Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Full Coverage of 2012 Coke 600

A Little Bang for the Buck

The 2010 Washington Redskins lacked explosion on the offensive side of the football.  There is no hiding this.  Our most explosive weapon on offense is a 5' 10" 209 lb soon-to-be 32 year old wide receiver.  Our most explosive running back, who became a starter by default, probably couldn't touch a 4.6 40 yard dash.  Our one-time explosive weapon at quarterback is soon to be displaced due to lack of production, inaccuracy, inability to run our offense, and a long list of past injuries that have left him a meer shadow of his former Pro Bowl self.  We are now left with a statue at quarterback, who shows an alarming propensity for turning the football over at key points of a football game. 

 

We have some young potential on this team, but none has really been able to contribute on a regular basis.  Fred Davis, who was know at USC to be a open field nightmare to tackle, and a mismatch for both linebackers and safities, is stuck behind the pedestrian Chris Cooley on the depth chart.  Brandon Banks, one of the most explosive and dangerous open field players in the game, is so vertically challenged, that the staff probably feels it is best to just let him return kicks and punts, instead of risking him getting his head taken off going over the middle of the field on an attempted pass route.  Anthony Armstrong surprised us all in 2010.  He has game breaking speed, but he sure as hell isn't going to break many tackles in the open field.   Malcolm Kelly, a kid with some potential, has yet to see the field with any consistancy due to injuries.

 

So this leaves us with.........................................................sorry, mind mind went blank for a moment there.  Where are we going to be in 2011?


Star-divide

Well, before we discuss our team, lets look at the other teams in our division.  These are teams we need to compete with.  These are teams who we face two times each season.  These are teams with which our future hangs in the ballance.

 

Dallas Cowboys - Their team is loaded with explosive play-making talent.  They have an athletic quarterback, who is capable of avoiding the rush, and using both his legs and arm to make plays down the field.  Romo has had his ups and downs, but we can all agree that he's much better than anything we have at the QB position.  Romo's favorite target, Jason Witten, is one of the best TE's in the NFL, and is a nightmare for opposing defenses.  The Cowboys also boast a trio of explosive running backs.  Any one of the three(Barber, Jones and Choice) would be an instant starter for the Redskins, and would represent a hugh upgrade.  Finally, the Cowboys wide receivers boast two great athletes, who are great in the open field.  Miles Austin is like having a running back in a wide receivers' body.  Dez Bryant is a phenomenal talent, who will only get better.  Roy Williams, the forgotten man on their offense, is a better weapon than any WR we currently have on our roster.

 

Philadelphia Eagles - This team may have the most explosive talent in the league at the skill positions.  Mike Vick is.............well, lets just say that he's the most exciting playmaker at the QB position in the NFL.  DeSean Jackson is one of, if not the most explosive WR's in the league.  And to think we could have drafted him in 08'.  Throw in another blazer in Macklin, and you have just produced a horror film for defensive coordinators.  Now as a defensive coordinator you think game planning can't get much worse right?  But Wait, There's More!  What is there that LeSean McCoy can't do.  He's fast, he's powerful, and he can catch the ball out of the backfield as well as any back in the NFL.  Oh, by the way, did I forget to mention Brent Celek?

 

New York Giants - The giants are the third best team in the division when it comes to explosive playmakers on offensive, but even in third place, they are well above the Redskins.  Their franchise QB, although not known to be the best athlete, is far better than any product we have put on the field in that respective position.  The Giants strength on offensive is at the wide receiver position.  Smith, Nix, Hixon and Manningham are all offensive weapons who are dangerous with the football in their hands.  Any one of these guys would be a #1 wide receiver on the Redskins.  Bradshaw and Jacobs, although not considered game-changers, would run circles around the trio we have. 

 

So lets focus on the Redskins.

 

We have an opportunity to significantly upgrade our talent in this years NFL Draft.  We need some offensive playmakers on this team, and the early rounds are full of them.

 

1st round options:

Cam Newton - unbelievable athlete, who possesses rare size, speed and arm strength for the quarterback position.  Would provide an immediate spark for an otherwise dormant offense.

 

Julio Jones - Did anyone see what this kid did to LSU's Patrick Peterson?  If not, go back and watch the 2010 LSU-Alabama game.  Jones is a mismatch for almost any corner or safety in the NFL. 

 

Mark Ingram - Emmit Smith was just heard singing the praises of the Alabama junior RB.  Emmit said he reminded him of himself, just with better speed.  I watched a lot of Alabama games in 2009 and 2010, and I can't remember Ingram getting caught from behind once he broke into the open field.  This kid is a dangerous weapon. 

