Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Veterans Share Their Favorite Sports Memories

Redskins Set to Draft 6th in 2012 NFL Draft

The Redskins will draft in the sixth spot in April's NFL Draft. The Skins came into the day with their best possible selection being fourth overall and eighth overall at the very worst. After losing 34-10 against the Eagles today, the worst spot the Skins could then finish was sixth. The Skins finished at sixth as a result of the Buccaneers getting trounced by the Falcons and Browns losing a tight contest to the Pittsburgh Steelers.

The Redskins will likely be in the market for a QB in the first round, but will need to avoid trades and, perhaps, the Cleveland Browns to obtain a top flight quarterback.

1. Indianapolis Colts (1-15)
2. St. Louis Rams (2-14)
3. Minnesota Vikings (3-13)
4. Cleveland Browns (4-12)
5. Tampa Bay Buccaneers (4-12)
6. Washington Redskins (5-11)

On Tuesday I will release my full 2012 First Round Mock Draft. Let the discussion begin!

Comment 266 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

glad this season is over

can not wait for FA and the draft!!! really hope we get lucky and get a qb that will lead us to the playoffs

by munson21502 on Jan 1, 2012 7:32 PM EST reply actions  

gotta say this free agency period is real intriguing to me

a lot will unfold i think…we’ve got cap space and holes to fill

As for me, all I know is that I know nothing.
*Socrates*

by atark001 on Jan 1, 2012 7:34 PM EST up reply actions  

How many picks do the skins have?

How many total picks do we have and what rounds?

"I'm tired of hearing about money, money, money, money, money. I just want to play the game, drink Pepsi, wear Reebok. " - Shaq

by williamhudsonlink on Jan 1, 2012 8:09 PM EST up reply actions  

thanks

"I'm tired of hearing about money, money, money, money, money. I just want to play the game, drink Pepsi, wear Reebok. " - Shaq

by williamhudsonlink on Jan 1, 2012 8:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Not sure yet, depends on comp picks and what not. I believe right now we have 9 picks... maybe?

Two fourths (Campbell trade)
Two sixths (McNabb Trade)

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 1, 2012 8:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Steve was saying due to his injury we may not have to give up anything. Don't quote me though.

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 1, 2012 8:22 PM EST up reply actions  

i've yet to see what those conditions are so it is possible we lose either the 6th or 7th

but unless the condition was just making the team, I’m guessing they weren’t met. Usually it will be based on yards or % of snaps, so i’m doubting we give anything up.

Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Jan 1, 2012 9:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Parks I thought that we have an extra 5th for Fat Albert. Was that a contingent of pick?

by WestCoastHokie on Jan 1, 2012 8:46 PM EST up reply actions  

It was for 2013 though

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 1, 2012 8:54 PM EST up reply actions  

something to look forward to.

Regardless it is still the most positive contribution that he ever made.

Another question, do you know if the second 6th that we got for McNabb was contingent?

by WestCoastHokie on Jan 1, 2012 9:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Yea it was, I don't know what it was for though

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 1, 2012 9:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Probably a safe bet that whatever the conditions were they not met.

Any chance that wepickup any compensatory picks? I am the only big FA that I remember that we lost was Rogers but I am not sure how comp picks are awarded.

by WestCoastHokie on Jan 1, 2012 9:07 PM EST up reply actions  

It would be based on this year, I wouldn't expect much

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 1, 2012 9:15 PM EST up reply actions  

really? he made the pro bowl. how much worse can it get than to lose a free agent who goes on to make the pro bowl for another team?

by les boulez bomber on Jan 2, 2012 6:13 AM EST up reply actions  

Its based on amount lost to gained. One player making the pro bowl means nothing

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 2, 2012 10:03 AM EST up reply actions  

so it begins

when the brown’s hail mary went limp, i half expected the “quickening” (highlander style) to occur somewhere at redskins part

but for real though, do you think the browns having a higher draft pick will make a trade up (if desired) cheaper for us, because they may be more apt to stand put, or not?

As for me, all I know is that I know nothing.
*Socrates*

by atark001 on Jan 1, 2012 7:32 PM EST reply actions  

I don't think the Browns will go QB, but they could be a prime trade candidate

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 1, 2012 7:36 PM EST up reply actions  

to stay in-line with Redskins tradition

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 1, 2012 7:44 PM EST up reply actions  

well there was talks of us waiting till next year to get a qb

so it would be better to act now instead of going6-10 to 8-8 then have to give up even more in the next draft. maybe browns would take 2 2nds and a 3 for him ?

by munson21502 on Jan 1, 2012 7:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Talks? Where?

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 1, 2012 7:55 PM EST up reply actions  

to grab a better franchise QB prospect than would be available to us because you dont expect him to last the next two picks

by les boulez bomber on Jan 2, 2012 6:22 AM EST up reply actions  

yes but again i ask

why would you entertain that trade idea?? It is awful

Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Jan 2, 2012 10:41 AM EST up reply actions  

i get the feeling from shanahan's pressers

that he is not inclined to trade up…he keeps talking about “how we need a good draft” this year…which makes me think we’ll stand pat…so if no QB falls to us at 6th i think we’re tacking WR or O line

As for me, all I know is that I know nothing.
*Socrates*

by atark001 on Jan 1, 2012 7:42 PM EST up reply actions  

I feel the same way, he's being using the word "depthy" A LOT lately.

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 1, 2012 7:43 PM EST up reply actions  

exactly

which i honestly think is the right thing for the team, although probably unpopular in the short term

As for me, all I know is that I know nothing.
*Socrates*

by atark001 on Jan 1, 2012 7:44 PM EST up reply actions  

yep

I could see him trading down again

When I was a kid, my father told me, "Never hit anyone in anger, unless you're absolutely sure you can get away with it." -Russell Ziskey

by Redskin44 on Jan 1, 2012 8:11 PM EST up reply actions  

I think you are hearing us posture. It is too early to know if we would the cost to move up will be. But IND threw out three first rounders is what it will take- which is not surprising since it is their job to get as much as possible. But most people outside IND commenting on the matter are dismissing it as the too high- which is also not surprising.

