Looks Like Someone Has a Sixpack of the Mondays
1. There are very few slow weeks/slow periods on the NFL calendar. Indeed, these days there are just times when things are slightly slower than warp speed and we are currently in one of those pockets. Thankfully, we have a team that has barely managed double digit wins in two years, an owner that employs desperation and trucks full of money to chase championships, a full-blown quarterback crisis, huge question marks at multiple starting positions and a fanbase that has never considered a dead horse to be underkicked. You have to love this town.
2. Last week's news that the Redskins were noodling the possibilty of franchising Fred Davis caused me to stop and think--and that isn't good for anybody. I have been adamant about the importance of Chris Cooley to our offense, but that is not to suggest that Fred Davis is not a beast that our passing game can ill afford to lose. If both of these guys are healthy, you would think our offense would explode. Unfortunately, the Redskins have been either hesitant or unable to feature an effective two tight scheme that exploits the abilities of both guys. Perhaps a fully recovered Cooley and a more seasoned Davis can work together better in 2012. One would think that defenses would be hard-pressed to take away both of those guys. Actually, thousands would think that...hundreds of thousands. Regardless of how healthy Cooley is, it makes sense to assume that Davis would remain a primary target in the passing game, to the tune of 80+ catches and plenty of YAC.
3. I could care less about total stats. If we have Cooley and Davis on our offense, we have ZERO excuse not to be more effective in the red zone. It looks like we are turning the corner a tiny bit in that department from epic lows, but our touchdown percentage inside the red zone needs to be higher. It is easier said than done, but the only way to get us to stop saying it is to go out and do it.
4. You have all heard me extol the virtues of drafting Riley Reiff, the huge offensive tackle out of Iowa. We can and will disagree between now and the draft on the wisdom in this selection, but think about it this way: if you are expecting or hoping for an offensive lineman at the top of the first round, just about any other flashier player/position is going to excite you if that is the direction we take. My support for picking the horse out of Iowa is not solely based on setting myself up for a pleasant surprise--Reiff and Trent Williams would give us a real position of strength at tackle. I am no genius, but being strong at the tackle position is a good thing...I have heard.
5. The LaRon Landry saga is going to really turn dramatic I think. You have all the makings for the kind of soap opera that we simply don't need but won't be able to avoid. There is LaRon's extremely high level of play in recent years when healthy, his recent inability to stay on the field for an entire season and the unique decisions regarding the treatment of his injuries. There is Washington's hesitance to resign a player for big bucks when they are unsure of his ability to contribute significantly on the field and their desire to retain a player they drafted and invested in heavily. There is the uncertainty of both parties regarding what other teams might be willing to pay which leads to indecision on both sides on how to play this out. While this won't get to Peyton Manning-saga status, for us it will snowball a little because on top of everything else, safety is a position of need on this team and we don't have anybody that is as good as Landry is when he is healthy.
6. Then again, who are we kidding--no matter what happens and no matter who we sign and no matter what plans we make and no matter who we draft, we all know that Reed Doughty will somehow be starting at safety on opening day. It is as inevitable as Parks commenting below about how little use he has for Chris Cooley.
91 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
“There is LaRon’s extremely high level of play in recent years when healthy”
I can not think of a two game stretch where he showed a high level of play let alone extreme.
#4. Im onboard with drafting Mr. Reiff. That sounds chalk-full of longevity and is safe.
At this point im not sure Cooley is anything more than a decoy that is prone to contracting season ending injuires on non-contact plays.
Same goes for LaRon. Save the drama and missed tackled and let him walk.
come on...he dominated for a half a season two years ago...
by Ken Meringolo on Feb 13, 2012 12:47 PM EST up reply actions
he definitely should be judged primarily on his most recent play...
but I would argue that he was absolutely playing at an extremely high level during that span.
Wasn’t he a defensive MVP candidate at the time?