 

2nd round options:

Jake Locker - Unbelievable athlete at the QB position.  Has the ability to make all the NFL throws.

 

Jon Baldwin - Physical freak at the WR position

 

Torrey Smith - A blazer with good size to boot.

 

Ryan Williams - When healthy as a freshmen at VTech, he was unstoppable

 

Now you can argue with me all you want on how none of these guys I listed will be able to make a difference unless our offensive line is improved.  You'll also argue that defense needs to be improved first and foremost. 

 

But there is one thing that you can't argue, and thats a glaring lack of talent at the skill positions. 

 

I'd like something to get excited about, and the meer thought of trotting out a starting lineup consisting of Grossman, Torain, Armstrong, Moss(if he re-signs) and Cooley does not trigger a catharsis.  Hell, thrown in a case of RedBull, two Viagra, and a shot of human-grade Test, and i'd still have a pulse in the low 60's. 

 

So please Redskin's Front Office, give us fans something to cheer about in 2011.  If not, you may see a lot of empty seats, and a few fans wearing paper bags with the words "Dead Skins", because that's in essence what we'll be; Fans Without a Pulse.

Comment 53 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Is this another one of your "Enlightening" posts?

Cam Newton, Julio Jones, and Mark Ingram? Mark “freaking” Ingram?

Dear Passionate fan, I know you are passionate, but please reply with a logical answer or I will ignore you.

by TerpsAllTheWay on Feb 20, 2011 12:35 PM EST reply actions  

Argue all you want

but the names on this team speak for themselves.

This post is accurate, and you know it’s true.

Are you not entertained?

by Tiller56 on Feb 20, 2011 1:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Mark Ingram though?

Seriously even Julio Jones I understand, but I would never take a Running Back in the 1st unless it was Chris Johnson or Arian Foster.

Dear Passionate fan, I know you are passionate, but please reply with a logical answer or I will ignore you.

by TerpsAllTheWay on Feb 20, 2011 1:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Didn't say we needed to take him at 10

just giving options.

If it were me, I’d go Newton Rd#1, Baldwin Rd #2

Are you not entertained?

by Tiller56 on Feb 20, 2011 2:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Ok, but I would eliminate him from our options.

My Preference is still Best Defensive Player Available and I wouldn’t be frustrated if we went QB, but I feel 80% of the time we should go BDPA, 18% QB, and 2% WR.

Dear Passionate fan, I know you are passionate, but please reply with a logical answer or I will ignore you.

by TerpsAllTheWay on Feb 20, 2011 3:33 PM EST up reply actions  

I'd be happy if went D with our 1st two picks.

31st ranked D
18th ranked O

I consider myself a one man wolfpack..

by Diesel44 on Feb 20, 2011 12:53 PM EST reply actions  

look further into those offensive #'s

your missing a key point.

Do you want a hint?

Are you not entertained?

by Tiller56 on Feb 20, 2011 1:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Half of the players taken in the 1st will be DL/OLB.

That needs to be out 1st pick, not a WR or a RB (not even a consideration). We have the worst front 7 in the NFL on D. We need 3 new starters (OLB, DE, & NT). Two of those can be addressed in RDs 1&2.

Here’s a less subtle hint. Our D f’ing sucks

I consider myself a one man wolfpack..

by Diesel44 on Feb 20, 2011 5:21 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

+1 and Rec'd

Unlike a Great Defense, a Great Offense can’t carry a terrible defense, but a great defense CAN Carry a great offense. That’s what we’ll have to rely on for the next two years until we can fully fill our roster with starting level, talented players.

Dear Passionate fan, I know you are passionate, but please reply with a logical answer or I will ignore you.

by TerpsAllTheWay on Feb 20, 2011 5:25 PM EST up reply actions  

I meant
but a great defense CAN Carry a great terrible offense.

Dear Passionate fan, I know you are passionate, but please reply with a logical answer or I will ignore you.

by TerpsAllTheWay on Feb 20, 2011 5:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Doesn't matter if you want D or not

You still have to admit that we have NO offensive playmakers

Are you not entertained?

by Tiller56 on Feb 20, 2011 5:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Luxury picks. It's like the new rims on a Ford POS.

We need an impact OLB/DE at #10. That player won’t be there in the 2nd. A WR will be even though I wouldn’t draft one.

