Redskins Speak with Mike Adams
Obviously the Skins are going to connect with a slew of players over the five or so days and a report for all of these "meetings" aren't entirely necessary; but I thought the recap of a Mike Adams interview today was extremely interesting. Adams has been forgotten by some because of his five game suspension surrounding the Ohio State scandal and a 2009 suspension because of drug related charges.
Nevertheless Adams has been rising up draft boards and impressing many scouts, including that of the Redskins during the all-star game phase. According to Mike Jones of the Washington Post, the Redskins met with Adams today and asked him about the possibility of moving to the right side:
"Whatever a team wants," Adams said. "I’m just blessed to be in this position. No matter where I go [in the draft], I feel blessed."
What can we speculate from this meeting and the particular question of moving to right tackle? Does this spell the end for Jammal Brown, who Mike Shanahan has been keeping a close eye on? Could this also signal a possible trade back? Adams is thought to be a mid to late 1st round prospect, so perhaps this could mean the Redskins are planning on getting their QB via Free Agency. Or is the more likely scenario that Mike Shanahan and Bruce Allen are just doing their due diligence in Indy?
58 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
And so the tanlged web is woven by the shanahan spider once again
I hope this is a precursor to a trade back. But would we be in jeopardy of losing out on tannehill if we took adams late first?
Perhaps, but maybe they feel one or the other could fall to 39 or maybe they address QB in FA
Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions
Address?
Unless you’re talking about Peyton, how would we ADDRESS the QB situation? You don’t look at Orton as ADDRESSING it, do you?
Where do they teach you to talk like this? In some Panama City "Sailor wanna hump-hump" bar, or is it getaway day and your last shot at his whiskey? Sell crazy someplace else, we're all stocked up here.
Not my personal preference at all... I agree with you, but want to avoid fun with semantics haha
Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions
Good enough
Where do they teach you to talk like this? In some Panama City "Sailor wanna hump-hump" bar, or is it getaway day and your last shot at his whiskey? Sell crazy someplace else, we're all stocked up here.
The only way to address it is to pick up the phone.
Then say, “Jeff my man! Let’s make a deal.”
I see it as more cushion for the pushin'
by iH8dallas on Feb 23, 2012 7:59 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Did everyone here about the alternative combine iH8 will be watching all weekend?

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions
They need to take care of those muffin tops.
I see it as more cushion for the pushin'
by iH8dallas on Feb 23, 2012 8:02 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
You want us to trade for Matt Moore
Or JP Losman?
Where do they teach you to talk like this? In some Panama City "Sailor wanna hump-hump" bar, or is it getaway day and your last shot at his whiskey? Sell crazy someplace else, we're all stocked up here.
Only 19 reps of 225?!?
Not everything but gives you insight into his work ethic or lack of. I don’t want our RT to bench less than me.
@Callahan_9 on the twitter machine.
but would we be in jeopardy of losig ou on tannehill....
i hope so. anybody but tannehill….please
Really?
Tannehill upside > other QB prospects
Redskins @RGIII - 2012
by Copious 1 on Feb 23, 2012 7:53 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
+1
Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions
his upside is about equal to RGIII's, Griffin is just further along
as for next year, depending on who comes out and how Barkley develops, yes it could be right up there with them.
Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com
by Steve Shoup on Feb 23, 2012 8:11 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Bold statement... I love it
Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions
haha
Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com
personally I like Tannehill (esp. for the Skins) more than Barkley
Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com
I like Tannehill's size more, but man that's a tough one
Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions
I think Barkley's more polished now
but Tannehill has the size, mobility, and great potential. Also there were just far too many games where I saw Robert Woods bailout Barkley, where throws to any other receiver not named Calvin Johnson or Larry Fitzgerald would have resulted in a couple incompletes (or INT’s) but Woods would come down with it.
Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com
I just don't see the great potential yet
he just ok; far from great. There are major holes in his game, and no one, not you, I , Mayock, Keiper, coaches or GM’s know if they can be fixed.
R.I.P JVP 1926-2012
Who's in next year's draft class?
Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions
The Skins have to be interested in every lineman capable of starting
it won’t matter who our QB is next year if this keeps happening: http://www.nfl.com/videos/washington-redskins/09000d5d823624bf/Panthers-defense-sack-7-yd-loss
Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com
Even this guy?

