The ROOT! of our problems in DC.
My emotions were quickly stirred up this morning when my fellow Ball Hog, Kevin Eaton went on Twitter and began armor-all’ing (is that a word) the tires of the good ole Braylon Edwards bandwagon coming to DC. Rumors have started about the Redskins bringing Edwards over to DC, you can read more about it here.
Eaton spoke about “always entertaining upgrades at talent” and that he’s “6’3″, fast, had 900yds and 7td’s last year and that he would welcome him to DC. When Eaton was challenged about his questionable work ethic, his off-the-field issues, etc… Eaton replies “why does everybody have to be a “leader,” “I’m all for great character guys but not all the guys on the team need to be great character guys.” Unfortunately, Eaton speaks from the same perspective that MANY Redskins fans view our moves during the off-season, what’s even scarier is that I think our upper-level management tend to view free-agency through the same scope at times.
This is a hot button issue for me: talent ALONE does not win you championships!
I remember an interview Phil Jackson did earlier this year on ESPN1000 Chicago where he was asked about the talent in Miami, Jackson replied: “There’s no question about the talent they have, but talent doesn’t always win. The team that shows the best teamwork will win it.” He goes on later in the interview and added: “I always refer back to when Wilt Chamberlain was traded from Philly to LA. Trading Wilt, put himself, Elgin Baylor and Jerry West together, three of the top scorers in the history of the NBA and they never won a championship and they were together for four years.” Jackson said.
One of Alan Stein’s (national strength & condititioning coach) favorite blogs is the one titled“Energy Givers.” Read the excerpt from Alan below (click on the photo to enlarge):
From what you know, heard and seen about Braylon Edwards, would you classify him as an “Energy Giver.” I wouldn’t… and there in lies the problem in DC, for years are “stars” have not been our leaders. If Braylon came to DC (that would mean Moss would be gone) he would immediately become our #1 receiver and the most notable face at the wide receiver position, our “star” at that position.
Look at this picture below of our captains in 2009:
Thats a lineup of: Rock Cartwright, Khary Campbell, Chris Samuels, Jason Campbell, Cornelius Griffin and London Fletcher, the team leaders, the team captains for your 2009 Washington Redskins. I agree with Samuels and Fletcher being on the list but no offense to the others, they needed to go. The PROBLEM I find with this is: when you look at our roster in 2009, the players that we market, promote, put on the front covers of our programs, sell the most jerseys of, pay the most money too, etc… ARE NOT IN THIS PHOTO. Where’s Portis, Moss, Cooley, Landry, Hall, Rogers, Haynesworth, Smoot, etc… you know all the guys whose jerseys hang on the shelves of every Redskins Store in the DC, MD, VA area. I love Rock Cartwright and all but how much can he “lead” the team when he’s sitting 3rd on the depth chart? At the same time, Portis, if he chose to be a leader the impact would’ve been incredible and the organization knows that, they PAID him to attend off-season work outs and encourage guys, are you kidding me?
I’ve had an issue with this for as long as I can remember; I adamantly believe that the Redskins failures are due to the fact that our highest paid, most talented, most recognizable players are NOT our leaders. Think back to grade school or high school sports, the best players were always the ones that EVERYONE looked up to and followed their lead. This is no surprise that in New England: Brady, Wilfork and Mayo are the Patriots team captains. In Indianapolis, Manning and Bracket lead the charge. Green Bay is led by Woodson, Rodgers, Jennings and Hawk, as it should be!
Every off-season we line up our player rankings and immediately look towards the top and try to figure out which next big uber-talented “star” we’ll bring in, while we’ll protect our signing by saying “we have a strong locker room,” AKA, “our 2nd & 3rd string guys are great guys who’ll keep the big-ego’d starters in line” – good luck with that!
This year we need to be even more careful with the overflow of young talent brought into DC. We have the opportunity to mold them to exactly how we want them to be, but we also have the opportunity of corrupting them for good if certain bad influences get around them.
My hope going into this off-season is that when Bruce and Mike are about to make that call, or gas up Danny’s jet to begin the guerilla tactic approach for our first free-agent that they more than just look to see if Player A is talented (Eaton and thousands of others approach) but they also ask themselves: is player A going to make the 6-7 players at his position better on a daily basis too?
We’ve been lacking “stars” who are willing to lead like our W/L column has been missing wins, hopefully we can reverse both this year.
www.ballhogsradio.com
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
You're picking up issues with guys that were the ST captains.
You have to have one or two ST captains ala Rock Cartwright. We don’t have Brady and Manning. McNabb was our captain last year. I don’t really see any problems in the selection process.
Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions
The article is kinda harping on an issue i have been hoping is over with.
Well written though.
Fear the Turtle!
by HailToTheRedskins on Jul 9, 2011 12:34 AM EDT up reply actions
6 of our draft picks this year were team captains
I’m pretty sure the FO is focused on bringing in strong leaders. However, our #1 WR is not on the roster yet and we will have to sign someone. It could be Moss or even Edwards. I don’t want Edwards, but after trying to bring in character guys like Galloway last year and failing, we may see them reach for someone with more talent regardless of character.
