Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing' Set For Sunday

Bruce Allen Sits Down with Hogs Haven: "We Have Changed the Status Quo"

We weren't the only people to get time with Bruce Allen yesterday as many of you know. But we did get some quality one-on-one time with the Washington Redskins General Manager, and we had the chance to raise some of the issues we have spent the last year debating here at Hogs Haven.

Bruce is no rookie, and he proves his veteran mettle with some of his answers below. You'll find that we spent zero time on Donovan McNabb and Albert Haynesworth. Frankly, I am sick of talking about it, and I was not about to waste my precious time on either topic this time around. Thankfully, every other reporter he spoke to yesterday brought it up so we didn't have to...sweet.

Our interview with Bruce after the jump (and yes, I do ask him about the memo they sent out last year stating that Tthe Future is Now").

Star-divide

Hogs Haven: Last year when you came on board, you said "the status quo was unacceptable". What aspect of the organization did you set out to change right away and how would you define today's status quo?

Bruce Allen: Well, first of all I think we have changed the status quo. Not to the levels we want in record, but I think we have the infrastructure in place and the foundation for us to be successful. When you blend a bunch of new players, new coaches and new schemes on offense and defense, it's going to take some time. But I believe the will of this team and the fight in this team is actually quite impressive.

HH: We spoke with Chris Cooley recently and he told us that he expected it to take 3-4 years to get the ship righted because of the expected turnover. While that is just one man's opinion-and a tight end for that matter-what would be your response or comment on that sentiment?

Bruce: (laughs at the tight end comment) Well, you know...that's Chris' opinion. I don't really comment on that.

HH: This next one is kind of a big one for us. We have spent considerable time on it and many of our readers have voiced their opinions on this topic. Not to suggest that you carry with you a lot of regret, or can even afford to given the world you kind of live in, but with regard to sending out a memo last year suggesting that "The Future is Now"...would you go back and maybe do that differently? What do you feel about that decision at this point in time?

Bruce: What memo are you referring to?

HH: The letter that was sent out to the Redskins fanbase last summer ahead of the preseason where the key phrase was "The Future Is Now" and that the team was really gearing up for a big run. While there were things in place that maybe could have backed that up, that was a big cause of angst we think because it seemed that in fact we were rebuilding and that we weren't built to win it immediately. Is that something that you would go back and do again?

Bruce: Well, Ken, let me first explain the phrase "The Future is Now" for you. When my father said that, it was something he had been telling the kids our entire life. That meant, "Take care of today. What you do today will determine what your future looks like. If you do everything you can to be the best you can in that day, your future will be brighter." And what we're trying to do today-actually today because we're cross-checking our player evaluations offense versus defense-is to make sure we're doing everything to improve our team. Our intensity and desire to win every single game will not change.

HH: Assuming for a moment that we are kind of putting this team together, whether you want to call it rebuilding or not, how would you rank your priorities in terms of building the team from an ideological perspective-draft, free agency and even the addition by subtraction of players who just don't fit in?

Bruce: Well, the number one thing is to get 53 men working together for the benefit of the team. The coaches' and the players' objective is no different than anybody else in the building and that's to be successful. Whomever we think can fit into that magical mix, that's who we're going to try and add to this football team...whether it's via trade, via draft or via free agency.

HH: As a personnel guy, would you rank one over the other, specifically regarding free agency and the draft?

Bruce: You can do that more in hindsight when you do it because there are some gems sometimes in the draft that you get or undrafted free agents like we got a few players this year or it can be in free agency. There is really no set or fixed in concrete way...we're going to look at every avenue we can to get better.

HH: One could argue that you really built a veteran team in Tampa Bay, but in the draft, it seemed that the decision-makers in that Tampa Bay front office at the time didn't produce a ton-in fact I think it was just one...Pro Bowler. Without really going back and talking about that in particular, I think what people want to know is what did you learn from that experience in Tampa Bay and how would you compare the Washington Redskins decision-making structure with the one you had in Tampa Bay with Jon Gruden?

Bruce: You do learn every year on this job and every month on this job and every week on this job and that goes hand in hand with what we are doing now. We're evaluating our players and not just what they can do or what they can't do but how will they fit in with another player. And I think experience will tell you that, have we made some mistakes in the past, yeah certainly I'll raise my hand on that. But if you work harder today and do everything you can today to make sure you research every aspect of a player...that can minimize your mistakes.

HH: Does Coach Shanahan say, "I need this guy" or...how does it work deciding on which free agents to bring in with regard to the way you guys work?

