Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

Five of the Major 2010 NFL Rule Changes

Jason Brewer, the fine editor for the Eagles SBN blog, Bleeding Green Nation, attended a seminar at Eagles' training camp where NFL officials explained some of the rule changes for the upcoming season.

1.) Umpire move - The Umpire that stands behind the defensive line will be moved 15 yards behind the offensive line. Injuries to the umps and the fact so many Wide Receivers use the ump as a screen were listed as the reason. Inside two minutes, the referee will return to his old position so he can quickly spot the ball.

2.) Fair Catch Interference - Last year in the Titans/Texans game, Jacoby Jones called for a fair catch, had the ball bounce off his chest, and was subsequently hit. Because the ball bounced off Jones and didn't hit the turf first, officials awarded possession back to Houston and tossed in a 15-yard penalty for fair catch interference.

So the NFL clarified the rule: If a player has signaled for a fair catch, he must be allowed a chance to recover a muffed kick before it hits the ground. However, under the new rule the kicking team is not assessed a 15 yard penalty for the hit. If the ball hits the ground or the returner does not signal for a fair catch, then the ball is live.

Star-divide

3.) When a Runner Loses his Helmet - Starting this year, a play will be blown dead as soon as the runner's helmet comes off during the play. This only applies to player with the ball. As soon as the helmet comes off, the play is dead and the ball is spotted where the helmet came off. It will be treated as if the player was down by contact.

4.) Hitting Defenseless Players - An illegal hit on a defenseless player is when the initial force of contact by a players head, shoulder, or forearm is to the head or neck area. A "defenseless player" will be defined as a QB in the act of passing, A WR in the act of making a catch, a kick or punt returner in the act of making a catch, a runner who is in the grass or whose forward progress has been stopped, a player on the ground at the end of the play, a QB after a change of possession, and a kicker or punter after the ball is kicked. Violations will result in a 15 yard unnecessary roughness penalty.

Example: If a WR has made a catch, but has not had time to defend himself a defender can not launch himself into the WR with his his helmet, shoulder, or forearm in a way that strikes the WR's head or neck area. "Launching" means leaving the ground to make the hit. If the defender doesn't "launch" himself or the WR had time to defend himself then it is not a penalty.

5.) Automatic 10-second run off - Bruce Raffel, from SBN Ravens' blog, Baltimore Beatdown, explains:  

 Let's say you are trying to get in position to score at the end of the half or game and have no timeouts left and then have a pass ruled incomplete with 9 seconds left. The official upstairs calls for a replay and if the replay shows that the pass was complete, there is an automatic runoff of ten seconds and the half/game is over. You'd be better off having it stay incomplete and try again to gain a few more yards the next play or spike the ball to kick a FG, but now don't have a choice in the matter. I asked that scenario to the officials and they acknowledge the issue but said now you can't stop the clock with that 10 second automatic runoff. Hope this doesn't end up hurting anyone, but we'll see.

The fair catch rule and the automatic 10-second run off rules I really don't like. 10 seconds seems like a very high number. If it was the 2009 Redskins, certainly, but it doesn't take most teams to get to a ball and spike it. After all, it's the referees that are the stopping the clock.

Comment 44 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

RE: Rule 1
Inside two minutes, the referee will return to his old position so he can quickly position the ball

, unless he was killed on the play or scrubbed off a defender to allow the TD.

Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.

by Scott E on Aug 11, 2010 1:13 PM EDT reply actions  

I have serious issues with #4

its a violent game…….everybody knows this coming in, and they get paid well for doing it. I really don’t want to see anybody seriously hurt….not even Romo (not seriously anyway)…..this is ridiculous, you can’t leave this in the eyes of the ref ….so you can’t hit a receiver in the act of a catch with the front half of your body? Do we need to hire Jackie Chan for FS so he can hit him with his feet (I know it would only make the roster older, nobody wants that) Or a QB throwing the ball?…..if you hit him waist high with your shoulder as he is throwing….or in the knees (thanks Mr Brady) or in the head its a penalty? lets go ahead and let him wear the redshirt on gameday> WTF!!! Football is probably the most strategic game…and a very intelligent game, but it is not a civilized game, and shouldn’t be….we have baseball for that.

by MagicHat on Aug 11, 2010 1:15 PM EDT reply actions  

Agreed

I want to go ahead and agree with pretty much everything you said. I think the games rules on hitting are becoming overly complex and this hurts the sport. It gives officials too many ways to mess up a game. I think the nfl should take into consideration that the game rules need to be trimmed down and simplified.