Peyton is due $28 million before the draft which makes it very expensive to keep him and pry a top 2 QB prospect away from IND.

by les boulez bomber on Jan 2, 2012 6:26 AM EST up reply actions  

why do you feel so?

i think it is LIKELY they go QB if the top two are available. He did not win one division game in two season- that’s a big deal and looks even worse when every division team had a QB that led them to the playoffs this year. After two years as a starter, they still won only 5 games. And perhaps worse of all, he nearly got his coaches fired following the concussion incident and has not even seen the practice field since.

If they dont trade up, and they are perfectly positioned to do so with three top 36 picks in this draft (#4, mid twenties, and 36), I would expect them to nab Tannehill with their second 1st rounder.

by les boulez bomber on Jan 2, 2012 6:20 AM EST up reply actions  

are we picking 7TH

where is jacksonville,shouldnt they be ahead of us?

by the fantasy king on Jan 1, 2012 7:33 PM EST reply actions  

Why would they picking ahead of us? We have the easier SOS.

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 1, 2012 7:36 PM EST up reply actions  

ooops

i thought jacksonville only had 4 wins,i satand corrected!

by the fantasy king on Jan 1, 2012 7:44 PM EST up reply actions  

I think

that Matt Flynn just made himself millions in a game that didn’t matter today. I could see a QB-hungry team signing him, taking them out of the race in the draft for Robert Griffin III. I could see Cleveland or Seattle signing him for way more than he’s worth, ignoring that he played a poor Lions secondary, and has more weapons than anyone else in the NFL. Mark my words, Matt Flynn will be overpaid, and it better not be by the Washington Redskins.

I changed my last name to Shanahan, and now I'm the new OL Coach.

by ripST on Jan 1, 2012 7:35 PM EST reply actions  

pack sat 5 started on offense and 2 on D

lions was fighting for the 5th seed.. now they have to play the saints with the lose…. ouch!

by munson21502 on Jan 1, 2012 7:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Pro Bowler!

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 1, 2012 7:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Flynn sure did have a hell of a day today. And perhaps the value of three years of work under Aaron Rodgers outweighs the risk of signing a guy with two career starts. Give him some cash, free up that pick, we could all have a happy 2012.

by Danny Burrito on Jan 1, 2012 8:18 PM EST up reply actions  

my only worry about flynn is the sample size

is he a matt schaub type or a rob johnson…i’ll leave that to the evaluators to figure out though

As for me, all I know is that I know nothing.
*Socrates*

by atark001 on Jan 1, 2012 8:21 PM EST up reply actions  

there is no guarantee

but next years QB draft class could be deeper than this year’s pending on who comes out. If Flynn flops we can make a move for a QB next year

When I was a kid, my father told me, "Never hit anyone in anger, unless you're absolutely sure you can get away with it." -Russell Ziskey

by Redskin44 on Jan 1, 2012 8:25 PM EST up reply actions  

i was thinking that as well

next year’s draft sound deep at QB if they all come out…i think we might be best served to sure up our o-line and WR positions (along with depth at other positions)

As for me, all I know is that I know nothing.
*Socrates*

by atark001 on Jan 1, 2012 8:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Every year is supposed to be the deepest QB class.

I see it as more cushion for the pushin'

by iH8dallas on Jan 1, 2012 9:04 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

no, not true

When I was a kid, my father told me, "Never hit anyone in anger, unless you're absolutely sure you can get away with it." -Russell Ziskey

by Redskin44 on Jan 1, 2012 9:15 PM EST up reply actions  

or Matt Cassel...

parlaying playing on a great team into a huge contract, and then doing Just O.K. for the new team.

by jgibbsfan1 on Jan 1, 2012 9:45 PM EST up reply actions  

he did go to the Pro Bowl

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 1, 2012 9:46 PM EST up reply actions  

+ 1

I said the same thing about Kevin kolb

by mr.snyderhireme on Jan 1, 2012 10:52 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

i agree but don't rec it....

the “dark days” portion scares the shit out of me

by TheUberest on Jan 1, 2012 9:14 PM EST up reply actions  

huh? why would history be against bringing in a former backup QB?

Yes there are failures, but quite a few successes as well.

Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Jan 1, 2012 9:24 PM EST up reply actions  

I think we'll trade up if necessary to get Luck or RG3

It was really too bad Cleveland didn’t beat Pitt. Is Cleveland likely to stick with McCoy?

by Donnio1234 on Jan 1, 2012 9:40 PM EST up reply actions  

no he is a backup for them going forward minus any transitional starts he gets

by les boulez bomber on Jan 2, 2012 6:31 AM EST up reply actions  

Skins have too many holes

Too many holes to be trading up for one man. I don’t care if it is a QB.

It better be one sweet deal in order for me to agree with that one. I don’t want to sacrifice two good players in order to get one. Maybe it’s just me.. but that’s how I feel.

"I'm tired of hearing about money, money, money, money, money. I just want to play the game, drink Pepsi, wear Reebok. " - Shaq

by williamhudsonlink on Jan 2, 2012 10:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Because all the talking heads say he will ??

I think that’s a great question & IMHO the odds would be less than 50/50 that he is gone by the time that we draft

by ENsDad27 on Jan 1, 2012 10:25 PM EST up reply actions  

There were reports that started on draft day saying rival executives would be shocked if the Skins didn't trade up to draft Gabbart.

We saw how wrong that rumor was, as well as many other rumors concerning the draft.

Believe nothing, especially so far away from the draft. When it comes to Shanny, don’t believe anything, ever.

Skins rule

by Horcasitas4 on Jan 1, 2012 10:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Here is just an example
Last week John McClain of the Houston Chronicle reported that the Redskins were “trying like crazy” to move up in the draft in order to select one of the top quarterbacks available. That made some sense because the Redskins aren’t expected to keep QB Donovan McNabb next season.

But then this week Pete Prisco of CBSSports.com reports that the Redskins are actually looking to trade back in the draft. Prisco says Washington is eyeing QB Christian Ponder or QB Andy Dalton.

Skins rule

by Horcasitas4 on Jan 1, 2012 10:51 PM EST up reply actions  

If that's true......

Then they sure had the right 2 qbs in mind

by mr.snyderhireme on Jan 1, 2012 10:56 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Which would bode well for us this year.

Shanny seems to have a real knack for RBs… and he hasn’t been bad with his drafting of QBs, either (Cutler, for example, is an decent enough QB, even if he’s dumb as Terry Bradshawa rock). If Shanny identified the right guys last year, and he does it again, we can easily enough go with one of the other options.

