Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: UFC 146 Results: Junior dos Santos TKO's Frank Mir

What Is The Redskins Biggest Special Teams Need? And How They Might Find The Answer?

LANDOVER MD - DECEMBER 12:  Graham Gano #4 of the Washington Redskins reacts to one of two missed field goals during the game against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers  at FedExField on December 12 2010 in Landover Maryland. The Buccaneers defeated the Redskins 17-16. (Photo by Larry French/Getty Images)

While we all know that the Redskins have a number of pressing needs, ranging from quarterback to nose tackle, a few that often get overlooked are those on Special Teams. While the Redskins no doubt lost their games due to an ineffective Offense and Defense, their Special Teams play didn't do them any favors (outside of Brandon Banks of course). The Redskins need to find a way to improve at three key Special Team's positions; Kicker, Punter and Long Snapper.

If you asked me a month ago I would have said that Kicker is the least of the Redskins Special Teams needs, despite the numerous missed field goals from Graham Gano. Although most fans would feel the sting from those missed field goals the most, I felt that Gano was dealt a pretty unfair hand. Throughout the year Nick Sundberg's snaps were consistently high or low, that I think accounted for a least a couple of the missed field goals. I also felt that Gano's kickoffs, in particular his placement, helped make up for his spotty field goal percentage. Gano not only consistently kicked the ball deep inside the 5 yard line, but was very good at directional kicking that helped shrink the field for opposing returners. Now with kickoffs 5 yards closer, I think there it eliminates a good bit of Gano's ability as I believe a number of kickers will be able to provide the field position advantage Gano did.

Even with Gano's diminished value, he still might be worth more to keep around than the Redskins punters or LS Nick Sundberg. Sundberg was inconsistent throughout the season and left the punters and holders having to reach for the ball all season, which messed up the timing on a number of kicks. Although Sundberg's snaps could be part of the reason the Redskins punting was so poor, it's not the only reason.

The Redskins were 4th in the league in punts (thank you offense), but just 8th in yards and 11th in net yards. They ended up 2nd worst in both yards per punt and net yards per punt. The Redskins were tied for 21st in number of punts inside the 20, despite having so many more opportunities than other teams (part of that reason though goes back from the offense, since I'm guessing the majority of the time the Redskins were punting from their own 30 yard line). One thing that can't be blamed on the offense is the fact that only 17 of the Redskins 94 punts were fair caught, which comes out to just 18%. Most of the top teams were between 24-34% when it came to fair catches. The Redskins lack of fair catches, led them to being 2nd worst in return yardage.

So how do the Redskins fix these Special Team's woes? My plan after the break:

Star-divide

Long Snapper: Now this is obviously not going to be a major free agent signing or draft pick, but the Redskins need to make signing the best long snapper they can a priority, which will likely be an undrafted rookie free agent. The good news for the Redskins is that typically long snappers aren't drafted so they can likely get the top one. Also working in the Redskins favor is the fact that the pick of the litter, Danny Aiken, went to UVA and hails from southern Virginia. The Redskins should have a leg up in signing him if he is an undrafted free agent. 

Punter: Depending on how free agency shakes out, there could be some interesting names (this assuming anyone with 4+ years is a free agent). If not, the Redskins will need to bring in a rookie, which preferably would be an undrafted free agent. There are a number of options that could be available, but there is one that I would potentially consider drafting in the 7th round (hopefully with the compensation pick). That would be Chas Henry from Florida. The Ray Guy winner, had a 45.1 yard average, and consistently placed balls inside the 20. He also has experience as a FG kicker and kickoff specialist, as well as being a holder. If the Redskins trade back or are able to trade players to stockpile more mid-round picks using a 7th rounder on a guy like Henry would be worth it to ensure that you get him.

Kicker: This is the one area I'd like to see the Redskins make a priority and potentially even use a 5th round pick on Nebraska K Alex Henery. Henery who was also an elite punter has the strongest and most accurate leg in this draft. He missed just one extra point during his career in nearly 200 chances. In addition he made over 89% of his career FG's and consistently showed range from beyond 40 and 50 yards. In fact his only missed FG this season was a blocked 51 yard attempt. He has the leg strength to be a weapon on kickoffs as well, and could be the Redskins long term answer at their revolving door of kickers.

Analysis: Now I know most Redskins fans might want to have me committed for suggesting that Washington use potentially two draft picks on specialists, but they need to find some way to address these positions. Now I would be quite a bit more reluctant to use picks on kickers if the Redskins don't trade back and stockpile selections. If Washington does acquire extra selections though, I would have little problem using a 5th and 7th rounder to fix Washington's kicking woes, which have really been an issue for the last decade. Considering how poor our late round selections preformed last season, at least the Redskins would be getting actual value and not just bench/practice squad fodder out of their late round picks, by selecting Henery and Henry (It would also be fun to grab both given their similar names).

Steve Shoup has been a Redskins fan his entire life and dreams of the day they get back to the glory days of his youth. In addition to his regular piece on Hogs Haven, you can find his daily writings at Fanspeak.com.  

