Hogs Haven Round Table: 2012 Expectations for Leonard Hankerson
This week's edition of the Hogs Haven round table had us discussing Leonard Hankerson. We looked to grade him on some of the more important aspects of being a Wide Receiver, such as route-running, hands, red-zone threat and just his overall performance/potential.
Kevin: It's a shame we didn't get to see more of Leonard Hankerson this season. I remember in training camp he had unbelievable hands along the sideline and in the redzone, but routinely struggled to catch balls over the middle. Is it a fear of getting popped? Perhaps. But the over-the-middle drops continued in pre-season and it took until week 8 for Hankerson to see action, which was accelerated with the injury to Santana Moss. Three of Hank's four games were with John Beck as QB, so how do we evaluate those games? The game that Grossman won his job back, vs Miami, Hankerson had 8 receptions for 106 yards showing off his Univ of Miami talent. The Redskins lack size and speed at WR, so hopefully Hank didn't lose any of that 4.43 combine speed with his hip injury.
Route-running: Hank improved from pre-season, but the one game Hank shined was against the Dolphins, who have a 26th ranked passing defense.
Hands: A- on the sidelines, C- between the hashes. Hank has the hands to make spectacular one-handed grabs, so there's optimism here and he was taking hits routinely in that MIA game.Red-Zone: Hank was a stud in this department at the U and there's no reason he can't continue winning jump balls in the NFL. Hank is listed at 6'2.Overall: B. In my book, Hank has potential to be great but not elite. He surely can contribute at a high level, but his weaknesses over the middle are noticeable when compared to WRs like Brandon Marshall and Dez Bryant. To Hank's defense, WRs usually don't put big numbers there rookie year, so how Hank handles this off-season will set him up for 2012. The work ethic is there. (Brandon Marshall had 309 yards in 15 games his rookie year, then exploded for 1325 yards and 7 TDs his next season).2012 Stat Predictions: This is a tough one since the Redskins will likely bring in a playmaker at WR to be the #1. Gaffney is signed through 2012, Moss has the slot, so Hank might not even be in the top 3 WRs. I still think he wins the starting job but gets hurt again. 35 receptions, 412 yards, 2 TDs.
Parks: Fans need to remember that Hankerson struggled and had just one good game. He's falling in the same category as Jarvis Jenkins as a growing legend in the Redskins' community without really doing much yet. We need the Hank versus Miami, not super-dropsies, inactive Hank. This offseason will define whether or not he's Malcolm Kelly, or a legit target for the Redskins.
2012 Stat Prediction: 25 catches, 350 yards, 3 TD's.
Tiller: Hank was my favorite draft pick of the 2011 draft. I was disappointed he didn't see the field earlier in the season, but I was excited when he finally did get his shot. He showed the ability to make the tough catches look easy, but sometimes made the easy ones look tough. Overall, I would have to say he was a bit of a disappointment for me; from not contributing early, to some of his drops and wrong routes, to finally be put on the IR with the hip injury.
I do however see some tremendous upside. Hank gets in and out of breaks fast, is a fluent runner, and possesses the size that we need at the wide receiver spot. I expect him to claim a starting spot next season, and never look back.2012 Stat Prediction: 16 games started, 69 catches, 875 yards, 7 TD's.
Steveo: Maybe you could say I'm being generous to Hankerson given the limited sample size, but I think we saw some nice flashes in those San Francisco and Miami games. Sure there were some rookie mistakes, and it took Hankerson longer to get on the field. But when he was on there it was mostly a positive and he showed the potential to be a quality starting receiver in the NFL. He's got the best size/speed combination on this team and hopefully he can recover from his injury and be a good weapon in our passing game.
