Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

Report: Redskins Have Bieber Fever for Braylon Edwards

Evan Silva, a popular NFL writer for Pro Football Talk, NBC Sports, and Rotoworld, recently tweeted:

ESPN's John Clayton on free agent Braylon Edwards: "Watch for Washington to make a big bid." #Redskins

A few thoughts. How would anyone know this? Is this simply the media doing the same ole, "The Redskins always go after big named players, so expect them to go after Braylon?" Or, as Rick Snider said, is this agents working their magic through the media to drive up the price for the clients? So many big-named players are linked to The Danny. It is what it is. If the Redskins don't bring back Santana Moss, then they certainly need a non-rookie there. 

The former Jet and Brown has only had one 1000 yard season in his career. That's not too much of a knock since he was with Cleveland 5 years and got 904 yards last year with the Jets. Edwards led the league in dropped balls in 2009 with 16, but it appears last year he only dropped 1. 

Also well known are his legal issues, which include: driving 120 in a 65mph, punching a party promoter in the face (I'm OK with this one since the promoter was a friend of Lebron), and a DWI, which he is still on probation for. Based on the Redskins move to bring in high-character guys, the Edwards signing would surprise me a little.

Last year he signed a 1-year, $6.1million and is a free agent currently.

Poll
Should the Redskins sign Braylon Edwards?
Yes
338 votes
No
973 votes

1311 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 91 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Please god NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jul 8, 2011 10:07 AM EDT reply actions  

just curious what is your main objection?

Just general principal of spending that kinda money on a position that might catch 7 balls a game or do you think he is a bad player/fit?

Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Jul 8, 2011 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

Goes back to character, he has a track record of incidents and he's just a strange dude. I don't want him in my locker room.

Also DC seems to be a modern day Sodom and Gomorrah for guys like this.

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jul 8, 2011 10:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don't know I think he gets labeled as a bad character guy b/c of the incidents but I don't think he is in the same category as say a Vincent Jackson

that is a guy who has serious off the field issues and is a “prima donna”, as well as apparently a bad teammate. I don’t think Edwards is Art Monk exactly, but feel he is potentially mislabeled.

My concern is money, I don’t know if I want to tie up that much in a player (and a position as I hope they’d still bring back Moss, b/c otherwise it would only be a minor improvement), when they have other needs. As I said if they bare bones it, the Skins could free up an extra $2-4 million from what we projected, and if they sign a lesser CB than Joseph (like I hope) then you could legitimately have an extra $8 million sitting around out there.

Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Jul 8, 2011 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don't know man, when the DUI thing went down he acted like he franky did give a F...

He went to court in jorts and a t-shirt, he’s just strange.

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jul 8, 2011 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

yeah I'm not saying he is perfect, I just don't see him in the 'head case' category or anything like that

I don’t think he is a bad character guy. He’s just not a locker room leader. I actually like him a bit more than Rice, b/c of the injury issues and Edwards better track record of success. the drop balls worry me, but he has had quite possibly the worst QB’s in the league since he got drafted (Jeff Garcia being the exception).

Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Jul 8, 2011 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

I certainly like him more than Rice

But I voted no because I’m in the re-sign Moss boat. I don’t see us retaining Moss and Signing another big name receiver as well. I don’t see him as a cancer or anything; just a guy who has done some stupid things. At least you don’t hear him run his mouth too much.

If we don’t bring Moss back, I would rather have Edwards than a Rice (injuries) or Burress (herp derp).

by willster on Jul 8, 2011 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would rather have Rice (talent) over Edwards (mediocrity)

"By far the worst performers on the (Redskins) are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins

by smutsboy1 on Jul 11, 2011 10:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

I like Edwards, but I got to vote no

he’s gonna get a pretty big deal (I guessed 6 years $48 million) and I just don’t know if we should put that kinda money in our WR’s until we have a line (and QB). Maybe if we cut down to the bare minimum with all the players that should be released, and make some smart FA choices (like not going for Joseph at CB) but I would make sure our D-Line and O-line needs are met well before we look to sign Edwards.

Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Jul 8, 2011 10:08 AM EDT reply actions  

this makes perfect sense and i agree completely.

A black cat crossing your path signifies that the animal is going somewhere. -Groucho Marx

Hogs Haven. On Twitter..

by Kevin Ewoldt on Jul 8, 2011 10:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

my only concern is they sign Edwards and bring back a bad oline and he looks like a bust

A WR is only as good as the QB throwing to him, and the line giving him the time to get open. We can’t really do anything about the first issue, but we can fix the line. If we give Beck/Grossman/Hanie (that’s for me and Ken)/ Devlin (that’s for Parks and Tiller) a wall to stand behind than Edwards could be awesome, and have a huge impact. Otherwise he is just be a slight upgrade.

I will say this though, a Moss, Edwards, Hankerson, Paul, Armstrong/Robinson/Banks/Austin receiving corps would be pretty filthy.

Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Jul 8, 2011 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

No, there is a lot wrong with Edwards..

Terrible hands, has never had a 1000 YD season and has a career avg of 57 YDs per game. Sure let’s give this clown a fat contract w/ 15-20 Mil guaranteed.

No is the answer

@Diesel__44 on the twitter machine.

by Diesel44 on Jul 8, 2011 5:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with the hands

but the overall yardage is hardly his fault (outside of the dropped passes) bad QB play is the culprit there. People will disagree but Mark Sanchez has been pretty horrible these last two seasons (despite every advantage a QB could ask for), and I will say that really whoever our QB is this year, I’m assuming they can complete more than 55% of their passes (and we will throw a lot more).

I’m not saying their aren’t issues, but I do feel that he is someone I’d kick the tires on depending on the contract.

Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Jul 8, 2011 5:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

He actually does have 1 1000k season

Still don’t want him

@Diesel__44 on the twitter machine.

by Diesel44 on Jul 8, 2011 6:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes, I just looked at his stats more carefully

seem pretty impressive. That one year, 1289 yds, 904 last year with the Jets, steady number of catches. I compared to Rice, and Braylon looked better in some key categories, like catches, yards per catch, yds after catch – seemed to be very consistent. And seemed to be improving every year recently. I’d say he’s worth something – seems as if he is a pretty solid performer. $8 million worth? – I’ll let the heavy thinkers decide that.

by Donnio1234 on Jul 8, 2011 9:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Would you take him for, say, $5 mill?

I don’t know much about him except what I read on HH. But his off field problems seem rather minor, and I didn’t read much about his work ethic and on-field behavior. Somebody said he only had one drop last year. Five years were with a shaky team. The 1000 yards stat could have various explanations. The Jets liked him enough to pay him $6 million. The asking price alone suggests that he has something. Apparently he is a big, talented guy who has not yet achieved stardom. So, no, we shouldn’t chase him or throw big money at him, but I think Shanahan could take a look at him, see if he wants to come here, and do much better due diligence than I just did.

by Donnio1234 on Jul 8, 2011 8:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly if he checks out

And we have extra money he is a good value

Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Jul 9, 2011 2:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

rec rec rec

rec rec rec
rec rec rec
rec rec rec

"By far the worst performers on the (Redskins) are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins

by smutsboy1 on Jul 8, 2011 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

I rec'd that as well....

but only because I consider Moss “one of our guys”, no reason at all to out and get someone else.
Hell, about a month ago we were debating on weather or not to keep Banks and I reaaly want to keep him but he needs to be able to bring something to the offense. I know he is a different kind of threat but we have got some tall guys that we need to take a look at……I voted that he would be on the outside of the bubble, but I obviously hadn’t seen any video of him in a while when I voted, I watch him return kicks and think there is no way we cut this kid.

by MagicHat on Jul 8, 2011 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

I feel the same
…I consider Moss "one of our guys",

SpottieOttieDopaliscious

by Rekka on Jul 8, 2011 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

I voted yes...

