Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

Sucks for Luck: Stanford Quarterback Andrew Luck Inching Closer and Closer to Unenviable Situation

We have all heard about the "Suck for Luck" strategy that either will or won't be employed by NFL teams between now and the end of the season. Hell, some of the teams involved in the discussion could use the strategy and nobody would even be able to tell. (Can Miami or Indianapolis play worse?) 

As the 2011 season progresses, and the line of...ahem...bad teams forms for the right to draft the Stanford quarterback, it is becoming increasingly clear that Andrew Luck is being set up...to fail?

Think about it.

Right now, he is being called the "perfect quarterback." He is being called the "next Peyton Manning." He is considered a "can't miss prospect." He is in trouble.

Assuming that Luck does nothing between now and next April to diminish his value as the greatest prospect of his generation, he will likely find himself in an uncomfortable position (no, not the backseat of a Volkswagen).

Star-divide

Count me among those who have little reservation putting Andrew Luck under center in the NFL tomorrow. He could start for at least a handful of teams in the league this weekend. I am not at all concerned that his ability, approach, work ethic or desire to win will result in him becoming a bust. What I am concerned about is that he is already facing impossibly high expectations from teams who have not even drafted him yet.

Let's set aside, for a moment, the possibility that Luck could bomb out in the NFL. It absolutely exists, but we can all agree that for this kid, that possibility is a statistical improbability. No...I think he will be a very good pro.

But will "very good" be good enough? That is the problem Luck will face when he gets to the NFL. He won't be coming in as a "project." He won't be coming in as a guy with "lots of upside." He will be coming in as "The Savior."

The Savior. How do you exceed those expectations?

You can't. It is impossible. Your best-case scenario has you maybe meeting those expectations, but depending on how long it takes you to get there, it could already be too late for fans in this league to care.

Do you realize that for Andrew Luck, he might have to be a Super Bowl-winning version of Tom Brady/Peyton Manning relatively quickly just to MEET the expectations that fans will have of him? And he has to do it before suffering ANY injuries, ANY setbacks in his pro development and ANY controversy.

I hear you out there saying, "Yeah, but he will be paid millions of dollars to play the game he loves. His face will be on cereal boxes, Oreo commercials and British cigarette ads. Are you really feeling sorry for him?"

I am not feeling sorry for him, but I am doubtful that many 22-year old dudes are ready to shoulder the kind of burden he will be asked to shoulder. Peyton Manning was not even considered the same kind of no-brainer that Andrew Luck is considered to be--depending on who you believe, there were teams ready to take Ryan Leaf before Manning if given the chance. I don't hear anyone suggesting that there is anyone in college football today that would or should be drafted ahead of Andrew Luck.

This will not scare away teams from drafting Andrew Luck, nor should it. And thanks to the new CBA and the reining in of rookie contracts, the upfront investment a team will have to throw down to get Luck is a fraction of what it once was. So at the very least, Luck won't have to live up to a $100 million contract inked before he ever plays a down in the NFL. That is a HUGE benefit for a player in his situation if you ask me.

Andrew Luck is going to be asked to save a franchise from years of losing, years of playoff absence--years of mediocrity. The truth is he is probably capable of playing at a high enough level to do it. But the pressure he will face from the first second he enters the league to turn his team around will be ludicrously intense. I don't care how mentally tough you are...once you realize you are being graded based on how much better you are than Aaron Rodgers, Tom Brady and Peyton Manning--right out of the gate--it has to affect you.

As I said before, this won't stop teams from drafting Andrew Luck, and it won't stop Andrew Luck from attempting to be the best professional quarterback he can be. But I am starting to question if I want this circus coming to my town.

There...I said it. I have serious reservations about Andrew Luck--or any college player--coming to this town and playing for this team under this ownership and for these coaches with that kind of pressure and those kinds of expectations. It could kill us all. Of the million plus possible outcomes, only one would cause us to resemble rational, happy people. All of the rest would force us into "unwashed masses" territory, reducing us to an angry mob with a collective high blood pressure problem that could cause mass cardiac arrest. You saw how bad it was when we were debating issues surrounding John Beck and Rex Grossman?

This is the situation that faces Andrew Luck when he decides to leave Stanford. Perhaps more important than his ability to successfully navigate these pitfalls as a pro will be which team brings him on board for the journey. Luckily for everyone involved, it doesn't appear that the Redskins will be in position to draft the Stanford product. In fact, for us to draft Andrew Luck, we would likely have to trade away our future in exchange...essentially upping the ante and somehow adding even more pressure and expectations to the equation.

