Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: AEG To Purchase Spurs?

Brandon Banks and Terrence Austin Need to Make This Team


They average a diminutive 5'9" and 161 pounds, and thats only because Brandon Banks significantly lowers that average, but these could be the two most explosive players on the Washington Redskins.  They are WR/KR's Brandon Banks and Terrence Austin.  Both rookies, one a seventh round draft choice, and the other an undrafted free agent, share a lot in common. 

 

Aside form their small stature, both men are fighting for a position on the Redskins 53 man roster come this fall at the same position; backup wide reciever, and return specialist.  But that is not where the similarities end.  Both players have game changing speed; something the Redskins have not seen in the return game in over a decade. 

Star-divide

Banks played his college football at Kansas State, where he excelled as a wide receiver and return specialist in his two years.  His best receiving year came in 2008 when he caught 67 passes for 1049 yards and 9 touchdowns.  He also added a 98 yard kickoff return for a touchdown.  In 2009, Banks lit it up in the return game with 39 kickoff returns for 1127 yards and 4 touchdowns.  He also pulled in 56 receptions for 705 yards and 1 touchdown.  He boasts sub 4.4 speed in the 40 yard dash, and is said to have posted a 4.4 in the 2010 NFL combine after pulling a hamstring half way through the run.

 

As a Redskin, Banks showed flashes of his ability in the return game when he took a punt  77 yards to the house against the Buffalo Bills.  The speed he showed, made the Bills special teamers look like they were stuck in slow motion.  For the game, Banks had 4 punt returns for an average of 24 yards, including the 77 yard touchdown.  He was not a prominate part of the passing game. 

 

Terrence Austin was a seventh round draft pick of the Redskins.  He played his college ball at UCLA, and posted carer totals of 109 receptions, for 1192 yards and 5 touchdowns.  He excelled in the return game as well averaging an impressive 24.1 yards on kickoff returns in 2008-2009.  Eventhough he failed to take a return to the house, he did have an 82 yard return as a junior that was one step away from being a score.  Austin ran his 40 in the low 4.4's at his UCLA pro day, and has reported times in the mid 4.3's. 

 

In the Redskins preseason game versus the Bills, Austin caught 2 passes for 18 yards, one of which was an impressive extended grab across the middle in traffic.  Austin also added 2 kickoff returns for a 24 yard average, and had 3 punt returns for 22 yards. 

 

The delima for the Redskins coaching staff is what to do with the receiving corps this preseason.  We have vetrans Santana Moss, Joey Galloway, Roydell Williams, Bobby Wade, and Mike Furrey, to go along with youngsters Devin Thomas, Malcolm Kelly, Anthony Armstrong, Banks and Austin.  The staff will most likely keep six wide receivers, with at least one serving as the primary kickoff/punt return specialist.  This is where things become complicated for Banks and Austin. 

 

The staff is most likely going to have to make a descision between the two, as to which one they keep, and which one they either release, or assign to the practice squad.  Moss, Thomas, and at lease one of either Williams/Galloway(or possibly both) are pretty much assured to make the team.  That leaves either two or three spots left to be filled.  Malcolm Kelly, who is battling yet another injury, could be one to watch over the remainder of the preseason.  If he is unable to get healthy, and work his way onto the field, the former second round draft pick could become a training camp cut.  By all accounts, Anthony Armstrong has had an impressive camp thus far, and is determined to make the team.  He can also contribute as a special teamer, which should help his chances. 

 

The question is, should the Redskins coaching staff choose to keep Galloway/Williams over the likes of Banks/Austin, or would it be in the better interest of the team to release Galloway/Williams, and keep both the young playmakers on the 53 man roster.  Can the team live with the mental mistakes a young receiving corps is sure to make, in favor of having that big play ability on the roster, or will Shanahan and company want a few seasoned veterans to mix in with some young talent, eventhough those veterans may only have a year or two left in their football careers. 

 

Only time will tell which direction the staff will choose to go, but one thing is for sure; we should be seeing a lot of both Banks and Austin in the next couple preseason games.  Try not to blink, because if you do, your bound to miss something special.

Comment 72 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I really hope Banks makes the team just as a dynamic return guy, I think its going to be hard for both Banks and Austin to make the squad though…

Did any one see Marco Mitchell take it 71 yards to the house last night?

by Parks Smith on Aug 15, 2010 10:00 AM EDT reply actions  

Yes, the mitchell catch was pretty impressive

Does anyone feel we released the wrong WR when we let Mitchell go, and still hung onto Malcolm Kelly?

