Bucs' WR Michael Clayton an Option for the Redskins?
In my ritual morning task of compiling the Daily Slop, I came across an interesting post by Eric Schmidt that suggested the Redskins might be interested in Michael Clayton, the former 2004, 15th overall pick by the Bucs out of LSU. It's not that far-fetched the Skins have interest considering Bruce Allen has already brought in two former Bucs' castaways, Joey Galloway and Josh Bidwell. Some interesting facts on Clayton:
- Clayton re-signed to a 5-year, $24 million deal before last season.
- Clayton is buried on Bucs' depth chart listed in the always embarrassing "Others." Some see it as a motivation tool similar to what Shanahan is doing to Devin Thomas, but either way, he's in the dog house.
- Clayton was told coming into this season he was on the bubble, which he handled with class.
- He has been having a "REAL good camp" despite seeing no action in pre-season yet.
- List of QBs he's played with in Tampa: Josh Freeman, Byron Leftwich, Josh Johnson, Jeff Garcia, Bruce Gradkowski, Brian Griese, Luke McCown, Chris Simms, Tim Rittay, and Brad Johnson. A lot of QBs for 6 years in.
So that begs the question...what is Clayton worth in a trade? The Bucs lose a lot of negotiating power since it's clear they regret forking over that much dough. Tampa would love to dump that contract if they can, which means ShanAllenhan could probably get him for next to nothing (similar to the Beck trade). Of course, there's always the chance Clayton could be cut. The Redskins do still have multiple, late 2011 round picks...the bigger question is does he fit in? Jon Gruden, his first coach, was a WCO guy and is in the Bill Walsh tree with Shanahan (Gruden under Paul Hackett and Shanahan under George Seifert), so there is some similarities in regards to offense terminology.
After the jump SB Nation's Bucs' site answers my questions regarding his skills and trade-ability...
|
Career Stats |
Receiving |
Fumbles |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Season |
Team |
G |
|
Rec |
Yds |
Y/G |
Avg |
Lng |
YAC |
1stD |
TD |
|
Fum |
FumL |
|
||||
|
2004-05 |
Tampa |
16 |
|
80 |
1193 |
74.6 |
14.9 |
75 |
6.5 |
56 |
7 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
||||
|
2005-06 |
Tampa |
14 |
|
32 |
372 |
26.6 |
11.6 |
41 |
5.5 |
18 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
||||
|
2006-07 |
Tampa |
12 |
|
33 |
356 |
29.7 |
10.8 |
27 |
3.7 |
22 |
1 |
|
2 |
0 |
|
||||
|
2007-08 |
Tampa |
14 |
|
22 |
301 |
21.5 |
13.7 |
39 |
5.8 |
14 |
0 |
|
1 |
0 |
|
||||
|
2008-09 |
Tampa |
15 |
|
38 |
484 |
32.3 |
12.7 |
58 |
5.3 |
21 |
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
||||
|
2009-10 |
Tampa |
13 |
|
16 |
230 |
17.7 |
14.4 |
47 |
2.6 |
11 |
1 |
|
0 |
0 |
|
||||
|
Career |
84 |
|
221 |
2936 |
35.0 |
13.3 |
75 |
5.4 |
142 |
10 |
|
5 |
1 |
|
|||||
I've always thought of Tampa as a strong market, but they're next pre-season game will be blacked out for a 75-radius market.....EESH.
What do Tampa fans have to say? I pinged Craig of SB Nation's BucsNation.com on this:
If this rumor comes to fruition, I will pack his bags myself, drive him to the airport, and pay for his flight.
In all seriousness, yes, I believe this is a distinct possibility. Clayton was signed to the albatross of albatross contracts in GM Mark Dominik's first season after the underperforming Clayton was prepared to visit the Seattle Seahawks. Since then, he hasn't done any better. Some folks thought Gruden was the problem, that the offensive system was the problem, the changing QBs, etc, etc, etc. The problem is Clayton....and nobody's really been able to figure out what happened after his rookie season. He doesn't get open consistently. He is notorious for dropping passes, especially when contact is imminent. He's made statements like "the check is in the bank."
You've got me. Its been one of the great mysteries around here. However, there's one thing that's been steady throughout all the changes people have mentioned....and that's Clayton hasn't performed. He's the constant among all those variables.
He's not particularly good at either of the aspects you mentioned. If he was, he'd regularly catch more than a pass or two per game. Its tough to count how many times he's dropped the ball as a defender approaches him. If WAS fans are looking for a silver lining, its that he's a tremendous blocker in the running game and can help stretch the running game outside and promulgate some second-level runs. Really, his strengths would make him closer to a tight end than a WR for me....maybe bulk him up and make him a tweener guy like David Martin was/is for the Packers/Dolphins.
There's no doubt the Bucs have needs. Depth along the offensive line is a primary concern for me. Depth at linebacker is needed. A defensive end that can rush the passer.
This is where I'd normally make my, "Let's trade Heyer for Clayton" joke, but after Heyer's strong game against the Bills, I'm ready to read the next page. The Redskins actually do have to cut a decent DE...Jarmon, Holliday....might as well get a WR back, right?
