Top 25 Receivers in the NFL: Do the Redskins Have One?
by Tiller56 on Jul 1, 2011 5:58 PM EDT
Email
PrintI wanted to take a look at who I feel are the top WR's in the NFL. I'm sure some players and position rankings will be up for debate. I tried to look at potential (up-side) and production, and then combine them with intangibles, such as size, speed, hands, etc. In short, I didn't JUST focus on stats.
It's up for debate. Have at it.
1 - Andre Johnson
2 - Larry Fitzgerald
3 - Calvin Johnson
4 - Roddy White
5 - Reggie Wayne
6 - Brandon Marshall
7 - Greg Jennings
8 - Wes Welker
9 - Miles Austin
10 - Steve Smith(CAR)
11 - Vincent Jackson
12 - Mike Wallace
13 - Marques Colston
14 - Santonio Holmes
15 - DeSean Jackson
16 - Dwayne Bowe
17 - Hakeem Nicks
18 - Anquan Boldin
19 - Sidney Rice
20 - Jeremy Maclin
21 - Steve Johnson
22 - Steve Smith(NYG)
23 - Percy Harvin
24 - Braylon Edwards
25 - Dez Bryant
Just Missed - Michael Crabtree, Pierre Garcon, Malcom Floyd, Deion Branch, Santana Moss, James Jones, Austin Collie, Mario Manningham, Kenny Britt, Mike Williams(TB), Ochocinco
81 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
No. Especially since Moss is a FA.
But No, Moss is not a top 25 WR..
@Diesel__44 on the twitter machine.
Lol, DeSean at 15. I get it. He’s cocky and you hate him (as do the Giants and Cowboys fans), but let’s get real here.
http://www.bleedinggreennation.com/ - Eagles
http://bloggingthebeast.com/ - NFC East
The problem with the fan’s rankings of WOs is they look at who is unstoppable. Andre Johnson / Calvin Johnson. When they are on they can just go up and get a jump ball over anyone. What the non Eagles fans don’t see is the safeties lining up 35 yards off the line of scrimmage because they are terrified he’s going to just run right by them. That opens up things all over the field with the rest of the team’s pass catchers and running backs.
"Learning to eat soup with a knife"
Where would you put him?
He is a threat, but more one-dimensional than a lot ranked above him. His season high in receptions is 63.
I hope your implying I ranked him too high.
I got Tiger Blood running through my veins!
honestly I'd probably flip D.Jackson and Steve Smith (Car), obviously in the past Smith was elite but his skills have shown some age
Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com
Please. Jackson is half as dynamic and versatile as Smith
Smith hasn’t aged as much as plays with worse and worse QBs every year
Frankly I’m surprised it took this long for entire defenses to guard only him.
"By far the worst performers on the (Redskins) are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
Are you talking about 2005 Steve Smith? Because that guy was awesome. Not so sure about 2011 Steve Smith. Look, I’m not going to try to sell you guys on how good DeSean Jackson is. You already know.
http://www.bleedinggreennation.com/ - Eagles
http://bloggingthebeast.com/ - NFC East
I got Jimmy's back here
DeSean Jackson definitely should be higher. He is not complete enough to be higher then about 10, but if you got Mike Wallace at 12, DeSean Jackson HAS to be higher then him, because they do the same thing, except Jackson does it a little better.
Yeah I despise DJack especially since Vinny passed on 2x but he belongs at #10.
My favorite DJack moment was he met London Fletcher on a crossing route.
@Diesel__44 on the twitter machine.
Steveo
I wouldn’t put D Jax in the top 10. He’s just not that versatile yet, and has a season high of just 63 receptions. If he were to average 75-80 catches a season, I’d def rank him higher.
I got Tiger Blood running through my veins!
Exactly.
Desean is a dangerous and deadly player. Best deep threat in the league.
But he’s not in the class of all-purpose franchise WRs, like most of the guys listed in the top 10 there
"By far the worst performers on the (Redskins) are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
Overall Tiller I don't disagree with your list, just the placement for a couple of guys
As for the bottom of the list though I think you could make a solid case for Moss over any name (with maybe the exception of Braylon Edwards). There is a ton of potential in that group, but few guys who have shown any consistency (even during a limited career).
