Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Safety Ryan Clark's Motivational Workout

The Temptation of Peyton Manning


I've been thinking a lot of this chatter that is all over the interwebs and sports talk radio about Peyton Manning coming to DC and I think a) its ridiculous and b) its a bad idea. But like most things, I tend to over-think and I've been doing that on this subject a lot.

First off, it could be ridiculous. Manning may have gotten clearance, but you don't have to watch Any Given Sunday to know that sports and medicine aren't always looking out for each other. But if Manning can play, why not take a shot? Signing Manning wouldn't cost them any draft picks and any money they would spend on him would be short term money and I believe they have done enough thus far in the last two drafts that it won't be a repeat of the 2000 Skins. Manning would bring leadership and experience and elite level talent. He would bring a professionalism and an example of how to be a true leader on a team that has been lacking that across the field. A lot of people think of great players going to different teams, they think of Namath as a Ram and Unitas as a Charger. But Brett Favre took the Vikings into overtime of the 2009 NFC title game and Joe Montana had playoff success with Kansas City. It can be done, great players can contribute with other teams.

The problem is signing Manning changes nothing in terms the needs of the team. They still need a quarterback of the future, they still need playmakers at wide receiver, they still need depth on the O-Line. Signing Manning just ensures that at best they will get much better play at QB as long as he doesn't get really hurt. It's a stop-gap, and that might be, in the end, why this won't work. Does Manning want to essentially be in the same place he would be in Indy if he signed with Washington? In the end, this leaves me rather indifferent if they sign Manning or not because it won't really matter one way or another. The core of this team is still weak whether Manning is signed or not. He makes things better for sure, because I can't even write R__ Gro______ name in the same post as Peyton Manning.

The temptation isn't whether to sign Peyton Manning or not. The temptation is whether we allow Peyton Manning to dominate our thoughts and focus this off season, to let it determine our success versus failure. Instead I would focus on names we don't know, offensive lineman and draft picks that will turn us into the New York Giants and New England Patriots, teams that can perennially restock their rosters because of smart management. Sign Peyton Manning, don't sign Peyton Manning . . . in the end, neither decision would define if this team because a true power in the NFC. The small choices of signing and drafting depth, speed, and talent will be what makes us a winner or not.

So what would I do?

I would keep the 6th pick and see what happens because unlike last year, this draft does have depth. I would focus like a laser on Justin Blackmon, who I think is going to be a true stud on this team. The most depressing stat of this season was the Redskins scored exactly ZERO touchdowns on yards after the catch. Its a lack of talent at both quarterback and wide receiver. Santana Moss is a great player, but he's who go with for an 10 yard crossing pattern for a first down. The last three Super Bowl winners . . . New Orleans, Green Bay, and New York . . . have proven that you don't need the dominate rusher to win, you just need a rushing attack. Evan Royster and Roy Helu are a nice tandem and I say give them a year to see what they can really do as a combination. You have Blackmon, Moss, Hankerson, and Gaffney as WRs, I think things could be interesting. What would make a compelling case for Manning being signed is that there is so much young talent on this team . . . being around a superstar like Manning could do wonders for them. Think Fred Davis . . .

The point of all this is that I hope Skins front office brass don't become Manning-obsessed to the point that they ignore what really needs to be done. Sign him or don't, just don't repeat the mistakes of the past and define success by a big name versus doing the real hard work of winning.

Comment 14 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I agree somewhat.

It’s not likely that Manning makes the Skins SB champs. If they sign him, he may come and go with little results like past big name FAs at their career’s end.

Then again, I do think he will make this team much better immediately. Moss, Hank, Davis, Cooley are a good group of targets. He will only make them work harder too. I just think Manning works too hard not to have success.

