Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: UFC 146 Results: Junior dos Santos TKO's Frank Mir

Stillwater, DC

Mulling over the Redskins this year, you can see a lot of weaknesses on this team. A lot. But you can also see some foundations slowly being built that one hopes will grow. On the defense we have the threesome of Brian Orakpo, Ryan Kerrigan, and Jarvis Jenkins (hopefully) that if all works out could become a ferocious group. Even the much-maligned offensive line, I've noticed slowly some players starting to step up like Will Montgomery and Willie Smith that could, hopefully, add depth when our line his finally healthy. But above all, even more than the defensive backs, no unit on this team is weaker than wide-receiver. We all love Santana Moss, he'll go down as one of the great Redskins of all time, but he's being asked to be more than he is. He's the perfect slot receiver who can slice and dice a defense over the middle. He's not a #1. In this league, you need that monster receiver who can just go get a ball that is thrown up there. Rex Grossman is a built-in 2 turnover a game guy, but part of that reason is in his entire career the man has never had an elite #1 receiver (I can't think of any in Chicago). This is not to say that Grossman would somehow morph into Drew Brees if he had Megatron lining up for him. But that dimension is missing for the Redskins and has been for a long long time, which means offensively Grossman is being asked to throw it deep to guys that can't just "go get it." Now he does it anyways, but that isn't always a bad thing.

Enter: Justin Blackmon.

The Oklahoma State wide receiver has the chance to become a Calvin Johnson or Andre Johnson-type. Explosive, athletic, a receiver who can impose his will on a game. His slash this year at OSU was 113/1336yards/11/.8 average/15TDs. Sick.

Now, this all depends on the jockeying of the various terrible teams in the league. As of the most recent Hogs Haven draft watch, this might be a bit of a stretch. We know Indianapolis is going QB . . . Andrew Luck. Minnesota is an interesting case because they, like Washington, could go a million different ways here. They have the QB, they have a running back, but need help everywhere else. Offensive line is probably the most important thing they need, but they could take Blackmon here. Then St. Louis, who upgraded with Brandon Llyod but no doubt would go for Blackmon. But they, too, need help everywhere else. And I wouldn't put it past St. Louis to trade Sam Bradford if it meant getting Grffin or Barkley for half of what pre-lockout Bradford cost them. Or they could just trade down. Or they could take Blackmon.

But let's assume the chips fall and Blackmon is there for Washington. I'm beginning to think its not such a bad idea to pass on Griffin or Barkley and take him. Why?

http://www.sbnation.com/admin/entries/new?community_id=61&entry_type=FanPostEnter: Brandon Weeden.

I know this might be getting silly. But this year's draft is interesting because of how truly deep the quarterbacks are. Last year we saw guys like Ponder and Gabbert move high up in the draft because it was a weak draft for QBs and some franchises felt so much pressure to get their QB they took them too early because there was not a lot of choices. This year is different. Guys like Kellen Moore, Brandon Weeden, Russell Wilson, and Ryan Tannehill would have gone first round last year. Weeden and Tennehill, I argue, are better than Gabbert and Ponder. Real depth is here and I think the Skins . . . assuming youngsters like Leonard Hankerson and Roy Helu develop into true NFL players . . . .can take a gamble on Blackmon high up and count that you can get a good QB down low.

So why Weeden? Its not just to be cute with a funny blog title and the coincidence that Weeden and Blackmon lit up the Big 12 (except Ames) the last two years. Weeden is big, has a powerful arm, and can mover around - the kind of movement someone like Big Ben does. What some people are holding against him, the fact that he's 28, I think is a positive. The Shanahan system requires discipline and maturity, something that Weeden has. I think at 28 he can come in and be more comfortable commanding not only the offense, but the huddle and the locker room as well. It also makes him low risk/high reward. They wont' have to spend near-as much money for him, his upside is huge, and if it fails it won't be as spectacular.

But the moral of the story isn't necessarily to make it Weeden, though I really like him. But guys like Wilson, Tannehill (who some people really like) and Moore have as much of a chance to be great in the NFL as Luck, Griffin, and Barkley but won't have the same pressure, nor will it cost as much. If the Skins can pull this off, they could address QB and WR in the first two rounds and then draft offensive lineman with the rest of their picks.

You know what? I'm not even sure this is realistic or smart. But my worry is that over-focusing on Barkley or Griffin without fully evaluating what is in this draft - and it looks to be an incredible one - could blind us to the fact that we could fill a lot of needs and move us forward as an organization much faster than just picking Griffin or Barkley.

Comment 23 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Blackmon

i like him and think he is going to be a great pro but its def a risky move

by yellowfeathers on Dec 14, 2011 8:32 PM EST reply actions  

Weeden always intrigued me..

He is a great QB but he is old to be a draft pick. My thoughts have been if hemis there in the third maybe fourth round then pick him. Thus can let us get good talent at the top of the draft and get a QB even if he is only here for a few years. It let’s the skins fill other holes while getting a better QB then Rex and we can draft a QB in either next years draft or the year after that with a good foundation. The. We can trade Weeden or if he is doing great then keep him or just relegate him to the backup role. Because you never know if someone may come knocking for a QB offering a pretty good DB and a second round pick or something of that nature….