Guess I’m in the minority :(

"That's what she said!"

by iH8dallas on Jul 8, 2011 10:17 AM EDT reply actions  

You went to an HBCU so you should be used to it.

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jul 8, 2011 10:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not saying we "should" sign him, but he was a BEAST in college.

I am kind of undecided on this one. As with any roster signing, I would do it for the right price I guess.

by preppiejack on Jul 8, 2011 10:18 AM EDT reply actions  

Jason White was a beast in college

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jul 8, 2011 10:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

hey I like plastic apples!

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jul 8, 2011 10:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think he can be a really good receiver

my issue is until we fix our line, our WR’s won’t have the time to get open. So while Edwards would help, it will be a minimal improvement at a high cost. Now if we fix our line and get the defense right then i could by it, but by then he is probably off the market.

Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Jul 8, 2011 10:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

the flip side of that....

due to Edwards particular experience, he is probably quite familiar with looking back and seeing his QB in trouble before he finishes his route. He might be more apt to break off his route and find that open spot in coverage. (which is really why I think Santana had such good #’s last year)

by MagicHat on Jul 8, 2011 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

I feel lke this is the 3rd or 4th time you've mad this point

I think everyone knows your stance. Until our line is fixed he will only be a marginal upgrade. We get it. If the O-line and QB were better he’d be a big asset. DUH!

by CuseSkinsfan1 on Jul 8, 2011 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

i don't understand your point?

I shouldn’t respond to comments to further the discussion, b/c others already know my point?

Sure I reiterate the same point b/c I’m hoping for an open discussion and for someone point to as to why a WR is more valuable than an O-lineman or D-lineman. This is even a case where I’m not totally in the negative, but just establishing pre-conditions to me being okay to signing him.

Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Jul 8, 2011 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

Ignore the ridiculous responses

The open ended commentary on a blog seems to be a difficult concept for some to understand

by ENsDad27 on Jul 8, 2011 8:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

I dont think it was a ridiculous response....

WHen I read a thread I read all the comments, and make my own when I decide to join in. I read through all the “open ended commentary” and have no difficulty grasping the concept. I was just remarking that I had read steveo’s point, then again, then again….then again. I got it. Just felt like letting him know….that I had gotten it. Assuming most people are like me and actually read through the enitre discussion sometimes things become repetitive to the point where it gets a bit much….just sayin’. But I guess actually keeping up with the WHOLE running dialogue is a difficult thing for some people to grasp.

by CuseSkinsfan1 on Jul 9, 2011 12:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

My point is just...

Why keep making the same point over and over again. I’m sorry if it rubbed anyone the wrong way. Just my two cents…take it or leave it.

by CuseSkinsfan1 on Jul 9, 2011 12:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

and you really thought this was necessary??
If the O-line and QB were better he’d be a big asset. DUH!

We are all fans of the same team, no real need to put down each other, especially on a blog meant for discussion

by ENsDad27 on Jul 10, 2011 6:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Alright but each comment is it's own thread

Not everyone who thinks a certain way about a player responds in the same thread so I will look to continue the discussion in multiple threads

Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Jul 9, 2011 2:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

It's no crime to repeat yourself..

Not everyone reads every post and can repeat it verbatim

@Diesel__44 on the twitter machine.

by Diesel44 on Jul 9, 2011 2:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not a crime, but it can get very tedious

To hear the same people harp on the same things OVER and OVER and OVER.

But I’m probably guilty of that myself occasionally.

A Redskin Potato

by Mr PotatoHead on Jul 9, 2011 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed

Re-sign Moss and then bring in some Big Uglies for the O and D line, starting with NT.

My give a damn broke.

by davesomethin on Jul 8, 2011 5:42 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

IF...IF we did not go after Moss....

and I really don’t see we shouldn’t, AND, we bring another FA (even more mind boggling to me, if I don’t resign Moss that means I am lettin the young guys loose on the town)……if that happens I would put Braylon in the top 3-4 in the discussion. I like Simms Walker, and Jacoby, although I am less familiar with him. I would go Edwards over Rice if the contracts were comparable.

by MagicHat on Jul 8, 2011 10:21 AM EDT reply actions  

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Way too expensive, drops passes (often in big moments) and is a head case.