No Danny, Nooooooo - Tom Landry, 1982., and Washington Redskins fans, 1999-

by BillWard on Jan 1, 2012 11:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Cutler is a great QB.

Just look at the Bears with him and without him. I’d love for him to be our QB; and he did go to Vanderbilt, so he’s not dumb.

Skins rule

by Horcasitas4 on Jan 2, 2012 1:33 AM EST up reply actions  

I think they make those calls and have those discussions as part of the due dilligence process. expect the same this year. at least i hope they do.

by les boulez bomber on Jan 2, 2012 6:33 AM EST up reply actions  

Baseball reporter from the Houston paper, awesome source

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 2, 2012 10:06 AM EST up reply actions  

huh? John McClain is the Texans beat writer and a great NFL insider

my guess is it is due to his dedication around the holidays

Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Jan 2, 2012 10:53 AM EST up reply actions  

It was just one example.

Shefter and Mort are also unreliable, as are most if not all sources. Heck, even if it comes from the GM’s mouth, it shouldn’t be trusted.

Skins rule

by Horcasitas4 on Jan 2, 2012 3:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Well the good news is, QB is far from the Brown's biggest need.

Question is though, if RG3 is on the board when they pick, do they pass up? I think they’d go like last year and trade down. If that is the case, then its a question of who is willing to jump above the skins for RG3.

With the play of Matt Moore in Miami, do they really need to trade away picks to jump up for RG3?
The Jags wont give up on Gabbert after 1 year, and won’t trade up for a QB 2 years in a row.
Bills gave Fitzpatrick an extension, hard to see them trading up.
Chiefs? They have Orton and Cassel. Possible that they trade up, but they may just go with one of those guys.
Cards can’t afford to give up on Koln after one year (or they’ll stick with Skelton)
Seahawks maybe. Would take them a lot to move up though, And you have to admire what Jackson was able to do through injury there.

Am I missing anyone?

by UkRedskin on Jan 1, 2012 7:46 PM EST reply actions  

interesting

i’ve been thinking lately that all this talk of trading up might just be for not…something tells me that teams may sit pat…unlike last year, where the draft came before free agency and the outlook of the league was shadowed by the CBA dilemma, i’m not so sure last years reaching for QBs is an indicator of the future or just an aberration?

As for me, all I know is that I know nothing.
*Socrates*

by atark001 on Jan 1, 2012 7:49 PM EST up reply actions  

yes

after the lose tonite i think jerry jones makes a big move and trades up for rg3. tony has had a good team and alot pick them to make deep playoff runs each year.and their star players aint getting any younger well their rookie wr and rb look scarey.

by munson21502 on Jan 1, 2012 7:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Omg

I was thinking the cowboys too….. Or the eagles…. They have the picks to offer if they wanted to move up

by mr.snyderhireme on Jan 1, 2012 11:00 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

There is an out clause in the contract before next season
Bills gave Fitzpatrick an extension, hard to see them trading up.

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 1, 2012 7:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh, I didn't know about that.

That might make things interesting. They were high on Newton last year according to reports.

On a separate note, Tony Dungy just said that don’t presume Colts will take Luck, but RG3. Interesting thing is that would make more sense if they kept Manning. You could argue RG3 would benefit from a year or two under Manning and learning a pro-style offense/taking snaps from under center etc.

by UkRedskin on Jan 1, 2012 8:02 PM EST up reply actions  

If that is thats case

then the colts FO is terrible.

When I was a kid, my father told me, "Never hit anyone in anger, unless you're absolutely sure you can get away with it." -Russell Ziskey

by Redskin44 on Jan 1, 2012 8:15 PM EST up reply actions  

do you think he played poor enough to be dropped?

i dont. their biggest problems are all on defense

by les boulez bomber on Jan 2, 2012 6:36 AM EST up reply actions  

rg3 will be a big jersey seller next year

i cant see the browns passing on him. im even thinking he wont even make it to the browns. not sure how he could… since he seems to be a better qb verision of vick. for us im leaning towards get flynn and draft a later round qb try to trade back or just get the best player of postion of need with the 6th pick.

by munson21502 on Jan 1, 2012 8:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Yea people will be running to get doo doo brown colored RG3 jerseys

Do you really think Mike Holmgren is going to make a decision based on jersey sales? I’ve yet to see anyone walking around in a Cam Newton jersey

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 1, 2012 8:07 PM EST up reply actions  

You aren't looking hard enough...

Richmond and Farmville are not exactly NFL hotbeds…


Top Selling Jersey List, NFLShop.com, April 1-Sept. 30, 2011
1. Aaron Rodgers, Packers
2. Tom Brady, Patriots
3. Mike Vick, Eagles
4. Troy Polamalu, Steelers
5. Clay Matthews, Packers
6. Drew Brees, Saints
7. Tony Romo, Cowboys
8. Miles Austin, Cowboys
9. DeSean Jackson, Eagles
10. Jason Witten, Cowboys
11. Mark Sanchez, Jets
12. Dez Bryant, Cowboys
13. Peyton Manning, Colts
14. Brian Urlacher, Bears
15. Eli Manning, Giants
16. Cam Newton, Panthers
http://www.cnbc.com/id/44785637/Packers_Aaron_Rodgers_Continues_To_Lead_NFL_Jersey_Sales_Tebow_Falls

But no, I don’t think Holmgren is planning on drafting by sales potential…

by DavidDunn on Jan 1, 2012 11:23 PM EST up reply actions  

The concentration of those sales must be insane.

Of those, I’ve only ever seen Vick, Austin and Brady. I guess it doesn’t matter where it sells, as long as it sells.

Skins rule

by Horcasitas4 on Jan 2, 2012 1:35 AM EST up reply actions  

Really?

I see Polamalu jerseys everywhere.

"I'm tired of hearing about money, money, money, money, money. I just want to play the game, drink Pepsi, wear Reebok. " - Shaq

by williamhudsonlink on Jan 2, 2012 10:52 AM EST up reply actions  

Nope.

I assume if I lived in D.C. or northern Maryland I would see many of those jerseys, though.

Skins rule

by Horcasitas4 on Jan 2, 2012 3:25 PM EST up reply actions  

he had barely played by sep 30. he will be higher than 16 next year

by les boulez bomber on Jan 2, 2012 6:38 AM EST up reply actions  

Would make sense, especially with the projected crop next year

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 1, 2012 8:23 PM EST up reply actions  

time for you to make a choice, Parks.