Also, yes, we are talking about two years ago, but I was just suggesting there was at least one more than two-game stretch where he got it on.
by Ken Meringolo on Feb 13, 2012 1:11 PM EST up reply actions
two years ago Cooley was 2nd on the team in passing so its not as though he's really disappeared
Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com
by Steve Shoup on Feb 13, 2012 11:35 PM EST up reply actions
I've never been a fan of Landry. Let him walk.
Also, I wanted Fred Davis to start over Cooley in 2009. He’s obviously the more talented player.
I see it as more cushion for the pushin'
I’d take Landry for a reasonable contract, but that’s not going to happen.
He’s obviously the more talented player.
More raw receiving talent, but not more talented all around. not a better blocker, not a better route runner, not a smarter player.
"By far the worst performers on the (R*dskins) are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
How do you know he's not a "smarter" player.
Fred Davis has a knack for getting wide open and making big plays.
I see it as more cushion for the pushin'
a nearly endless stream of reports that he was slow to pick up the offense in his first few years and then under shanahan the coaches weren’t happy with his route running.
also he’s apparently not a smart human being either.
tons of nfl players smoke weed. only the dumb ones get caught.
"By far the worst performers on the (R*dskins) are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
by smutsboy1 on Feb 13, 2012 12:45 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I don't care if he has a sub-70 IQ. He's big, fast, gets open and scores touchdowns.
Cooley has been hurt for what seems like forever.
I see it as more cushion for the pushin'
He gets open on well designed plays, namely the one where the TE goes across the formatting and runs a wheel route, sneaking out the back side
Like I said, Davis is the best raw talent, and a great receiving talent.
But there is more to being a great TE than that.
Sorry that Chris Cooley got his ankle rolled up on or whatever happened to him, but for years CC scored TDs too.
"By far the worst performers on the (R*dskins) are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
by smutsboy1 on Feb 13, 2012 12:49 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
formatting formation
"By far the worst performers on the (R*dskins) are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
I love Chris Cooley
but he has only has six TD’s in 4 years… But when healthy he catches a ton of balls. I want them both next year.
Right, he’s been injured and playing in Zorn-based offenses.
Fred Davis only had 3 this year, it’s not like he was a threat to make the pro bowl.
I agree with you: we need both.
"By far the worst performers on the (R*dskins) are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
I bet Sleepy makes the Pro Bowl as an alternate if he didn't get in trouble this year
We need to stop gauging people by Pro Bowls haha
Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions
well yeah, it's just a lazy way to say, "elite"
I mean, Tebow almost made the pro bowl.
"By far the worst performers on the (R*dskins) are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
ih8...I understand why you like Davis
But everything smuts said is true and has been true for a while. until he proves otherwise, he is simply a very talented athlete that you can’t depend on.
by Ken Meringolo on Feb 13, 2012 12:53 PM EST up reply actions
I get it, he's a knucklehead.
The majority of his job description is lift weights and run fast, I don’t expect him to be highly intelligent.
Not to mention he has the best hands on the team.
I see it as more cushion for the pushin'
I don't think you appreciate the tight end position
You have to be smart enough to play with the offensive line effectively AND understand your role in the passing game.
You have to be able to block, no exceptions
you have to be able to run good routes and find holes in zone coverage in addition to making decisions how best to help out the quarterback when he gets into trouble.
Fred Davis at this point is a better wideout then T. E.
The world looks mighty different when you're peeking out your belly button
by Skins Fan '77 on Feb 13, 2012 1:02 PM EST up reply actions
Oh I appreciate tight ends, if you know what I'm saying.
I see it as more cushion for the pushin'
by iH8dallas on Feb 13, 2012 1:07 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Yeah, I threw you that softball on purpose.
The world looks mighty different when you're peeking out your belly button
by Skins Fan '77 on Feb 13, 2012 1:10 PM EST up reply actions
Fred Davis' role in this offense requires FAR more than strength and speed ih8
He has to be able to get on the exact same page as the quarterback, offensive line and wide receivers. Cooley could do that. Davis has not proven capable of that yet. If he was able to get there, he would be in elite territory. As he is now, he is equally capable of making a big catch as he is missing a key block or misreading a defensive coverage.