I consider myself a one man wolfpack..

by Diesel44 on Feb 20, 2011 5:56 PM EST up reply actions  

True about WR

but a good QB won’t be there at #42. Thats why I say QB in the 1st, WR in the 2nd.

And please don’t say Ponder.

Are you not entertained?

by Tiller56 on Feb 20, 2011 8:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Really?

QB in the first and WR in the 2nd? That would rival any draft Vinny has ever been a part of.

I consider myself a one man wolfpack..

by Diesel44 on Feb 20, 2011 8:13 PM EST up reply actions  

You have to agree(even if you don't like the idea)

that QB and WR are both positions of need……………..correct? If Moss leaves, we don’t have a starting calibur WR. We already don’t have a starting calibur QB, so I’m lost with your reasoning for being against this idea(unless it’s simply because you don’t like it).

Here is the needs chart again:
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/team-needs/NFC

Please note the two highest needs for this team. I guess I’m not the only one who’s an idiot.

Are you not entertained?

by Tiller56 on Feb 21, 2011 7:16 AM EST up reply actions  

The problem is people get obsessed with QB's, RB's and WR's

I’m not saying they aren’t important, and by no means do I think they aren’t needs. In fact I’m probably even more pessimistic than you in that department for the Skins, as I have no faith in Malcolm Kelly, and believe that Armstrong has probably peaked, and is at best a 4 on a playoff caliber team. I also have less faith in Torain than most, given his injuries and inconsistency.

The problem is one player doesn’t make a team. Even if you put Tom Brady on the Panthers (or us for that matter) they aren’t challenging for the Super Bowl, or even a playoff appearance. Sure they’d win a few more games, but until they build the supporting cast it won’t matter. In some ways the Redskins issues are even worse, the Panthers had a decent offensive line (though Otah being out killed them, and now with Kalil leaving it will be worse), great backs, a receiving corps that is young behind Smith and has some potential, and a far better defense.

Receivers have even less of an impact than quarterbacks, look at this list of teams last year, with far superior receivers than us that still had bad seasons. Many of them had better quarterbacks and/or receivers as well.

The Skins need to add some talent, but they right now can’t afford to spend top picks on it. Shop for bargain deals in later rounds and hopefully do a better job than the Riley-Morris-Austin picks from last year. (I know some still like Riley, but that was a little to high for him).

Steveospeak- content manager of http://www.fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Feb 21, 2011 11:34 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

IF you go look at the poll Jester did

you see over 150 other idiots just like me.

Are you not entertained?

by Tiller56 on Feb 21, 2011 7:39 AM EST up reply actions  

Here's your hint

Look at 3rd down conversion %, red-zone TD’s, and scoring offense. How did we do there?

Just curious.

Are you not entertained?

by Tiller56 on Feb 20, 2011 1:18 PM EST up reply actions  

The defense ranking is misleading.

1st and foremost we’ve given up a ton of passing yards for the past few years.
2nd we had guys learning a new defense, which requires significant adjustment.
3rd if you improve two positions (NT and S), then that number easily improves 7-9 spots
4th did you watch the games? despite being 31st the Redskins played everyone lose.

Just saying….you can’t cleave to that ranking too much.

by Copious 1 on Feb 20, 2011 3:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Did you forget our giant whole at DE and OLB?

Dear Passionate fan, I know you are passionate, but please reply with a logical answer or I will ignore you.

by TerpsAllTheWay on Feb 20, 2011 3:33 PM EST up reply actions  

I'd go Guard with 2nd Round pick though.

Dear Passionate fan, I know you are passionate, but please reply with a logical answer or I will ignore you.

by TerpsAllTheWay on Feb 20, 2011 3:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Terps

I’m going to be cursing you out in the fall, if we draft Cam Jordan, and Rodney Hudson, then we have to watch Grossman throw his usual 15-20 interceptions to some WR we’ve never heard of who can’t even get out of his own way, none-the-less a defender, all while we futilely attempt to run the football for a whopping 3.2 yrds per carry with the two-headed monster we call thunder and,……… um………………….drizzle?

Then at the end of the season we pull out a few unlikely victories over some shitty teams, thus improving our record to 5-11, and placing us in the same position we are in heading into the 2012 draft.

Thats being:
Getting stuck with a 3rd or 4th choice at QB(cus we sure as hell ain’t gettin Luck, or should I say Lucky, and prob won’t have a shot at Jones, if he decides to enter, either). Them we will have the same people saying the same shit as this season: Shanny’s gotta go, we need a FA veteran QB, lets go out and sign the hottest FA dive WR we can find. Add to that that next season we are likely to need a young CB, and if we want a good one, we’re going to have to use a pretty high draft pick to get one.

