th over all) to give to St. Louis, Cleveland does. If St. Louis trades with Cleveland they are still assured of getting either Kalil, Claiborne or Blackmon. If they trade with us then all three of those players are most likely gone. Nobody on this site wants RGIII more than I do but I don’t think that it’s going to happen.

by ENsDad27 on Feb 8, 2012 7:38 PM EST up reply actions  

I think we already have it in place.

To trade up with RG3 or at least i hope we do . I forgot were i read it at right off hand but i really do think they have something in place with the rams and i think we will all be shocked by it 2 .

by washingtonwin on Feb 8, 2012 7:41 PM EST up reply actions  

What if we can't trade up for RGIII ??

We don’t have two first rd. picks (& one of those picks is 4th over all) to give to St. Louis, Cleveland does. If St. Louis trades with Cleveland they are still assured of getting either Kalil, Claiborne or Blackmon. If they trade with us then all three of those players are most likely gone. Nobody on this site wants RGIII more than I do but I don’t think that it’s going to happen.

by ENsDad27 on Feb 8, 2012 7:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Wes Bunting's Mock has St. Louis picking DT Brockers @ #6...

I don’t know much about him, but if he begins rising up the board, Fisher’s background, along with Gregg Williams (DC), believe in pressure defense, I could see them going this route, along with the extra picks from the trade…

by jgibbsfan1 on Feb 9, 2012 10:01 AM EST up reply actions  

Brockers is definitly rising

don’t know if he’s quite that high, but he has put himself in the mid 1st round

R.I.P JVP 1926-2012

by Tiller56 on Feb 9, 2012 10:07 AM EST up reply actions  

Brockers is easily a top ten talent & might crack the top five

he is definitely the best, least talked about player in this draft. He surprised a lot of people when he declared as he is a redshirt soph but he is loaded with talent & could actually end up as a player that some team might want to trade up with us for.

by ENsDad27 on Feb 9, 2012 7:42 PM EST up reply actions  

huh? So you're saying stick to one of the 23 prior QBs instead of going to number 24?

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Feb 8, 2012 7:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Im saying.

Keep it at number 24 for the next 15 years by getting RG3 .

by washingtonwin on Feb 8, 2012 7:45 PM EST up reply actions  

What if he needs to rest when we have a #1 seed shored up, do we not start #25

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Feb 8, 2012 7:50 PM EST up reply actions  

SURE .

This is what we need to let RG3 learn behind orton or sexy rex and maybe he could learn how to throw interceptions .

by washingtonwin on Feb 8, 2012 7:36 PM EST reply actions  

Um

Ortons td to interception ratio far outdoes Rex Grossmans. Rex is 56-60 for his career. Kyle is 80-57

Author: Hogs Haven
Founder: The Burgundy Warpath

by Ronnie Adkins on Feb 8, 2012 7:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Orton is 9-9 last 2 years, which I think is relevant given he’s in equal shape as Kerry Collins. his QB rating the last two years has been dreadful.

"Marge, it takes two to lie. One to lie and one to listen." --Homer Simpson

by Kevin Ewoldt on Feb 8, 2012 8:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Yea but to be fair the Broncos were making him throw 167 times per game w/ no running game and no defense

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Feb 8, 2012 8:10 PM EST up reply actions  

You'll hear this tonight but let me show you some numbers

Orton has a 2.5% chance, according to his total career completions and total career interceptions.
Rex has a 3.8% chance
Just for frame of reference Brees has a 2.7% chance.

Author: Hogs Haven
Founder: The Burgundy Warpath

by Ronnie Adkins on Feb 8, 2012 8:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Career passes.

Not completions. Sorry again

Author: Hogs Haven
Founder: The Burgundy Warpath

by Ronnie Adkins on Feb 8, 2012 8:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Aside from Redskins QB talk...

My timeline is full of idiots arguing about UNC and Duke. What makes it unbearable is that none of them went to either institution.

I see it as more cushion for the pushin'

by iH8dallas on Feb 8, 2012 7:40 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

i dont like kyle orton

i’m fairly curtan he wont get us to playoffs, and that meens we will have a bad record, so whats the point of getting him, if hes not helping he’s hurting….if ur gonna get a temp fix go with peyton and groom someone, he has a better chance of getting to playoffs even with the risk of injury.

Q-tip

by Sean Qtip Guilliams on Feb 8, 2012 8:13 PM EST reply actions  

Actually....

I think that he spelled certain wrong

by ENsDad27 on Feb 8, 2012 9:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Actually....

You missed the joke. I know how to spell certain. Thanks

Author: Hogs Haven
Founder: The Burgundy Warpath

by Ronnie Adkins on Feb 9, 2012 9:29 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Don't mention it

& you are right, I definitely missed whatever joke you are talking about

by ENsDad27 on Feb 9, 2012 7:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Orton was terrible with a team that later went to the play-offs with Tim Tebow at QB

He is an upgrade over Rex as far as TOs but he’s not really any type of answer. Maybe if the plan is to be drafting in the bottom quarter again next year……

by ENsDad27 on Feb 8, 2012 9:13 PM EST reply actions  

Was he awful? show me that stats

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Feb 8, 2012 10:38 PM EST up reply actions  

OK...