He had a good year last year because the Jets had Santonio opposite him and a good running game. If he came to Washington, he’d be the No 1 target and the pressure would get to him.

No.

StephenBeagrie on Twitter and Facebook.

www.culturebully.com
www.stevebeagrie.com

by Stephen Beagrie on Jul 8, 2011 10:22 AM EDT reply actions  

so...

nothing changes. What a fail by DeMaurice Smith’s gamble. They’re gonna have to cave.

A black cat crossing your path signifies that the animal is going somewhere. -Groucho Marx

Hogs Haven. On Twitter..

by Kevin Ewoldt on Jul 8, 2011 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

Who in our front office is talking to the media or agents about players?

Do we really think that Bruce or Big Mike are tipping their hand? They only work with smoke and mirrors, this is obviously a contract ploy. If the media is going to assign all these players and link them to us, the least they could do is get on HH and check out who we’ve already “signed”….

by ptowny on Jul 8, 2011 10:53 AM EDT reply actions  

they have to talk about something....

it’s their job. I am not even surprised they went back to Favre well.

by MagicHat on Jul 8, 2011 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not a fan

of Receivers with a history of mega CARLOS-ITIS

it cost Derek Anderson his job in CLE

by Kia.Area51 on Jul 8, 2011 11:18 AM EDT reply actions  

Derek Anderson

cost Derek Anderson his job in Cleveland

The blood you see on my jersey could mean one of two things......either i keep running over the same guy trying to tackle me.....or.....I should really be wearing those pads they gave me!!!!!!

by Lil_Dwilliams17 on Jul 8, 2011 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

+1

Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Jul 8, 2011 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nope

I don’t really have anything to add that hasn’t been said. Just no.

and..please finish the damn cba

The Beat Box aka skins secondary.

by Al_CaPWNED on Jul 8, 2011 11:28 AM EDT reply actions  

I don't think the Redskins will sign Edwards.

Or any big name, big money guys. That will take us back to the bad old days that we thought were over. I think it is the same with Jenkins, agents using Washington to pump up their clients’ value thru some ‘anonymous’ source.

I don’t trust Clayton either, his inside sources are bogus to me, he’s been wrong about this lockout since March. I’d believe it more if it was Shefter, but even then, Shanahan uses him for floating rumors as well.

I’d take Moss for 3yrs/17M over Edwards 5yrs/40M every day, all day. Edwards also surrounded by a superior offensive team; great O-line, #1 receiver, 2 quality backs and TE, decent Qb.

 Let’s get Moss back into the fold, and then draft our young stud receiver in a year or 2. It’s getting old for everyone to float Washington as a big payday destination. Enough with that already.

by JDC15 on Jul 8, 2011 11:54 AM EDT reply actions  

We're going to spend a lot of money this offseason thats a fact.

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jul 8, 2011 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

But we'll be smart about it right?

We’ll get value, instead of jersey sales.
We’ll fill area’s of need instead of making big splashes for no apparent reason.
Those lowly redskins will once again join the warpath to victory.

and i’ll wake up

The Beat Box aka skins secondary.

by Al_CaPWNED on Jul 8, 2011 11:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm going to wait and see how the new CBA works out.