Thank You……………….please pass the Tylenol!

Are you not entertained?

by Tiller56 on Feb 20, 2011 6:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Read this:
When’s the last time the Redskins had a quarterback who was widely considered to be in the top 12 of his position? The 1992 season is probably the answer to that question, with Super Bowl MVP Mark Rypien coming off a year in which he threw for 3,564 yards, 28 touchdowns and 11 interceptions.

Since then, Washington has enjoyed pathetic quarterbacking from Heath Shuler, to Gus Frerotte, to Brad Johnson, to Tony Banks, to Shane Matthews, to Danny Wuerffel, to Patrick Ramsey, to Mark Brunell, to Jason Campbell and Todd Collins. There’s a reason the Redskins have just three postseason appearances since 1992.

Are you not entertained?

by Tiller56 on Feb 20, 2011 1:22 PM EST reply actions  

you summed it up in two words

pretty good. Wouldn’t you like for once to have great, and have that great be someone we actually drafted and groomed.

Are you not entertained?

by Tiller56 on Feb 20, 2011 8:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, our skill positions suck but....

Focus my man. Our first priority in free agency and the draft needs to be the trenches. Unfortunately Vintastrophe has backed us into a corner and now we have to address our OL and DL before we can do anything about the skill positions.

I say we devote almost the entire draft and free agency to OL and DL and then try to get lucky with some late round draft picks. Next year should be entirely focused on skill positions though.

by Floppy P Key on Feb 20, 2011 2:19 PM EST reply actions  

Realize this my man
Our first priority in free agency and the draft needs to be the trenches.

We are not going to win without playmakers on offense. Period.

I’m for improving the “trenches” with FA.

Are you not entertained?

by Tiller56 on Feb 20, 2011 5:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Free agency in 2011 can turn this Team around in most positions. Quarterback is a definite exception. Granted that FA done

in moderation (not shooting for the elite) would be for building a overall Team foundation that could be further developed and maintained in future drafts. In this perspective taking Cam Newton is worth the risks. By minimizing the draft versus free agency in one season the draft loses it’s significance for team building at least for 2011. It is not like drafting Cam Newton would be setting the Skins back five years if he happened to be a bust. The same logic applies to Gabbert.

Not playing on semantics, extensive means wide spread whereas intensive is concentration on a specific aspect. In that sense whether or not Newton is a reach it is an intensive move that makes sense if free agency as mentioned above is extensive.

by Jefferson1935 on Feb 21, 2011 2:25 PM EST up reply actions  

This thread defines the draft issue beautifully

Beef up the skill positions (especially QB) or the lines? Of course, we need help in both areas. I’m more with Tiller on the issue, because there are other ways to improve the lines.

by Donnio1234 on Feb 20, 2011 3:50 PM EST reply actions  

EXACTLY!!!!!!.

You can’t get top notch skill position players on QB without paying a pretty penny in Free Agency of through trading draft picks. However, you can get some solid offensive linemen in FA and some prospects later in the draft. I don’t get why people don’t get that. You do not need to burn high draft picks on the Offensive line. Next up…..D-Line, plenty of nose tackle depth in this draft.

by Copious 1 on Feb 20, 2011 4:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes, copious

another one who gets it

Are you not entertained?

by Tiller56 on Feb 20, 2011 5:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Great Post

Tiller great post and insite on our needs. I hope we get Cam Newton and address the later rounds with O-line. I think that we should have a open camp for those who wasn’t drafted and look at a couple of small schools with some Big Lineman. I think we could fine a couple of Gems in those schools and we might find a good WR or Two who is dedicated.

by NITECRAWLER1G on Feb 20, 2011 4:18 PM EST reply actions  

Thanks Nite

by the way, you done fighting with Parks?

Are you not entertained?

by Tiller56 on Feb 20, 2011 5:49 PM EST up reply actions  

LMAO

Yeah I’m done with I was having a Spartan moment. I mean no harm to nobody or anything of that nature.

by NITECRAWLER1G on Feb 21, 2011 11:37 AM EST up reply actions  

Big Lineman: There are plenty of these kinds of players that are draft prospects. Most of them are not invited to the Combine.

These players will usually have a 40 yard time slower than 5.30 seconds which is generally an indicator that their speed within 10 yards also is not that great. A few examples: Jake Vermiglio, OT, North Carolina State; Soeren Wendland, OT, Liberty; Quintin Borders, OT, Union College (KY). These guys are a dime a dozen. Yet there are some that might make it to an NFL roster, but not one using zone blocking: James Brewer, OT, Indiana; Andrew Phillips, OG, Stanford; Rich Lapham, OT, Boston College.