Bruce: It really starts in our pro personnel department. We'll have all the players in the league evaluated and graded and then we meet with the entire coaching staff and discuss the players and then we'll prioritize as a staff-the entire coaching staff and the entire scouting staff-on various models of fitting X player at Y position until we exhaust every one of the potential options we have to acquire a player. So the entire staff gets together and it's an honest and candid debate sometimes of opinions, but we have been able to come together as a group on each decision we've made.

HH: How would you contrast the styles, or the way you have worked with Jon Gruden and Mike Shanahan?

Bruce: Well, you know everybody's different in this league...and in life! Everyone has their unique perspectives. I don't know if Mike has worked with someone like me or if Jon has worked with somebody else different than whomever. It's different because people are different but the objectives are the same. When Mike was in Denver and when I was in Tampa or Oakland and...we're here and we want to win.

HH: I know that the CBA is a big issue and I'm not going to ask you about it, but for a moment if we could kind of set it aside which I know is a big deal, it looks like we could see a free agent class this offseason like none we have ever seen, both from a numbers standpoint as well as a talent standpoint. Without giving away any specific strategy-

Bruce: Don't worry, I won't!

HH: Haha...Can you speak to two things: a) what kind of player the Redskins think they need at this point and b) if you anticipate any difficulties acquiring your top targets due to the perceived treatment of perceived players this past season?

Bruce: No, I think we'll make our game plan and hopefully be able to execute a lot of it. I think it is a little premature.

HH: Agreed...and I appreciate that. It is just interesting that-and you've been around the NFL for a long time and you understand that sometimes in the past the Redskins have been criticized for pursuing the free agency route more than the draft route and yet this offseason the free agency route may in fact be the best course for the Redskins based on how many draft picks we have as well as the kinds of players that could be available.

Bruce: We made it a point that this was the 2010 season and we didn't want to compromise where we were in the future. We see the draft obviously as a great way to set up the core of your team. That is what we are going to start focusing on when we go down to the East-West game next week and the Senior Bowl and as we prepare for the Combine. There won't be an avenue that we won't look to try and help our team.

HH: We really appreciate your time and we certainly wish you guys the best.

Bruce: I appreciate you guys. Thank you.

Comment 60 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

This Phrase
What you do today will determine what your future looks like

I find this phrase to be some what of a dichotomy. So, we sign McNabb(today), and it determines what our future looks like(we loose a 2nd in 2010, and a 4th in 2011).

and then this:

If you do everything you can to be the best you can in that day, your future will be brighter."

So we bench McNabb and suspend Haynesworth(in that day), and by doing so, we diminish the trade value each of these players may have had(the future)

Sorry, couldn’t resist to interject some McNabb and Haynesworth here.

Are you not entertained?

by Tiller56 on Jan 14, 2011 7:22 AM EST reply actions  

+1

I know he’s required to give a generic answer, he should at least admit they made some mistakes.

Dear Passionate fan, I know you are passionate, but please reply with a logical answer or I will ignore you.

by TerpsAllTheWay on Jan 14, 2011 9:51 AM EST up reply actions  

It's not very specific, but.....

have we made some mistakes in the past, yeah certainly I’ll raise my hand on that.

by MagicHat on Jan 14, 2011 10:41 AM EST up reply actions  

What does that have to do with Allen?

Wasn’t it Shanny who benched and suspended them.

I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.

by GeoFly on Jan 14, 2011 10:37 AM EST up reply actions  

Isn't allen supposed to be the GM here

It should have a lot to do with Allen IMO

Are you not entertained?

by Tiller56 on Jan 14, 2011 3:09 PM EST up reply actions  

It SHOULD have a lot to do with Allen

but we all know he’s not here in that capacity. Personnel moves and decisions begin and end with Shanny. All that other crap they spout about everybody having a say in these decisions is BS

SpottieOttieDopaliscious

by Rekka on Jan 14, 2011 3:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Wow, looks like someone

asked for a double shot of reality with his frappuccino this morning.

by Obey on Jan 14, 2011 2:48 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I can’t get with this logic. It’s Haynesworth and McNabb that have dimmished their trade value. Haynesworth by defining his own role on the team (nickel) and being a drunk malcontent and McNabb by being unable to learn the offense and playing poorly. Playing McNabb the final 3 games would have probably erased any doubt that he was washed up and at least folks that are blind to how truly bad McNabb was will blame the Shanahan (s).

by Diesel44 on Jan 14, 2011 8:35 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Haynesworth certainly HAD trade value

and the WAY the coaches handled him hurt that. Now, other teams know he’s of no value to us, so instead of offering us a pick for him, they can wait until he is outright released, as they have to expect that is going to happen.