Poll
How should the Redskins address their Special Team needs?
Draft
37 votes
Free agency
73 votes
Undrafted free agency
103 votes
Combination of the above
174 votes
Stick with what they got
37 votes

424 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 22 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

No reason to draft a kicker.

Gano is going to be fine if we don’t pull the rug out from under him. Gano’s college stats stack up above any kicker coming into the league this year, so you can’t just quote those as an improvement. The way to solve the revolving door at kicker is to find a guy with ability and promise and then work with him to develop him into a fifteen year fixture on the team.

Definitely need a new long snapper though (I think saying the errant snaps caused “a couple” missed FGs is being overly charitable).

by tuckwell on Apr 2, 2011 1:27 PM EDT reply actions  

Special Teams was our strong suit oustide of Gano and the TB game this year.

I really believe in Gano. He has what it takes and we shouldn’t let him go just yet.
Here are some stats:
Gano had the 15th best kickoff average with 66 yds.
Yes, he had a starting kicker low of 69% Field Goals Made, thats terrible.
I was lucky enough to “shadow” Dan Stienberg in the Press Box for the Tampa Bay game. I sat in the front row next to Tom Boswell, where he told me all these schemes and so on. Mike Wise was next to him… It was a very cool experience. I remember before the game, the cover article of “The Washington Post Magazine” (I believe- might have been Washingtonian), was about the disposal of the NFL Kicker. It had a long interview with none other than Mark Moseley. They talked about how Moseley had made 60% in his first year as a Redskin, and that coach Allen (?) didn’t quit on him. He went on be the all time leading scorer in Redskins history, a MVP, and a 3 time Pro Bowler. WITH A 65% CAREER AVERAGE. I understand the game has changed a lot since his time, but he’s in the damn Ring of Fame. Don’t quit on Gano yet.

Concerning the rest of our special teams, obviously Banks was a great boost, but I don’t know if he can repeat what he did last year if we don’t get him involved elsewhere. I feel like players who are relied only to return end up under preforming. I do think, however, that we should involve Armstrong in kicks. He is about as fast as Banks and could give Banks a little less pressure. Possibly having Banks do punts and Armstrong do kicks. Armstrong did say he returned a lot in High School, and he would love to in the NFL.

Punting needs to be addressed. We had 40 yards per punt. That’s terrible.

Now the NFL doesn’t have stats on kickoff yards and so forth, but if I remember correctly we were superb minus Perry Rielly on one play. We had great blocking, something announcers commented on quite a bit, and great ability to limit returns on the other end. We pin teams down! We had quite a few inside the twenty punt stops, mostly because the offense would get to about the 50 and die.

So I think were in pretty good shape.

by Andrew DeFrank on Apr 2, 2011 2:04 PM EDT reply actions  

No I do appreciate Gano's ability on kickoffs

I just worry that with the new rules there won’t be much of an impact difference. Gano’s directionality led to just a 19 yard return average, but he had few touchbacks, now a typical kicker could get a lot more touchbacks and decrease the overall starting field position.

As for the % I agree last year was pretty low and maybe not what you should have expected, but you can’t compare his percentage to that of someone who played 20-30 years ago. The game has changed so much in that time now that everyone is a soccer style guy. I went through the team stats in the last decade and only a handful of teams had a % under 70, and that was by a team so in some of those instances I’m sure it was due to a primary kicker getting injured. I understand giving a guy another chance, but if you don’t address the position and some point we will likely always be in mediocrity.

We did well to limit K.O. return yards no doubt, but punt return yards were another story, we gave up quite a few of those and that was a major weakness. Not only were our punters only barely cracking 40 yards a punt, but it was weak hang time which led to more/longer returns.

Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Apr 2, 2011 5:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Undrafted free agency...

I would not want to miss out on the guy who gets drafted by another team and turns out to be a sleeper and can make a differance for the Skins at some of the key positions that they need help at. Sometimes mechanics can be worked out in Gano`s case and also for Sundberg. Some kickers have a high % since they are kicking short field goals but once they start kicking from 45 or longer they are mortal and you have to wonder why can`t the offense get the extra five yards in the first place. Might be because other crucial elements are missing. High scoring offense`s are not consistantly kicking FGS from the 50 yard line anyway.

by mybluebone on Apr 3, 2011 12:29 AM EDT reply actions  

I disagree with everybody and say that we should draft a kicker

who cares about late round picks anyway, they hardly pan out to be special teamers most of the time, so why not use late round picks (if we trade back and stock pile) on our kicker and punters? The dude from Nebraska is ill!

Special Teams are always overlooked. I say we invest in our future now! No amount of stats can make up for that 20 sumthin yard field goal Gano missed last year. I’m tired of giving people chances….bye Gano.

by TheUberest on Apr 3, 2011 2:17 AM EDT reply actions  

If we let him go.