@Parks
I understand that we have to have special team captains on there, but the point I was trying to make is that our “stars”, our most marketable guys, our highest-paid guys, etc… don’t possess the character to “lead” the team. That is a problem.
Ball Hogs
www.ballhogsradio.com
Agree
JC was never a true leader, or a star. He was almost thrust into the position our of need. He almost looked akward in that role. A team leader that none of us really like is Casey Rabach. He is the unquestioned leader of our offensive line, yet he may be its weakest link. On defense, we definitly have two leaders; Fletcher and Orakpo. Unfortunately, Fletcher’s time as a Redskin may be coming to an end in a year or two. I believe Rak will definitly step into that role.
My hope is we draft a high character QB in 2012 to be the new face of the franchise moving forward. Two guys with excellent leadership skills, are also the two who will likely be sitting atop the draft boards come April……………..Andrew Luck and Landry Jones. I also believe Hankerson could become that type of player for us in the future. A guy like Landry is a lead-by -example type player. I don’t believe is is a stand-up, in-your-face type of captain.
I got Tiger Blood running through my veins!
I agree with almost all of this
maybe all. I just would like to give JC some credit for handling himself as a professional throughout an awful lot of nonsense and near constant trade rumors.
I feel like JC
could have been more of a leader if there was more consistency with the offensive coach’s. I know at some point you have to stand up and take charge but I think one of his biggest downfall’s was the revolving door at OC. Having a different OC trying to mentor him in their own way really hurt his progression even though he was getting better statisticly
The blood you see on my jersey could mean one of two things......either i keep running over the same guy trying to tackle me.....or.....I should really be wearing those pads they gave me!!!!!!
by Lil_Dwilliams17 on Jul 9, 2011 10:20 PM EDT up reply actions
Campbell had 52 starts here in DC.
It’s on JC that he’s wasn’t a leader and is now in Oakland.
@Diesel__44 on the twitter machine.
by Diesel44 on Jul 10, 2011 1:05 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
The culture seems to be changing...
As Liger said above, High character guys seemed to be a priority in this draft. Those guys have the potential to be the leaders of the Redskins’ future. Re-signing Moss instead of a guy like Edwards would be another sign of that comittment. Shanahan has shown support for Beck. While it is questionable if Beck is the best option at QB, there is no doubt about his character or desire to be a leader. Let’s watrch and see if that commitment continues in this year’s free agent signings (so far so good with Otogwe).
A Redskin Potato
These seem to be valid points to me
I think our head coach tried to take us back to the land of professionalism last year after our foray into the romper room on the third sun of the Zorn nebula. On the other hand, I feel like he let his ego run a bit rampant at times, forcing some of our players to question whether they were being treated like adults…this is merely my guess from an outside perspective.
I’m all for having our stars be our character guys be our leaders…and triple vice versa…but that seems a bit obvious to me. Every team wants that. We have had a dearth of all three, and the few obvious examples are aging their way out.
I also think the reference to basketball is only somewhat relevant. Roster size alone implies that one player can have a far bigger impact in roundball both on the court and in the locker room.
All that said, I tend to agree. I would much rather resign Moss for 2-3 years than sign a Braylon Edwards type mercenary. I won’t judge him too harshly as an individual…I think this happens far too often in sports media and fandom. He’s never said he’s a Redskin like Moss has though. He’s never given my team 100% year in and year out throughout achingly frustrating seasons like Moss has. He’s never crushed my team’s hated rival on a consistent basis like Moss has. So he’s a little long in the tooth…meh. He can teach our young bucks a thing or two and retire with a sensors he deserves. Maybe those other high character guys around the league will respect our front office for once and actually consider playing in our nation’s capital for something other than a giant contract.
My 14 cents anyways…
You have points,
but the best players or the highest players shouldn’t be the captains all the time. If Albert were a captain of the Redskins, I’d choke on my vomit. Sometimes rookies or young players are the best players on the team who are marketed, but they shouldn’t always be captains.
To me, captains need to be respected locker room vets, not necessarily the most talented player, and not necessarily the quarterback of the team.
Earn it!
Being a star and brought onto a team doesn’t make you a team captain. You’ve got to earn that position. Did McNabb? Only be reason was his seniority, certainly not by his play. Fat Albert? Would never become one even if he hadn’t made the meltdown he’s become the past two years. JC always seemed like the last thing he wanted was to be the frontman and team leader although that’s the usual position for a QB. Is he now in Oakland? Don’t think so. There’s still doubts about him even there. Rak is one for this team on one ned of the spectrum as is Fletcher on the other end. If there’s one on offense I’d have to give it to Moss and not Rabach.
Rabach is a captain by default
He is the veteran of the o-line, and the signal caller up front. His poor play aside, he is a good leader.
Now imagine if we were to draft Luck or Jones in 2012. Both have exceptional leadership skills, and I would assume both to become faces of the franchise, and leaders of the team and community.
I got Tiger Blood running through my veins!

by 


























