Film Breakdown of Redskins Red-Zone Efficiency
This was an idea from Skinzaholic56 from my last breakdown. In the comments he said "...I do have a request. With extra time during the bye, I’d really like a breakdown on some of our goal line woes. We have a huge problem with scoring in the redzone...". I really like this idea, so I'm gonna run with it. Just to let you guys know, if you have any ideas on what you'd like to see broken down, leave a comment below or hit me up on Twitter (@UkRedskin1). I'm always open to suggestions and ideas, so I'll look into pretty much every idea. Anyways, on to the breakdown.
The Redskins rank right around the middle of the league in red-zone scoring percentage with 46.67% of our red-zone trips ending in points on the board, down from our 51.16% last year. We average 3.8 scoring attempts per game, converting 1.8 of those attempts on average each game. (Stats from teamrankings.com). For those who are interested, the Giants lead the league with 80% scoring percentage in the red-zone.
One of the main problems we have in the red-zone is our run game becomes ineffective, forcing us to pass. The zone-blocking scheme (ZBS) that our offence is built on requires lighter, quicker and more agile Olinemen. When we enter the red-zone, defences can afford to bring 8 in the box (bringing an 8th man in the box means to have your base defence, or front 7, in the 'box' and then adding an extra player - usually a safety - to help out number the blockers on a run play) without as much risk because they don't have as much ground to make up if it turns out to be a pass play. In goal line situations, you'll usually see the defence stack the Dline, and an offence stack the Oline with extra TE's and FB's to help block. With the lighter Olinemen we require for the ZBS, on the goal-line, when you need to power the ball into the end-zone, they will get overpowered in 1-on-1 blocks quite often. Lets have a look.
Here we have a typical zone stretch play. The idea, as always is for Hightower to follow the line to the outside, and cut back if he see's a gap. But as you can see, the Giants stacked the line because they don't have as much ground to make up if it turns out to be a play-action pass. Davis is blocking Boley on the left side of the line, we'll see in a minute that he gets overpowered, as do the interior guys.
With Davis being beat, Hightower is forced inside into heavy traffic. Kory Lichtensteiger, Will Montgomery and Chris Chester are doing an ok job if Hightower was able to get outside. But because he's forced to come back inside, the Dlinemen overpower the interior Oline.
And of course, this results in Hightower getting stuffed. This isn't to say you can't run at all in the red-zone, just that it's a lot more difficult to run in the red-zone than normally.
If our Red-zone run game isn't as effective as we'd like, what other options do we have. Team's with a big WR like Calvin Johnson like to just throw up jump balls and trust them to come down with it. Unfortunately, we don't have a WR on our roster that can do this:
Side note: I was at this game while on vacation in Florida. We were sat in the stand you can see there, and directly in line with the goal line. Had a perfect view of this catch, and I couldn't believe he did it!
The other popular trend in the NFL right now is the 'Back-Shoulder Throw'. The idea of this throw is to get a WR to run what looks like a 'go' or a 'fade' route, forcing the DB's head to turn away from the QB. The QB then throws directly at the WR's back shoulder, so that the WR can turn and catch it without the DB having a chance to break it up. Aaron Rodgers and Eli Manning are among the best QB's in the league at this throw. Manning and Nicks are a deadly combination in the red-zone because of this throw.
Here's an example of this throw, in the Giants Monday Night Football against the Rams. Nicks is going to run what looks like a 'fade', where Manning would normally throw over his shoulder for him to run into. But in reality, he sticks his foot in the ground, and comes back for the pass.
You can see Nicks stick his foot in the ground and begin to turn away from the defender. Manning should have thrown the ball to Nick's back shoulder, which I've circled in black. But notice the defender is still running like it's a fade.
Even with a bad ball placement here, you can see just how effective this kind of throw is. The DB doesn't stand a chance. If Manning had thrown to the black circle, it would literally have been impossible to defend. This kind of throw is increasing in popularity in the league, and with it being a "copycat league" everyone will be trying it soon. The question is, is Rex Grossman (or John Beck for that matter) accurate enough to make this throw? I'm not 100% sold on that, but it remains to be seen.
So, with no WR on the roster with the ability to get jump balls like Calvin Johnson, and with us unsure if Grossman has the accuracy to make the back-shoulder throw, what options do we have? The play-action pass I believe is our best option. Fooling the defence into a run, allowing a TE or a FB to get open in the end-zone can be a legit threat for us in the red-zone. Here's an example from the Cardinals game of a perfectly executed play-action on the 1 yard line, and something I want to see more of.