Don't feed the TROLL!...You have been warned.

by the maroon bird on Dec 14, 2011 8:38 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Hemis= he is

Don't feed the TROLL!...You have been warned.

by the maroon bird on Dec 14, 2011 8:39 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I agree he is a stud

How would you feel if we traded back if the big 3 are gone and pick up a later 1st and an additional second and picking him with one of our second rounders. At the point of the best 3 QBs being gone the rest are all question marks ( not saying ant prospect isn’t but some have more question marks about them then others). This lets the skins get a QB and some other good players.

Don't feed the TROLL!...You have been warned.

by the maroon bird on Dec 14, 2011 8:56 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I agree

But if by some chance we are unable to get a QB in the first do we just roll with Grossman or what…

Don't feed the TROLL!...You have been warned.

by the maroon bird on Dec 14, 2011 9:01 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I dont get your arguement. Luck is on a different tier in comparison to these other qbs

If Weeden can be as good as luck why cant a 3rd or 4th round reciever be as good as blackmon?

by alwaysremember21 on Dec 14, 2011 8:48 PM EST reply actions  

I'm not sure if he's comparing weeden to luck

However he is saying how weeden would be in the “big 3” conversation if he was a younger prospect.

Don't feed the TROLL!...You have been warned.

by the maroon bird on Dec 14, 2011 8:51 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I would take Luck over any qb except for Elway

He is that good in my opinion. And in Mel Kipers unfortunately

by alwaysremember21 on Dec 14, 2011 8:54 PM EST up reply actions  

I would pick Brees

Just my opinion though because he is already an established star in the league.

Don't feed the TROLL!...You have been warned.

by the maroon bird on Dec 14, 2011 8:57 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

If I had a choice. . . Sammy Baugh

Then we can cut Deangleo “I think with my rectum” Hall also

by Venthril on Dec 15, 2011 8:28 AM EST up reply actions  

No... QB in the 1st and OT in the 2nd or bust

Dear Passionate fan, I know you are passionate, but please reply with a logical answer or I will ignore you.

by TerpsAllTheWay on Dec 14, 2011 8:58 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

AGREE

this is the year to pick a QB. Lets get the best one we can and start improving other problems on our offense.

by yellowfeathers on Dec 14, 2011 9:05 PM EST up reply actions  

RG3 #1

You make a fair argument man, not gonna lie. Justin Blackmon is one of my favorite college players; the kid has a work ethic and is a baller, but we’ve got to get a QB and we’ve got to get OL. Santana Moss, Jabar Gaffney, Leonard Hankerson, and Niles Paul is not a bad top 4 WRs and Helu is gonna be a star. We need the QB and OL to bring this offense together, no doubt.

by BigOLinemen on Dec 14, 2011 9:06 PM EST reply actions  

great argument

but i’d rather draft 2 qb’s and double the chance we get a stud signal caller from this year’s draft.

btw i would add perry riley to the bright future list with dejon gomes having a chance at being “landry who?”

by DCrez on Dec 14, 2011 9:28 PM EST reply actions  

If you want two

Why not make the second one the guy that everybody says is not tall enough to play in the NFL but is 49-3 career. Kellen Moore, Boise State. The guy’s just a winner and he’ll probably come cheap.

by DudleyDoright on Dec 15, 2011 9:15 AM EST reply actions  

Blackmon will be gone by the time we draft so I wouldn't worry about it too much

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Dec 15, 2011 9:51 AM EST reply actions  

First of all

OL is worse than WR.

Sorry, Hurt, Chester and whoever our RT is are worse than Gaffney, Moss, and hopefully Hankerson.

Second of all, even if WRs were worse, OL is TWICE as important.

So, NO.

Sorry.

Well written post though.

"By far the worst performers on the (R*dskins) are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins

by smutsboy1 on Dec 15, 2011 11:02 AM EST reply actions  

More picks .

IF , The top 3 QB’s are gone before we pick , the skins should trade back fot a later 1st , and a second round pick . Get QB and OT with first 2 picks . Choose the best player available , as it is possible that we get a better tackle in the first , while being able to get the same QB or equally talented QB , with the 2nd rounder . Then , maybe trade the other 2nd rounder for a second 3rd , and another 4th . We could end up with a QB , OT , 2-3rd rounders and 3-4th rounders to adress NT , OG , ILB , DB , C . Still leaving a 5th 2-6th , and a 7th rounder to draft for depth . Are there any good kickers coming out of college ?

by EldonD on Dec 15, 2011 6:18 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email hogshaven@gmail.com

Managers

Superbowl_small Kevin Ewoldt

Riggins_small Ken Meringolo

Editors

Sb_small Parks Smith

Small Steve Shoup

Chalkboard_football-opt403x300o00s403x300_small UkRedskin

Washington_redskins_helmet_small Redskins News

Authors

Badshirt2__2__small fatpickle

Family_in_disney_small Tiller56

Rg3super_small HTTR4LIFE

Hh_small Ronnie Adkins