Don't ever let failure get you down. Remember, a very successful major league hitter failes 70% of the time.

by Tiller56 on Aug 15, 2010 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

With 20-20 hindsight, yes

I and almost everybody else were shocked when they let Marco go. Malcolm just continues to disappoint.

by Donnio1234 on Aug 15, 2010 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

That saying doesnt work here dumbass

he said WHEN WE LET HIM GO…meaning at THAT time. not NOW.

I thought it was the wrong decision WHEN it happened.

by tw10 on Aug 15, 2010 9:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Dude, calm down

There was nothing wrong with Donnio’s comment. Seriously, don’t start a fight where it isn’t needed.

I'm back. YAY SUMMER!

by DCO'sfan on Aug 15, 2010 10:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

no, he really did use “20-20 hindsight” incorrectly. yes, tw10 could calm down.

a life: it's the shit that happens while you're waiting for moments that never come -Lester Freamon

by eastcoastatlas on Aug 16, 2010 10:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

OK fair enough

But there’s no need to nitpick. And tw10 didn’t need to insult him in the process.

I'm back. YAY SUMMER!

by DCO'sfan on Aug 16, 2010 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

Why is it used incorrectly?

It means that you see the correct action now, looking back, knowing what happened – having more facts, the benefit of seeing the results. And that it wasn’t obvious back then (or they wouldn’t have done it), although it doesn’t preclude some seeing the truth back then. So it’s easy to look back at something and say “that was a mistake”, even though many or most would have done the same thing. We have perfect vision (20-20) looking back at the past. “Of course Snyder shouldn’t have made Jim Zorn head coach, of course Vinny shouldn’t have drafted Thomas and Kelly so high”, etc. I think it is increasingly apparent that dumping Mitchell was a mistake because our current receiving corps isn’t so great, especially for big targets. I wasn’t too happy about it at the time because he did seem to be our best big receiver (I was sceptical of DT and MK even then). So, what do you think is the correct usage of the phrase? How do you use it? DCO’sfan – thanks.

by Donnio1234 on Aug 16, 2010 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

you simply didn’t need to use it. you said you were shocked when they let Mitchell go, therefore you didn’t need 20-20 hindsight to see it, you already knew it was wrong to hold on to the Okahoma system-product. i really don’t know why i felt the need to say anything, just boredom. whatever. you’re good. carry on. nothing to see here

a life: it's the shit that happens while you're waiting for moments that never come -Lester Freamon

by eastcoastatlas on Aug 17, 2010 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

20-20 hindsight

Thanks for the thoughtful reply. It’s a very old phrase, at least 50 years old, and it’s not worth arguing about exact usage; this isn’t an English class. On MM: I was surprised when he was cut, but more just wondering about why they did it, rather than any great feeling for him. It wasn’t necessarily a mistake – he didn’t do special teams, and they may have already planned on bringing in Galloway, Wade and the others, and they may have wanted to give him a chance to hook on with another team, and there may have been some other problem – who knows? Mike probably doesn’t have any regrets, but since I got a little down on current receivers, it occurred to me that it would be nice to have MM back. I.e., in retrospect, it might have been better to have kept him. I don’t know how good he is, but my guess is that he’d make the team (I’d put him ahead of Furrey, Kelly, Galloway, Banks (as a WR) and Hodge, and in a group with Austin, Williams, Wade, Thomas and Armstrong).

by Donnio1234 on Aug 17, 2010 10:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm still not sure

what the big hurry was to release Mitchell in the first place.

by VA_Skin on Aug 15, 2010 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Mitchell

Yes, why? I wonder if he said something somebody didn’t like? They brought in like ten receivers, but no big receiver as a big target (unless they thought that MK was the guy, or figured that they would rely on the TEs).

by Donnio1234 on Aug 15, 2010 3:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Did you see the other passing TDs by the Vikings in that game? The Rams secondary looked terrible. Plus Mitchell’s TD was so late in the 3rd period it was likely against a few guys who probably won’t even make the team.

I’ll hold off my Mitchell judgment until I see him play in the regular season and against a better secondary.

by superjuan on Aug 15, 2010 9:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rams secondary looked terrible

Good to hear that – we play them 9/26. Chance to see Bradford, too.

by Donnio1234 on Aug 17, 2010 10:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

If I recall, Mitchell wasn’t much of a blocker and wasn’t much of a special teams tackler.

by hsoup on Aug 15, 2010 10:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Marko's route running and special team limitations seemed have been factors in his release.