Fred Davis is going to run up like he's blocking a LB at the next level before cutting outside into an open space. Logan Paulsen does the same on the far side. Darrell Young acts as if he's lead blocking, but also cuts outside once he reaches the line of scrimmage. Hightower comes up and makes a big block to help give Rex more time.
I've circled Davis, and the LB that is responsible for covering him. The LB is completely sold on the play-action fake and bites on it, leaving Davis all on his own.
As you can see, Grossman has a huge wide open area to throw into to hit Davis for the easy TD. I've also circled Paulsen who's just coming off his cut, and Young who would have been an option in the flat had Davis not been so wide open.
These type of plays are what I'd like to see more of in the red-zone to help get that scoring percentage up. I see Darrell Young as a huge red-zone threat on these type of plays with his ability to break tackles and make people miss that we saw in pre-season. He can be an under the radar guy that teams will underestimate, meaning we can utilise his ability to the full.
That's it for this breakdown. Sorry it's not as long as the last few, but hopefully you'll all still enjoy it and discuss it in the comments. Don't forget to hit me up on twitter (@UkRedskin1) with any ideas or suggestions you have.
24 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Excellent breakdown
As usual. Perhaps a break down of the kick return game, given Parks full frontal assault on Banks yesterday.
I like the back shoulder idea. I think Grossman is accurate enough. His problems have been more not seeing the defense, underthrows on deep balls, and late arriving balls. Not sure if he has enough velocity to make that play work. He would have to throw it very early without seeing how the defender was playing it, perhaps.
Formerly KS and CS
by ThrowItDownBigManThrowItDown on Oct 8, 2011 3:48 PM EDT reply actions
Only problem with return game is camera angles.
The TV camera angles often don’t tell the whole story on kick returns, unless he takes it all the way back, at which point its rather irrelevant if he’s worth his spot or not because clearly he would be.
The back shoulder throw is incredibly hard to perfect. You need a WR and a QB to be perfectly in-sync with each other, and for a QB to trust his WR enough to come back and make the play, otherwise he can look very very foolish. The good thing for Rex is that he does have full confidence in whoever he’s throwing to. He’s spread the ball around very well and puts confidence in his WR’s to pull in the catch (something I’ll look at in more detail in the second part of the Rex breakdown next week).
Follow me on Twitter: @UkRedskin1 feel free to give suggestions on what you'd like to see broken down each week.
The other cryptkeeper
Dare i say it J.Jones. Gasp
Fear the Turtle!
by HailToTheRedskins on Oct 8, 2011 11:34 PM EDT up reply actions
great breakdown
It’s to a point where its no reason in sayin great post because every post has ben on point lol, id like to see the running game broke down
by BmoreRedskin on Oct 8, 2011 5:43 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Haha thanks.
Running game will be broken down at some point next week, maybe Tuesday or Wednesday.
I’m not too fussed about people saying great post or anything like that, I just want to generate a discussion, and I’ve noticed the only one of these that has was the Grossman breakdown. I like to hear your opinions on what I’ve broken down, if you agree, disagree, or can add to it or question it. That sort of thing. So far we’ve not really had any of that.
Follow me on Twitter: @UkRedskin1 feel free to give suggestions on what you'd like to see broken down each week.
I agree that play action is the best option
I believe they should mainly try to run the ball or play action on the goal line. The 2 best things they are better at which gives them a better chance of scoring.
I am with you UK
Moss is good enough in the end zone, but Grossman throws too soft a ball to accomplish the behind the shoulder pass. Calling Geomac. Earth to Geomac. And the Skins definitely need a WR who can go up and grab a ball. So where are they?
exactly
what I was thinking… or, hell, Green Bay lines JerMichael Finley up wide sometimes, and NE was doing it with Gronkowski a few weeks ago… meaning, what would keep us from lining Paulson up as the TE and flexing Fred Davis out iso’d one-on-one?
Along the lines of what someone else was saying above re: running more in the Red Zone — i seem to recall the ‘97 and ’98 Broncos were tremendous at the goal line… I mean, TD was Mile-High-Saluting somebody 2 or 3 times a game, right? I don’t remember them ever having a problem at the goal line. Matter of fact, the nature of the MIKE Shanahan offense seems to be geared towards 5-10 yard mismatches resulting from misdirection or overloads… maybe KYLE’s 3 & 4 wr sets with 5’9" receivers doesn’t quite achieve the desired effect.