3 & 5 as a starter (1 & 4 in Denver with the same team that Tebow took to the play-offs 2 & 1 in KC) 59.5 comp. percentage which is not bad until you see that it’s with 7.0 YPA. 9 TDs & 9 int.s & a QB rating of 77.8. Awful ??… Maybe not & possibly an upgrade over Grossman & Beck but nothing special

by ENsDad27 on Feb 9, 2012 4:45 PM EST up reply actions  

No way

The reason I stopped rooting for the Broncos is because Cutler got replaced by this guy. I still haven’t gotten fully back on board yet. A playoff win is nice but Tebow is completely inconsistent. That said, Mike McCoy sure managed to adapt his offensive system to the QB’s talent, which is much more than can be said for McDaniels, or sadly, Kyle Shanahan (gratuitous trashing of KS as usual).

Orton is absolute a blackhole where leadership quality is concerned. He is strictly a system QB, very little improvisation ability. Not very mobile either. His TD-to-INT ratio was inflated. During 2009, he threw mostly short passes and bubble-screens, on strict orders from his head coach no doubt. He played two full seasons like they were garbage time; I’m sure Broncos fans wish he would have thrown deep much more and risk more INTs when his team was done 10, 20 points. In 2010 he had a deep threat (ex-skin Brandon Lloyd) and did better throwing deep. But he was still fixating on a single receiver: Brandon Marshall in 2009 (caught an NFL-record 22 or so passes in one game; of course with stats like that, it was a losing effort); Lloyd in 2010. Not an improvement over Grossman, and would take time to learn the system than is worth the wait.

by formerbroncosfan on Feb 8, 2012 10:18 PM EST reply actions  

All we may need is a slight upgrade over Rex

and a guy who can buy us a tad bit of time. Orton gives us both.

R.I.P JVP 1926-2012

by Tiller56 on Feb 9, 2012 7:59 AM EST reply actions  

I like the idea but...

RGIII and Luck are the only 2 QB’s worth going after in this year’s draft. Cleveland has more to bargain with to obtain RGIII and we can’t afford to give away the farm with so many other needs to fill. We are still 2 years away given the McNabb debacle. We need a top 5 offense and defense to compete and we still have glaring weaknesses on the offensive line, Wide Receiver, Secondary, and depth. I say acquire Orton, and use this draft to address the other needs, trading down if we can to acquire more picks. We will need a replacement for Fletcher and some of the older Defensive players; we need a guard, and a tackle and some depth on the offensive line. If we reach for a franchise QB now, we will not be able to address the other positions. How many potential franchise QB’s careers have been derailed because they didn’t have a solid supporting cast? And how many unknown QB’s turned out to be hall of famers because they had a great supporting cast and system? Brady, Warner, Montana to name a few.

by A Connecticut Redskin on Feb 9, 2012 8:36 AM EST reply actions  

Bad examples

All three of those was great QB’s 2 of them top 5 QB’s of all time and Kurt Warner is top 20 and took Arizona to super bowl.

A better example maybe Troy Aikman, Mark Rypien, Eli Manning 1st SB.

by Highspeed30 on Feb 9, 2012 9:16 AM EST up reply actions  

isnt Brady technically a system QB? Some might even say Arron Rodgers.

Now im not saying they are but it has been argued. Brady was a 6th round draft pick who (according to most HH fans only a 1st round QB can succeed in this league) got his chance after Bledsoe goes down and Cassel steps up and blows up after Brady goes down. Now I have no doubt Brady isnt a monster QB but since Brady hasnt played anywhere else and isnt going anywhere only time will tell. Same goes with Rodgers he is a monster QB but if Matt Flynn (a 7 round pick) can step up and do what he did in only 2 starts then one can argue that GB is also a QB friendly system

HAIL 4 LIFE!!!!

by squigums on Feb 9, 2012 10:33 AM EST up reply actions  

I will disagree with your assessment...
We need a top 5 offense and defense to compete

Sure, that would be great. But I don’t think it is necessary. Both SB teams show that this is NOT a prerequisite for the playoffs / SB…

by jgibbsfan1 on Feb 9, 2012 10:05 AM EST up reply actions  

I'd be OK with Orton as an interim QB

But only because he’d be relatively cheap AND he’s less turnover prone than Grossman.

I’d prefer Peyton if he’s healthy though. But I doubt Peyton would have any interest in coming here as this organization is know for its management struggles and there is too little surrounding talent (on offense, especially the OL) to make a SB run.

by aFan4Life on Feb 9, 2012 8:54 AM EST reply actions  

I would not mind Kyle Orton as a backup

But not as my starter, he has pretty much shown what he is and that is nothing more than a spot starter, or a caretaker or game manager not a Franchise QB

by Highspeed30 on Feb 9, 2012 9:22 AM EST reply actions  

Thank you

I have been saying this for a while. Shanahan has been saying we lacked depth, that the roster was far thinner than he thought, when he joined the team. He did a lot of wheeling and dealing in last year’s draft to get quality to build upon. He has said over and over that this rebuilding will take about 4 years. He can’t rebuild if he mortgages the farm for RG3 and I am convinced he will not do so. Next year, with another slew of draft picks, and 3-4 quality free agents, we will be much more competitive with much better depth, a few more starters, and this includes 1 or possibly 2 playmakers. Orton is the way they keep from giving up too much and setting back the rebuilding another 1-2 years.

by Skinzfan on Feb 9, 2012 3:24 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email hogshaven@gmail.com

Managers

Superbowl_small Kevin Ewoldt

Riggins_small Ken Meringolo

Editors

Sb_small Parks Smith

Small Steve Shoup

Chalkboard_football-opt403x300o00s403x300_small UkRedskin

Washington_redskins_helmet_small Redskins News

Authors

Badshirt2__2__small fatpickle

Family_in_disney_small Tiller56

Rg3super_small HTTR4LIFE

Hh_small Ronnie Adkins