33 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
That is an incredible drop off
in production. Do we really need another WR? Hmmm…
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
He's not worth anything more than an invitation to a camp try out
and a new minimum contract.
Good lord that current deal is awful.
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
Screw that
I’d rather give up Carter and that’s only if we HAVE to give up somebody.
I say wait ’til he gets cut and bring him in for a tryout. No way do I wanna take on that contract
SpottieOttieDopaliscious
I'm too excited about our young guys
the last thing I want to do is bring in another veteran to block their development. I want Galloway, Furrey, Wade, etc. gone as it is. Who needs this guy?
I would say that his first season was a fluke.
Yeah he has potential but so does everyone else. For any team to take on that contract with those numbers would be crazy. To take on that contract with those numbers and give up a draft pick would be complete lunacy. I agree with smuts, minimum contract and then let him compete for a spot. Gone are the days of making this team just because you played well one season 5 years ago or because of your name.
Bucs will either grit their teeth and keep him because of his contract or just cut him, either way they should have no leverage in the trade market unless of course Vinny Ceratto is making decisions for another NFL team.
IFFY AT BEST
Boy, the numbers and comments from Tampa ain’t great…..
Maybe I’ve drunk too much of the Kool-Aid, but I think I’d wait. Besides, as the pre-season goes on, players such as Jarmon, Holliday, et al may bring a better price…..
What a terrible idea!
Why give up anyting for a guy that doesn’t to make the team anyway!?
I can`t see any value in this...
Since he has not been an impact player for several seasons. Trading for him would be a waste at this point since the recievers we have at this time need playing time. Waiver wire pick up if he gets cut and the Skins need to replace someone due to injury. I am still hoping that Thomas and Kelly can full fill the reason why they got drafted in the second round instead of an offensive lineman. I want to forget the Cerrato (rotto) era as much as everyone else.
PLEASE
I hear ya….but hope the term ‘rotto" doesn’t catch on…it’s way to close to rottie and my Rottweiler would be deeply offended if anyone mistook him for the late and not-so-lamented Vinny Cerrato.
(Maybe you could go old school like a Cab Calloway song and refer to Cerrato as “Vinny the Moocher”)
I was attacked
and bitten by a Rottweiler a few years ago. I still like him more than I like Vinnny. At least the dog was put to sleep. Vinny just won’t go away.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
Dogs are mans best friend...
Good thinking my bad it is a new era in DC. Many new names on the roster and a good test for the recievers with the Ravens this week.
This article is a waste of time. Fodder. Nothing out of the normal for Kevin.
If were going to trade, lets get someone TOP tier, not some upper middle to middle class player…
by TheOverLordMarshl on Aug 18, 2010 11:20 AM EDT reply actions
Of course it is fodder,
Its pretty much all fodder, If I go 24 hours without opening this site I can count on over 100 articles, blogs, blurbs, fan-posts, questions, answers, opinions and some general insanity relating to the Washington Redskins…..its all fodder until gameday, and a free lunch to some hungry Skins fans………I don’t disagree with your point, we don’t need the guy, but the fodder was enough to get you to chime in…..not that kevin needs any back up from me, but I do appreciate what he brings to this burgundy and gold table.
Save up our fire power for
Vincent Jackson or a good O-lineman.
Based on the unflattering comments
From Craig, I’d say that it’s not worth it to trade for Clayton. I’d rather work with one of the younger receivers we already have on our team. If he gets cut, then we can try him out, but other than that, it’s a no from me.
I wouldn't even waste the time to try him out.
He probably has the skills to make the team and then would likely sit back in cruise control while we have to cut one of our younger guys who might develop.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
Only because of Shanahan
And his “no half-assing” approach would I be somewhat OK with bringing in Clayton. If Zorn were still here, then I wouldn’t even think about it. Plus, if Clayton were to come in and become a part of the roster, Shanahan would make him earn it over whoever we would have to cut in his place. But like I said, I’d still rather work with one of the younger WRs we already have on our team.
Good point on Shanny making him earn his spot
but it’s kind of late in the game for a move like this considering what we have on the roster, IMO. Only getting a V Jackson kind of WR would make any sense to me at this point, and only if we got him on the cheap.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
Cut Jarmon?
Already? He was a third rounder last year!(supplemental) Is he that much of a bust?
I believe it is "injury"
single, not plural. But its a knee, so….
I don’t consider him a bust, at all, just a fact of life in the NFL that your career can be short despite the effort and talent. Wish him well, but he is in a real battle right now and this D Scott kid seems to be tearing things up in practice against our 1st string.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
We don't need this guy....
Moss, Thomas, (I will accept Galloway, if Shanny really believes we need him….I used to be a big fan of this guy for awhile.) Austin……I don’t see Banks being long term and we are going to have enough positions to replace. Armstrong seems to have potential…….we have this guy in MK, huge potential….I am on the fence with MK and would still tather have him over Clayton.
I tather have all of our
guys over Clayton at this point. :)
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
Clayton
stay where your at, we don’t need another injured player …….

by 





