Is there really any correlation between the increased rules against hitting and a lessening of injuries? Shit, the hitting was the main reason I played the game.

The Beat Box aka skins secondary.

by Al_CaPWNED on Aug 11, 2010 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

agree

I had a comment the NFL will stand for the National Flagfootball League within 10 years…but held back only b/c of the term “launching.” I predict I’ll be writing a few recap Posts about a lost game due to a stupid penalty from #4. Fans will get turned off from footbball if that’s the case. Hockey for the most part kept their roughness in place.

Hogs Haven. On Twitter. And Facebook.

by Kevin Ewoldt on Aug 11, 2010 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Magic, I think you maybe misreading it

you just can’t lead with your shoulder forearm or head when “launching” yourself into the opposing player in the head or neck, you can still plant a shoulder right to the chest or you can collide with your forearm shoulder to there head/neck as long as your not leaving the ground to do so…
I get where you’re comming from though, the brady rule is pretty lame

by skinsfan28 on Aug 11, 2010 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

It seemed so backwards

they praised these fierce pass rushers and enshrined them in the hall of fame, and then in the cowboys game there was a good shot on the cowboys qb as he released the ball, and it was a 15 yarder and first down. Ronnie Lott would have never been able to play with these new rules, it’s a shame..

by DoWork on Aug 11, 2010 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think Goodell wants to eventually do away with the sack

the QBs will wear red jerseys like they do in camp and you won’t be allowed to touch them at all, under penalty of immediately forfeiting the game and the offending defender being put to death.

He seems to think that passing TDs are the only exciting thing about football and promoting them the only way to “build the brand,” as he puts it. I think he’d rather football be turned into 7-7, and do away with the unnecessary and unsightly linemen and boring running game. And tackling.

by CarverM on Aug 11, 2010 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hopefully

They institute your “red jersey QB rule” while we still have a healthy McNabb….. Thought they had been experimenting with that rule in NE for years……

by gopens44 on Aug 11, 2010 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

ha!

sad but true…

The Beat Box aka skins secondary.

by Al_CaPWNED on Aug 11, 2010 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

what you just described is called

arena football….most chuckleheads seem to enjoy it for some reason

The world looks mighty different when you're peeking out your belly button

by Skins Fan '77 on Aug 11, 2010 7:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't think you read it right. Rule #4 is no head hunting on a defenseless player.

I think it’s easy as fans to disagree, but we’re not the ones who get alzheimer’s at the age of 40 (Andre Waters) and commit suicide.

Football is a violent sport, but that in no way precludes us from taking steps to protect the players and elongate their lives.

There’s no question in my mind that football can remain a great sport while incremental steps are taken to protect the players. The health benefits of rule changes like this one far outweigh the negative effects on the regular flow of the game.

As our understanding of the brain and body advances, so too must the sport advance.

"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins

by smutsboy1 on Aug 11, 2010 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

They're throwing flags for good ole' fashioned clean football hits

That’s our issue, not the terminology. The fact that they’re watering down the game. That rule would make half of Sean Taylor’s highlights 15 yarders..

by DoWork on Aug 11, 2010 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't get it

out of all of the rules, #4 should be the easiest to go along with.

You can’t go full force into another players head or neck while he’s defenseless? I think it’s a great rule with everything we’re finding out about concussions and whatnot.

SpottieOttieDopaliscious

by Rekka on Aug 11, 2010 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

The sport has to evolve.

Concussions. Alzheimer’s. Suicide. We know more about the human body and brain than we used to. The rules have to evolve as the science does too.

“that’s the way it was back in the old days” isn’t a valid argument.

"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins

by smutsboy1 on Aug 11, 2010 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree

Rule # 4 is by far the most important & needed of any of these rule changes. It is not intended to water down what is an exciting & violent sport but to protect players for that second that they are unable to defend or prepare for a bone jarring hit.It is not that they can not be hit when they are vulnerable, just not the “launching” your head or forearm into an opposing players head or neck. These are our players & I would like to see them be able to enjoy a full life after football ( that does not include anybody with a star on their helmet of course ).

by ENsDad27 on Aug 11, 2010 6:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Did you guys watch the Cowboys/Bengals game?

