Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ryder Hesjedal Wins Giro d'Italia

Washington Redskins: Select......

Now Look.....


I know most people will disagree with everything I write today but I have always wanted to post my own Redskins 7-Round mock draft. Every year I get in the draft mood and can't help myself but start looking into prospects that I could get my hopes on. This year I feel like the first 4 rounds, if we pick the right people, could make us a contender.


I hear a lot of talks and have looked at a lot of mock drafts and it is frustrating. There are so many different ideas of how the draft will play out. There are many options that are being thrown around so to sum them up we have; the trade back option, the trade it all away for one player option, the take the best player available option, the take a OL option, the take a DB option, and the take what we need option.


Option 1: Trade Back

I am not against the trade back option but I don't think Shanahan has the luxury to trade back this year. This will most likely be the year that defines Shanahan's time with Washington as either a failure or success. Also, who would we trade back to? I know a lot of people are hoping we would get the kind of deal that the Browns got last year from Atlanta so they could acquire Julio Jones. However, that is a lot to hope for.

Option 2: Trade It ALL

Now I am oppose to this idea because when I say trade it ALL I mean trade it ALL. We would be going backwards back to the Vinny and Snyder era where we trade everything away to acquire one player. If we trade up I say we go for gold, in this case Luck (but we all know Indy is not moving from this spot). In order to get the number two or three spot for RG3 we would have to give up a 1st rounder this year and next year plus a 2nd and a latter round pick. I think the kid is amazing and honestly I would love to have him but to give up so many future starters for one player is a big risk. We don't even know if RG3 will be the future, nothing is set in stone. RG3 may be a bust and if we trade the farm to get him we could be in for a long depressing future trying to get out of the mess. Besides every year there is a player that is a must have and next year it will be Matt Barkley and Landry Jones.

Option 3: BPA

I have nothing against this idea either but I can't see us going defense with our #6 pick again. We have already solidified our defense and it is now our offense to get the overhaul.

Option 4: Draft OL

Now I see a lot of Mocks with us drafting a OG or OT. This just can't happen. Honestly our OL was not all that bad. Trent was solid at LT and he still needs to learn some things (like not smoking weed) but has shown great improvement. Kory L. was great at LG as long as he comes back strong we are good. We need a new C (no offense Will M.) but drafting a new C in the latter rounds or FA would go a long way. Chris Chesters was solid all year round and Jamal Brown showed promise toward the end of the season. I could see a replacement for Brown but not through the draft. My main problem with drafting a OT with #6 is that most teams that do draft a OL in the first round is either solid everywhere else or has a serious need for one. We neither have a serious need or are solid everywhere else. The Redskins have more pressing holes to fill.

Option 5: Draft DB or RB

Again More Pressing Holes To Fill Than DB or RB. Our problems at DB can be fixed with FA or drafting a project player that can learn. Our RB have been the best I have seen in years. With Helu, Royster, and maybe Hightower in the backfield our RB position is well covered with talent.

Option 6: Draft What We NEED!!

This is my favorite option. We have so many needs and it is not just QB. We need QB, WR,OT, C and those are just the ones we need fixing ASAP. We also still need a ILB this year or next to replace Fletcher when he retires. I think Jamie Dukes a NFL Channel Analyst said it best when he said...

"There's a saying that states a house divided against itself cannot stand, and although it's admirable that a coach like Mike Shanahan wants to position his son to be his successor, success must first occur. THE SKINS NEED A QUARTERBACK... Jamie's Judgment: Draft the best available offensive skill players."

Though Jamie says we need a QB he also says Draft the best available skill player like a WR.

SO after all that ranting (geez I feel so much better getting that all off my chest) here is my 7- round Mock for the Washington Redskins.

P.S. Oh and I do apologize that the later rounds have a lot of OR options at the position it just gets so difficult to mock in the later rounds when you have limited scouting resources so far away from Draft day. Also since I am not doing a full 7 round mock for every team so most likely most of these later players will be gone before the Redskins get there so in the later round I have given many options just in case. Or at the very least you have a idea of what position they should draft.