Lastly, speaking of the ’97-98 Denver teams, I think about Mark Schlereth blocking for a SB MVP in ’97, a 2000 yd rusher on a SB champ in ’98 (obv. the same guy -TD – but hear me out), and being a member of our very own SB-winning 3-headed rushing machine in ’91…. so does that an HoF resume make?
by Prodigal PGcounty son on Oct 9, 2011 4:51 AM EDT up reply actions
I'm surprised we haven't seen Davis
out wide more often. I thought with him slimming down in the off-season, they were going to rotate him in at WR occasionally to allow both him and Cooley on the field at the same time.
Follow me on Twitter: @UkRedskin1 feel free to give suggestions on what you'd like to see broken down each week.
UKRedskin are you affiliated with BAFL, or whatever it is called these days?
I played in the former BSL/BAFL from 2002-2004, I remember there being some cats who were very eager to learn any of the American-style nuances of the game that I could provide, but also that very few had advanced knowledge of route combinations and defensive coverage theories that you display. I was just wondering if you were in that group with Riq Ayub and Steve Rains and the like.
by Prodigal PGcounty son on Oct 9, 2011 4:56 AM EDT reply actions
No I'm not
Don’t know either of those guys, sorry.
Follow me on Twitter: @UkRedskin1 feel free to give suggestions on what you'd like to see broken down each week.
Do you think that the red zone run game would be more effective with a power back like ATV in there?
He can just rumble over people. I’d also like to see Helu in there. He always seems to find the smallest holes and break through them. That would be really helpful in the red zone. I just don’t think Hightower can get it done.
Contrary to popular belief, I am not Jewish.
Great point
I think ATV is the man for the job
Torain would help
He’s obviously a big power guy who can break tackles, and that’s useful in any situation. I think he would be effective when we have a little bit of room, like on the 4/5 yard line. But I don’t see our Oline being strong enough to overpower too many stacked Dlines on the 1 or in goal line situations. But yeah, having Torain fully healthy would certainly be a plus.
Follow me on Twitter: @UkRedskin1 feel free to give suggestions on what you'd like to see broken down each week.
I vote for Austin
I think he is the best WR on our squad for the behind the shoulder pass. I saw him make some incredible grabs in practice this preseason and think he would keep Rex from looking foolish even if the pass isn’t perfect. We need to work him in more, especially in the redzone.
I'd like for him to get some reps also
He definitely earned a spot with his performance in preseason, and I hate to think of a WR set out there with Gafney AND Stalworth on the field at the same time. We have to get these young receivers some reps sometime.
Gaffney has been one of our better Red Zone targets
because he offers some height and polished route running. But I agree, I would like to see Austin get some reps out there in general.
Follow me on Twitter: @UkRedskin1 feel free to give suggestions on what you'd like to see broken down each week.
Like I said 3 months ago
T.O. would solve this problem. Hankerson can not get on active roster. Worst case senario use T.O. as a decoy. Glad to see you guys caching up.
The Rod has spoken
T.O. would solve this problem to an extend
But the work we’ve done to get rid of the bad character or locker room disruption guys (Haynesworth, McNabb), would T.O. be worth the potential distraction?
Follow me on Twitter: @UkRedskin1 feel free to give suggestions on what you'd like to see broken down each week.
T.O. seems to have had a positive effect on young WR corps -- AFTER he leaves
to play devil’s advocate for your point, Rodskin…
teams that he has been on:
Dallas — nondescript WR corp when he arrives, fairly talented group since he left. not the greatest example because Pat Crayton and an emerging Miles Austin were the only guys left;
Philly — not a single WR of note when he arrived, a full stable now;
Buffalo — only Lee Evans when he arrived, now a young group of overachievers;
Cincy — teamed with Chad (Johnson), now the young guys have moved on without either of the two, not as successful yet, but also breaking in a new QB…
so maybe if we would have had an offseason, and if he had not hurt his ACL, maybe you bring him in for camp competition in June o push our young guys… the guy’s work ethic is legendary, learned from the great Jerry Rice himself. Could he be at the point in his career that Jerry was with him, ready to pass the torch and tips on? Maybe he is passing on either knowledge or example of preparation to his WR mates.
….having said that, in no way do I personally endorse him coming in at midseason to THIS group…!
by Prodigal PGcounty son on Oct 9, 2011 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions

by 





