MK’s receiving skills in college rather than his injury history has helped him stay on the Team up to this point. MK certainly has
not done enough to prove himself in the NFL.

by Jefferson1935 on Aug 16, 2010 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Marko's route running and special team limitations seemed have been factors in his release.

MK’s receiving skills in college rather than his injury history has helped him stay on the Team up to this point. MK certainly has
not done enough to prove himself in the NFL.

by Jefferson1935 on Aug 16, 2010 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

My feeling on the WR's

I would love to see 6 wr’s kept.
Moss
Thomas
Williams
Kelly
Banks
Austin/Armstrong

If Kelly can not get healthy, and start to become a contributor, I think I could live with releasing him. This way, I would favor Armstrong, Banks and Austin all making the team.

I am just not in favor of having Joey Galloway on our roster. For one, he is old(how many more years will he likely be able to play). Do we want to cut young talent in favor of a guy who may be able to help us for 1 year?

Second, he’s OLD, and doesn’t play special teams.

Third, did I mention he’s OLD!

This is prob all premature after just one preseason game, but it’s a fun topic to discuss, and definitly something worth watching over the next few weeks.

Don't ever let failure get you down. Remember, a very successful major league hitter failes 70% of the time.

by Tiller56 on Aug 15, 2010 10:13 AM EDT reply actions  

I agree with you here

The only issue is I want to keep Austin and Armstrong. Banks should definitely be kept as a return guy, as having speed and dynamic ability is something we’ve lacked for a while. Austin is impressing and I think Armstrong is too. 7 WRs is probably too much and would cause us to lose depth else where, so I definitely could see Kelly being cut.

by BigOLinemen on Aug 15, 2010 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree. Galloway may help this year but we need young guys to get practice reps

I’m fine cutting Galloway and MK

"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins

by smutsboy1 on Aug 15, 2010 10:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

I doubt Galloway gets cut

But I’m keeping my fingers crossed.

If we add Westbrook and keep Galloway, they cut Austin/Banks, and Torain/Williams I’ll be pissed.

Don't ever let failure get you down. Remember, a very successful major league hitter failes 70% of the time.

by Tiller56 on Aug 15, 2010 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

yes, that would bad IMO

I really hope Westbrook goes elsewhere…….and I would be fine if they cut Galloway and MK

by MagicHat on Aug 15, 2010 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm really feeling Westbrook to Denver

Hope i’m right

Don't ever let failure get you down. Remember, a very successful major league hitter failes 70% of the time.

by Tiller56 on Aug 15, 2010 10:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

I heard that rumor too

but nothing yet to back it up.

Don't ever let failure get you down. Remember, a very successful major league hitter failes 70% of the time.

by Tiller56 on Aug 15, 2010 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Actually

The Rams aren’t close to signing Westbrook, according to a team official. Even though the Rams remain a possibility as a landing spot for Westbrook.

But Westbrook is still an option for signing with us according to Shanahan.

I’m not sure how this all plays out, but if I were Westbrook, the Redskins would seem like the most tempting landing spot. Unless there’s a team in play for his services that I don’t know about. But just like everyone else, I’d hate for Westbrook to take up a roster spot from one of the younger players.

by bigrm18 on Aug 15, 2010 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

I have the same feeling (about cutting the vet receivers)

That’s not to say the old guys are bad receivers. I appreciate them being in training camp and setting a bar for our young guys. But this is a part of the team that needs to develop some youth. And from the flashes we saw Friday night, it looks like we have some fast players ready to step up.
Torain was looking pretty strong too for the running game.Williams was a total surprise because I had heard no hype about him leading up to the first preseason game.
And of course Trent WIlliams looked sharp. Please let the man stay healthy. I have a good feeling about that left side, but we’ll need to see more.

by willster on Aug 15, 2010 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree also

I would like for us to have 6 WR’s Moss, DT, Wade, Williams, Austin, and Banks as the return guy…

I just dont see Galloway making the squad nor do i see kelly making it if he cant stay healthy. i agree completely with the 6 WR’s except on the which receivers to keep, i would prefer wade to williams. I think Wade would be great in the slot.

by jkitts84 on Aug 17, 2010 9:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