Oh God...I just threw up in my mouth a little.

Comment 41 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

As the 2011 season progresses, and the line of…ahem…bad teams forms for the right to draft the Stanford quarterback, it is becoming increasingly clear that Andrew Luck is being set up…to fail?

Any QB that goes to the Dolphins, Colts, Cardinals, Seahawks, or yes, even the Redskins, is going to be set up for big time failure. This is why I’m such a strong advocate of building the team for one more year and putting a rookie QB in a position to succeed.

by TheDeepBall on Oct 28, 2011 1:02 PM EDT reply actions  

What if you continue to build the team for one more year and put a 2nd year QB in a position to succeed?

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Oct 28, 2011 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

Christian Ponder is a 2nd year QB?

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Oct 28, 2011 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

We all said the same with Sam Bradford and he was playing for a playoff spot week 17.

"You guys know how this works. You ask questions and I don't answer them." Mike Shanahan to Washington media reporters

by Kevin Ewoldt on Oct 28, 2011 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

You know what would be hilarous

Is if Luck says eff it I am gonna be an architect and not enter the draft. . . hahaha.

by Venthril on Oct 28, 2011 1:06 PM EDT reply actions  

Or transfers to West Virginia

Editor at Hogs Haven - Redskins Blog
Twitter: @RVAparks Check it out for the latest Redskins news and opinions

by Parks Smith on Oct 28, 2011 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't know how bad it would be

if he went to the Colts. They did the same thing to get Manning as they are doing now and they went 13-3 when Manning showed up. I don’t trust the Colts.

by hambonejackson on Oct 28, 2011 1:37 PM EDT reply actions  

Got your numbers reversed.


Manning was certainly a bright spot in 1998 for the Colts, but he also threw a league high 28 interceptions as the team struggled to a 3–13 record, with a defense that surrendered more than 27 points per game.

by Xin Baixiang on Oct 28, 2011 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yep

I don’t know why I thought it was his 1st year. 2nd year. Sometimes it helps to look things up 1st. But the point is the same. Good year. Bad year Draft QB and back up again.61-7? Suck for Luck.

by hambonejackson on Oct 29, 2011 12:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

too much Red Bull...

Wow, talk about your hyped up intensity. Put the coffee down.
Let’s be real, ALL 1st rd. draft picks have enormous pressure to perform, which might explain why so many don’t. All the increased “Savior” perceptions are only coming from media formats, like this one. In the real world, he will face the same pressure any 1st pick has faced in the past. They are usually picked by the worst teams who are in need of a savior.
I, for one, have seen him play and I believe his prospects are sure. The surest thing worthy of our trading up to get him. But that is just me.

by jgibbsfan1 on Oct 28, 2011 1:38 PM EDT reply actions  

us to resemble rational, happy people.

We’re Redskins fans. No danger of that :D

Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital. -Aaron Levenstein

by MoMoMojo on Oct 28, 2011 1:57 PM EDT reply actions  

Peyton was able to run with that "Savior" role

Ryan Leaf was not, we’ll see. From what we hear, Luck has the mindset and strong will of Peyton, not the fragile, pressure bomb that was Ryan Leaf’s psyche.

by Dammit Cerrato... on Oct 28, 2011 2:30 PM EDT reply actions  

As did Elway, Marino, Aikman, Manning.

They all had similar hype. Some of these qb’s have been groomed to succeed and many often do succeed. I don’t think the risks/pressure is as much of a deal to them as we think.
To me, it seems like it would be a lot of pressure but for someone like Luck, he may relish the opportunity.

HTTR!

by mkjo on Oct 28, 2011 3:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd still take him in a heartbeat.

Yeah, he’s got big shoes to fill… and yeah, he could disappoint.

But you have to gamble a little to win big…. and he has the upside to be a BIG win. Imagine how good our team would be with a top 10 QB….. yeah, we still have missing pieces, but we would also likely be 5-1 right now.