I think I would put Moss in there since i’m a big fan of size i’d prob. keep Bryant and Johnson in the bottom despite their limited work. But I think any of Maclin, Harvin or Steve Smith (NYG) could be replaced by Moss.
Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com
True
I’m looking at present(at least last 3 years or so with some of these older guys). Moss was a little too up and down for me to give him a top 25 ranking. Also would like to see some more TD’s. Of course age factors in too, as I have some younger guys with a higher celing ranked ahead of some other vets who could have easily made the list.
I got Tiger Blood running through my veins!
Sadly, no.
you can’t make an argument for any of those guys over Tana
"By far the worst performers on the (Redskins) are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
Obviously Santana is not going to get rated for potential since he is on the downward slope of his career.
Moss ranked 1st in yards after the catch – http://www.coldhardfootballfacts.com/Articles/11_3771_YAC_attack%3A_the_best_recievers_after_the_catch.html
Top 15
WR ……………Team…..YAC……TYARDS
Santana Moss.. WAS 93 505 yds 1115 45.29%
Percy Harvin… MIN 71 459 868 52.88
Miles Austin…. DAL 69 439 1041 42.17
Reggie Wayne. IND 111 438 1355 32.32
Greg Jennings. GB 76 436 1265 32.47
Wes Welker…. NE 86 433 848 51.06
Stevie Johnson BUF 82 419 1073 39.05
Eddie Royal….. DEN 59 409 627 65.23
Dwayne Bowe.. KC 72 400 1162 34.42
Danny Amendola STL 85 390 689 56.60
Roddy White…. ATL 115 381 1389 28.89
Mike Wallace… PIT 60 376 1267 35.61
DeSean Jackson. PHI 47 364 1056 34.47
Calvin Johnson.. DET 77 354 1120 31.61
Mario Manningham NYG 60 347 944 36.76
Moss ranked 39th in DYAR
http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/wr
We cannot yet fully separate the performance of a receiver from the performance of his quarterback. Be aware that one will affect the other. Moss’ stats can’t be adjusted for McNabb’s inaccuracy.
When you consider potential and upside
Yeah, Santana has no spot up there. But if you want to talk about the best WRs of 2011 in terms of performance on the field, the only place it matters, Moss makes that list easily.
You could look at these ratings from a fantasy standpoint.
I like Fantasy Football, but try not to mix it in too much in actual discussion, however, is this discussion, it could be interesting to see(obviously before the season starts)who are going to be the top 25 fantasy WR’s. Now, you obviously will have guys like Brandon Lloyd, who finally had his break-out year in 2010. He isn’t making the list of top 25 in the NFLbecause he’s only had the one year, and is soon to be 30, so that lowers his up-side. T.O. is another one. If I did this 3 years ago, T.O. could have made this list.
I got Tiger Blood running through my veins!
Yeah
I agree with you man. Good list overall though.
I think Greg Jennings
Should be in the top five. He seems to catch everything thrown his way and take it to the house on any play.
The world looks mighty different when you're peeking out your belly button
by Skins Fan '77 on Jul 3, 2011 10:56 AM EDT reply actions 2 recs
I was close to putting him there
I just couldn’t find a guy above him I wanted to move back.
I got Tiger Blood running through my veins!
He's also one of the best route runners in the entire league.
:-)
Did you guys see where he was on that NFLN Top 100 list?
Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!
Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!
I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.
You already know
what I think of that Top 100 Players list, Omaha. :)
"It's a great day to be great, baby!"
"Here I am, brain the size of a planet,
and they ask me to pick up a piece of paper.
You call that job satisfaction?
'Cause, I don't."
THE BEARS STILL SUCK!
lulz
Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!
Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!
I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.
What Omaha said!
A couple of weeks ago, I came across two Chiefs fans on Arrowhead Pride arguing over who was the better WR between Jennings and Dwayne Bowe, and the guy arguing for Bowe had the audacity to say,
Jennings route running also isn’t that great.Naturally, I jumped into the argument with both feet, haha.
Rec’d.
"It's a great day to be great, baby!"
"Here I am, brain the size of a planet,
and they ask me to pick up a piece of paper.
You call that job satisfaction?
'Cause, I don't."
THE BEARS STILL SUCK!
Yeah, I followed your link before.
Funny stuff.
Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!
Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!
I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.
Have to jump into the fray.