Jkitts84 - I'm close

although I hate to give up Armstrong. I’d keep him over Wade, Williams, and possibly even DT. Don’t know what’s going on with DT. If I had to pick right now, I’d go with Moss, DT, Armstrong, Wade, Austin, and Banks as the return guy. They could keep Williams and put Austin or Armstrong on the practice squad.

by Donnio1234 on Aug 17, 2010 10:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think I'm just as enthused about Galloway Not making this team

as LJP was in favor of Campbell being the next John Elway

Don't ever let failure get you down. Remember, a very successful major league hitter failes 70% of the time.

by Tiller56 on Aug 15, 2010 10:36 AM EDT reply actions  

I really can't come up with

a legitimate argument for keeping Galloway. He is on the downward slope of his career while Austin, Banks and Armstrong have nothing but upside. Based on Friday’s game, I say we put all our money on the young guns and let Joey ride off into the sunset.

Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.

by Scott E on Aug 16, 2010 8:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

Somebody needs to tell that to Shanahan.
I say we put all our money on the young guns and let Joey ride off into the sunset.

by bigrm18 on Aug 16, 2010 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

I STILL WORRY....

While Banks was a HOOT to watch, I still worry what will happen to him when he gets leveled by a defensive back or linebacker….and sooner or later it WILL happen. Someone made a good observation on Friday’s kick coverage…they said the Bills didn’t respect Banks’ speed, so they played their coverage to the inside. Don’t know if that’s true, but NO ONE is going to under estimate his speed now…..

by Tee L on Aug 15, 2010 10:47 AM EDT reply actions  

If his primary role is KR/PR then his size isn't important to me.

Might be the least important position to have size at besides like punter or something.

"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins

by smutsboy1 on Aug 15, 2010 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

UNLESS

Might be….unless he gets nailed and knocked out of a game….or worse. LOVE the speed, don’t mind the height….just worry about the bulk….

by Tee L on Aug 15, 2010 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

He played 2 years at KState

so I’m sure he took somr pretty descent shots while he was there. He was also their leading receiver, so he wasn’t just one dimensional.

Don't ever let failure get you down. Remember, a very successful major league hitter failes 70% of the time.

by Tiller56 on Aug 15, 2010 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

He said he only took two real bad hits at Kstate

thats what he said this morning on the sports junkies, he says he uses his quickness to avoid most direct hits

by skinsfan28 on Aug 16, 2010 8:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'd hate to take a descent shot

but I guess any hit that makes you fall is a descent shot right? It is true that he will spend some time injured, but there is some precedent. Darren Sproles, Dante Hall, and Devin Hester are all among, or were among, the smaller players in the league that impacted the game returning the ball and also contribute an occasional game breaking play on offense just because of their speed. Hester and Sproles are listed at 190, Hall 180 so these guys are bigger than Banks but keep in mind they all have put on weight since entering the league because of their size.

by samthemantis on Aug 16, 2010 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

If he gets knocked out of a game

We have DT and D Hall to return kicks. It’s not like it would cripple us.

Insert something witty here.

by Knubles and Bits on Aug 15, 2010 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly

like I said, with PR/KR size is pretty much irrelevant

"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins

by smutsboy1 on Aug 15, 2010 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yup

Darren Sproles. He’s thicker then Banks, but he still ain’t big, and he hasn’t had a problem back there.

by BigOLinemen on Aug 15, 2010 5:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

If he can hold onto the football, he’s big enough.

by hsoup on Aug 15, 2010 10:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agree about Austin and Banks

I also think you’re right on about Westbrook, tiller. Shanahan as already tipped us off about the number of receivers he will keep, it’s six.
I agree with all the comments about wanting to go with the more youthful players, but unfortunately, Shanahan is already tipped his thoughts on this as well; he wants to have a Super Bowl team this year, therefore Galloway and Williams will make the roster. I would not be surprised to see Wade make the roster as well.
Malcolm Kelly will be/needs to be cut very soon, he just cannot stay healthy. Even if he manages to make it into two or three games in the preseason, he is not going to play 16 games, Shanahan knows that, and so we. Another bad VC pick, the whole scouting department knew this, inexcusable.
Here is what I think we will end up with wide receiver: Moss, Galloway, Thomas, Williams, Austin, and Wade….. I really hope I’m wrong on the last one.