Round 1

WR Michael Floyd

Floyd has a dynamic skill set that makes him a mismatch nightmare against defenders. The senior was Notre Dame's most valuable weapon in 2011 and demanded lots of coverage. Despite the extra coverage he caught 95 passes for 1,106 yards and 8 TD's for the season. " Floyd might rank as the best pass catcher in college football since Larry Fitzgerald." Floyd has fantastic size, speed, quickness, and body control. He has displayed unbelievable ball skills and makes amazing acrobatic catches look easy. There are questions about his top speed. However, he is rarely ever caught from behind and runs like a beast after the catch. He looks like a true No.1 receiver in the NFL and the Redskins could use a threat like him to greatly help our offense.

Round 2

QB Nick Foles

Foles had a rough season due to the lack of a capable defense. He was often left in a shootout position. Foles completed 69 percent of his passes despite the shootouts situations. He threw for 4,334 yard with 28 TD's and only 14 INT's (most of his INT's came from the late game shootouts where he started to force passes). Foles also has a bad knack for locking onto one receiver for too long and did not make his proper progressions. Foles has a big arm and would be considered a pocket passer but his mobility is greatly under rated. He will not dazzle you with his speed but will be able to run for positive yard if necessary. Foles has great accuracy, ball placement and high football IQ make him an interesting candidate as a potential franchise player.

QB Ryan Tannehill

Tannehill will enter the draft with only 20 starts at QB and Tannehill still needs to make up for a lot of lost time to learn the mental necessities of the position. Tannehill has a special skill set, but he is going to need a lot of grooming at the professional level. For the season, he completed 62 percent of his passes for 3,744 yards with 29 touchdowns and 15 interceptions. Tannehill is an excellent athlete and is extremely dangerous running with the football because of his days as a WR. Tannehill has a strong arm with the potential to grow into an accurate passer. However, in my opinion his lack of starts and need to make up lost time at the position means he will need to sit behind a experienced QB and the Redskins do not have that luxury.

Round 3

ILB Tank Carder

I previously had Kevin Reddick here at round 3. However, it seems i was wrong and found that Reddick didn't declare so. So Now I am torn from Tank Carder and Audie Cole. Tank is a rougher prospect and Cole could rise to the second round if he impresses in the Senior Bowl. I already know many are praising Cole during the 1st Senior Bowl practice. So I am going to assume Audie Cole will be gone before our pick in the third round.

Tank Carder is a big solid OLB with great instincts, speed to attack sideline to sideline, and solid tackling technique. He shows a knack for taking the correct angles to the ball and attacks blockers directly to fill gaps. He has shown that he can attack the gaps and If he can add some weight could take on NFL caliber linemen. Tank does good in pass coverage and has speed to cover running backs out of the back field. Good blitzer and uses his hand well to fight off blockers. Tank is a very aggressive tackler and shows good form and has the agility to prevent being eluded. Tank is a team leader on and off the field, plays with fiery attitude. Tank could learn a lot from Fletcher and could be a great in a year.

Round 4

C David Molk

Molk was an excellent college player, Molk is a fast and mobile blocker who did a good job of opening up holes and protecting his quarterback. Molk is very undersized, at the next level, Molk will have to be in a zone-blocking scheme so he will fit Shanny's zone-blocking scheme.

OR

C Garth Gerhart

Gerhart is quick and athletic and it allows him to be effective when pulling. Gerhart also isn't afraid to get physical and fights through the whistle. He is a better run blocker than pass blocker. Gerhart needs to improve his awareness but his athleticism could make him a good fit for Shanny's zone-blocking scheme.

Round 4

OL Quentin Saulsber

Saulsberry is a versatile player who has logged time at four of the five offensive line positions. He was the starter at right guard ,left guard, and right tackle. In the NFL, Saulsberry could stay at center at his current weight. If he moves to guard, he will need to add some more bulk and power to his game. At the very least, Saulsberry should be a versatile backup for game days.

OR

OT Don Barclay

Barclay is athletic and has quick feet he has been a solid blindside protector, and is a suitable run blocker. Barclay is a quality sleeper prospect he is probably better served on the right side at the NFL level.

OR

OT Tanner Hawkinson

Tanner Hawkinson is quick, athletic, and matches up well with pass rushers. It would be good to see him add some strength and power for the NFL.