Eric Mensik, OT, Oklahoma, 6-5, 292 lbs, 4.90 sec 40 yd – 2010 Big 12 All-Bowl team – converted TE. May be an UDFA.
http://espn.go.com/blog/ncfnation/tag/_/name/eric-mensik

by Jefferson1935 on Feb 21, 2011 2:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Unless we trade back and stockpile picks taking a QB, WR, or RB in the top 2 rounds makes zero sense

We don’t have enough money to fix all our O-line and defensive holes in FA, So for us to take positions that won’t be effective without an offensive line doesn’t make sense. I would look at free agency to look at some bargains, both on defense, but at the skill positions as well.

A couple names to look at:

Receiver: Steve Breaston- doesn’t have the size we need, but a big upgrade to our corps nonetheless.

Mike Sims Walker- helps address the size issue, not a number one, but at least someone opposing defensive coordinators would care about.

Roy Williams- he is likely a cap casualty in Dallas. i know there are some issues, but he could be worth the cost. (He will get decent money, but not star money).

Running back: Brandon Jackson- sure handed back, could help lessen the load on Torain.

Brian Westbrooke- yes he is old and has an injury history, but he still has some talent, Could be a good cheap signing.

Reggie Bush- Bush will be on the open market unless he agrees to take like a 90% pay cut. Not a great runner, but will help the Skins around in every facet of the game.

As for the draft, i’d take a RB with their top pick in the 5th round, with my top target being Dion Lewis. I’d look to take a big receiver late like DeAndre Brown. Someone with some size and upside.

Steveospeak- content manager of http://www.fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Feb 21, 2011 3:42 AM EST reply actions  

Those guys a no better than what we currently have on the roster.

Bush maybe, but he’s a gimmick more that a sure bet. Sims Walker is inconsistent. For the money that you would pay those guys, you can get two solid starters on the offensive line. At that point…QB and WR are not bad options. Everyone begging for O-Line, but you can nail that in free agency no problem. You have no Newton/Gabbert/Locket QB in free agency and no J. Jones or Baldwin either.

by Copious 1 on Feb 21, 2011 12:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Except you need 4 new O-line starters no to mention

at least 5 defensive starters (DE, NT, OLB, ILB, FS), you can’t fix all of those in FA (or even combined with the draft).

You are right Bush is a gimmick, but that can be beneficial to the Skins. Torain and Williams can handle the dirty work, but Bush can be your breakaway guy. He’s not going to get a huge contract, and would get at most $2-3 million a year, considering we were paying Portis $8 million I think that is a fair signing.

Guys like Breaston, Williams and Sim-Walker are all an improvement over Armstrong, and a VAST improvement over the type of guys they are replacing (galloway, R. Williams, T. Austin). Roy Williams will probably cost the most, but has the highest upside. Breaston and Sims-Walker should be in the $3-4 million range.

Yes there is no Newton/Gabbert/Jones/Baldwin in FA, but what happens if those guys end up like V. Young/Byron Leftwich/Mike Williams/Charles Rogers

Steveospeak- content manager of http://www.fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Feb 21, 2011 2:09 PM EST up reply actions  

"Except you need 4 new O-line starters... (and) at least 5 defensive starters"

Many would disagree with your premise. It is too pessimistic, and, if true, isn’t going to be fixed any time soon. And, in any case, it is not a reason to not take a QB (and certain other skill positions) in the draft. It seems to me that the obvious plan would be to get our QB in the draft, and most of the linemen in FA. Use other draft picks wisely, often on BPA or on positions we can’t or don’t get in FA (the draft isn’t until late April, so they should have a pretty good idea where they stand). I say, get the QB first. If he fails, try again.
I wrote this before reading Jefferson’s post, but I think (or hope) he (Jefferson) is, as usual, right on the numbers. That is, we should be able to afford to get most of the players (linemen, etc) we want in FA, as long as we don’t blow a huge amount on one guy. Say, for example, $2.5 mill x 10 = $25 mill. They might even be able to fit in one “star”. Dan will be thrilled to do it (hee hee).

by Donnio1234 on Feb 21, 2011 3:34 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't know about that

I doubt many would say that Lichtensteiger, Rabach and Montgomery are starting caliber players. Jammal Brown some might say he is, but he sure didn’t show it. Not to mention he is an FA and will cost some money. I don’t know what defensive end or NT starters you have in mind, but guys like A. Bryant, J. Jarmon (though I do like him), Daniels, Holliday aren’t starting caliber. We don’t have an outside linebacker (Alexander can’t cover or pass rush) and McIntosh is an FA. Free safety was a huge issue as Kareem Moore was easily one of the 5 worst in the NFL.