Is next year a very deep draft class, or isn’t it? I’ve seen you suggest both, depending on what you were arguing at the time. Pick one.

by TheDeepBall on Jan 1, 2012 10:29 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

No it's not time for me to make a choice.

I don’t know who the hell is going to be in next year’s class. This year’s class was deep a couple weeks ago, now…not so much. There is not telling who will and won’t commit next year. So I’m not going to sit here and spew about how awesome Aaron Murray is.

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 2, 2012 10:09 AM EST up reply actions  

the concussion killed his career in CLE

by les boulez bomber on Jan 2, 2012 6:39 AM EST up reply actions  

no team can assume they'll have a certain pick the following season

or that whenever they do decide to address qb, they’ll have several quality choices available. If they like Griffin and he’s there they’d take him imo

by DCrez on Jan 1, 2012 8:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Browns have 2 1st rd picks they can address their needs with other picks

would you keep McCoy and pass on an opportunity for Griffin?

When I was a kid, my father told me, "Never hit anyone in anger, unless you're absolutely sure you can get away with it." -Russell Ziskey

by Redskin44 on Jan 1, 2012 8:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Sure, if you're Mike Holmgren

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 1, 2012 8:28 PM EST up reply actions  

nope

When I was a kid, my father told me, "Never hit anyone in anger, unless you're absolutely sure you can get away with it." -Russell Ziskey

by Redskin44 on Jan 1, 2012 8:35 PM EST up reply actions  

good discussion

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 1, 2012 8:37 PM EST up reply actions  

always is with you

When I was a kid, my father told me, "Never hit anyone in anger, unless you're absolutely sure you can get away with it." -Russell Ziskey

by Redskin44 on Jan 1, 2012 9:16 PM EST up reply actions  

see to me having that extra 2nd makes it more likely that Cleveland goes QB

b/c they have that other pick to grab another big need at G/RB/WR/OLB

Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Jan 1, 2012 9:26 PM EST up reply actions  

agreed

When I was a kid, my father told me, "Never hit anyone in anger, unless you're absolutely sure you can get away with it." -Russell Ziskey

by Redskin44 on Jan 1, 2012 9:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Miami will certainly try to move up....

Moore is not the answer in their opinion…the question is how much are they willing to pay

by DavidDunn on Jan 1, 2012 11:16 PM EST up reply actions  

won't matter

they already decided to move away from Moore….at least that is what they were leaking..

by DavidDunn on Jan 2, 2012 11:55 AM EST up reply actions  

I can't even talk about this anymore.

Happy New Year everyone. Let’s hope that 2012 is better than 2011 for the Skins.

Whomever the QB is, I hope they win us a title. Griffin, Flynn, (insert name)…

Let’s wait until FA, then the draft, then preseason then games. HTTR!

I see it as more cushion for the pushin'

by iH8dallas on Jan 1, 2012 7:54 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

happy new years to you as well

this loss blew too…was oh to similar to the jets game for my liking

i agree with you that we have to wait for free agency to unfold (and then each successive phase), but speculating is fun, just ask the 49ers (the gold miners not the football team)

As for me, all I know is that I know nothing.
*Socrates*

by atark001 on Jan 1, 2012 8:10 PM EST up reply actions  

We are the team in best position for RG3

However, we gotta watch for the trade ups. I’m happy with our position though. Gives us a real shot.

by BigOLinemen on Jan 1, 2012 8:05 PM EST reply actions  

Forget getting RG3, he won't be there. Someone will make a trade to get in top 5.

Rams, Vikings, Tampa all will put the pick up for bid.

Alec: Chris, did you really buy a $1400 toilet?
Chris: Yeah, it's great. It's Japanese and has those little warm water jets that clean the undercarriage.
Eric: Chris, it's a toilet, you shit in it.

by pfhokie on Jan 1, 2012 8:10 PM EST up reply actions  

+1

When I was a kid, my father told me, "Never hit anyone in anger, unless you're absolutely sure you can get away with it." -Russell Ziskey

by Redskin44 on Jan 1, 2012 8:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Yea...

The Rams will not let the USC OT get away… Just like, the Vikings will not let the best cover corner get away. All eyes will be on Browns & hope they pick a RB, the Bucs pick a CB or WR(even if they need help everywhere), Also, hope M.F go to Miami or Seattle considering they have a better supporting cast than another QB needing teams, unless he goes for the money.

by LA11 on Jan 1, 2012 8:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Im hoping rg3 falls to us

not so we can draft him but so we can leverage him for a trade down. An offer of picks for our pick. Work the magic mike.

by davetrembling on Jan 1, 2012 8:10 PM EST reply actions  

That's dumb

If RG 3 is as good as promoted…. Then you draft him, all the picks we could get for him won’t even come close to the same value of a star qb…. You gotta know when too buy and when to sell kiddo

by mr.snyderhireme on Jan 1, 2012 11:09 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Dumb?

thats the thing kiddo. you can’t fall for the hype. And we have MULTIPLE needs. Shall we be a colts clone if this said star happens to get injured. Id rather solidify my entire team.

by davetrembling on Jan 2, 2012 1:35 AM EST up reply actions  

I think we might even get a little more than that

When I was a kid, my father told me, "Never hit anyone in anger, unless you're absolutely sure you can get away with it." -Russell Ziskey

by Redskin44 on Jan 2, 2012 12:15 AM EST up reply actions  

we aint that lucky....

first of all there isnt too many guys that will be left by the time we pick that will be worth that type of deal. and the falcons only did it because they thought it would push them over the top. they figured that their first this year would be a late 1st round pick. so if we do get a trade offer that is the kinda team that will offer us. maybe blackmon falls to us and the ravens want that WR to help them get over the hump? all i know is i hate this waiting game us fans are stuck in lol

by munson21502 on Jan 2, 2012 2:12 AM EST up reply actions  

and he has been a home run super star the past four or so games- worth every penny. matt bryant needs to improve more now

by les boulez bomber on Jan 2, 2012 6:46 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't foresee any situation in which Robert Griffin falls into our laps.

Maybe, MAYBE bring in Flynn… still undecided on that front, and draft a second round QB. Worst case scenario, Flynn sucks. Yeah, that’s the worst case scenario.