I’m not counting on having big money to spend until it’s written in stone first.
Even then, I would hope they sign more guys cheaper to build depth, increase competition, and think about re-signing some of our guys first. No bidding wars please. A few guys on the roster due to hit free agency next year also, might be money better spent to re-ink them sooner than later.

by JDC15 on Jul 8, 2011 5:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

this is the type of player we are trying to rid the lockerroom of

this is exactly the kind of guy cerrato would get,that why we need to make it clear with this free agent class that it is not business as usual with the redskins.snyder has entrenched us in the image of over spending and under achieving that we become patsy or bargaining chip that agents use to up the price for their clients,oh just tell them the skins are interested and who would disregard that, because danny and vinny set that standard.we will spend this year partly because we may have to according to the how the new cba reads,and partly because we have plenty of holes and money to fill it,that what your suppose to do anyway.the issue is how we go about it,i have said all along that we need to continue to make moves to signal to the nfl and the media that the culture and philosophy in ashburn is changing once and for all.with that being said we need to make smart moves there are plenty of free agents that will help fill the teams holes and wont cost too much,lets take a similar approach as we did with the draft make smart moves,that make sense and not go for the big splash.there will be so many free agents available that we could spend and bring in a big haul without bringing in a huge name and a huge contract just for the sake of making a splash

by mal0378 on Jul 8, 2011 12:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Ew thats gross

I rekka rec

"You're fucking out!"

by travisjh86 on Jul 8, 2011 12:13 PM EDT reply actions  

If you bring in Edwards I'm guessing you are not going to resign Moss!

Why would you bring in someone that doesn’t offer anything more than Moss, doesn’t know the playbook, and gets bad press (not as bad as punching drivers and feeling up waitresses)? Doesn’t that go against everything you are trying to do in this organization?

by VBSkinsFan on Jul 8, 2011 12:55 PM EDT reply actions  

The numbers don't add up!

Moss wants to be here, we want him here soooo

Moss
Armstrong
Hankerson
Kelly
Paul
Robinson
Banks
Austin

TOO MANY WIDE RECIEVERS

by Andrew DeFrank on Jul 8, 2011 1:32 PM EDT reply actions  

Overall I get what you are saying

but this really isn’t even an argument. Obviously Moss and Hankerson are locks. Armstrong and Paul are likely as well with Paul probably on firmer ground given his age and upside. But as for the rest you don’t have much in the way of a sure thing.

Kelly has been injured every year, is in the last year of his deal so keeping him is for only one season, and has yet to do anything significant. Also he wasn’t drafted by the current regime so there are no ties there. Also if you sign Edwards, the one thing Kelly has going for him, his size, is no longer unique on the roster.

Robinson was a 6th rounder and I think has a real shot given his skill set and size (as compared to Banks), but it won’t be handed to him.

Banks is an electric return man, but if he can’t show he can be an effective WR in camp/preseason he could not make the team. Between the new K.O. rule and the ability of Paul and probably Robinson and Armstrong to do those roles, he could be considered redundant.

Austin is essentially in the same boat as Banks, though not as good of a return man and only slightly more valuable of a receiver.

If we don’t sign an Edwards type of WR, it is b/c we want to put money in other areas, not b/c we think we are ‘set’ at the position.

Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Jul 8, 2011 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Only the top three will definitely make it

I’d guess your top 5, plus Banks on special teams and spot WR. But I’d like somebody better than Kelly and Paul, although they could surprise. That grouping is not real impressive, and suggests that we could use Santana and another top receiver, like Rice or Edwards,or, preferably, a tier lower than that (for money reasons). Imagine a WR corps of Rice, Moss, Hank, AA and Paul. Probably cost too much, but if possible…

by Donnio1234 on Jul 8, 2011 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd rather us start these young guys,

but maybe the idea behind drafting three WR’s is to make them compete. If we are just gunna cut Kelly when the lockout ends, why didn’t we in September?

by Andrew DeFrank on Jul 8, 2011 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

b/c last year Armstrong was an unknown, Moss a UFA (still is but it is promising) and we didn't draft 3 WR's

we would have had to pay most of that money in an injury settlement anyways, so why not stash him on I.R.

Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Jul 8, 2011 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ken and Kev

Just checking in to see what you guys have been up to in the most boring off-season ever.