You won’t get stars at every position, but you can at least get starting caliber guys at every spot.

Actually by my calculations we should have at least $50 million in cap room (assuming we cut or trade all the likely suspects, Hayensworth, Portis, McNabb, etc.), but that doesn’t mean we can spend wildly. In addition to the needs I mentioned above, we need multiple D-linemen (and Carriker at best is league average), maybe another ILB given Fletcher’s age, a nickel corner and 2 receivers to help add talent. We will need depth at RB, S and OLB as well. Some of the lesser needs, like depth could be our late round picks, but the point is we have to address the starters in FA. Unfortuanately you can’t just sign the $2-3 million FA’s and hope to be successful. Yes there are bargains to be had, but all we signed last season were guys in that range, Hicks, Larry Johnson, Bucchanon, Kemoeatu and it blew up in our face.

Some of our FA’s can be bargain types or league average starters, but we need to add actual talent. We need to sign a couple big names not just one or two, and def. not at WR.

Steveospeak- content manager of http://www.fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Feb 21, 2011 4:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Also remember a chunk of that money would go to resigning guys

Grossman will get a slight increase and Moss and Rogers will both eat up a solid chunk.

Steveospeak- content manager of http://www.fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Feb 21, 2011 4:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Good points all

Unfortunately, they won’t be able to do everything they want. They’re going to have to live with some of the current guys. So Shanahan/Allen will have to use their resources wisely, and make choices. One point mentioned by several of us is that, in a sense, there are no choices at QB. It has to be the draft, and probably, depending on how Shanahan evaluates the QBs, either at #10 or 42, or somewhere in between if we can trade down. So I take that as a given. The other top pick would most likely go to a D-line or WR, depending on what happened in FA. Ditto for the lower round picks.

by Donnio1234 on Feb 21, 2011 6:10 PM EST up reply actions  

I get what you are saying

but you are assuming that whatever 1st or 2nd round QB will end up the answer. When time and time again that is proven not to be the case. These guys have potential, but they are all raw prospects. This isn’t Sam Bradford or Matt Ryan we are adding.

In my book all current resources (FA-money and first and 2nd round picks) need to be devoted to the primary needs, O-line, D-line, rush linebacker, and FS. If we start adding 2nd, 3rd and 4th rounders, then you address those needs.

It isn’t as though these are the only quarterbacks who will every be NFL ready. Next year should have just the same number of QB’s and (Luck who is a stud), and baring some shocking development we are looking at another top 10 (or top 5) pick next season.

Steveospeak- content manager of http://www.fanspeak.com

by Steve Shoup on Feb 22, 2011 10:06 AM EST up reply actions  

Steveo26 said "We don’t have enough money to fix all our O-line and defensive holes in FA." Contary to this, if the Team does not

spend $10-20 million on a few players, they could easily find 11 other free agents within $25 million total and still keep most of the players from the 2010 roster as depth players.

by Jefferson1935 on Feb 21, 2011 2:58 PM EST up reply actions  

We can easily

add a C and G in FA. We can also add a DE and OLB. Remember, the FA don’t have to be the big-name stars at their positions, rather young, promising, hard workers, who fit into our system and our team philosophy.

Are you not entertained?

by Tiller56 on Feb 21, 2011 7:19 AM EST reply actions  

I would just like to point out

that Ingram was caught from behind by linemen several times this year. From MTD’s scouting report:

his biggest question right now is his top end speed as there are several instances where he was catch from behind by defensive lineman (most notably by Auburn DE Antoine Carter who also knocked the ball loose and out of the back of the end zone in this years Iron Bowl).

by CarverM on Feb 21, 2011 9:50 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email hogshaven@gmail.com

Managers

Superbowl_small Kevin Ewoldt

Riggins_small Ken Meringolo

Editors

Sb_small Parks Smith

Small Steve Shoup

Chalkboard_football-opt403x300o00s403x300_small UkRedskin

Washington_redskins_helmet_small Redskins News

Authors

Badshirt2__2__small fatpickle

Family_in_disney_small Tiller56

Rg3super_small HTTR4LIFE

Hh_small Ronnie Adkins