Contrary to popular belief, I am not Jewish.

by DCO'sfan on Jan 1, 2012 8:43 PM EST reply actions  

Agree

If the Browns don’t take him, I think we will see miami, hawks, or chiefs make a move to trade up

When I was a kid, my father told me, "Never hit anyone in anger, unless you're absolutely sure you can get away with it." -Russell Ziskey

by Redskin44 on Jan 1, 2012 9:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Also

Reports just came that Griffin has not actually made his decision about the draft. Things are still up in the air.

Contrary to popular belief, I am not Jewish.

by DCO'sfan on Jan 1, 2012 8:45 PM EST reply actions  

Baylor assistant AD said that this morning

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 1, 2012 8:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, and so did Griffin himself

Decision should come by January 10th.

Contrary to popular belief, I am not Jewish.

by DCO'sfan on Jan 1, 2012 9:24 PM EST up reply actions  

he is very likely to come out

he won the heisman
had a great game that locks top ten, probably top 5
baylor is not playing for anything next year

by les boulez bomber on Jan 2, 2012 6:48 AM EST up reply actions  

if he stays its because of the olympics and not football related

by les boulez bomber on Jan 2, 2012 6:48 AM EST up reply actions  

His dad already said it's not a hard decision for him to come out

They are just waiting to make it official until they meet with the 5 agents they are talking to. He said sometime next week they will make that decision and then sit down with the Baylor coaches and administration to make it official. He’s going to the NFL. It’s a lock.

by tmarine17 on Jan 2, 2012 10:21 AM EST up reply actions  

I cannot believe

Anyone is even thinking about signing a QB like Flynn as the answer? Two starts in a 4 year NFL career? Have we learned nothing?

by elfenwish on Jan 1, 2012 8:53 PM EST reply actions  

seriously

but teams make that same mistake time and time again

by DCrez on Jan 1, 2012 8:54 PM EST up reply actions  

I can't believe we went in with Rex.

I also can’t believe I was dumb enough to think Beck could play.

At least Flynn looked good in his action.

I see it as more cushion for the pushin'

by iH8dallas on Jan 1, 2012 8:57 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

So did Beck in limited preseason action too, according to you. He was AWESOME!
At least Flynn looked good in his action.

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 1, 2012 9:02 PM EST up reply actions  

And in the same post I said it was dumb of me.

Are you just drinking watermelon flavored vodka and trolling my comments tonight?

I see it as more cushion for the pushin'

by iH8dallas on Jan 1, 2012 9:11 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

yep

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 1, 2012 9:16 PM EST up reply actions  

enjoy the offseason

ok, the giants suck.
by BigBlueIntervention on Oct 4th

Namdey Asomgua sucks.We should have signed Antoneo Cromote so he could have taught his brother, cousin, son or however they are related how to play in teh slotz.I also h8 his nice guy act. I herd he blows through teh hoes faster than runningbacks thru our dfense.
by Snax on Oct 5, 2011 11:02 AM PDT

Shady is the best RB in the NFL not AP
he is the real deal, that dude scares me to death more than anyone on that team besides Vick with time to throw the ball
Bruce Carter+Sean Lee=BRUCE LEE!!!!
by ChiaCrack on Nov 5, 2011 7:50 AM PDT

by EagleEyes on Jan 2, 2012 12:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Limited starts doesn’t always parlay to failure. See Matt Schaub. Two career starts before signing with Houston as a starter, and for the most part has been solid there.

by Danny Burrito on Jan 1, 2012 9:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Schaub was 10,000 times better prospect coming out of college than Flynn

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 1, 2012 9:20 PM EST up reply actions  

That means nothing...

Considering Beck was a better prospect also.

by LA11 on Jan 1, 2012 9:54 PM EST up reply actions  

and Schuab was a better prospect than Brady

When I was a kid, my father told me, "Never hit anyone in anger, unless you're absolutely sure you can get away with it." -Russell Ziskey

by Redskin44 on Jan 2, 2012 12:15 AM EST up reply actions  

what's up with the Darrell Green stuff on twitter?

Sounds like he wants to coach in some capacity for the Skins.

I see it as more cushion for the pushin'

by iH8dallas on Jan 1, 2012 8:54 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

in his 50's? impressive...

We DO need help in the secondary… and he IS a Hall of Fame CB…

by 1x1an on Jan 1, 2012 9:17 PM EST up reply actions  

i beat darrel green in a race after i smoked like 100 other kids at a fan day

it was the first year norv turner was our coach i think. i think he let me beat him but the other race was funny. out of 100 young kids 14 to 17 90 of them just stopped as i took off. the others were 20 yards back when i crossed the line.and my shoe fell off when i took off lol.

by munson21502 on Jan 1, 2012 9:33 PM EST up reply actions  

I bet he didn't let you win

I guess i’ll be the first to tell you you run in the 4.3 forty range. You should do something with that.

I want to get high, so high. I want to get high, so high. Sleepy, Silverback, and I are going to roll a blunt if anyone wants to join us.

by 64ShagginWagon on Jan 1, 2012 10:46 PM EST up reply actions  

well its a little late for that. that was when i was 16

more then 15 years ago lol.i wasted a god given gift thats for sure.all i ever did was win a few bets from racing dogs, scooters and people on bikes… and ran down some boys kite on a windy night on the beach after it blew out of his hands.

by munson21502 on Jan 2, 2012 2:33 AM EST up reply actions  

ouch! yeah that was fast

by les boulez bomber on Jan 2, 2012 6:53 AM EST up reply actions  

Question of the day: What makes Flynn better than Tannehill, Cousins, Weeden, Foles, Moore, etc.?

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 1, 2012 9:24 PM EST reply actions  

Nothing

Absolutely nothing. But he doesn’t cost draft picks. That’s the only reason I would consider signing him over those guys.

Contrary to popular belief, I am not Jewish.

by DCO'sfan on Jan 1, 2012 9:25 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

But he does cost considerably more money than a draft pick

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 1, 2012 9:26 PM EST up reply actions  

That's true

And that’s my issue. I don’t think there is a win-win here. But I don’t want to give up the farm for RGIII when I could have a capable—which in my opinion, is all we can say about Matt Flynn at this point—QB and have a less developed prospect learn from him.