Does that help to explain this?

Are you not entertained?

by Tiller56 on Jan 15, 2011 9:13 AM EST up reply actions  

Also, look at it this way

In Denver, Brandon Marshall was a malcontent, and was disruptive to the team; much as Haynesworth was here in DC. The Broncos still lept the kid on the field. Although he was a problem off the field, he still was able to be traded for a draft pick.

Are you not entertained?

by Tiller56 on Jan 15, 2011 9:16 AM EST up reply actions  

Value?

If you call trading a former all-pro and a guy that just cashed a check for 21 mil for a 4th RD pick Value? The was the offer from Tenn and it was worth the gamble to see if Al would pull his head out of his arse and be a man. We’ll probably end up with a 4th anyway.. As far as McNabb we overpaid for him considering the next closest offer was a 4th from the Raiders. We have all the leverage due to the contract he stupidly signed and if a team want’s him they’ll want him prior to OTAs, training camp, and the preseason. I’m guessing a 4th or 5th.

I consider myself a one man wolfpack..

by Diesel44 on Jan 15, 2011 12:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed.

However, I don’t fault Shanahan for not trading Haynesworth at the deadline or prior to the season. It was worth the gamble to see if AL would actually want to play. He didn’t and we’ll probably end up with the same compensation. Not to mention…try telling your boss that you just traded a guy that he just cut a check for 21 mil for a 4th RD pick.

I consider myself a one man wolfpack..

by Diesel44 on Jan 15, 2011 1:42 PM EST up reply actions  

However, I don’t fault Shanahan for not trading Haynesworth at the deadline or prior to the season

I can’t agree with this Diesel. Shanny had the entire offseason to understand the motives for this guy not to want to report to any of the OTA’a and Mini-Camps. He and Bruce seemed set to prove a point with this player, and IMO it backfired. I can only hope your correct in your assumption that we will still be able to get at least a 4th for him.

Are you not entertained?

by Tiller56 on Jan 15, 2011 3:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Anyways

Good interview Ken

Are you not entertained?

by Tiller56 on Jan 14, 2011 7:23 AM EST reply actions  

good interview

I think you got as much as can be expected out of him, considering he really needs to avoid letting very much information get to other teams. If he were to declare they were going to pursue a particular person then other teams could use that info so it makes sense not to let the info out.

He had a tricky twist on the “The Future Is Now” phase, you can tell he’s in upper management. Any ordinary person would interpet the phrase to mean they are trying to win now and not the way he explained it.

I really hope they are being this comprehensive in their efforts: “We’ll have all the players in the league evaluated and graded and then we meet with the entire coaching staff and discuss the players and then we’ll prioritize as a staff-the entire coaching staff and the entire scouting staff-on various models of fitting X player at Y position until we exhaust every one of the potential options we have to acquire a player.”

by aFan4Life on Jan 14, 2011 8:33 AM EST reply actions  

You know, theoretically, he could have been telling the truth

His dad really was a “today is the first day of the rest of your life” kind of guy.

by d_c_guy on Jan 14, 2011 10:37 AM EST up reply actions  

Its funny

That entire interview he gave 2 answers and a whole lot of rhetoric. I wonder if he plans on running for congress in the future. . . .

The more I hear from Bruce the more I believe Warren Sapp. This guy has no idea about the football side of things he is there to work the cap and play golf with redskins alums.

by Venthril on Jan 14, 2011 8:34 AM EST reply actions  

What do you expect him to say?

Certainly you can’t expect him to lay out for the rest of the league the Redskins inner plans for the next six months. What team does? Everybody holds their cards close at this time of year. They have to evaluate who’s in the draft, who’s a free agent and where hundreds of potential players fit into their plans. You think he’s going to lay all that out in one fluff interview?

by DudleyDoright on Jan 14, 2011 8:43 AM EST reply actions  

I love the end where he say

in 71’ my dad brough half the Rams here with him.

Thats what all good coaches do; bring with them, or sign players with whom they are comfortable with. Thats why, as a fan, I liked the signing of Litch. Shanny knows he ran the ZBS at Bowling Green, and knows he can run it here in DC.

Are you not entertained?

by Tiller56 on Jan 14, 2011 3:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Morocco Brown

I’m curious to see how long some of these holdovers from the Snyderrato era will stick around.

