Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Comparing Mark Cuban and Dan Snyder

On Pickled Hogs Radio last night, Ken Meringolo, Brian Mitchell and I were kicking around the notion of Mark Cuban being compared to Dan Snyder. Obviously, they both like free agency and spending. I generally have always disliked Cuban, if for no other reasons than the constant images of him yelling at refs as well as what appears to be micromanaging. I thought the comparison with Snyder was a good one, except for the fact Cuban has been to the playoffs every single year he's been an owner since 2000-not an easy accomplishment when you think back to how bad that team was.

After the jump are some Mark Cuban quotes on Dan Snyder's criticism from 2009 along with some rather interesting times the two owner have crossed paths before. 

Back to the radio show, BMitch chimed in with an excellent point:

BMitch: Mark Cuban likes everyone of his players. He doesn't show favoritism to certain players. That's the difference between him and Dan Snyder. If you're the last guy on the bench and your owner is showing you the love like Mark Cuban does, that last guy on the bench is willing to run through a wall. But if you have the owner dealing with a certain group of people and not everybody else, then you have more than half your team who could care less about the owner and it comes out in their play. That's the difference.

Umm...#26 certainly comes to mind with "favoritism," and BMitch's comments ring true to the poor play of some key players. Ken then had this to say: 

Ken: My main argument against this would be that an NBA roster is much smaller than an NFL roster, and thus easier for an owner to spread out his love equally. That said, Snyder has gone so far in the other direction over the years, lavishing his love and attention on individual players to the point where he flat out ignored and alienated most of his team. The lackluster effort that B Mitch refers to on the part of players who have felt slighted by the owner could be attributed to guys who have played for the Redskins I am sure.

Star-divide

Unlike Kevin, I have always liked Cuban as an owner. He has not only put his money where his mouth is in terms of bringing in talent, he has taken on the establishment that is the NBA. Personally, I can't stand David Stern. He strikes me as a bullying, smarmy rich dude that oversees a league that many fans simply don't trust. Cuban has come in, set up independent investigations on refs, the way games get called, the circumstances that surround the way games get called, and released these findings to the general public as well as to the league. He bleeds with his team from courtside-not in a three-piece suit, but in Dallas Mavericks gear. The lesson Dan Snyder could learn from Cuban-in my opinion-is that Cuban did ultimately change his style this season, especially as the season wore on and into the playoffs. While I don't think his being quiet was the reason that LeTravel was so awful in the Finals, Cuban's actions represented a respect for his team, his coaches, and the game in a way that positively impacted the "big picture." Dan Snyder could use a change in style. To some degree you could say he began that change last year, but who really knows? The fact that Cuban has a ring now should serve as a positive reminder to Snyder that all the money in the world, and even all the talent you could ask for is aided by actions that any/every owner can take...IF that owner is truly dedicated to winning a championship above all else. From a bird's eye view, it's pretty easy to compare Dan Snyder and Mark Cuban (before the Heat series at least).

Other Snyder-Cuban crossroads:

"I just think Dan wants to win so badly, SO so badly, that it sometimes comes across as meddlesome because they haven't won yet. If they had won--let's just say they had drafted the right quarterback, they had drafted Matt Ryan or whoever, the young quarterback coming out. And that's not to say that their current quarterback isn't going to get the job done, but the Redskins just haven't had that superstar at the quarterback position that I think can carry them. And if they had, you would hear less or talk less about Dan Snyder, and he would be the guy who transitioned, took over and did a great job."

And then there's this:

* Useless Comparison Chart *
    Dan Snyder Mark Cuban
Movie Investments Yes Dick Clark Productions  Magnolia Pictures
Entertainment Investments Yes Red Zebra Broadcasting Landmark Theatres
Wanted to buy a second team Yes Tottenham Hotspurs (UK) Penguins, Pirates, Cubs, Rangers
Charity Yes Redskins’ foundation Fallen Patriot Fund 
Executive Producer Movies Yes Valkyrie Multiple (IMDB)
Player salaries since Jan. 2000   Over $1 billion $880 million
Kids Yes 2 daughters; 1 son 2 daughters; 1 son
Jewish Yes Yes Yes
Born & Raised No Silver Spring, MD Pittsburgh, PA

 

I didn't realize he was a Penguins fans. I knew my dislike was seeded somewhere. In all honesty though, I do like Cuban now. He's celebrating no different than I would and doesn't give a sh*t about what anyone thinks. Kudos, Mark Cuban.

Comment 4 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

BMitch thinks some players did not play well because they suspected that Snyder did not like them?

Owners lavish love and affection on their players? You think that Snyder should quit meddling, but keep spreading all that love and joy around? Maybe he should count his love as money – so every smile counts as $20, every hug as $50, etc. And now I know why Albert Haynesworth didn’t play well – he was upset because he thought old Dan didn’t appreciate him.
    I hope you guys are kidding. BMitch may have had too many wedges collapse around him, but you guys must have been driven over the edge by the lockout – or else you’re just drunk, or driven insane by Dirk Nowitzki’s singing. Or maybe your humor is just over my head. I didn’t know Cuban owned (a part of?) the Cubs. My guys aren’t doing very well this year – must be Cuban’s fault.

by Donnio1234 on Jun 17, 2011 10:58 PM EDT reply actions  

Not sure what Mitchell meant

but it is true that favoritism can fracture team unity.

by Jim America on Jun 21, 2011 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe they've just confused

Is their confusion stemming from Danny Boy’s infatuation with a soccer team in England? Do they sense that Dan is drifting away from the Skins so why put out the effort? Football? REAL football? Does Danny see a way to be a winner by investing overseas? Cuban apparently wants to invest in America not overseas. Maybe Danny should think about Buy American.
Actually the lockout is getting to everyone when articles like this appear in late June.

by DudleyDoright on Jun 18, 2011 7:58 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email hogshaven@gmail.com

Managers

Superbowl_small Kevin Ewoldt

Riggins_small Ken Meringolo

Editors

Sb_small Parks Smith

Small Steve Shoup

Chalkboard_football-opt403x300o00s403x300_small UkRedskin

Washington_redskins_helmet_small Redskins News

Authors

Badshirt2__2__small fatpickle

Family_in_disney_small Tiller56

Rg3super_small HTTR4LIFE

Hh_small Ronnie Adkins