Finding a hole underneath is 101-level stuff and can only get you and the offense so far. We need more if he is going to be a franchise guy.
by Ken Meringolo on Feb 13, 2012 1:05 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I smell a post
for that british guy where he breaks down fred davis’ route running capabilities and whatever else about him.
Every time I look at davis he looks like he’s running half assed routes. Those half assed routes seem to work. But they are still only 1 cheek on a tight end.,
The Beat Box aka skins secondary.
by forever you mean a year?
Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com
by Steve Shoup on Feb 13, 2012 11:36 PM EST up reply actions
Laron Landry = Roy Williams
Formerly KS and CS
by ThrowItDownBigManThrowItDown on Feb 13, 2012 1:07 PM EST up reply actions
Sign and trade Landry
Start a bidding war for him. Someone will bite and give up something decent
by Hustler of Culture on Feb 13, 2012 12:33 PM EST reply actions
an inconsistent player coming off season ending injury?
this isn’t madden.
"By far the worst performers on the (R*dskins) are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
by smutsboy1 on Feb 13, 2012 12:34 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
+1 if Bruce Allen could pull that off then I'll sign a club seats contract
Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions
by Parks Smith on Feb 13, 2012 12:38 PM EST up reply actions
Cooley and Davis
more effective in the red zone…Waiting, sweetheart, still waiting
When I was a kid, my father told me, "Never hit anyone in anger, unless you're absolutely sure you can get away with it." -Russell Ziskey
With manning deciding who to throw to between them
Sure sign me up
I am no genius, but being strong at the tackle position is a good thing…I have heard.
What offense we were able to generate from 2000-2008 agrees with you.
We need our next JonJan/ChrisSam combo
"By far the worst performers on the (R*dskins) are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
Unfortunately we don't have either part of that equation
The rock never miss a game (and only missed one snap) until his ankle took him out.
Chris Samuels also was very reliable and played at a Pro bowl level his entire career.
Who on our roster has the potential to do these things? Our two starting tackles can’t even stay on the field, and when they do their level of play is not consistent.
The world looks mighty different when you're peeking out your belly button
by Skins Fan '77 on Feb 13, 2012 1:07 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t think TW has chronic (ha!) injury issues. He got rolled up on. It happens.
TW still has great potential and is learning from a good offensive mind.
I’m happy with him as the current plan at LT (or RT)
"By far the worst performers on the (R*dskins) are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
If we do bring in Reiff, TW is the RT, in my humble opinion
by Ken Meringolo on Feb 13, 2012 1:15 PM EST up reply actions
My biggest scare
And im not sure why no one is talking about this…
Is if we move TW to RT, will he want to stay here when his contract is up? Because the dude came here on premium money draft contract, and RT would be a downgrade.
It would be suck really bad to invest in him only to see him peace out after 4-5 years
prior to coming to the Redskins
Trent Williams had exactly one year as a left tackle. He has been either a right tackle or right guard exclusively.
In view of his performances on and off the field, he shouldn’t have any problem moving to the right side
The world looks mighty different when you're peeking out your belly button
by Skins Fan '77 on Feb 13, 2012 4:17 PM EST up reply actions
well he's still under contract for 4 years so I think they'll be fine
Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com
by Steve Shoup on Feb 13, 2012 11:41 PM EST up reply actions
Cooley hasnt been as effective in recent years.
I’m a huge Cooley fan, but he hasn’t been the same player he was earlier in his career. he is versatile and can still be a good TE/H-back. However Fred Davis is the best TE on this roster.
In other news, since football is slow, check out Yahoo Sports.
On the front page, none other than NCCU basketball player Landon Clement!