Contrary to popular belief, I am not Jewish.

by DCO'sfan on Jan 1, 2012 9:30 PM EST up reply actions  

why would we give up the farm?

if we draft him, we draft him….no need to trade up for em’ tho IMO

by TheUberest on Jan 1, 2012 9:32 PM EST up reply actions  

actually i just addressed this in the Flynn blog

but there isn’t as big of a difference. A QB like Griffin (assuming the 5th year gets picked up) will make over $32 million guaranteed. Flynn won’t get more than $22-25 million guaranteed (and that would be over 6 or 7 years). Yes there is other money involved, but if he doesn’t work out it won’t be too hard to get out of.

Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Jan 1, 2012 9:32 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Man this is fun, 4 months of this bickering haha

Can’t wait until we get to people’s post on how we need DJax and VJax

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 1, 2012 9:36 PM EST up reply actions  

cosign

and unfortunately that’s bound to happen….

by TheUberest on Jan 1, 2012 9:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Suprised it hasn't yet.

You’ll see waves
1) QB talk
2) Blame for this season
1) Shanny
2) little Shanny
3) Snyder
4) Danny Smith
3) Crazy FA talk
4) Reasonable draft talk

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 1, 2012 9:42 PM EST up reply actions  

We need to fire the owner!

I mean, COME ON! He can’t cover, he can’t get us a Superbowl, he’s charging outrageous prices for a subpar experience.

FIRE DANNY BOY!

(Did that just blow forward through the offseason so we can get to the reasonable draft talk?)

No Danny, Nooooooo - Tom Landry, 1982., and Washington Redskins fans, 1999-

by BillWard on Jan 1, 2012 11:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, months and months of guessing, bickering

rating QBs, mock drafts, etc. And nobody will know what Shanahan is thinking, and Shanahan will totally ignore anything written on HH. But a really fun offseason – more fun than these last two seasons have been.

by Donnio1234 on Jan 1, 2012 11:09 PM EST up reply actions  

I dont think Flynn vs RG3 is the right comparison. RG3 wins that one hands down. I think you consider signing Flynn vs one of the second or lower tier prospects

by les boulez bomber on Jan 2, 2012 6:57 AM EST up reply actions  

the pick is an asset as well

money is money but you can use the pick for a player of another position rather than investing the money and losing the pick.

by davetrembling on Jan 2, 2012 1:07 AM EST up reply actions  

I think my dream situation would be to sign Flynn and draft Tannehill or someone like that

I think I’d even prefer that to RG3

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 1, 2012 9:27 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

That would be my ideal scenario as well.

I think in the end Flynn will be nothing more than a stopgap. But also, who’s saying that won’t happen? It very well might.

Contrary to popular belief, I am not Jewish.

by DCO'sfan on Jan 1, 2012 9:28 PM EST up reply actions  

the best part of this scenario is

the ability to trade back and acquire more picks cause we all know we need as many picks as possible

by J.D.45 on Jan 1, 2012 9:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Actually, I think we need a top QB more than we need a bunch of picks

There have been so many pleasant surprises that we are in pretty good shape in previous areas of need, like O-line, RB, WR, D-line, LB, etc. We desperately need a top QB, but beyond that they may just want to improve at safety (because of Landry’s health), O-line, WR, maybe ILB. It seems to me that Shanahan should do whatever it takes to get Luck or RG3 (unless he actually likes one of the others, like Jones, Tannehill, Foles, or Weeden just as much).

by Donnio1234 on Jan 1, 2012 11:34 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

really?

Flynn and Tannehill over RG3? why? (just curious honestly)

by TheUberest on Jan 1, 2012 9:28 PM EST up reply actions  

I think RG3 is a fine player, and can be a great pro. However, I think his value is over-inflated and isn't a great fit here.

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 1, 2012 9:32 PM EST up reply actions  

i don't know about the over-inflated value part but...

i do think that his chances of succeeding in DC are slim if he were to be drafted here, but i don’t think it’s because of a lack of skill, i think shannahan wont tailor the system to fit the kid.

it’s kind of sad because wherever he goes that’s exactly what he’ll need to be successful in the NFL…a system suited for his skill-set.

by TheUberest on Jan 1, 2012 9:36 PM EST up reply actions  

I completely agree with you and that's what I've been arguing all along.
but i don’t think it’s because of a lack of skill, i think shannahan wont tailor the system to fit the kid.

If RG3 is put in a situation similar to Newton, where they cater the whole offense to him then he’ll succeed. If not, then I think he’ll flounder.

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 1, 2012 9:37 PM EST up reply actions  

What does Rex do that Griffin or any other qb can't?

Seems to me there is disconnect between fans notion that we run some kind of highly complex system that is too much for a rookie and the fact that every week rex is out there throwing 2 picks and just generally chucking the ball wherever he wants and that seems to be our system. Most of this offense is throw to a spot on your first read, it’s not like Rex is getting to his 4th progression to make plays.

by DCrez on Jan 1, 2012 10:06 PM EST up reply actions  

This drives me crazy.

The Shanny system is not brain surgery. You throw a football to an open player on your team (not Rex’s strength), it’s not hard.

He’s the worst starting QB in the NFL, except for maybe Gabbert. Flynn or Griffin would make an immediate positive impact.

I see it as more cushion for the pushin'

by iH8dallas on Jan 1, 2012 10:17 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Exactly

That system stuff is starting to get on my nerves. When I hear that stuff, I envision Rex Grossman pulling Shanny’s play book outta the desk drawer like King Arthur pulling Excalibur outta the rock.

Where do they teach you to talk like this? In some Panama City "Sailor wanna hump-hump" bar, or is it getaway day and your last shot at his whiskey? Sell crazy someplace else, we're all stocked up here.

by CJHutch on Jan 1, 2012 10:43 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

And didn't Kyle himself say they would tailor to the talent of the players?

Just because they have been fairly rigid SO FAR doesn’t mean that they won’t tailor to talent as they can. The issue is getting guys that can work in a close variant of the system they want to run, and getting folks to understand what they need to do.

Then, with the guys that are even close, you adapt to their strengths, and offset for their weaknesses. It’s called COACHING.

We just didn’t have the QB that was worth adapting the offense to.

No Danny, Nooooooo - Tom Landry, 1982., and Washington Redskins fans, 1999-

by BillWard on Jan 1, 2012 11:55 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

that wont change no matter who the qb is

i just see a huge disconnect between the notion Shanny is running a complex system vs what we actually see on Sunday. I’d swear half the plays are zone reads, and like Dunn said the offense is predicated on the Shanny run game- it’s not some hyper-complex passing attack that only Matt Barkley or Andrew Luck could possibly understand as rookies

by DCrez on Jan 2, 2012 1:03 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree it isn't too complex but there is a huge jump in general from college to the NFL, which is why so few rookie QB's can succeed

a lot of the issues are just reading defenses, knowing when to get rid of the ball etc.

Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Jan 2, 2012 1:34 AM EST up reply actions  

thats because when they justified the mcnabb trade they said we need an experienced proven vet to handle the system and now that we are clearly in the grab a qb mode they are saying you dont have to be experienced in the system to succeed in the first year

by les boulez bomber on Jan 2, 2012 7:01 AM EST up reply actions  

That's what I was trying to do compare RG3 to Rex, thanks for that

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 2, 2012 10:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Why isn't he a good fit here?

Isn’t this offense predicated on play action and movement out of the pocket, and a good deep ball?

I haven’t seen him a ton, but I thought that is what people liked about him?

That being said, I saw him in the bowl game and he looked mega antsy in the pocket…

by DavidDunn on Jan 1, 2012 11:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Where did I say he isn't a good fit here?

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 2, 2012 10:13 AM EST up reply actions  

Short memory.

“I think RG3 is a fine player, and can be a great pro. However, I think his value is over-inflated and isn’t a great fit here. " -Parks Smith

"Dominant" is an adjective.
"Dominate" is a verb.
We'll work on "Dominance" once we get the first two figured out.

by Reedskin on Jan 2, 2012 11:43 AM EST up reply actions  

Re-read, I got on your case b/c of WHY you wanted Flynn

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 1, 2012 9:43 PM EST up reply actions  

OHHHHH.

Well, that’s a perfectly sane and reasonable thing to do.

I see it as more cushion for the pushin'

by iH8dallas on Jan 1, 2012 9:48 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Where do you think Tannehill will go? Late 1st? Early 2nd?

My give a damn broke.

by davesomethin on Jan 1, 2012 9:55 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

So we would have to trade back from our 1st… This will be an Interesting draft to say the least.

My give a damn broke.

by davesomethin on Jan 2, 2012 9:57 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

yep

I think trading back is a smart play

Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Jan 2, 2012 10:55 AM EST up reply actions  

I completely agree

I had mentioned it before to you Parks that I think Flynn has talent and would be our best bet for the next few years.
Rex would be a fine backup and we could draft a QB in waiting next year.
It would give us the option to follow last year’s pattern and restock the roster with depth.

by dlucero7 on Jan 2, 2012 12:17 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

He did throw for 480 yards and 6TDs in an NFL game, breaking records for one of the oldest NFL teams.

So he’s got that going for him.

I see it as more cushion for the pushin'

by iH8dallas on Jan 1, 2012 9:33 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Flynn plays for the Cardinals?

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 1, 2012 9:34 PM EST up reply actions  

haha thought you said oldest, my bad

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jan 1, 2012 9:35 PM EST up reply actions  

football outsider

doug farrar really likes rg3. says has the highest potential of all the qbs. also said tannehill reminds him of a more athletic charlie whitehurst. huge drop off from luck/rg3 and jones/tannehill…

by Meraj Chowdhury on Jan 1, 2012 10:20 PM EST reply actions  

sacrilege for anyone to question Luck as the best qb

but that’s what we’re going to see leading up to the draft. Griffin has such a live, accurate arm there’s just not much to criticize unlike most mobile qb’s.

by DCrez on Jan 1, 2012 10:28 PM EST up reply actions  

if we

don’t trade up to get the top 2 qbs, i’d rather trade down and fortify depth…i hope cleveland is intrigued by the potential of getting flynn

by Meraj Chowdhury on Jan 1, 2012 10:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Last week I said I'd rather have RG3 than Luck... they almost ran me out of here!

I meant that for the asking price for Luck (couple of 1sts and 2nds), I’d rather have RG3 (perhaps move up 2 positions and give up a 2nd)

by 1x1an on Jan 1, 2012 11:53 PM EST up reply actions  

i really respect

the opinions of those who currently or past worked at football outsiders and saying that rg3 has the greatest potential of all qbs (not to mention more ready to play from day 1 then most people think)…is huge. Also, the other thing the worried me was that they said there is a tremendous drop off in the next set of qbs. Being the third year of the shannhan rebuilding process, they need a high ceiling qb to develop as the franchise signal caller.

by Meraj Chowdhury on Jan 2, 2012 12:44 AM EST up reply actions  

RG3 is too good for us to get, most likely

that completely meaningless Giants win come back to bite us in the ass, as they head into the postseason. Damn shame Browns didnt pull it out today!

by DCrez on Jan 2, 2012 12:59 AM EST up reply actions  

Just tonight, on the Giant game broadcast, Tony Dungy said that as of now

he would take RG3 over Luck. He didn’t really say why, but I got the impression that he thought that he was better suited to the current NFL – which I took to mean that RG3 might be a better runner. Tony is one sharp dude, so when he talks, I listen.

by Donnio1234 on Jan 2, 2012 12:41 AM EST up reply actions  

my problem with the wait til next year plan

although i am not keen on the idea of trading any hi picks like weve been notorious for doing , im less keen on the idea of not moving up to snag rgIII while hes there for the taking. reason being that theres too many variables between this april and next april. if we pass on a qb this year (and if its not luck or rgIII we SHOULD pass on a qb) then we are basically saying we are going all in for barkley next year. unless somebody sees another qb in college right now who is ready to step in from day one and be our franchise qb in 13. while i certainly wouldnt mind barkley being our qb, he’s a top 5 pick next year barring a disastrous senior season and although with rex at the controlls we always have a shot at being the worst in the league, i see us being exactly where we are this year at the end of 12, 5-11/6-10 and somewhere in the lower end of the top 10 draft picks. at that point we would probably have to trade even MORE to get him. basically we would just be setting ourselves an additional year back for a qb whos only advantage over rgIII is he runs a pro style offense at usc (which cam newton showed can be easily adjusted too with enough talent and hard work) im just saying. id rather see it happen now.

by _QB1_ on Jan 1, 2012 10:44 PM EST reply actions  

My problem with waiting until next year is that...

I don’t want to suck next year.

I see it as more cushion for the pushin'

by iH8dallas on Jan 1, 2012 10:51 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I got news for you

We have JUST as much chance at winning a Superbowl next year with a rookie QB as we do with Rex Grossman.