I know there is some concern on how long it took him to get on the field, but plenty of wide receivers take a 1-3 years to become effective in the NFL, and those guys didn't ever have to deal with a lockout their rookie season. He's expected to make a full recovery so I don't think he should get points off due to the injury. Hankerson. My prediction for next season is over 60 catches and 800+ yards for Hankerson.2012 Stat Prediction: 65 receptions, 875 yards and 9 TD's
UkRedskin: Hankerson was the pick I was initially most excited about coming out of the draft. The Redskins have been in dire need of a go-to WR for years now. But after the Gaffney trade and some questionable pre-season performances, I think we all cooled on him for a while. He sparked to life in that Miami game after winning the number 1 job (even if it might have been through necessity). Hank has the ability to pull off some amazing catches and then drop simple ones. For me it looks like its just a lack of concentration. For the easy ones he may be thinking about trying to break the first tackle and get more yards rather than focus on catching the ball first. His route running was coming along, but like all rookies needs work. But I think where Hank will be key next year is in the red-zone. We saw it a couple of times (I vividly remember the 2-point extra play) where he ran a fade or a back-shoulder throw on the goal line. Having a receiver with the ability to do that will be huge for whoever is at QB next year, rookie or not.
2012 Stat Prediction: Something in the region of 60-70 receptions, 700 yards and 8 TD's would be a success in my book.
Ken: The reason why Hankerson will have a chance to be a factor next season is because of his much improved route running. He was making major strides there before his injury. He was also starting to really use his size to his advantage. I like the idea of this young, big receiver having a chance to get in on the ground floor with whatever quarterback we draft.
2012 Stat Prediction: 53 catches, 750 yds, 9 TD's.
Hogs Haven grade:
Route-Running: B-
Hands: C
Red-Zone Threat: B+
Overall: C+
(Thanks to Ken, Kevin, Parks, Tiller and Steveo for their contributions... even though your emails are a bit all over the place)
39 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Love this kid but
did anyone else think that was a push off by Hank?
"Were not here for a long time... were here for a good time."
it probably could have gone either way
and considering it was a rookie I thought they’d call it, but it’s nice to have a receiver that is physical enough to maybe get some of those calls.
Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com
by Steve Shoup on Dec 31, 2011 11:50 AM EST up reply actions
He’s falling in the same category as Jarvis Jenkins as a growing legend in the Redskins’ community without really doing much yet.
Lets not leave out Niles Paul and Terrence Austin who i actually heard people on this site say “have shown a lot of progress” and “looked really good”. These three “stars” have a combined 26 receptions on the years. Jenkins have a total of ZERO career tackles in the NFL yet people got these guys penciled in as week 1 starters next year.
Troy Aikman is the greatest announcer of all time.
FWIW Niles Paul is one hell of a blocker.
So I’m not sure why there’s so much player hating on HH this morning.
I see it as more cushion for the pushin'
not hating....
just not ready to say he’s an answer at WR until he shows it in a real game.
there is no player hating
Just overly optimistic commenter hating
Troy Aikman is the greatest announcer of all time.
by Jeff Bernard on Dec 30, 2011 10:32 AM EST up reply actions
AFter our next draft, we will have a whole new batch of "legend" late round picks for us to cherish.
And the process will repeat itself every year. All that matters is how much we are right.
Skins rule
i'm just worried about his hip injury
not sure the extent of it or the details, but anything with a hip is concerning to me…i just hope he recovers to full strength, because we could use his size and hands out there
As for me, all I know is that I know nothing.
*Socrates*
Agree with Parks
It is amazing how much optimism we Redskins fans have for unproven players considering our last 20 years of shitty to mediocre football. Maybe it’s because there is so little reason to be optimistic about the playmakers we actually see starting games.
I’m not getting excited about a WR again until he actually does something consistently. I remember people getting pumped about Devin Thomas after that game he had against the Saints and we know how that turned out.
That being said, this team needs a big play threat as much as anything so I hope the optimistic projections are on point.
how much is it with WR play, compared to lack of QB play?
by alleykatt1000 on Dec 30, 2011 10:38 AM EST up reply actions
oh the qbs are a bigger problem for sure...
However, D. Thomas got cut by the Panthers and doesn’t figure into the NYG passing attack. A lot of Skins fans thought he would be a no 1 or 2. I’m done touting a WR until there is a real reason to do so.
It would however help us a tremendous amount to have guys that you could just throw it up to in one on one or that are so fast they adjust the other team’s D. We don’t have a guy like that.