I Am Jack's Raging Bile Duct

by VA_Skin on Jan 16, 2011 8:52 PM EST up reply actions  

I see he is taking to Washington very well.

Wonderfully political answers.
“I’ll say nothing of value, spin some folksy wisdom, and you’ll love me for it.”

Honestly though, I like his answers.

by mdm1185 on Jan 14, 2011 10:06 AM EST reply actions  

They probably can't comment on CBA related matters...

…but do you a possible roster capacity of 61 if that 18 game season happens…since our drafting was such crap I assume our scouting department was in a shambles…will the improvement Shanahan brought to that area this year carry over as all teams compensate with intensified scouting?

by Bullet Nation in Exile on Jan 14, 2011 10:42 AM EST reply actions  

Geez...

I forwarded this to my Uncle who has lived in TAM the last 30+ years…season ticket holder, his son in law coached on the Bucs during Gruden era, and here’s his reply…

SAME OLD BRUCE MOSTLY B.S. AND PLATITUDES. HIS DAD SAID"THE FUTURE IS NOW " AND BY THAT MEANT HE TRADED ALL TOP DRAFT CHOICES FOR THE "OVER THE HILL GANG" INCLUDING ABOUT 7 AGING L.A,RAMS PLUS SENIOR ASSISTANT COACHES LIKE TED MARCHIBRODA et al. BRUCE JUST DOES NOT GET IT AND NEVER WILL. BUCS STARTED 10 ROOKIES IN WIN VS. SAINTS AND SAINTS KEPT FIRST STRINGS IN GAME UNTIL IT WAS CLEAR THAT FALCONS HAD SECURED A WIN AND WERE TOP SEED IN PLAYOFFS. ALLEN’S REPLACEMENT WILL PROBABLY BE IN RUNNING FOR GM OF THE YEAR. SEE——-FREEMAN,BLOUNT,MIKE WILLIAMS, BENN, ETC

In short, the Bucs are a solid team before and after Bruce’s arrival….and where the Skins are now compared to last year (roster wise), as Lavar pointed out, is pretty much the same. Lots of holes with old players.

Hogs Haven. On Twitter. And Facebook.

by Kevin Ewoldt on Jan 14, 2011 10:49 AM EST reply actions  

Male or female?

Scientists believe that the first human being to live 150 years has already been born. I believe I am that human being.

by DCO'sfan on Jan 14, 2011 11:53 AM EST up reply actions  

Both?

Dear Passionate fan, I know you are passionate, but please reply with a logical answer or I will ignore you.

by TerpsAllTheWay on Jan 14, 2011 11:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Haha well played.

Scientists believe that the first human being to live 150 years has already been born. I believe I am that human being.

by DCO'sfan on Jan 14, 2011 12:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Not sure what you expected in 1 YR without a 3rd RD pick and the oldest and weakest FA class in the history of FA. The McNabb trade was a colossal mistake but it’s going to take more than 1 YR to fix the last 10 YRs.

by Diesel44 on Jan 14, 2011 8:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Waste of time

This interview was a waste of time. Allen said nothing of substance. Of course I wouldn’t expect him to give away any plans, but what did we learn from this. Nothing.

by redskins-texas-fan on Jan 14, 2011 11:31 AM EST reply actions  

haha

SpottieOttieDopaliscious

by Rekka on Jan 14, 2011 12:17 PM EST up reply actions  

I somewhat agree

his answers could not have been more vague. But the reality is he doesn’t have have to give away anything he doesn’t want to, no matter how much anyone demands it.

Actions speak louder than words so I’m not going to hold it against him. It will all be determined by wins, talent and youth. Especially the shape they leave this team in after they are eventually ousted by Snyder.

by skinsymets on Jan 14, 2011 11:53 AM EST up reply actions  

Agreed

Some of the questions were really good, and the answers were very nonchalant. I’m not asking him to show us his hand, but give some respect to the pressing issues, and the fans who are very disgruntled.

by Jedi Mind Kicks on Jan 14, 2011 3:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Good interview - Bruce did some nimble dancing - drop the 3-4?