Even though I strongly believe in the eyeball test as a 1st evaluator, I do like to also use statistical analysis or statmetrics.
A general rule of thumb in evaluating players for salaries and projected performance is to take individual statistics from the past 3 years, then average them out, and base those averages on the most recent season. The prime age of production has been shown to be 27-28, and players over that age are expected to meet or just fall short of their average, while players under that age are expected to exceed their averages.
The 4 most important stats, in my opinion, for wide receivers are: receptions, yards, touchdowns, and 1st downs.
Santana’s average, and expected performance for 2011, are 80 receptions for 1,075 yds, 5 TD’s, and 50 receptions resulting in 1st downs. Based on 2010 stats, he ranks 12th in rec’s, 12th in yds, 30th in TDs, and 16th in 1st dns. Taking those averages, and dividing by 4 for the categories, Moss ranks as the 18th best receiver in the league.
Clearly touchdowns are his biggest weakness, or he is in the top 12-15. In my opinion, Bruce Allen has to pay Santana as the 18th best receiver in the league, which puts him at about $6M per year. With his age being over prime, his production is expected to decrease annually, but not by more than 10% year over year. By the 3rd year of Santana’s contract, expectations are for 65 rec’s, 810 yds, 3 TDs, and 40 receptions for 1st dns.
Of course, those numbers are re-evaluated every off-season up or down. By grading his recent play, and having reasonable expectations, a 3 year deal around $18M is fair and warranted based on past performance and future projections. And he clearly, in my opinion, is a top 20 receiver going into 2011.
I like your analysis
but I would add in Red Zone TD’s, as I think they are EXTREMELY improtant. It would be interesting to factor that in, and see where Santana ranks amongst the league with all 5 measurables.
I got Tiger Blood running through my veins!
Santana in top 25? All signs point to YES!
Compare Santana Moss to the guys you have on your list. Santana belongs.
In the “What have you done for me lately?” category:
Moss was #4 in Receptions and #10 in Yards last year. That makes him a top ten WR for 2010.
In the “Career Consistency” category:
For the players on your list that have been playing 5 years or more, only NINE of those guys have higher totals for BOTH yards and receptions.
Those players are:
Andre Johnson
Larry Fitzgerald
Roddy White
Reggie Wayne
Brandon Marshall
Wes Welker
Steve Smith(CAR)
Marques Colston
Anquan Boldin
Greg Jennings has more yards, but less receptions.
For the players that have been playing less than five years:
FOUR players are averaging more yards per season (but less receptions). Those players are:
Calvin Johnson
Mike Wallace
DeSean Jackson
Dwayne Bowe
NONE of the other players on the list are averaging more receptions per season.
This means that of the 25 players on your list, 14 are averaging more yards per season. 9 are averaging more receptions per season (and ALL of those 9 are part of the14).
That puts Moss no lower than 15th.
A Redskin Potato
Clarification:
This scentence:
“only NINE of those guys have higher totals for BOTH yards and receptions”
should be:
only NINE of those guys have higher AVERAGES for BOTH yards and receptions over the last five years.
A Redskin Potato
by Mr PotatoHead on Jul 3, 2011 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't think it's realistic to assume that Moss is the 15th best WR in the NFL today.
It would be nice to say we have a top guy(or had a top guy), but It’s just not realistic. If we were being totally stat driven, Brandon Lloyd would make the top 10, and I don’t think there is a fan in all of HH who would believe Lloyd is top 25.
Now, for Moss’ sake, had this been done 5 years ago, he would have been in my top 25.
I got Tiger Blood running through my veins!
Yeah, you have to consider situations as well.
Roddy WHite’s stats are crazy because he’s the only legitimate receiving threat on ATL and he has Turner and the run game to take pressure off of him.
Then look at someone like Greg Jennings, who plays in a system that likes to spread the ball around to as many as 5 different receivers.
The eye test is extremely important in situations like these. HOW he gets the numbers is more important than just getting them.
Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!
Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!
I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.
This is stats gone wild, or at least gone bad.
"By far the worst performers on the (Redskins) are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
For those receivers
Greg Jennings has more yards, but less receptions.
who have more receptions. don’t you think that they, too, would have less if their quarterbacks had as many weapons to spread the ball around to as Rodgers has?
And, how many of them, if their QBs did have as many weapons, would be throwing hissy fits about not getting the ball enough?