I agree
and the fact that he couldn’t break into the starting lineup worries me. It’s not like are set at WR with Gaffney. It shouldn’t be that hard to earn a starting spot with this WR corps.
All WRs are Macolm Kelly to me until they prove otherwise.
Man, I can't believe some of these predictions for next year.
Apparently there was a party with some pretty crazy drugs, but Kevin and I weren’t invited.
Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions
Got to look at it as what he could get each game.
I felt that if he starts, he should be getting at least 4 catches a game. Over 16 games that’s 64 receptions. Then if you look at his average yards per reception (12.5) that equals around 800 yards. But I thought I’d lower it down to around about 10 yard average, which would see him around 650-700 yards.
Then with the TD’s, I just felt that he’s one of our few Red-Zone threats that we can actually throw a fade or back-shoulder throw to, and he an go up and get it. With the possibility of a rookie QB being in charge, that could be a go to play for us.
agreed
I did the same thing but figured his average would go up, since he wouldn’t have the Beckster throwing to him for some of his throws.
I’m also basing it on the fact that i believe the QB and OL production will go up, which should benefit the receivers.
Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com
by Steve Shoup on Dec 30, 2011 11:22 AM EST up reply actions
Y'all are taking crazy pills, I hope you're right though
Hankerson has a lot of upside, but his preseason performance was very discouraging
Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions
by Parks Smith on Dec 30, 2011 11:24 AM EST up reply actions
Yeah but you aren't factoring in RG3 throwing for 4500 yards and 35 TDs next year
I mean Hankerson has to catch some of those right?
Troy Aikman is the greatest announcer of all time.
by Jeff Bernard on Dec 30, 2011 11:47 AM EST up reply actions
good point, my bad guys
Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions
by Parks Smith on Dec 30, 2011 11:51 AM EST up reply actions
yeah but i'm not going to knock him too much given the lack of an offseason
and his average in those 4 games (which the Carolina game shouldn’t even count) was 40 yards a game (12.5 ypc). If you figure it was more like a 3 game 160 yard performance the average is 53 yards per game. Which is on par with Torrey Smith, and ranks only behind Jones and Green among rookie receivers.
Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com
by Steve Shoup on Dec 30, 2011 11:56 AM EST up reply actions
I agree. Some rookies need training camp more than others.
Hankerson showed that he needed it badly. After getting enough reps in, he showed a glimpse of a future above-average to good possession receiver.
Skins rule
I gotta look at it this way.
- Hank is coming off an injury
- Moss, Gaffney Paul, and maybe Stallworth will definitely be here (Armstrong is a wild card)
- Most think we’re going to draft another WR “high” or bring in a guy like Bowe in FA
So where are the touches coming from. I think you have to look at guys drafted around Hank (Brown, Pettis, etc.). I love Hankerson but y’all are vastly over-inflating this dude right now.
Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions
by Parks Smith on Dec 30, 2011 11:23 AM EST up reply actions
I'm not sold we bring in another guy.
Hank is the only guy on the roster currently who really fits the Z receiver role. He has the size and the speed to get deep and make plays. Shanahan appears to favor Moss in a slot role, which is also where Paul will see playing time. Gaffney fits as a good X receiver in 3 receiver sets, but ultimately I think Hank wins out the 1 spot (unless they bring in a Bowe or draft a Blackmon/Floyd/Jeffery which I don’t think they will).
I don't know man. Coaching staff seems less then content on the offensive side of the ball.
Kyle said yesterday even if the Skins sign Hightower back that they will still look for further RB help. Pretty crazy. I’d expect the same to happen at the WR role.
Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions
by Parks Smith on Dec 30, 2011 11:34 AM EST up reply actions
but Kyle is right
it is smart to carry 4 backs, esp. with one coming off a major injury.
While i could see a WR being added, I think it will be another draft pick, who won’t challenge much this year, and will be around for the year after when Gaffney is a FA and Moss might be a cap casualty
Stallworth might be here, but I wouldn’t call it a given, and I think Hank will def. surpass him. The hip injury is a question mark, but it far better than some sort of knee or achilles injury..
Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com
by Steve Shoup on Dec 30, 2011 11:59 AM EST up reply actions
What makes me optimistic
is how he progressively more productive in the three games he played. By the game he suffered his injury, he had emerged as Grossman’s favorite WR target and clearly had the confidence of the Shanahans.
WR is still a an area that could use some enhancement, but I think a WR corp of Moss, Hankerson, and Gaffney, with Davis and Cooley at TE could stack up with other teams in the East for 2012. In other words, if there is no elite QB available with the first pick, I’d rather see an OL taken then a player like Alshon Jeffrey.
by NittanyBlueHen on Dec 30, 2011 10:47 AM EST reply actions
agreed
our pass catchers might not be the best, but they aren’t the worst like our QB and OL
Steveospeak - Content Manager of Fanspeak.com
by Steve Shoup on Dec 30, 2011 11:23 AM EST up reply actions
Gaffney !!!!
He would have a,ready surpassed 1000 yds. , and might have been close to 100 catches , if not for the Beck ordeal .
3 years
and I think this kid will pan out to be what they expected from him. Either way we need some stability at the QB position, building a rupore with your receivers is pretty important. Can’t wait to see this guy next year he has so much potential.
building a rupore is extremely important....what's a rupore again?
just kidding with ya, I know what you meant (rapport btw) and agree with your point, but I don’t see it taking 3 years.
"Please don't dominate the rap, Jack, if you got nothin' new to say."-Robert Hunter
That's Hindi for "Thank you, do you want that in a commerative Redskins wrapper?"
Either that or he meant to say “rapport”.
As in, “If the rookie quarterback and Hankerson develop a rapport, Hankerson could easily be the go to guy in the offense; if that is the case, these numbers may be on the low side.”
No Danny, Nooooooo - Tom Landry, 1982., and Washington Redskins fans, 1999-
It was fun while it lasted
Without being overly flamboyant, don’t want to get lynched, but I personally am very worried about the hip injury. Is he coming back 100? No. When do football players play at 100? rarely, but the hip for a young receiver. I’d say 20 300 2. After watching the games over again the receivers seemed to get open fairly easy and they are productive considering. My guess in the draft will be 2 Qbs 2 Olinemen 2 Dbs 1 receiver tightend either or, probably receiver.
He who knows when he can fight and when he cannot, will be victorious.
I really thing we may not go WR in the draft if we get a good QB instead...
Gaffney and Hank out wide, Moss in the slot on 3rd down. RGIII chuckin’ balls around…that’s just dangerous, IMO.
I think Hank will get 9 starts, but a lot of quality time in the 7 games he doesn’t start at the beginning of the season. 47 catches, 625 yds, 13.3 ypc, 5 tds for Hank next year…I see him getting a lot of balls thrown his way.
The reason why Hank gets a lot of love (as with Niles Paul and Terrance Austin) is because of the effort and hard work we have heard and seen them put into their craft as young professional wide receivers. For a team that has seen many guys come and go that saw Washington as a place to get paid and laid, while putting in half-ass effort, we should be excited at the number of high-character and high-effort guys that we are bringing in. Effort will equal progress, and progress will lead to quality.
Check out the link
http://www.hogshaven.com/2011/8/10/2355257/leonard-hankerson-knows-down-field-blocks
Remember this post? Before he played a snap in the NFL. We still haven’t seen anything from him. Hopefully he can just make the team.
Somebody very funny and on the mark wrote this..
Unfortunately he also knows downfield drops.
@Callahan_9 on the twitter machine.
I think high expectations for Hank are warranted...
Highschool: 3-star recruit coming out of Highschool. Highly recruited.
College: Broke Michael Irvin’s single season record… making him one of the best WRs in Miami’s history. Looked incredible in the Senior Bowl.
NFL: 3rd rd pick (despite having a late 1st to 2nd rd grade). Injured before getting the opportunity to show anything.

by 



