OR

OT Josh Oglesby

Oglesby's has shown surprising mobility to get downfield while also executing in the run game.

Round 5

CB Omar Bolden

Bolden has had some injury issues his last season Bolden had three interceptions with seven passes broken up, 52 tackles, and averaged 29.2 yards per kick return with a touchdown. He is known as a leader and high-character individual the type Shanny and Allen love. Bolden was once considered a 1st/2nd round pick before his injuries and if he can get over the injuries then he could be a steal.

OR

CB Trevin Wade

Wade had a rough because the Arizona defense was awful but he stood out above his teammates. For the season, Wade had 52 tackles with 13 passes broken up and two interceptions.

OR

CB Isaiah Frey

Frey had totaled five interceptions with 37 tackles and 16 passes broken this season. Frey is a quality sleeper prospect who could be developed at the NFL level in a year or two.

OR

CB Cameron Chism

Chism had 47 tackles with two tackles for a loss, three interceptions, one forced fumble, and four passes broken up this year.

Round 6

FS Jerrell Young

Young has 51 tackles with three tackles for a loss, two passes broken up, one forced fumble and two interceptions. Young has a still raw skill set but could be developed in the NFL.

Round 7

DE Matt Conrath

Conrath has 64 tackles with 11 tackles for a loss, two forced fumbles and two sacks. Conrath has the physical make-up and skill set to potentially be a 3-4 defensive end where he could control his gap and stuff the run on the edge of the line.

OR

DE Patrick Butrym

Butrym has 22 tackles with 3.5 tackles for loss, one sack and one forced fumble this season. He was strong at the line of scrimmage. Butrym doesn't have the size or quickness to be an interior pass rusher but with his size and strength at the line of scrimmage, he would be best as a 3-4 defensive end where he could control his gap and stuff the run on the edge of the line.

Now everyone, hit me with your criticisms. I will enjoy reading them. I got all my information on the prospect, a small scouting report and their predicted draft order, from Walterfooball.com.

I know this mock will change as we get closer to Draft and Combine dates so I will enjoy doing this again.

Poll
Do you agree with my draft choices?
Yes, nice mock
32 votes
Yes, but different players
22 votes
No, other
6 votes
No, way off
27 votes

87 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 40 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Good job... Mocking 7 rds is hard... I like what you did with the options.

I’m not sure WR Floyd is as explosive as people think… he might get overwhelmed by NFL caliber CBs. If RG3 is not there… then either LT or tradeback.

I like Foles in the 2nd. ILB Reddick is good, but I think we’ll bring back London, and I like how Perry is developing. 3rd rd might be too high for an ILB given our starters.

I agree we’ll draft a Center, and I like both Molk and Gerhart… though 4th rd might be a bit high for Gerhart.

If Chism is there in the 5th… we are extremely lucky! I think we’ll deffinetly grab both CB and FS…

by 1x1an on Jan 23, 2012 8:07 PM EST reply actions  

Im drafting Reddick

in the 3rd not to start over London or Perry (unless he is just that good to start over Perry) but to take over for him in 2 years or so when London retires. Yes i could see London sticking around for another 2 years.

by squigums on Jan 23, 2012 8:33 PM EST up reply actions  

????So you have to trade everything away to move up?

Option 2: Trade It ALL

Now I am oppose to this idea because when I say trade it ALL I mean trade it ALL. We would be going backwards back to the Vinny and Snyder era where we trade everything away to acquire one player. If we trade up I say we go for gold, in this case Luck (but we all know Indy is not moving from this spot). In order to get the number two or three spot for RG3 we would have to give up a 1st rounder this year and next year plus a 2nd and a latter round pick. I think the kid is amazing and honestly I would love to have him but to give up so many future starters for one player is a big risk. We don’t even know if RG3 will be the future, nothing is set in stone. RG3 may be a bust and if we trade the farm to get him we could be in for a long depressing future trying to get out of the mess. Besides every year there is a player that is a must have and next year it will be Matt Barkley and Landry Jones.