The world looks mighty different when you're peeking out your belly button

by Skins Fan '77 on Aug 15, 2010 11:35 AM EDT reply actions  

What I really like about Austin is his ability to change directions at full speed.

combined with the ability to make consistently make catches, I think he has a lot of potential as a slot receiver too. That’s why I think he makes it over Banks.

by SSBlitz on Aug 15, 2010 12:35 PM EDT reply actions  

How about (in order of merit)

(1) Moss, (2) Williams, (3) Armstrong, (4) Wade, (5) Banks, (6) Thomas, (7) Austin (practice squad if Thomas is kept). I’d consider Thomas on the “bubble”, depending on his performance. He had that one nice touchdown, but was otherwise unimpressive. Joe Theisman pointed out one case when Wade could have cut inside for a catch but didn’t. I heard that Wade worked with Grossman in Chicago. I can’t see keeping Galloway or Kelly, and hope they do not get Westbrook.

by Donnio1234 on Aug 15, 2010 1:01 PM EDT reply actions  

armstrong and banks in front of DT?

That’s ignorant. Banks, the undrafted rookie who weighs 150 pounds, is on the bubble. Armstrong, who is having a good camp, is on the bubble. Devin Thomas, like it or not, is not going anywhere..

by DoWork on Aug 16, 2010 9:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think we keep Galloway..

purely because we don’t know what McNabb is doing yet. If he signs an extension then Galloway should be cut but if not then we need to milk this year for it’s worth, especially if keeping Galloway has us continuing to play the way we did in our first preseason game.

BTW how does one go about pronouncing delima? (not nitpicking, just thought the word was funny)

by Nobetterthenbob on Aug 15, 2010 1:04 PM EDT reply actions  

De Lima. It's how you drink a Corona.

"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins

by smutsboy1 on Aug 15, 2010 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

"If keeping Galloway has us continuing to play the way we did..."

What do you mean? What did Galloway have to do with it (he hardly played)? it was relatively meaningless anyway. But if you’re talking WRs, I would guess that K. Shanahan and McCardell had a lot to do with it. Did somebody use the word dilemma, as in “problem”.

by Donnio1234 on Aug 15, 2010 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes, I spelled Dilemma wrong and got called out for it.

Don't ever let failure get you down. Remember, a very successful major league hitter failes 70% of the time.

by Tiller56 on Aug 15, 2010 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

You remember...

when Galloway beat his man and McNabb missed him by just a bit? If Galloway proves to be a consistent deep threat we now have a receiver that can take pressure off Moss, something we have struggled to find the better part of the last decade.

by Nobetterthenbob on Aug 15, 2010 7:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Galloway

Right, I forgot. Donovan missed him.

by Donnio1234 on Aug 15, 2010 9:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not

but in anycase we need another player that can play deep and we can’t just wait on Devin Thomas to fit the shoes we give to him or any other young receiver. Now if Galloway goes on to show that he can’t produce or can’t take pressure off of Moss or other receivers then by all means cut him but if I see Galloway beat his man this preseason more than I saw all our receiver beat their men deep last year then I have no problem with keeping him.

by Nobetterthenbob on Aug 16, 2010 4:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

Who would you guys choose Austin or Banks?

by wizardsfan1 on Aug 15, 2010 4:39 PM EDT reply actions  

Probably Austin

because I think he has a future as a receiver and could help us in the slot as early as this year.

Insert something witty here.

by Knubles and Bits on Aug 15, 2010 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

As awesome as it was to see Banks take it to the house

I will need to see some more nice punt returns this preseason before I take the TD as a one time thing. I really hope that Banks is special and can produce consistently good returns, but I am not convinced after just one amazing play.

by RobtheRedskin on Aug 15, 2010 5:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Banks vs Austin

Austin was the more hearolded prospect coming out of high school. He was one of the top WR/ATH in the country on both Rivals and Scout. He didn’t quite live up to the hype at UCLA. Banks, on the other hand went the JUCO route before ending up at KState.

Overall, Banks had a more productive collegiate career than Austin did. Because thats all I have to go by as of right now, I’d have to lean towards Banks, but that doesn’t mean squat right now.

Personally, I hope they both make the team. If either ends up being cut, some team will sign them ASAP.

Don't ever let failure get you down. Remember, a very successful major league hitter failes 70% of the time.

by Tiller56 on Aug 15, 2010 6:57 PM EDT reply actions  

Do you see them as having trade value?

You did an about face on Banks from some earlier threads.

by Jefferson1935 on Aug 15, 2010 8:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was never against Banks

I was actually excited to hear we had signed him as an UFA

As for trades, it would never happen. Teams would just simply wait until one was released, then pounce. I also fear if either one is put on our practice squad, that anothe team could come in and sign them away from us.