The 15 yarder for hitting the QB was just sad. they’re calling 15 yarders for looking at the QB the wrong way. I’m going to have to agree to disagree on this one. When Russ Grimm says “When in doubt, lay em out” we all love it, but they make a rule against it and you guys are all on board, i’m confused..

by DoWork on Aug 12, 2010 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm more in line with the rule

as it pertains to WRs and backs coming out of the backfield as receivers. Yes, QBs are protected enough without this rule. On the other hand, factors involved the other night:

- It was pre-season and the umpire was probably being overprotective of Romo

- They were probably calling the penalty to emphasize that it will be called during the regular season

- It’s kinda new to them, so they wanted to play with their new toy

Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.

by Scott E on Aug 12, 2010 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

There are going to be bad calls.

But I’d rather protect the players and prolong their LIFE.

Read Andre Waters story and then tell me you’re ok with their concussions.

"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins

by smutsboy1 on Aug 12, 2010 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rule #5

Please clarify the clarification, ya? so now, there is no spiking the ball to get the FG team in? Seems like they have taken away part of the two minute drill if that’s the case. Why not just drop into prevent if the offense gains possession on their 20 or less? Now it won’t matter. Before, a team could chip away to the 30 and rely on having a few seconds left to get the FG team out there as long as they could stop the clock.

by gopens44 on Aug 11, 2010 1:58 PM EDT reply actions  

You can spike the ball….but if you threw to a WR and he makes a diving catch which the refs call incomplete…then they review it and it’s complete….10 secs come off.

Hogs Haven. On Twitter. And Facebook.

by Kevin Ewoldt on Aug 11, 2010 3:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Seems illogical

b/c in that situation, you didn’t have time to try to get set and spike the ball, which is perfectly possible in under 10 seconds.

Doesn’t seem like a good solution.

"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins

by smutsboy1 on Aug 11, 2010 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

agreed...this rule has disaster written all over it.

The NFL deserves for this rule to get blown in their face during the Super Bowl.

Hogs Haven. On Twitter. And Facebook.

by Kevin Ewoldt on Aug 11, 2010 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ok I have a question.

Is that rule only for review of a complete/incomplete pass? Because if you remember the Rams/Titans Superbowl where Dyson caught it near the goal line say there would have been 9 secs left. If they choose to review it. It’s either a TD win or an automatic loss? That’s pretty anti-climatic

Semper Fi Do or Die

Projected 2010 Record: 12-4. You heard it here first

by Jeremiah_24 on Aug 11, 2010 6:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

great question, not sure.

But that Super Bowl play was literally with 1 second left, right?

Hogs Haven. On Twitter. And Facebook.

by Kevin Ewoldt on Aug 12, 2010 8:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ya that was the last play regardless

Semper Fi Do or Die

Projected 2010 Record: 12-4. You heard it here first

by Jeremiah_24 on Aug 12, 2010 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

As long as it

doesn’t cost us the win. More Kool-aid please…

Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.

by Scott E on Aug 12, 2010 8:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

Don't you see?

Now there won’t be that bothersome 50-50 chance of the refs screwing your team on calls like this! It’s either:

1. They call a catch a no catch and screw your team.

or

2. They call a catch a no catch, then reverse it, then penalize your team 10 seconds of possession because they couldn’t make the right call the first time.

See? It simplifies the game…

/sarcasm

by willster on Aug 11, 2010 5:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

What if he makes a diving catch...

and then goes out of bounds? Is the ten second run off only for overturned catches where the reciever still comes down in the field of play? That’s not what you said it was.

I’m referring to things like the juggling catch where the reciever gains control before he steps out, but is ruled out. That’s over turned on replay. Ten second run off instead of the clock stopping?

by BillWard on Aug 11, 2010 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

thats a good point, wonder how they’re gonna address that, anyone know?

by Alpha_Red on Aug 11, 2010 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Seems like they're unnecessarily complicating things

It’s gonna be interesting to see how this rule plays out in the regular season, and/or if it costs a team a win or possibly a playoff berth.

by bigrm18 on Aug 11, 2010 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

On #4

I read it as meaning no head or neck shots at those specific times. It would be interference before the catch, so they’re saying just after, you can’t whack the guy in the head, with your head, shoulders or forearm. And it would logically be when the receiver (etc) is defenseless. The latter requirement might be the key thing.

by Donnio1234 on Aug 11, 2010 2:03 PM EDT reply actions  

But when does he stop being "defenseless"

If a reciever jumps straight into the air you have to wait until he comes to the ground and “gathers himself” before you can hit him? I see a lot of YAC if that’s the case this year. And it also means you have no chance to jar the ball loose for incompletions. Seems like the QB and WR will be out there just playing catch with guys watching.