David Akers! Shawn Shuisham!
YOU NEVER KNOW.
He loves this team, he’s responsible, and there aren’t better options out there.

by Andrew DeFrank on Apr 3, 2011 7:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

did you really just mention shuisam?

please dude, he still sucks. besides give me the dude from nebraska any day over gano!

by TheUberest on Apr 3, 2011 10:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

only because...

pitt had the jeff reed situation and he was the only half ass option they could choose. suisham still sucks though. anytime you go back and forth between us and the cowgirls, come on now!

by Lil_Dwilliams17 on Apr 3, 2011 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

and he had like the worst kick in super bowl history

I come ready, when I came out the womb I was ready, tell them mama that's why you had me, you knew I was ready. -Moss

Dominating your opposition physically is great and all, but confounding them mentally is sooo much more fun.

Im not racist and I don't discriminate, I stereotype; its faster

by Redwolf333 on Apr 3, 2011 7:15 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Why?

Like I said, Gano’s stats from college were as good or better than ol’ Cornhusker there. Means nothing for NFL success.

by tuckwell on Apr 3, 2011 7:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

KK.

Graham Gano (Florida State) was the 2008 Lou Groza award winner for best placekicker in the country as a senior. He finished the year making 33/34 PATs (one miss on a flubbed snap) and 24/26 FGs. He ranked #1 in the country in the categories of most FGs made, highest FG percentage and points scored. His two previous years, he was the team’s full-time punter, and split time with another punter his senior year. He finished with a career punting average of 42.1 yards, and was especially well known for dropping the ball into the “coffin corner” to pin opposing defenses inside their own 10 yard line.

Alex Henery (Nebraska) was the full-time PK for Nebraska for three years; his sophomore and junior years both saw him end up with mid-80% FG completion. His senior year showed improvement, making 18 of 19 FGs for a 94.7% average, and hitting a perfect 54/54 PATs. Henery also was the punter for his team, with his best year being his last; 69 punts for an average of 43.2 yards per attempt.

The one thing I can’t speak to on a comparison is range. I’ve personally seen Gano hit two 60+ yard FGs in one game in high school, and he used to put them through from 50-55 at FSU with no problems. Henery is said to have range out to 50-55 as well but I don’t follow Nebraska so I’m not sure what his long is, or what his comfortable max range is.

Point being what I said all along, the numbers stack up. Henery doesn’t really look any better coming out of college than Gano did, so why waste a draft pick? Remember Durant Brooks?

by tuckwell on Apr 4, 2011 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think there is a lot of similarities no doubt

Henery might have a slightly stronger leg than Gano and his lone miss this past year was a blocked FG that apparently wasn’t his fault.

I think the biggest difference for me is the consensus perception between the two. Gano despite his impressive track record was only considered a 6-7 rd. kicker in most draft circles, and obviously went undrafted. Henery is considered a higher prospect, with some sites pegging him for the 4th round. While he might not go that high and is likely more of a 5th round guy, I think there is a higher consensus on his abilities.

Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Apr 4, 2011 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Eh.

Only because of body of work. Gano only punted until his senior year. But I have to say, any GM that drafts a kicker before the 7th round better be damn sure he’s getting the next Janikowski.

by tuckwell on Apr 4, 2011 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

"High scoring offenses are not consistantly kicking FGS from the 50 yard line anyway."

^^ Nail on the head. The reason Moseley’s our all-time top scorer is because he kicked a lot of extra points and close-in field goals. A result of an all-time great line and explosive backs and receivers that march the ball down the field (and, more often than not, into the end zone).

As for the poll; I chose the combination of the above option, as we have three picks in the last round. If we can get, say, a potential Ethan Albright with the 252nd or whatever pick, that is more likely to be better value than any other position that late in the draft. We have the other picks for our diamonds in the rough anyway.

As for free agency (when business can be done again), its always struck me that specialists would be one of the best ways to take advantage of Snyder’s cash; just outbid other teams by an extra hundred thousand a year for the best kicker, snapper and punter and lock down those positions for a relatively low price, cap-wise.

by Stephen Beagrie on Apr 3, 2011 6:40 AM EDT reply actions  

I'm still kinda ticked

that Shanny dismissed ol’ reliable – what’s his name? – our previous longsnapper, who was only nearly perfect for about 30 years (yes I exaggerate, but…).

Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.

by Scott E on Apr 4, 2011 10:25 AM EDT reply actions  

Bad back. Wasn't going to be ready for the season signed with SD but was cut.

He’s retired.

I consider myself a one man wolfpack..@Diesel__44 on twitter.

by Diesel44 on Apr 4, 2011 7:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ethan “The Red Snapper” Albright. Not a bad snap during his tenure.

by SDot21 on Apr 4, 2011 12:50 PM EDT reply actions  

reply fail to Scott E. ^^

by SDot21 on Apr 4, 2011 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email hogshaven@gmail.com

Managers

Superbowl_small Kevin Ewoldt

Riggins_small Ken Meringolo

Editors

Sb_small Parks Smith

Small Steve Shoup

Chalkboard_football-opt403x300o00s403x300_small UkRedskin

Washington_redskins_helmet_small Redskins News

Authors

Badshirt2__2__small fatpickle

Family_in_disney_small Tiller56

Rg3super_small HTTR4LIFE

Hh_small Ronnie Adkins