2 firsts and a 2nd to move up for RG3 is far from giving it ALL up to get him?

by kevinjames73 on Jan 23, 2012 8:11 PM EST reply actions  

As Shannahan said

There are not 32 people on the face of the Earth that can be a franchise QB in the NFL. There are 2 players in this draft that have that potential way above the others. Period. Should really be all that should have to be said.

by kevinjames73 on Jan 23, 2012 8:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Sorry

You cant make a mock with different options for several picks. Thats not a mock draft. thats just listing players you want. If you want to do a mock then do one. Dont say do this or this or this.

by kevinjames73 on Jan 23, 2012 8:13 PM EST reply actions  

Thats still not a mock draft sorry.

A mock draft you are projecting who will be taken where Your not listing options. thhe other players he lists he shold have going to other teams.

by kevinjames73 on Jan 23, 2012 8:27 PM EST up reply actions  

It is a mock draft for a round or two

What he is saying (I think) is that in round two we take either Foles or Tannehill, whichever is available (if both, take Foles, if neither – unknown). It points up what seems to me to be an obvious fact – that any mock draft that goes beyond round two is an impossible task – there are just too many unknowns – literally hundreds of thousands in middle rounds, millions in later rounds. To do a mock you have to posit all the picks by all the teams – a literally impossible task – no more than wild guesses – especially since nobody knows what any of the teams are thinking.
I think mock drafts are usually just recommendatios and wish lists – and in that sense have a certain use.

by Donnio1234 on Jan 23, 2012 10:51 PM EST up reply actions  

lol Well then..

call this my new year wish list lol

by squigums on Jan 23, 2012 10:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Isn't that a mock draft?

I see it as more cushion for the pushin'

by iH8dallas on Jan 23, 2012 8:31 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Guess we're not supposed to post mocks now also?

Good job on the mock. Looks like you spent some time researching. I disagree on a few of your first choices but well done. One thing about RGIII being a BUST….our 1st round pick can also be a bust. And let me pose this question to you: We trade back with the intention of grabbing, lets say, Barkley next year. And next year we are in a position where we have a lower pick and have to give more to trade up? Do you then wait until 2013? This is what I am worried about if we wait while we are picking as high as #6 this year

by Bryan Black on Jan 23, 2012 10:31 PM EST up reply actions  

I understand

I like RG3 and if Shanny thinks that he is the guy for us then I wont complain if he trades up. I am just in trade up shock from years of bad drafts and trades. I like the idea of grabbing the best player for our system and making every pick count. But you are absolutely right if he is the guy go get him cuz we can never guarantee we will be in position next year.

by squigums on Jan 23, 2012 11:02 PM EST up reply actions  

I like your first 5 picks, but...

I was researching WR Micheal Floyd and found this,

Draft Scout Snapshot

after the Skins select him in the 1st round, maybe he and Donte Stallworth can celebrate by getting drunk and running over homeless people.

by Skinner99 on Jan 23, 2012 9:42 PM EST reply actions  

Or as I call it, a Tuesday morning.

I see it as more cushion for the pushin'

by iH8dallas on Jan 23, 2012 10:14 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

On Floyd - Wow, a college kid and frat boy that drinks - who'da thunk? Say it ain't so!

Now if there was a strong indication that he was an alcoholic – that would be different.
And that crack about Donte Stallworth was uncalled for. He’s a good guy. Did you ever hear the phrase “there, but for the grace of God, go I”?

by Donnio1234 on Jan 23, 2012 11:09 PM EST up reply actions  

3 times? In three years?

It’s like it was an annual event for him to get busted drinking. I understand people have fun at college, but come on. The kid needs to show some discretion, ecspecially going to a catholic school. I’m Just saying these are relevant factors. Shanny and Allen are going to do their due diligence so I’m cool with it if we get Floyd.