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions
Depends
Is that guy an upgrade over Jamaal Brown?
by The Agent C 83 on Feb 23, 2012 8:04 PM EST up reply actions
don't ask Steve that, you already know the answer
Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions
Don't ask Tiller either
He claims our line is just peachy
by Jeff Bernard on Feb 23, 2012 8:06 PM EST up reply actions
when i hear
“they are really not that bad” i want to freaking scream
by davetrembling on Feb 23, 2012 8:47 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
This is actually Dave's web cam

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions
Have I ever said I don't want upgrades on the line?
It’s just when to get them that differs from some
R.I.P JVP 1926-2012
I think this means that we are NOT drafting Mike Adams.
We’re trading up for Robert Griffin The Third
I see it as more cushion for the pushin'
by iH8dallas on Feb 23, 2012 7:56 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Remember when you got mad about repetitive statements yesterday?
Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions
No, but I am upset.
I can’t believe you and Steve used your stupid logic on me. You had me thinking that Weeden “might” be a good idea.
I’m back to my senses now.
I see it as more cushion for the pushin'
by iH8dallas on Feb 23, 2012 8:01 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Scary isn't it
Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions
I won't let it happen again.
I put my tinfoil hat back on.
I see it as more cushion for the pushin'
by iH8dallas on Feb 23, 2012 8:04 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I hope to have the hype machine plugged in and thrown in the bathtub with me.
I see it as more cushion for the pushin'
by iH8dallas on Feb 23, 2012 8:09 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Big Bang Theory is on.
I see it as more cushion for the pushin'
by iH8dallas on Feb 23, 2012 8:07 PM EST via mobile reply actions
That show has to be the most inexplicably popular show I have ever seen...
Saw my first episode the other day and consequently my last.
Give it another shot
Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions
Might as well be watching...
Two and a Half men, How I met your mother, and any other sitcom on TV. Personally we ditched watching network TV in my house. If it’s not a cop or hospital show it’s a show like BBT where you can see the punchlines coming a mile away. YAWN… Ill stick to MadMen, Breaking Bad, SouthPark, and HBO
You are the definition
Of wrong. Sheldon is the funniest character on TV.
Where do they teach you to talk like this? In some Panama City "Sailor wanna hump-hump" bar, or is it getaway day and your last shot at his whiskey? Sell crazy someplace else, we're all stocked up here.
Adams at RT and TWill at LT, What could go wrong?
2009 suspension because of drug related charges
@Callahan_9 on the twitter machine.
by Diesel44 on Feb 23, 2012 8:16 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
haha
Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions
then we sign V-Jax, franchise Davis and then after 1 night we have 4 guys suspended
Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com
I think Matt Jones is due for a comeback
Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions
Am I the only one...
that likes Adams more than Jonathan Martin?
Off-field stuff aside I think Adams is A LOT better than Martin
He may even be better than Reiff
Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions
Eh
Wouldn’t go that far, I like Reiff quite a bit more.
i agree
If Adams is focused he’s better than Martin (not Reiff though)
Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com
I hope it was just some post suspension rust
but I saw Adams get beaten like a drum when he came back mid-season at Ohio St. I would take him as a RT in the 2nd if he were there, but not in the 1st. Actually, even though he’s slipped a bit, I’d perfer Sanders. I would even rather fall back and draft Glenn, or just wait it out for Potter over Adams.
R.I.P JVP 1926-2012
Perhaps the coaching staff can spike his next protein shake
So that we can acquire him in the second or third…

by 






