Semper Fi Do or Die

Projected 2010 Record: 12-4. You heard it here first

by Jeremiah_24 on Aug 11, 2010 6:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Before you can hit him in the head or neck. You are free to hit him anywhere from the neck down as soon as the ball touches his hands.

Follow Bleeding Green Nation on Twitter & Facebook

by JasonB on Aug 11, 2010 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

If you don't "launch" yourself?

Or can you as long as you hit them low?

Semper Fi Do or Die

Projected 2010 Record: 12-4. You heard it here first

by Jeremiah_24 on Aug 11, 2010 7:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

I read it

 that you can launch yourself at any time, just not while using your head, shoulder or forearm to the offensive player’s head area while the player is “defenseless.” It’s not a bad rule if enforced properly. For one thing, there is nothing to it that I see that gives advantage to the offensive player. It’s purely for their protection and still gives the defender the opportunity to make the play.

Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.

by Scott E on Aug 12, 2010 8:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

Where are you reading this?
Or can you as long as you hit them low?

It just says don’t hit them in the neck or above, with your arms or helmet.

"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins

by smutsboy1 on Aug 12, 2010 9:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

Your referree picture above

Looks like he just landed a “crane kick” like Danny Russo on, who is that, Patrick Crayton? Someone with an “8” that doesn’t look big enough to be T.O. I know that this comment isn’t within the context of the post, but referee on Cowboy violence always seems like fun.

by gopens44 on Aug 11, 2010 2:11 PM EDT reply actions  

I don't understand the logic of rule 5

seems like the outcome is far too likely to screw the team with the ball.

"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins

by smutsboy1 on Aug 11, 2010 2:26 PM EDT reply actions  

I agree

I’m not seeing any logic nor benefit from that rule. It just doesn’t make sense to me at all.

by bigrm18 on Aug 11, 2010 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

#4 is to screw the D

might as well even the score

Semper Fi Do or Die

Projected 2010 Record: 12-4. You heard it here first

by Jeremiah_24 on Aug 11, 2010 6:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

So what penalty is declared on the team in rule 2?

If you don’t assess the 15 yarder, what teeth is there to the “you can’t hit the reciever during the muff until the ball hits the ground”?

by BillWard on Aug 11, 2010 4:18 PM EDT reply actions  

Hitting the returner is still a 15 yard penalty. This rule just clarified the situation last year where a defender basically took the ball away from a guy that bobbling a kick that he had called a fair catch for.

If you hit a guy that’s called for a fair catch that’s still a 15 yard penalty for interference.

Follow Bleeding Green Nation on Twitter & Facebook

by JasonB on Aug 11, 2010 7:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's not what the clairification says.
the NFL clarified the rule: If a player has signaled for a fair catch, he must be allowed a chance to recover a muffed kick before it hits the ground. However, under the new rule the kicking team is not assessed a 15 yard penalty for the hit. If the ball hits the ground or the returner does not signal for a fair catch, then the ball is live.[/quote]

Under what basis did the 15 yarder get assessed last year, then? This “Clarification” makes it LESS clear, if what you’re saying is true. It wasn’t like the Titans were assessed 30 yards for the play; it was only 15 then, for the interference. You say it’s still 15. So what clarification is needed?

by BillWard on Aug 12, 2010 8:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email hogshaven@gmail.com

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Arnold-schwarzenegger-kindergarten-cop_small
Trading Up Is Not The Solution. Here's why.
Super_47_small
I Ran Into Jim Haslett and We Talked QB Draft, Manning, Trading Up
Images_small
SB Nation 2012 NFL Mock Draft

Recent FanPosts

Small
Best Team for Jason Campbell?
Small
Peyton Manning...
Small
Where's your cut off
Small
Some clarity on Peyton's injury
Small
General Manager Me
Small
So here's the thing about Peyton Manning...
Small
Trading Back
Paterno_tribute_small
How Stupid Giants Fans Are

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Superbowl_small Kevin Ewoldt

Riggins_small Ken Meringolo

Editors

Fb_small Parks Smith

Chalkboard_football-opt403x300o00s403x300_small UkRedskin

Washington_redskins_helmet_small Redskins News

Authors

Badshirt2__2__small fatpickle

Paterno_tribute_small Tiller56

Small Steve Shoup

Defaukt_small HTTR4LIFE

Hh_small Ronnie Adkins