He could tutor not only a QB of the future, but the entire team as an example of how the best in the business go about their work.

by TorchM on Feb 6, 2012 7:42 PM EST reply actions  

another Peyton post....
The temptation isn’t whether to sign Peyton Manning or not. The temptation is whether we allow Peyton Manning to dominate our thoughts and focus this off season

seeing as this is the 20th post on our friend Peyton I assume it is safe to say until he signs somewhere or retires this topic will dominate the boards

by NESKINSFAN on Feb 6, 2012 7:43 PM EST reply actions  

I am one who has been for trading up for a QB

But if the reports are true and Peyton is willing to sign an incentive laden deal it makes it that much more possible. If we do trade down the notion of Peyton in burgundy and gold looks much more appealing than Flynn, Orton or any of the other FA QB’s. This would have to be accompanied by a 2nd round QB for me to be ok with it

by Bryan Black on Feb 6, 2012 8:25 PM EST via Android app reply actions  

Why?

In this case, that second round pick should be used to give Manning more protection or weapons. Next year is a stronger QB class at this point than this years was in Feb of last year. Better to make moves this year that set up drafting a first round talent at QB next year than to “waste” a pick on a non first round talent this year.

by tuckwell on Feb 6, 2012 11:30 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

I agree with that, i would take a guy late like Cousins or Bj Coleman, but if you dont take Luck or RG3 it would be a wasted pick, and if you have Peyton Manning then you may be good for 2-3 years at QB so u can get a guy next year

by Highspeed30 on Feb 7, 2012 12:21 AM EST up reply actions  

I can't believe we want to down this road again

It’s always next year……then when next year rolls around, it the following year. It’s time to shit, or get off the pot with the QB situation. Move up and get our guy, or just sell the damn team, and move it to LA.

Redskins fans deserve better than an injured, 36 year old Peyton Manning.

R.I.P JVP 1926-2012

by Tiller56 on Feb 7, 2012 8:46 AM EST reply actions  

Quit believing that this is like any time in the past 20 years.

It’s not. It’s nothing like any situation we’ve seen since Gibbs left, and really since before that. Quit letting your frustrations guide you and look at the situation logically. You’re about to make me post my own fanpost on the subject, and God knows we don’t need yet another thread about the QB situation here.

Try this. Erase the past from your mind. Totally. Imagine this was an expansion team last year, and we have what we have. Imagine that moving forward, we’ve got a goal to not just win playoff games or a quick Super Bowl, but to become a long-term success, a perennial playoff team on the order of the Patriots or Steelers. Now, with the roster AS IT STANDS NOW, do you think it makes more sense to trade 3-6 picks out of the top three rounds of two drafts to draft one player at QB this year, or do you think it makes more sense to use the width and breadth of this draft to address multiple needs, gain more picks next year and THEN make a move for “our guy?” Remember, Griffin doesn’t particularly fit our “system,” and there’s a guy in the draft next year that is the prototypical fit for our “system,” plus at least two others who look for all the world like top fifteen picks going into their senior or junior year.

Now, try the above scenario, but think of us as a team in the league that you hate the most. Whoever you most despise, be it Dallass or Philthy or whoever, put them in our position. What move would you want them to make the least, long term? Which move would best benefit that team?

by tuckwell on Feb 7, 2012 11:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks for the lecture

I now feel a lot better about taking the 36 year old, injured Manning

R.I.P JVP 1926-2012

by Tiller56 on Feb 8, 2012 8:01 AM EST up reply actions  

Better that

and a chance at a better team for the long term. Manning isn’t injured, by the way. The injury part is over. Now we find out if his arm can rehab into shape.

by tuckwell on Feb 8, 2012 12:25 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

gotta get over Barkely, he's not nearly as good as RG3 anyway

and I’ve yet to hear anyone explain what this system is that doesnt fit RG3 but apparently fits other players.

by DCrez on Feb 8, 2012 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't like Barkley, personally

But he’s a substantial upgrade to what we have, and waiting for a QB till next draft lets us fill a lot of holes sooner.

by tuckwell on Feb 8, 2012 4:11 PM EST via iPhone app up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email hogshaven@gmail.com

Managers

Superbowl_small Kevin Ewoldt

Riggins_small Ken Meringolo

Editors

Sb_small Parks Smith

Small Steve Shoup

Chalkboard_football-opt403x300o00s403x300_small UkRedskin

Washington_redskins_helmet_small Redskins News

Authors

Badshirt2__2__small fatpickle

Family_in_disney_small Tiller56

Rg3super_small HTTR4LIFE

Hh_small Ronnie Adkins