Photoshopping New Redskins Uniforms

I like the 70s look Skins unis. Seemed more butch. Don’t want us to look like Seminoles.

Oh…and I still sing “scalp em” not the new version.

Most arent naive to not know it is a reference.
The name Redskins may be the most offensive to some Indians. But, I’ve read I think that may Naitive Americans kinda like the acknowledment.

Am not in love with gold paints. I like white paints for some reason.Would like to see two narrow burandy stripes with a wide gold stripe in the middle, down the outside of the leg.

Gold helmut, leave those to the packers-my opinion of course.. I think we are fairly unique with the Burgandy helmut. Chiefs are close. Maybe gold names on jersey to add a little more gold but Burgandy is really our color-maybe burgandy paints with white tops if real burgandy, with gold stripes or design on jerseys-I like that. Nmbers should stay whte for ref and fans to see best-if that actually helps-else gold numbers..

I do prefer the Tomohack though. We should really ask our Native Americans who are fo r not changing the name!!!

They have more ivestment in this than most of us.

Just some thoughts..

Anyone who thinks the logo is meant to offend is just looking for oportunities to be offended. It’s meant to be a compliment, not an insult.

Are Colts and Broncos fans insulted by the oppression of animals as beasts of burden (you can add 1/2 of the NFL teams to that category)?

Are Chargers fans insulted by a logo which shows a dangerous facet of nature?

Are the Chiefs fans insulted (I live in Chiefs territory and I’m also a Chiefs fan so I know what I’m talking about when I say NO!).

Are Raiders fans insulted by their team name referring to criminals?

Are Minnesota fans offended by referring to Vikings?

Start changing things and you’ll end up having to change everything including the name and when you change that a lot of fans are just going to leave.

Don’t change the uniforms, don’t change the team name, don’t change the logo. If you don’t like them then leave.

Y’all know I’m in on this.

Nike has zero, and I mean zero ability to change anything related to the NFL logos. They may suggest uniform ideas to teams, but nobody has to accept.

Furthermore, the NFL has strict rules, more than any other league, on the subject of “branding”. If a team wishes to change logos, they must give the NFL over a year of notice. Uniforms can only be changed every five years at a minimum.

The NFL mandates that a team can only have three jerseys, and a maximum of one helmet. This is why “Pro Combat” in college will never, EVER be seen in the NFL.

Next year, we will see these changes:
An updated Panthers logo set, with the same uniforms.
Tweaked Seahawks logo and NEW UNIFORMS, potentially quite “Oregonesque”, within NFL rules.
Small changes to the Jaguars, as Nike’s uniform cut will be different than Reebok’s.

BUT THATS IT AS FAR AS WE KNOW.

Expect more changes in 2013 and beyond, but nothing drastic. The NFL is gunna look almost exactly the same.