I was just using Stallworth for effect. (how do you know he’s a good guy?) and anyway people with dreadlocks frighten me.

btw first time I read a quote from the bible on here, maybe that’s why we’ve been losing so much lately. maybe the guy from the City Paper was right?! maybe Dan Snyder is the devil!

by Skinner99 on Jan 23, 2012 11:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Good job

But I think you waited too late to address the defense. And you sort of overdosed on OLineman.

by mr.snyderhireme on Jan 23, 2012 11:24 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

I thought it was fairly balanced draft

WR,QB,ILB, C, OL, CB, S, DE

I agree that 3 rd is a little late but Reddick is still developmental and could grow tremendously from learning from Fletcher, since Fletcher will be with us for another 2 years. the CB are late too but i thought depth at the OL is more important and a good C and a OT or someone like Quentin Saulsber who can play it all would be nice.

by squigums on Jan 23, 2012 11:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Weakest link
Jamal Brown showed promise toward the end of the season. I could see a replacement for Brown but not through the draft.

He sucked for most of the year. He got cut slack for his hip injury last year but had a whole off season to heal up. Didn’t work cause he still whiffed on too many blocks. Got to cut him or trade him.

by DudleyDoright on Jan 24, 2012 9:44 AM EST reply actions  

he really didnt have all offseason

you forget about the lockout and the fact that during he couldnt get proffessional help like he would this year. He is also under contract and wouldnt be a horrible thing to make him earn his job in the offseason practices against a rookie and smith. then if he is still horrible then cut him or trade him.

by squigums on Jan 24, 2012 11:56 AM EST up reply actions  

He had from the end of last season until the start of this one to heal up

The guy is paid millions. What’s the matter with spending some of his own money to insure he’s healthy going into the coming season if he’s unable to get assistance at Redskins Park? Don’t give me the lockout excuse. He’s a professional whose job it is to come into camp in the best possible shape.

by DudleyDoright on Jan 25, 2012 8:48 AM EST up reply actions  

I thought Reddick

was only a Jr. and I did not see him declaring. Did I miss it?

When I was a kid, my father told me, "Never hit anyone in anger, unless you're absolutely sure you can get away with it." -Russell Ziskey

by Redskin44 on Jan 24, 2012 10:04 AM EST reply actions  

you might be right

i cant find anything new anywhere that says he did or didnt. But last word in Dec was that he wasnt going too declare so maybe.

by squigums on Jan 24, 2012 12:05 PM EST up reply actions  

You were absolutly right

I fixed it and changed it my third round choice to Tank Carder. I think he could fit into the 3-4 system with a year or so behind Fletcher. He may bot be as good a prospect as Reddick but he is still a great pick.

by squigums on Jan 24, 2012 1:34 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree I like Reddick as well

I think we could get Carder in the 4th, but fully agree with you about getting a young ILB

When I was a kid, my father told me, "Never hit anyone in anger, unless you're absolutely sure you can get away with it." -Russell Ziskey

by Redskin44 on Jan 24, 2012 2:59 PM EST up reply actions  

nice mock

but the first pick is kinda of a reach at a position that isnt as much of a need as other spots. dont get me wrong ied love to draft a great wr. but we havent had any luck with them over the years. so we might be better off getting a proven wr in FA for now. and use that pick on a stud olineman or cb

by munson21502 on Jan 24, 2012 11:27 AM EST reply actions  

I LIKE THE MOCK EXCEPT

At QB , we need a good QB not a second rate QB . As the old saying goes you get what you pay for , get a second rate QB thats what you will get on the field . Look how many QBs we have had in 20 years its 23 . We should just for once go out and get your QB , everyone one else in the NFL go out and get their QB in the draft so why shouldnt we grab ours instead of saying oh we will get him next year ? cmon folks its been over 20 years we need a GOOD franchise QB to lead our team not a half rate QB that will do so so . We go out and snag good defensive guys for our defense so why not snag a good QB so whats wrong with getting a guy that will lead our team and maybe go to a super bowl . It will not be a wasted pick to bring in RG3 , no one will regret this move .

by washingtonwin on Jan 24, 2012 7:17 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email hogshaven@gmail.com

Managers

Superbowl_small Kevin Ewoldt

Riggins_small Ken Meringolo

Editors

Sb_small Parks Smith

Small Steve Shoup

Chalkboard_football-opt403x300o00s403x300_small UkRedskin

Washington_redskins_helmet_small Redskins News

Authors

Badshirt2__2__small fatpickle

Family_in_disney_small Tiller56

Rg3super_small HTTR4LIFE

Hh_small Ronnie Adkins