"It's a great day to be great, baby!"
"Here I am, brain the size of a planet,
and they ask me to pick up a piece of paper.
You call that job satisfaction?
'Cause, I don't."
THE BEARS STILL SUCK!
Looking back, I see I mis-read your statement.
My bad. :)
"It's a great day to be great, baby!"
"Here I am, brain the size of a planet,
and they ask me to pick up a piece of paper.
You call that job satisfaction?
'Cause, I don't."
THE BEARS STILL SUCK!
Jeez NorthStarr,
I work so hard since the draft to build up a good reputation for Packer fans and here you come along and try to wreck it.
Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!
Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!
I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.
I DID say "My bad,"
and I admitted my error.
I try and talk football as respectfully as I can when I’m on other teams’ sites.
I do defend the Packers’ players when I feel they get slighted, but, again, I try to do it as respectfully as possible.
I even made nice with that Chiefs fan, when it was all said and done. :)
"It's a great day to be great, baby!"
"Here I am, brain the size of a planet,
and they ask me to pick up a piece of paper.
You call that job satisfaction?
'Cause, I don't."
THE BEARS STILL SUCK!
For some of you who feel Santana was slighted in this top 25:
Take WR’s #15-25, and assume they were all FA’s this year. Lets also assume money is of no objective. Lets also assume were are a new expansion team, in need of help at WR.
For me, it’s easy. I would choose any of the WR’s #15-#25 to have on my new team over Santana Moss, and for me, the descision wouldn’t even be close.
I got Tiger Blood running through my veins!
I understand your point, but football is a bottom line production game.
And Santana produces, and that’s the bottom line.
Would I be upset if Washington signs Sidney Rice? Heck no!
But salaries are an issue, as is familiarity with personnel and the playbook.
By the way, I heard a radio interview with Moss on SNR today. He says he is in the best shape of his life due to his new workout regimen. He expects to be better than he has ever been, specifically with his cuts and route running. He sounded great during the interview. He wants to stay in Washington, he likes Snyder, respects Shanahan, and loves his teammates and the fanbase. He didn’t show up to off-season practices because of no contract and fear of injury…understandable. He says he is ready to go day #1, and he has never felt better.
While he stuck up for Albert, he all but said the guy just doesn’t give full effort, and it is disappointing. He stuck up for McNabb, and blamed injury for his benching. He didn’t want to get involved in personnel decisions, and says he is worried about himself and doing all that he can to be the best player he can be.
Imagine that, a Redskin with heart, class, a strong teammate, a productive player, doing all he can to help the team win games. Sometimes we need to look beyond the age, numbers, and stats. Santana is one of those guys. He wants to retire a Redskin, and most fans want him back, in my opinion.. He has earned a good contract, and ShanAllen could make a strong statement to the team and the fanbase by rewarding one of our own.
I’m sick of the revolving door of mercenaries who come here for the big payday, and don’t give back. As a Redskin fan, I implore Bruce and Mike to do the right thing, Give Santana a fair contract, and keep one of the good guys in Burgundy and Gold !!
I would not be pissed if Albert is still here
He just needs to be here with the right attitude, and used in the right way(DE). If he and Carriker were our DE’s, and Nield, Bryant and Jenkins were out NT’s, with Jenkins also spliting time at DE, we would be pretty good up front. It will be a big IF, if Albert was commited, but if he is, and Shanny has gotton over his power trip, Albert can still be dominate.
I’ll welcome him back if the attitude is changed, and he and Shanny/Haslett have mended fences.
I got Tiger Blood running through my veins!
Mighty big gamble.
Let’s suppose that Fat Albert DOES have a change of heart and attitude, and decides that he is commited to play here. I think it would be a fragile relationship at best, and quite likely a dangerous ticking time bomb scenario. I would think that there is a HUGE chance that at the first sign of anything that makes Fat Albert unhappy, he will immediately revert back to being the malcontent POS that he was last year… or worse.
A Redskin Potato
by Mr PotatoHead on Jul 4, 2011 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions
On the field he's a beast
which is where we ned to focus our attention………………keeping him on the field
I got Tiger Blood running through my veins!
Yea he was in pure Beast Mode when the Eagles came to town.
“Hey! But he played well that one time versus the Bears!”
Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions
With his desire to sign Rice and keep Fat Albert, it is becoming clear to me that Tiller prefers high-cost, high-risk gambles to lower-cost, low-risk best bets.
A Redskin Potato
by Mr PotatoHead on Jul 5, 2011 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions
Clearly not true
Albert is already a Redskin.
And I only advocated 1 major FA signing so far, to which I also said, I would be fine without signing ANY WR’s, and going with what we have. To me, the WR debate started with “would you rather sign Moss, or Rice” to which I chose Rice, and for reasons which I defended. The votes between Rice and Moss were pretty damn close in the GM poll.
I’m probably one of the few on HH thats is against signing a lot of big names. It’s true, that I’d rather keep Haynesworth, than just let him go. IF we could trade him for something of value, then so be it, but I don’t want to just see him cut, and walk out of DC with a fat wallet. We all know AH can earn his keep if he is motivated, used correctly, and had mended ways with the coaches. Who knows if any of these 3 things will happen though.
I got Tiger Blood running through my veins!
Mighty big IFs
1. IF he is motivated.
2. IF he mends ways with the coaches.
3. IF he is used correctly
The big problem is #3. What does “used correctly” mean? Who gets to make that decision? Should it be Fat Albert or the coaches?
Fat Albert appears to have a very strong opinion about what that means, but in a team sport like football, it is (and should be!) the coaches’ decision how to use their players. If Fat Albert decides that the coaches aren’t using him the way HE feels is the correct use for him, how long untill #1 and #2 go out the window? Last year we had a cold war between Fat Albert and the coaches. If they mend the relationship, and then it breaks down again, it has the opportunity to heat up and get VERY ugly.
A Redskin Potato
by Mr PotatoHead on Jul 5, 2011 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions
IDK, thats a great question to ask
If I were one of the coaches, I would play him at DE, and let him absorb DT’s and cause havoc.
I got Tiger Blood running through my veins!
I respect this opinion 100%
Like I have said many times before, I like Moss, and respect what he has done in Burgundy and Gold. Would I be PISSED if we re-signed him?…………………no. I just feel like a younger, bigger WR would help our team in the long run.
The issue with money doesn’t seem to be much of an issue at all, and we all know we had one of the worst WR corps in the entire league last year. Actually, we were prob bottom five in the league at the skill positions(TE excluded). I like what we did in the draft with guys like Helu, Hank, Paul and Robinson. I also realize that WR’s often take 2 years before they are ready to make a major impact. I really like the idea of a young FA(mid 20’s)that is still in his/just entering his prime, that can be around for 5-7 years as an impact player for this team. A guy like Rice is a guy we can implement into our offense from day 1, yet we can still build around him due to his youth. Moss could also jump into our offense from day 1, but the likelihood of him being here in 3 years(and still playing at a high level)is very slim. If any WR is going to take reps away from our young players, I would rather it be a WR who will at least be part of the re-building process we are currently in. At soon-to-be 25, Rice certainly fits that part. Besides that, he give us a 6’4" body with speed, and a guy who has proven(albiet in just i main season) to be a Red Zone threat.
For the long haul, I just feel it is money better spent.
I got Tiger Blood running through my veins!
Dez Bryant?
A top 25 reciever, are you serious? I can name 10-15 more guys that should’ve been listed before Dez Bryant…..
If you were gonna put rookie reciever's up....
Mike Williams (TB) should’ve definitely been before Dez Bryant, he wasn’t spectacular at all last season…On the other hand Mike Williams (TB) had more TDs, more catches, a higher ypc average, was healthy (started ALL 16 games) and was overall just a better player last season than Bryant was….are you a Cowgirls fan pretending to be a Redskins fan?
by redskinsfan909 on Jul 4, 2011 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions
Kind of hard to deny the talent of Bryant even if his dad was a pimp and his mom was a ho.
@Diesel__44 on the twitter machine.
Mike W was TB's #1 target
Dez, up until the 2nd half of the season, was the 3rd option on the Cowboys. See what he did as a 3rd option, and imagine that as the 1 or 2 this season.
I got Tiger Blood running through my veins!
He also had Jon Kitna throwing to him.
Go Suns, Packers, Jays, and Huskers!
Green Bay Packers: Super Bowl XLV Champions!!!!
I also edit things at Ridiculous Upside. Check it out.
