Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: News And Other Updates Leading Up To Pats-Giants

Most Underpaid and Overpaid Redskins by 2010 Salary

Paycheck_mediumYep, these are the type of articles I'm left with until training camp gets closer. I pulled up the always fascinating Redskins salary cap sheet, which lists bonuses, cap space, everything you could imagine with the Redskins. It hasn't been updated for a few months, but still holds heavy weight. I decided to base these rankings solely on this year's salary and not signing bonuses since that money is long gone, so let's value them for what their weekly paychecks reflect. It should be noted that I had to leave players like McNabb out since they don't have deals or the details are unknown.

Most Valuable 2010 Contracts:

Brian Orakpo: $395K (Got a $12.1m 21.1m bonus last year). Contract ends in 2014 where he'll only be making $1.283mm a year then). By far the best contract on the team, which highlights the value of drafting over free agency.

Jammal Brown: $3.619mm (Steal for a Pro-Bowl Tackle). Brown came to the Redskins via trade after signing his RFA tender with the Saints.

Devin Thomas/Fred Davis:  $470K. Both will make $555K next year and will become RFAs.

Least Valuable:

Star-divide

Since everyone's salaries are so low from signing bonuses and the Redskins cleaned house from so many bad contracts, there's almost none left.

Clinton Portis: $7.191mm  Slated to make $8.5mm in 2012 and 2013, which is when the contract ends. I still think we should have cut Clinton. I love him, but after this season, I'm thinking that $17mil is as good as gone.

Haynesworth: $3.6mm. No matter how you look at it the Haynesworth contract is down-right awful. He's slated to make $3.6mm this year, which he could get anywhere, so there's no real incentive to work hard for the 3-4. Vonnie Holliday said he was against the 3-4 when he first went to Miami, but after learning it, he wouldn't want to do anything else.

Comment 38 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I don’t consider Jamaal Brown a pro bowl left tackle. He was – but he isn’t anymore

www.reservationforsix.com

by theeraser on Jul 22, 2010 10:50 AM EDT reply actions  

He just turned 29 which is still pretty young.

And he was out with a sports hernia, which McNabb had and he obviously was able to return to pro-bowl form from. It’s highly unlikely Brown would make a Pro-bowl again since he’s on the right side now, but getting a Tackle of that high quality for $3mil is a deal imo.

Hogs Haven. On Twitter. And Facebook.

by Kevin Ewoldt on Jul 22, 2010 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Right

Especially considering the contracts Chad Clifton and Barry Sims ended up getting, age factor, and injury history. Chris Samuels
gave a run down on his injury history a day or so ago and it was not pretty not even considering his neck, i.e., no cartilage in one knee.

by Jefferson1935 on Jul 22, 2010 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with Kevin

even if he isn’t pro-bowl we were in desperate need and he wasn’t a bad deal. If we get 2 years out of him which buys us some time to bring more youth to the line in the draft then he’ll be well worth it in my opinion.

by SkinsOsTerps on Jul 22, 2010 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

He may not be a pro bowl left tackle

But he probably is a pro bowl right tackle. The guy instantly becomes one of the best right tackles in the game. Regardless of coming off of injury.

by BigOLinemen on Jul 22, 2010 11:18 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I thought Clinton Portis was guaranteed this year's salary

So cutting him or not, he was getting paid. Which is another big reason we kept him.

by SSBlitz on Jul 22, 2010 11:05 AM EDT reply actions  

No contracts are guaranteed...

You can cut a player any year (before a certain date) and owe them nothing.

Hogs Haven. On Twitter. And Facebook.

by Kevin Ewoldt on Jul 22, 2010 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

I understand the general rules

But I remember hearing about a clause in Portis’ contract that guaranteed him this years salary.

by SSBlitz on Jul 22, 2010 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

In fairness

Portis would be the one Redskin I could justify giving a contract like this to.

by SSBlitz on Jul 22, 2010 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

That is precisely what Snyders strategy of annual renegotiation cap shennanigans gets us

"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins

by smutsboy1 on Jul 22, 2010 1:04 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Gets us what?

We have to keep our star running back?
(a year and a half removed from a league MVP season)

by SSBlitz on Jul 22, 2010 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Whether he's a star is irrelevant.

If you think CP is worth $7M this year and whatever his future guarantees are, I have a bridge to sell you.

"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins

by smutsboy1 on Jul 22, 2010 1:48 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I’ll throw in some ocean front property in Kansas as well.

The Once and Future King

by FlaGators on Jul 22, 2010 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

1.5 acres of ocean front...

…on the Pacific.

The lot is on the Northwest corner of Kansas.

The Once and Future King

by FlaGators on Jul 22, 2010 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Such a view...

sign me up, too.

Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.

by Scott E on Jul 23, 2010 8:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

Amazing how drafting talent creates great value

And big ticket FAs end up over priced.

Hmmm

"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins

by smutsboy1 on Jul 22, 2010 11:08 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

But....

He is the SackPo.

The Once and Future King

by FlaGators on Jul 22, 2010 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

OK

MUCH better….? Actually, I think he will end up earning every penny he gets before he is through with us.

Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.

by Scott E on Jul 22, 2010 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

correction: typo on me, not the xls...

hopefully the joke in the paycheck image will make up for it.

Hogs Haven. On Twitter. And Facebook.

by Kevin Ewoldt on Jul 22, 2010 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

hahaha

Wouldn’t have thought to click on it unitl you mentioned it. Classic.

by SDot21 on Jul 22, 2010 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

lol

[insert peter griffin laugh here] ….1 douche way …..[insert peter griffin laugh here] :)

by Jornek on Jul 22, 2010 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Question.

How many unproductive, out of shape, mama’s boys does it take to leach 17 million dollars from the redskins?

Answer: one.

by d_cisle on Jul 22, 2010 2:02 PM EDT reply actions  

One....

….a year.

Seems like. Sadly.

The Once and Future King

by FlaGators on Jul 22, 2010 11:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Two minor points

You said AH $3.6, “which he could get anywhere”. So forgetting the past, looking only at this year’s pay, wouldn’t he be fairly paid? In fact, that’s one of the reasons some thought he could be traded – his salary was relatively low. Also, on the Skins roster, W. Parker’s salary is listed as about $3.5 million. If that’s true, wouldn’t that be pretty steep for him?

by Donnio1234 on Jul 22, 2010 3:20 PM EDT reply actions  

wouldn’t he be fairly paid?

Yes, if he ever did what coaches asked, but there’s nothing he’s done so far to say he’ll a.) play or b.) show up in shape.

He lost 30 lbs, great. But people just subtracted his listed weight from the season. Who knows what his starting weight was when he began workouts.

Hogs Haven. On Twitter. And Facebook.

by Kevin Ewoldt on Jul 22, 2010 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Kevin - I wasn't thinking about his behavior problems.

We’ve beaten that horse to death. You’re absolutely right that the answer on AH is conditional – a lot of ifs. I was just assuming, for this discussion, that he would play well, as he can play. And with those assumptions, his actual salary doesn’t look too high – of course because he got huge bonuses already (as did Orakpo and many others). Say if he has a great year, tears up everyone – will the $3.6 million be exorbitant? Would another team sign him right now for $3.6 million? Or say Orakpo goes out and robs a bank and goes to jail – would he still be a bargain? I can’t see the future too well. As I scan the roster list of pay, it seems odd – a whole lot of seemingly low salaries for top players. I think it’s because bonuses and incentives are not included. Parker’s “salary” (if that’s what it is) sticks out like a sore thumb. The salary structure seems to be very complicated, very much determined by the situation at the time of the contract. By the way, Steinberg (?) of the Post commented on some salaries, and pointed out that Albert was the highest paid player in DC, but many others in various sports – including some NFL linemen – had more lucrative contracts than Haynesworth. He struck when the fire was hot.

by Donnio1234 on Jul 22, 2010 5:28 PM EDT reply actions  

From what I'm hearing about Willie Parker, that $3.6mil is justified.

We’ll see if that translates in training camp. He’s one of my (completely unjustified) predictions that impresses everyone.

Hogs Haven. On Twitter. And Facebook.

by Kevin Ewoldt on Jul 22, 2010 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Totally agree....

Hopefully “Fast” Willie Parker makes a comeback and produces this year. I’m looking forward to our group of RB’s.

The Once and Future King

by FlaGators on Jul 22, 2010 11:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Parker

Well, good – first I heard that on HH. Everybody else seems to figure it will be CP and LJ. But the coaches wouldn’t be keeping him if they didn’t think he could contribute. By the way, one of the times I was most shocked at Vinny was when the team took Fred Davis (who I figured we didn’t need) and passed up Philip Merling, a promising DE. If we had taken him, he could have replaced Philip Daniels when he went down, and they would not have taken Jason Taylor. But now, Merling is in big trouble – maybe jail type trouble. So that makes Fred look like the best choice back then. Who’d thunk?

by Donnio1234 on Jul 22, 2010 11:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm glad to hear

that Fast Willie is in the mix. This proves to be a great example of how real competition for roster spots improves everyone and everything. Then comes the tough part where you have to start making cuts….

Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.

by Scott E on Jul 23, 2010 8:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email hogshaven@gmail.com

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Images_small
SB Nation 2012 NFL Mock Draft
Dt_redskins__0
If not HIM... Then WHO????
Redskins2_small
QB Prospect that no one is talking about…
6a015432d86661970c0162fd02b74d970d-320wi_small
If you are Peyton Manning...
Dscf0836_small
When "all in " and "do anything " to get RG3 arent really so
Small
What would you trade to draft RGIII at #2?
Chris_small
The Best Miserable Game Ever
Small
Lets Talk QB Legacy
Small
Why the Redskins should sign Peyton Manning
Small
What IF the Redskin's signed Peyton Manning?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Superbowl_small Kevin Ewoldt

Riggins_small Ken Meringolo

Editors

Fb_small Parks Smith

Chalkboard_football-opt403x300o00s403x300_small UkRedskin

Authors

Badshirt2__2__small fatpickle

Paterno_tribute_small Tiller56

Small Steve Shoup

Defaukt_small HTTR4LIFE

299082_1983912328469_1563060038_31615508_515891242_n_small Ronnie Adkins