I see it as more cushion for the pushin'
Funniest gif I've seen
Duck Fallas!!
by believe_the_curse on Feb 13, 2012 1:09 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Can't stop watching it
Just like the day I first saw it… HAHAHA
"If there's football in heaven I will be thinking of Sean Taylor every time it thunders."
by Ohio Redskins on Feb 13, 2012 1:15 PM EST up reply actions
God, so much funny in one clip
I especially love the guy who ended up on it and says “Screw it, I’m outty”.
How have I never seen/heard of this!?!?!
The internet has failed me today. For shame internet, for shame…
What the shit
The dude standing by the 50 yard line
at the point of impact has such a feminine response to the incident…. Dude actually covers his mouth with that paper hahahahaha
"If there's football in heaven I will be thinking of Sean Taylor every time it thunders."
by Ohio Redskins on Feb 13, 2012 2:23 PM EST up reply actions
The way he tries to steer the cart before finally going all Italian boat captain is amazing.
I see it as more cushion for the pushin'
I'm sorry but we need to cut ties with Cooley.
He’s a true skin and a good guy but his time is up. I honestly think Logan paulsen can perform well when we have some other weapons. Also I see his blocking is progressing
Duck Fallas!!
by believe_the_curse on Feb 13, 2012 1:07 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Cooley will
need to restructure his contract in order to stay imo.
When I was a kid, my father told me, "Never hit anyone in anger, unless you're absolutely sure you can get away with it." -Russell Ziskey
Did you just say Logan Paulsen can replace CC?
Jesus christ.
"By far the worst performers on the (R*dskins) are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
I think he said Fred Davis can replace Cooley
and that’s pretty true. Paulsen would be the very rarely used second tight end.
Any player can replace any other.
Maybe not as well as cc did in the past but his best years are behind him.
Duck Fallas!!
by believe_the_curse on Feb 13, 2012 1:31 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
doesn't mean we should get rid of cooley
and I’m not sure what Paulsen has to do with anything.
Paulesen is a replacement level blocking TE.
"By far the worst performers on the (R*dskins) are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
Exactly paulsen can be the #2 or even a third option behind Davis.
All I’m saying is I don’t think Cooley doesn’t bring as much to the table now as he did in years past
Duck Fallas!!
by believe_the_curse on Feb 13, 2012 2:07 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
he’s getting older and coming off injury, but i don’t see the advantage to getting rid of him.
"By far the worst performers on the (R*dskins) are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
Apparently we don't need depth on the Washington Redskins.
That’s why it’s ok to ship off all of our good backup players, and trade away all our high draft picks. We won’t have ANY injuries this season.
on offense we have too many stars and not enough plays to go around
better to ship off Cooley.
"By far the worst performers on the (R*dskins) are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
Paulsen does not have the hands that Cooley has and IMO, is only a blocking option at this point in his career.
Hail to the Redskins!
Follow @HTTR4LIFE
by HTTR4LIFE on Feb 13, 2012 1:15 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I can replace Kobe Byrant, but that doesn’t make me a great or even decent basketball Player…
Cooley is a solid TE. He does it all. Why do we want to chase out our own homegrown, proven veterans?
My give a damn broke.
by davesomethin on Feb 13, 2012 1:56 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Logan Paulsen really struggled down the stretch and his blocking or lack there of cost the Skins more than once
Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com
by Steve Shoup on Feb 13, 2012 11:43 PM EST up reply actions
In the last three years Chris Cooley has missed more games than Laron Landry
I think Landry deserves another chance to prove he can be healthy. We all know the talent level that he’s capable of playing at when he is healthy. I would much rather see the Skins take a chance on Landry than one of the free agents on the market.
If you could get branch from the Raiders…
You’re telling me that he would still take Landry?
The world looks mighty different when you're peeking out your belly button
by Skins Fan '77 on Feb 13, 2012 1:25 PM EST up reply actions
Tyvon Branch is going to get a huge contract
Yes it would be nice to see him playing for the skins. However the money that would go to him would be better spent on positions of greater need. Like WR, OL, any QB not named Rex Grossman. Also Landry’s contract is going to be nearly as high because of the injury concerns.
