Haynesworth Was a Stud in 3-4 Schemes...Last Season
Our friend over at the Football Outsiders and Yahoo Sports, Doug Farrar, just wrote an interesting post how Haynesworth actually thrived in 3-4 situations last year. Typical Doug, it comes with the play diagrams to illustrate all the plays.
Haynesworth may be unhappy with the 3-4 concept, but when the Redskins went with a three-man front in 2009, he was still able to get past offensive linemen and make things happen. Two plays from Washington's Week 15 loss to the Giants clued me into Haynesworth's potential in a 3-4, and how the overall scheme might work under Haslett.
Now for the details...
On [the first] play, Haynesworth (92) employed a swim move to jet inside as Manning threw an incompletion on a quick out to receiver Hakeem Nicks(notes). The Redskins were actually set up to stop the run, and they ran a slide to the right side with Haynesworth cutting back. He still has the ability to disrupt in the middle, able to hand-fight his way through blockers. Before Haynesworth shuts down the idea of playing the nose in this role, he should watch some film of Cowboys nose tackle Jay Ratliff(notes), who has recorded up 21½ sacks since his rookie season of 2005 - just two fewer than Haynesworth has amassed since 2005 in supposedly more favorable settings for sack numbers.
I asked Doug, "Isn't it different since the Redskins weren't showing a 3-4? When you show a 3-4, it's much easier to attack that nose tackle versus a 4-3 where Albert can pick a gap and deal with two blockers." Doug responded:
Yeah, but with Orakpo and Carter in there, they'll be running a lot of four and five-man fronts. Even if they show 3-4 with outside rushers, a good nose should be able to penetrate, which is why I brought up Ratliff. It won't likely be like the 3-4 Dom Capers was running before the light went on with Clay Matthews; it should be more pressure-based. That should help Haynesworth as much as it would supposedly take sacks and pressures away from him.
So, really, the moral of the story is. Albert, get your ass into camp and let's make this work. You're a beast, you got paid, let's do this. With you in there, the rest of the line's job ins infinitely better. So suck it up.
Albert, whether fair or not, would probably say, "Yea, I don't mind doing 3-4 plays a couple times a game, but not all the time." Well, as Doug highlighted, the Redskins will be showing a lot of different line schemes.
2 recs |
9 comments
|
Comments
That's the key
the Redskins will be showing a lot of different line schemes
I thought AH was PO’d at Blache’s relatively simplistic, non-attacking defense. He should be excited at the opportunities for this year. Guy is a stubborn dude.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
Really interesting post
Makes me hope Haynesworth sees his great potential in an attacking 3-4
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
Just a guess, but...
Maybe AH’s decision to not attend OTA’s isn’t really about the 3-4 as much as it’s just that he doesn’t want to do it. He’s already signed a ginourmous contract, so it’s not like a lack of sacks is going to affect a pending contract negotiation and he knows he can eat up most blockers no matter what the situation. Wouldn’t it be easier to just say “I’m grumpy” instead of “I just don’t wanna” when it comes to OTA’s? Wouldn’t excuse him but maybe in his mind he’s not letting down his teammates as much if the holdout seems more philosophical than being just lazy. This here post suggests that he at least knows the truth. I dunno, slow sports day, had to comment on something….
Maake Kemoeatu was practicing at the OTA today.
Maybe this will encourage Haynesworth when he comes in on June 15. Maake is built like a block. He was running about half speed today.
And he apparently has the hugest head Shanny has ever seen – a size 13 helmet! The opposition would need to double team his giant noggin and put another guy on the rest of him!
Sounds like he's ahead of schedule
DOH! I just gave myself a cramp. :)
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
as i’ve always said, this 3-4 vs 4-3 nonsense is one of the most minbogglingly over-brought-up things about football. it gets so much play in the media and everywhere, yet it doesn’t mean a damn thing. teams don’t even use their base defense more than half the time. every play and every situation dictates a different scheme. A 3-4 can switch to a 4-3 instantaneously, and if the players you have on the field aren’t versatile enough to handle it, then your defense is going to suck balls regardless. I can’t believe how much focus gets put on the number format a coach uses to identify his main defense. fuck.
just another dose of media ..."much ado about nothing"
when it comes time to play Albert will be in uniform..
do people hate Reggie Wayne too?..or how about Chris Johnson..they aren’t practicing 365 days a year either

by 




