As for practice squad right now, my guess would be:
Banks or Austin
Keeland Williams
Selvish Capers
Dennis Morris
Jeremy Jarmon(this one may surprise some)

Don't ever let failure get you down. Remember, a very successful major league hitter failes 70% of the time.

by Tiller56 on Aug 16, 2010 8:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Logan Paulsen, TE, is another practice squad candidate.

Maybe the FS, Anderson Russell gets a PS shot. The team needs some other defensive players. The C/G Erik Cook is another PS possibility. The Skins might pick up some defensive line prospects cut by other teams after September 4th for the PS.

Eligible for PS:
Do not have an accrued season of NFL experience (six or more games on a team’s 53-man roster, injured reserve or PUP list), unless they were on the active list (i.e. were dressed to play) for fewer than nine regular season games during their only accrued season(s)

Jarmon may not be eligible for the PS since he played in 11 games in 2009 season.

by Jefferson1935 on Aug 16, 2010 9:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

I thought Austin set a bunch of UCLA records while there.

I guess it depends on the hype you were listening to, though.

by SSBlitz on Aug 16, 2010 9:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

He never really shined as a WR

He was a good return guy, but never scored a return TD.

Definitly didn’t live up to the hype.

Banks, on the other hand broke KState records for all purpose yards in a single season.

Don't ever let failure get you down. Remember, a very successful major league hitter failes 70% of the time.

by Tiller56 on Aug 16, 2010 8:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Banks vs Austin

I don’t know which I’d choose – like to keep them both – but it could be telling that Austin is a plausible WR and special teams player, whereas Banks is only being thought of as a punt returner. If it were me, I’d give him a full tryout at WR to see if he can contribute at all. If he can’t, it would be hard to keep him solely for punt returns. Is he trying out on kickoff returns? Is there any chance of spot duty at RB?

by Donnio1234 on Aug 15, 2010 9:26 PM EDT reply actions  

Too early to call yet

Banks looked awesome on the TD return, but the Bills deserve some credit here. That was some of the worst kick coverage I’ve ever seen. They didn’t even look like they were trying to seal the sidelines.

Bored and broke.

by ThaRak on Aug 15, 2010 10:38 PM EDT reply actions  

It's true

I watched the reply hoping to see what happened and part of it was that either the Bills players are really slow or they weren’t trying.

"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins

by smutsboy1 on Aug 15, 2010 11:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

did furrey even play on friday?

i would like to see banks make the team. if im not mistaken, shanny kind of let slip out he might keep 6 wide recivers. that is a good sign. i really dont see wade making the squad

Mike Green in regular season- Norris Canadiate. Mike Green in Playoffs- Nowhere to be found

by Lancers25 on Aug 16, 2010 7:27 AM EDT reply actions  

I don't either, but it's early in preseason
i really dont see wade making the squad

"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins

by smutsboy1 on Aug 16, 2010 9:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

Furrey didn't play on friday

and prob won’t play this week either. He is definitly a long shot to make the team.

Don't ever let failure get you down. Remember, a very successful major league hitter failes 70% of the time.

by Tiller56 on Aug 16, 2010 8:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email hogshaven@gmail.com

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Arnold-schwarzenegger-kindergarten-cop_small
Trading Up Is Not The Solution. Here's why.
Super_47_small
I Ran Into Jim Haslett and We Talked QB Draft, Manning, Trading Up
Images_small
SB Nation 2012 NFL Mock Draft

Recent FanPosts

Small
Offseason Position Primers: Defensive Backs
Small
Offseason Position Primers: Defensive Line
Small
Offseason Position Primers: Offensive Line
Small
WR is the key....
Redskins2_small
WR’s the Redskins Should Consider in 2012 Draft
298012_1597734759305_1714091948_855549_1285303626_nedited_small
Would RG3 Pull a ELI/ELWAY
Small
Whats so good about Tannehill?
Small
Who will we be pursuing this FA 2012?
Small
I'm Torn...
Small
Manning to Texans

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Superbowl_small Kevin Ewoldt

Riggins_small Ken Meringolo

Editors

Fb_small Parks Smith

Chalkboard_football-opt403x300o00s403x300_small UkRedskin

Washington_redskins_helmet_small Redskins News

Authors

Badshirt2__2__small fatpickle

Paterno_tribute_small Tiller56

Small Steve Shoup

Defaukt_small HTTR4LIFE

Hh_small Ronnie Adkins