On this point. In my opinion we have addressed our WR needs through the draft.. If these guys live up to their billing we should be just fine there. I’d like to see any big money signings occur on the offensive or defensive front lines. Otherwise I’m pretty happy with our roster. Not a superbowl roster, but a decent one that should be able to win us at least 6 games. Honestly I don’t think there is any way Beck could put up worse numbers than McNabb did last year, so 6 games seems like a reasonable bet, particularly with a much improved RB and WR group.

by Kurtstack on Jul 8, 2011 2:01 PM EDT reply actions  

No Thanks

The dude is so bizzare and those type of guys can kill a locker room. I don’t really believe this report to be honest but the Skins have done much crazier in the past so i can’t discount it. Besides the fact that he is strange, I don’t think he’s that great. I don’t want to say he’s overrated but if it came down to Santana or Him in free agency I would still go Moss despite the age difference. Our top priorities should be Nose Tackle, Guard, Corner. After that I would take a look at a WR and ILB. I think I would be okay with Armstrong, Hankerson, Moss and seeing what happens with Kelly, Niles Paul, Banks, Austin. At the same time, however, that’s a lot of question marks. Id rather see us look at a Sims Walker or James Jones

by jeffco01 on Jul 8, 2011 2:16 PM EDT reply actions  

6 guys (if 6, not 5) thatll make up the Skins receiving corp this season:

Moss
Hankerson
Armstrong
Robinson
FA
Austin
I don’t think Kelly, Banks or Paul make the cut, and I don’t see any big name free agents coming in but rather just a journeyman receiver

by Dammit Cerrato... on Jul 8, 2011 3:06 PM EDT reply actions  

haha what about Paul makes you think Austin or Robinson are better options than him?

He’s got huge upside and barring an FA signing he could win the number 3 job.

Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Jul 8, 2011 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

I have a case of the steamin' undies for Robinson

His hands and route running are silly and though SMU isn’t a perrenial power house, he consistently made huge plays in his time there and caught balls all over the field. I don’t see Robinson as only a deep threat kind of guy, I think he can give you something wherever you put him. I actually have a personal opinion that he’ll end up replacing Santana some day when he no longer is a Redskin, but maybe that’s just me be optimistic. I see more upside in Robinson than Paul. Paul to me you saw him be wildly inconsistent in an offense where he didn’t get many chances to begin with and I think he’s not as disciplined a route runner. I look more at intangibles coming out of college rather than upside I guess :P
Austin isn’t going to ever be more than a 5 or 6 guy if THAT, but I donno, I like what I saw in the short time he got his shot. I feel like he did what he could with what he had coming to him. You can maybe flip flop Paul and Austin maybe, but as it stands right now, ehh…

by Dammit Cerrato... on Jul 8, 2011 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

I am with you on Robinson

I just think you are negatively grading Paul for having an offense that didn’t feature him properly and a QB who wasn’t what i’d call the most accurate. Paul to me has big time upside and he is the type of guy that can really excel in a pro style system. I know it was a week but I thought he looked great at the SB practices, when he finally got to run real routes and have more accurate QB’s (for the most part he had to deal with Locker :P) throw to him.

Personally I think both can and will succeed, but Robinson is more a slot only guy, where Paul can play outside.

Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Jul 8, 2011 4:23 PM EDT reply actions  

Oh yeah, I think everyone notes Nebraska's offense as the major hindrance

There’s a reason Paul had to be drafted in the 5th and Robinson in the 6th. I just see Robinson as WAY more fluid.

by Dammit Cerrato... on Jul 8, 2011 8:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm going out on a limb, and say that Paul and Robinson are locks.

Not a short limb either, in my opinion. Paul and Robinson have huge upside, worth hanging onto this season for sure. I expect both will be returners as well. Hank, Armstrong, and Moss (hopefully) are in.
Kelly has a minimal chance to make it, in my opinion. Shanny has no allegience to him whatsoever. Austin and Banks will have to battle it out to the end in my estimation.

by JDC15 on Jul 8, 2011 6:14 PM EDT reply actions  

gone. It's slang.

A lot of fan favorites are on the bubble…Banks, Henson, Daniels.