And yet
you don’t appear to apply the same boost to Moss for his consistent production despot our subpar QB play? Seems like a double standard, but this whole venture is so subjective as to render it meaningless in my view.
*despite
i did not mean to bring Snyder into this.
Bryant's value is a lot greater than that of Moss my good friend
Just being a realist. NFL minds would agree
I got Tiger Blood running through my veins!
That was neither my point nor the one you were arguing
moving the goalposts…
Weren't you implying
that both Moss and Bryant had poor QB’s throwing them the ball for a portion of the 2010 season? If I read your response wrong, my bad. Thats what I though you meant with your “double standard” reference.
I got Tiger Blood running through my veins!
Yes, that was my point
it appears you made concessions in Bryant’s case but not for Moss. Your response, however, does not address this point. It just states that Bryant > Moss. I was not comparing the two…just pointing out an inconsistency in the way you are judging the players. Again, I feel that this is such a subjective argument that it doesn’t really mean much to me…all due respect.
If it doesn't mean much
why join the discussion?
I did lay out my criteria for my list above. Like it of not, thats how I view them. Feel free to disagree as much as you like.
I got Tiger Blood running through my veins!
Cause I felt like it
thanks for deigning me allowed to disagree.
Sorry
that was probably an overreaction…and a bit douchey on my part. I still think you are applying different standards to different players. As to your criteria, they are so vague and wide-ranging that I find them to be meaningless. One could rationalize any result under them as opposed to using criteria to determine a result. Maybe it would help if I knew whether we were talking about the top 25 now or the top 25 goig forward…one would rely more on stats and the other would more heavily weigh potential and youth.
Jim seems like a nice guy but is probably a bit of a liar.
I’m going to go out on limb and say that his last name is not America.
@Diesel__44 on the twitter machine.
One of my MC aliases actually
so you are partially correct, Mr. 44.
Well I've taken notice of you...not in a creepy way.
Condescending, marginally witty, high football IQ and a Skins and O’s fan. I’m cautioned by the WVU and Duke allegiances but I usually read what you write. If I see you and you see me and you’re not too intimidated, I would buy you a beer.
@Diesel__44 on the twitter machine.
I'm too stupid to get intimidated.
I’m from the dubvee, so WVU is in my blood. I went to Duke, so there’s that. Don’t prejudge me on that one though…we probably share a lot of the same opinions on Duke.
I’ll gladly accept your beer as long as you don’t mind me drinking a bourbon on the rocks alongside it. Next round’s on me.
My guess is that he's a friend of Parks
Of maybe Parks himself. You know how Parks is with the screen names.
I got Tiger Blood running through my veins!
It's definitely a conspiracy against you
of course, the first thing I did on this site was get into it with Parks over my dissing the Nats, but don’t let reality get in the way of your victim mentality.
exactly. Dez hasn’t proven anything yet.
he’s too high on that list.
"By far the worst performers on the (Redskins) are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
He(Bryant)played in 12 games in 2010
and still had 45 rec, for 561yds and 6 TD’s. Now imagine another 4 games. I’d bet at least 60 receptions, for over 800 yds and at least 8 TD’s. Not bad for a rookie.
But maybe your right. It could be a little early to put him on the list. Potential wise, It’s my opinion he should be there.
I got Tiger Blood running through my veins!
He had a great year, but MW has to be ranked ahead of him, based on achievement so far (and potential).
That’s all I’m saying
"By far the worst performers on the (Redskins) are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
I think Dez has more potential than MW
But true, they are both pretty damn good going into their 2nd year.
Hopefully we’ll be having this conversation about Hankerson next year.
I got Tiger Blood running through my veins!
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
Related FanPosts on Hogs Haven
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Recommended FanPosts
Recent FanPosts
In Association With
Shutdown Corner - NFL - Yahoo! Sports
- Detroit Lions DT Nick Fairley arrested again; now has more NFL arrests than NFL sacks
- Former high-school star Brian Banks does serious time on trumped-up charge, now hopes for an NFL shot
- Former ‘idiot kicker’ Mike Vanderjagt in trouble after accosting junior-high heckler
- Adrian Peterson blows teammates away in footraces; appears to be on the mend
- UPDATE: Charlie Sheen didn’t buy Lawrence Taylor’s Super Bowl ring
