This morning as I do every morning I check for updated Mock drafts. I am noticing that a lmore mocks have us taking Tannehill at 6 because hes the next best quaterback after rg3. When I look up his stats im am extremly confused as to why hes rated the 3d best quaterback. I have nothing against him and he is talented enough that I dont expect him to make it past miami,seatle,kc, and the browns if they miss rg3 and fall in our laps in the second round . but a lot of people also think he might be available when we pick in the second round .

So the question is whats so special about tannehill compared to the other 2nd tier guys. here are the facts

http://espn.go.com/college-football/player/_/id/232059/ryan-tannehill

http://espn.go.com/college-football/player/_/id/235677/brandon-weeden

http://espn.go.com/college-football/player/_/id/238803/nick-foles

based on the numbers he's the worst of the 3. I know 1 year less of starting than the others but even with that his best year doesnt compare with weeden's worst as a full time starter. him and foles are actually closer in stats than him and weeden. I am honestly kind of worried that because of age that the skins might take him over weeden even tho hes not as good. I only see 1 decent year from tannehill and 29tds to 15 pics isnt really that impressive. So what am I missing HH someone please tell me why a guy who would never be considered a 1st overall pick should be the guy we take as our QB of the future?