@Diesel__44 on the twitter machine.

by Diesel44 on Jul 8, 2011 9:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is the problem

I want Santana back.
I love Armstrong, and think he has a great future.
Hankerson is the next Jerry Rice (I kid, I kid)
Paul and Robinson are both “steals” with huge upside.
Banks is… BANKS!

by Andrew DeFrank on Jul 8, 2011 10:07 PM EDT reply actions  

YES!

This team needs more potential threats at WR. The offense has been struggling forever scoring points and anyone who can potentially bring 7-10 TD catches for the Skins I will take. I see nothing wrong putting a bid on this guy he is less of a risk than waiting to see if a guy like Malcom Kelly pans out?….Wait Who?….

by Kevin O'Connor on Jul 9, 2011 8:46 AM EDT reply actions  

hes a punk

id rather have plaxico over him cuz atleast plaxico is contrite and seems to have changed for the better..

by ImFROMdc88 on Jul 9, 2011 2:47 PM EDT reply actions  

Edwards is a great talent

But come on ESPN, just because the guy is a big name doesn’t mean the Skins will automatically go after him. I could overlook his character if we signed him, but I am not that interested in going after some big name WR, which is even more pointless if we don’t even have a good QB to throw to him.

by BigOLinemen on Jul 10, 2011 8:15 AM EDT reply actions  

I wouldn't be suprised if the Redskins

don’t sign any of these huge names because they want to build high character. Six of our twelve draft picks were team captains. Were not going after Crombartie, Edwards, Burress, or another questionable off the field guy.

by Andrew DeFrank on Jul 10, 2011 11:27 AM EDT reply actions  

It's a little hard to be sure about "character"

You can have a guy with a DUI or fight or something like that, but the guy is, in fact, a driven, dedicated, workaholic, and actually a good guy and good teammate. Look how Heinz Ward just got a DUI. Look at Sean Taylor. Seems to me that laziness, poor work ethic and lack of professionalism on the field are more toxic negatives than off the field shenanigans, because those things suggest the guy will never play as well as he should. And if the shenanigans were when they were young, and there’s no continuing pattern, I would be inclined to be forgiving. Like Niles Paul had a number of worrisome incidents when he first got to college, and some questionable moves on the field, but may have matured since then. Devin Thomas may have failed because of a certain type of character issue, although it was probably more lack of professionalism in his case – just didn’t work hard enough to hone his skills to the NFL level.

by Donnio1234 on Jul 10, 2011 1:18 PM EDT reply actions  

You can have a guy with a DUI or fight or something like that, but the guy is, in fact, a driven, dedicated, workaholic, and actually a good guy and good teammate.

There a difference in this happening once to a good guy and incidents happening repetively throughout their career

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Jul 11, 2011 9:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

Some great players may be testy perfectionists, not very nice

and pretty difficult to work with. Some great actors – like Dustin Hoffman – are like that. People are different, and I wouldn’t just automatically eliminate somebody because of a few odd incidents in their past. An example of a questionable decision based on vague, maybe bogus character concerns could be passing up Ryan Mallett in the draft (not to reopen that matter – it’s done). In any case, restricting the team to supposedly “high character” guys is going to cost us some good players. Edwards could be an example of that.

by Donnio1234 on Jul 10, 2011 1:39 PM EDT reply actions  

I agree

red flags alone don’t mean you should blackball a player, all it means is that you need to investigate more and get the answers you are looking for.

Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Jul 10, 2011 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email hogshaven@gmail.com

Managers

Superbowl_small Kevin Ewoldt

Riggins_small Ken Meringolo

Editors

Sb_small Parks Smith

Small Steve Shoup

Chalkboard_football-opt403x300o00s403x300_small UkRedskin

Washington_redskins_helmet_small Redskins News

Authors

Badshirt2__2__small fatpickle

Family_in_disney_small Tiller56

Rg3super_small HTTR4LIFE

Hh_small Ronnie Adkins