No Danny, Nooooooo - Tom Landry, 1982., and Washington Redskins fans, 1999-

by BillWard on Oct 28, 2011 3:06 PM EDT reply actions  

i dont care who we get...

as long as our only option at qb isnt john beck or rex grossmen. when i seen those 2 as our qbs this year. i thought we planned to suck for luck. then the preseason games started and i seen how the skins were playing as a team. then the first week came and i was hell yeah! we are gonna do something this year! then we squeek bye the cards and lose to a crippled cowboys team then get another lucky win against the rams and i started thinking we are 8-8 at best. with either of these 2 qbs starting. i think over the bye week shanahan and crew seen that too. and game planned to lose to the eagles and the panthers. dont think any coach will admit to plan to lose.. but it sure looked like it the last 2 weeks… now we got injurries out the rear.. so it will make the coaching staff look better if we lose the rest. which i think we do. maybe beat the dolphins. but even they will be hard tobeat for us now.

by munson21502 on Oct 28, 2011 3:10 PM EDT reply actions  

I can't help it....

SUCK FOR LUCK! SUCK FOR LUCK! SUCK FOR LUCK!

And that’s all I hear. A stadium full of people begging for the chance to perform fellatio in an effort to gain positive opportunities in the future.

by Xin Baixiang on Oct 28, 2011 3:23 PM EDT reply actions  

Hopefully it will be nice one day.......

To not worry about our Quarterback because we would have a great one, but instead to worry about who is going to be our Redzone Receiver and 2nd Starting Inside Linebacker for the future.
That would be really nice.

by jmpalomo on Oct 28, 2011 3:58 PM EDT reply actions  

Everybody is forgetting his dad...

There are noises emanating from the Luck camp that his dad is going to pull an Eli Manning type move and demand he be traded from the 0-for-loser that drafts him to some better team of his wishes. Now whether that comes to pass or not is down the road a bit. But I seriously doubt that the Skins will one of his hearts desires.

by DudleyDoright on Oct 28, 2011 7:06 PM EDT reply actions  

Anyone who has actually watched Andrew Luck play

can see that he is incredibly talented. He will have less pressure to prove himself & succeed than Cam Newton has had. All QBs who are high draft picks have very high expectations, actually all QBs have very high expectations put on them by fans who want their team to win. Luck has a completion percentage a little over 70 percent, a QB rating around 180 & he’s thrown 20 TDs with 3 int.s He has the chance to be great & I mean GREAT. Watch Stanford play USC tomorrow & then decide what you think he would be worth to a franchise that hasn’t had a top ten QB in a generation & hasn’t had a QB considered great in almost 50 years.

by ENsDad27 on Oct 28, 2011 8:17 PM EDT reply actions  

might make me too sad to watch him play

knowing we have almost no shot of getting him without giving up the farm.

by munson21502 on Oct 29, 2011 1:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

Why would that make you sadder

than having a qb like Marino and never winning a super bowl or watching a David Carr or Patrick Ramsey get absolutely brutalized. I would rather watch the ‘91 Redskins qb’ed by Rypian steam roll every team in the league to a super bowl because great teams win super bowls, not always great qbs.

by hambonejackson on Oct 29, 2011 2:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

You guys have already won way too many games to draft Luck

by The Legend on Oct 29, 2011 8:51 AM EDT reply actions  

Sad to say you are right

  The only way we would get him would be by a tremendous wallop from the Snyder Wallet Weapon and a trade of picks and players if he refuses to report to the drafting team.

I'm not the Devil's Advocate but I consiider him a close friend

by Dipper on Oct 29, 2011 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

there is really only very very few here....

that seem to think there is still some possibility of getting Luck-y…..even if we have to trade our next 3 drafts to get him.

"Please don't dominate the rap, Jack, if you got nothin' new to say."-Robert Hunter

by MagicHat on Oct 29, 2011 10:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

The Last thing the Skins need is a circus.

There are plenty of QBs coming in next years draft. Why take a QB that is going to do no more than cause havoc in the locker room with all the attention that Luck is going to get. Shananigans is just going to ruin any QB he gets anyway.

by runew on Oct 30, 2011 12:01 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email hogshaven@gmail.com

Managers

Superbowl_small Kevin Ewoldt

Riggins_small Ken Meringolo

Editors

Sb_small Parks Smith

Small Steve Shoup

Chalkboard_football-opt403x300o00s403x300_small UkRedskin

Washington_redskins_helmet_small Redskins News

Authors

Badshirt2__2__small fatpickle

Family_in_disney_small Tiller56

Rg3super_small HTTR4LIFE

Hh_small Ronnie Adkins