Where do they teach you to talk like this? In some Panama City "Sailor wanna hump-hump" bar, or is it getaway day and your last shot at his whiskey? Sell crazy someplace else, we're all stocked up here.

by CJHutch on Jan 2, 2012 12:52 AM EST up reply actions  

We are talking about in two years.

Next year, I want to have a rookie(RGIII) so we can be ready to compete by 2013-14. Next year would also be much better with him than Grossman, both in excitement and the win column.

Skins rule

by Horcasitas4 on Jan 2, 2012 1:41 AM EST up reply actions  

Guess I misread

Your statement. I thought you were implying that we shouldn’t draft a QB because we won’t win a Superbowl next year with one.

Where do they teach you to talk like this? In some Panama City "Sailor wanna hump-hump" bar, or is it getaway day and your last shot at his whiskey? Sell crazy someplace else, we're all stocked up here.

by CJHutch on Jan 2, 2012 2:10 AM EST up reply actions  

No big deal.

Honestly, unless Rodgers or Brees and their receivers magically change teams to the Skins, we aren’t going to win the Superbowl next year.

Skins rule

by Horcasitas4 on Jan 2, 2012 2:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Flynn made all the throws today

And he won’t cost us a draft pick. Flynn + keeping our first round draft pick to use on another position > using the first round draft pick to roll the dice on RGIII, or worse trading away multiple 1st round picks to go after luck. I like the fact that we’d be bringing in a guy who threw for the all-time Green Bay single game passing record. There aren’t many QBs in the league with the ability to put together a game like Flynn did today, and I’m fine with going with him as the starter for at least a couple years while we surround him with young talent through the draft.

by Kurtstack on Jan 1, 2012 10:48 PM EST reply actions  

Now starts 4 months of what ifs...

Keep the picks. We can go after a FA QB AND draft Tannehill/Weeden/Foles- maybe a move back in the 2nd round to get more picks.

A FA QB just costs money. We have plenty of that, our salary cap is in good shape, and we don’t have Vinny the Moron handling the deal. If we go that route, I doubt we overpay like we have in the past.

I’m not sure who I like best of the Tannehill/Weeden/Foles group, but I do think the best one will be every bit as good as Andy Dalton.

by tjkinva on Jan 1, 2012 11:02 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Revised Plan

FA – Flynn and Nicks (just to satisfy my inner-Cerrato),plus some quality unheralded guys, like Bowen this year, hopefully including a CB and an ILB.

Draft – trade back in the 1st. Pick Tannehill late in the 1st (don’t think he lasts to the 2nd), then retool the lines.

StephenBeagrie on Twitter and Facebook.

www.culturebully.com
www.stevebeagrie.com

by Stephen Beagrie on Jan 2, 2012 6:14 AM EST reply actions  

I could live with that

we would probably have at least 5 (maybe 6) picks in rounds 2-4 which would be huge in helping rebuild OL, WR, and CB. mybe grab a S or ILB along the way

When I was a kid, my father told me, "Never hit anyone in anger, unless you're absolutely sure you can get away with it." -Russell Ziskey

by Redskin44 on Jan 2, 2012 9:27 AM EST up reply actions  

Agreed

Maybe it’s Flynn or Tannehill/Weeden/Foles or both. We don’t need the best QB in the league; we need a smart, efficient QB that can run the offense and isn’t a turnover machine.

So keep the picks and improve the roster. More depth and competition makes the team better. The cure for preventing bonehead plays (like Moss and Stallworth yesterday) or bonehead behavior (Davis and Williams) is having players on your roster that can step in and play who won’t commit bonehead plays/smoke weed/etc etc.

by tjkinva on Jan 2, 2012 10:31 AM EST up reply actions  

JUST WANTED TO STOP BY AND SAY EHHHH HEHHHH

Too bad beating us twice couldn’t stop you Foreskins from being anything relevant in the league aside from ppl saying “how the hell did they beat the GIANTS twice???” you guys will be the bottom dwellers of this division for the next decade as well as this last one. Pathetic Abysmall, Deplorable, horrendous, and god awful are some of the words that come to mind when watching and thinking of you team. Congrats on winning the Super Bowl twice this yr against us. EHHHHHHH HEHHHHHH

by AHoustonGiant on Jan 2, 2012 10:08 AM EST via mobile reply actions  

congratulations on making the playoffs

As for me, all I know is that I know nothing.
*Socrates*

by atark001 on Jan 2, 2012 10:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Last time I checked the giants won't be winning the Super Bowl this year.

NO, GB, and SF will beat you (that is if you even make it past the wildcard round). Well at least you get to see Manning face again….

OH YEAH!!!

by the maroon bird on Jan 2, 2012 10:37 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Have fun getting smoked by Atlanta

and then sitting home like us and watching the rest of the playoffs. Only losers come to other teams blogs and talk $hit AFTER they make the playoffs with only 3 more wins then our team.

by tmarine17 on Jan 2, 2012 10:42 AM EST up reply actions  

hey man I'm still waiting to have that sports trivia contest with you

I know it is a risk for me since you are ‘all-knowing in sports’, but it is one I’m willing to take

Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Jan 2, 2012 10:58 AM EST up reply actions  

The Giants are our Super Bowl, really?

I’d much rather lose to the Giants than Dallas or Philly. I’m sorry we almost effed up your season. I’d have been mad if we helped the Cowboys make the playoffs.

Also you’re a fool.

"Dominant" is an adjective.
"Dominate" is a verb.
We'll work on "Dominance" once we get the first two figured out.

by Reedskin on Jan 2, 2012 12:14 PM EST up reply actions  

how's that special ed class coming along?

When I was a kid, my father told me, "Never hit anyone in anger, unless you're absolutely sure you can get away with it." -Russell Ziskey

by Redskin44 on Jan 2, 2012 4:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email hogshaven@gmail.com

Managers

Superbowl_small Kevin Ewoldt

Riggins_small Ken Meringolo

Editors

Sb_small Parks Smith

Small Steve Shoup

Chalkboard_football-opt403x300o00s403x300_small UkRedskin

Washington_redskins_helmet_small Redskins News

Authors

Badshirt2__2__small fatpickle

Family_in_disney_small Tiller56

Rg3super_small HTTR4LIFE

Hh_small Ronnie Adkins