To answer your question I would take Laron Landry.
by JeanBaptiste on Feb 13, 2012 1:47 PM EST up reply actions
Re-sign Landry, trade Cooley
If only because there’s someone else on the roster than can play Cooley’s position. As long as Reed Doughty is the backup, Landry has considerable value to the team. Unless there’s a better option in free agency or in the draft, you try to resign Landry.
Gotta love Cooley, but he’s expendable at this point and if he can bring some value in terms of draft pick(s) then make the move.
Don't know about that
I think most quarterbacks in the league would take Chris over Fred nine times out of 10
The world looks mighty different when you're peeking out your belly button
by Skins Fan '77 on Feb 13, 2012 1:27 PM EST up reply actions
Who would trade for 30 year old TE coming off a season ending knee injury?
Not to mention he just had the worst season of his Career.
by JeanBaptiste on Feb 13, 2012 1:41 PM EST up reply actions
Then just outright release him?
You comment makes it seem like you think he has no value, in which case you’re making the case to keep Davis over Cooley.
by NittanyBlueHen on Feb 13, 2012 1:45 PM EST up reply actions
Im saying keep them both
There’s no need to trade Cooley because he doesn’t have much trade value. But He’s still has value to the team.
by JeanBaptiste on Feb 13, 2012 1:49 PM EST up reply actions
I don't doubt that...
but age and propensity for injury make Davis a better keep out of the two IMO. Either way, I think they should choose one and move the other.
trade value isn't high for either player
just keep both. it’s not like our offense is over flowing with talent
"By far the worst performers on the (R*dskins) are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
"2 TEs at the same time"
Cooley and Davis on the field would be an excellent combo for either a rookie QB trying to get his feet wet or another year of Rex dumping it off. Think about Helu’s 14-catch game. Why not embrace the short game?
Browns are strong at tackle
And where are they?
I just think going QB is only option. Tackle takes a backseat to QB right now.
Playin Basketball year-round once my knee is all good
@TheMrRice25 on the twitter machine. My twitticon is Richie Petibons 5 Championship rings. I'm the one weraring them.
Cowboys are exceptionally strong at QB where are they?
Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com
by Steve Shoup on Feb 13, 2012 11:45 PM EST up reply actions
what? since when?
Tony “Choker” Romo is great for winning meaningless games but when the heat is on he checks out. The Cowboys are not strong at QB.
Romo is a top 10 QB
sorry.
"By far the worst performers on the (R*dskins) are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
by smutsboy1 on Feb 14, 2012 11:39 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
yeah thats not true
I know it is a great narrative, but Romo ranks 2nd among active QB’s in QB rating, TD% (both behind Rodgers who doesn’t have near the sample size), 4th in completion % ahead of Brady, Rivers, Big Ben, Schaub etc., , tied for 2nd in yards per attempt (again behind Rodgers),
People can talk about the clutch factor, but should Romo really be penalized so much for succeeding early and not needing a 4th Quarter comeback? I’ll agree that there is some importance there, but it doesn’t take him out of the top 5-7 QB discussion.
Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com
Manning, Tannehill, Reiff
Things would be looking up! One of the big advantages of getting Manning is that it would free up that #6 pick. The idea would be to get Tannehill, Foles or Weeden (or whoever Shanahan wanted) in the second or later round.
By the way - Nick Foles was on that All Star college football challenge Saturday
Couldn’t watch it, but Nick did win his part of it. Big guy, looks very young.
got news for you
if we get manning he is going to want a guy like cooley to throw to that will be his dallas clark look davis is not going to get resigned for a big contract maube a 1 year deal he might get its to risky right now to give him a 3or 4 year deal shanny is not stupid cooley is still going to be on the team as a security blanket in case davis goes off the up n smoke pot breakdown sorry haters and davis jock sniffers cooley is still going to be on the team
lohaus #54

by 



