On TV he didn’t look too good physically – maybe tired. Their methodology seems sound, hardly any other way to do it. Same as when Vinny was here. The GM must consult the coaches on possible acquisitions, and is virtually never going to overrule the coach – which is why I never thought Vinny was as much to blame for bad decisions as many on HH say.
The comments on Haynesworth were probably simple gamesmanship, but Bruce talked of evaluating players vis a vis a system – how they fit a particular system. When they do that they might discover that they don’t have anybody suitable to the 3-4 defense, and that Albert is far and away their best player if they switch back to the 4-3. Bruce talked of progress, but there has been no progress in the defense because of the 3-4. They are worse defensively, and there is virtually no way to fix it if they stick with the 3-4 – they need too many players. In short – just my opinion, with which many will disagree – their defense will suck in the 3-4, be good in the 4-3, especially with AH. Unfortunately, Allen will not decide on the 3-4 – Shanahan will. Bruce is probably stuck with trying to get 3-4 type players, which could be why he seems sort of depressed – he knows he can’t do it.
He also mentioned that they were in good shape to head into FA – because they went cheap this year. So they have a lot of firepower to get players. And that’s good.

by Donnio1234 on Jan 14, 2011 12:13 PM EST reply actions  

Bruce Allen

should sell rubber dog sh*t at a flea market for a living with answers like that.

by Obey on Jan 14, 2011 2:42 PM EST reply actions  

Did someone drain your anal gland today?

Cause your aweful testy

Are you not entertained?

by Tiller56 on Jan 14, 2011 3:16 PM EST up reply actions  

I, like everyone else

would like to hear answers that are not scripted and contain “spin”

by Obey on Jan 14, 2011 3:24 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm taking it that you don't

like Bruce then, since he gave away a 2nd round draft pick last year

by Obey on Jan 14, 2011 6:01 PM EST up reply actions  

HaHa

Good point. I thought that sucked but I don’t expect a GM to give out much info between now & Free Agency/Draft

by ENsDad27 on Jan 14, 2011 6:41 PM EST up reply actions  

haha

First off, thanks for doing this. I love the questions you asked even if the answers were predictable. I don’t know what anyone here expected, the man can’t or shouldn’t just blurt out the strategy going forward for the skins.

I remember a guy that used to sit infront of the media during press conference and explain everything like a 5th grade algebra teacher, detailing all his thoughts to the world…he works for the ravens now.

Show me a GM that’s sitting down right now with the media spelling out his offseason strategies and waxing philosophic on the lessons life has taught him…

Thanks again for doing the interview, enjoyed reading it and I am going to focus on one line as my gleaming beacon of hope.

We see the draft obviously as a great way to set up the core of your team.

The Beat Box aka skins secondary.

by Al_CaPWNED on Jan 14, 2011 4:03 PM EST reply actions  

I, for one am disappointed with this interview

I would have asked if him if there were any Macacas he’d bring onto the team.

by hambonejackson on Jan 14, 2011 5:31 PM EST reply actions   2 recs

Thank you

What angers me about the whole idea of him and his vagueness is people pay to come and waste their money on this team and he has so little respect to people he is living off of that eh can’t even tell them what he is doing. Whats the big secrete? I am trying to get football players and no one in the NFL is to known this? I suppose agents of players don’t communicate with other prospective GMs. I suppose its all so proprietary information that the people who actually support the whole project are not allowed to know what they are paying for. They were not like this before. They were so much more forthcoming about everything. now they are secretive and simply full of shit. I always felt the Redskins were apart of DC. i don’t feel that way about them anymore. They are just too corporate for me. I am also a basketball fan and I kind of like the Wiz. For the 1st time in my life I feel like I am drifting away from the Skins and the NFL.

by hambonejackson on Jan 15, 2011 3:21 AM EST up reply actions  

Secretive = DC.

Ohhh WikiLeaks, I’m talking to you.

Scientists believe that the first human being to live 150 years has already been born. I believe I am that human being.

by DCO'sfan on Jan 15, 2011 9:18 PM EST up reply actions  

haha

I Am Jack's Raging Bile Duct

by VA_Skin on Jan 16, 2011 8:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Great questions.

Unfortunately the answers could have just as easily come from his brother…

I Am Jack's Raging Bile Duct

by VA_Skin on Jan 16, 2011 8:24 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email hogshaven@gmail.com

Managers

Superbowl_small Kevin Ewoldt

Riggins_small Ken Meringolo

Editors

Sb_small Parks Smith

Small Steve Shoup

Chalkboard_football-opt403x300o00s403x300_small UkRedskin

Washington_redskins_helmet_small Redskins News

Authors

Badshirt2__2__small fatpickle

Family_in_disney_small Tiller56

Rg3super_small HTTR4LIFE

Hh_small Ronnie Adkins