Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Tim Wakefield Retires

The Thursday Line -- Will Strasburg Play Right Tackle For the Redskins?

I sat in my seat for just about every pitch on Tuesday night. Strasburg blew me away. So let me be the 5,349,586th to say he was every bit as advertised. I am not a big memorabilia guy, but I definitely keep tickets from games like that. It went straight in there with the ticket from Darrell's last game and the ticket from Cal's last game.

And no, he won't be playing Right Tackle for the Skins...but I heard he can make a 22-yard field goal (stupid Suisham).

On to today's line:

Over/Under: Age of the Washington Redskins in 2010 -- 29
According to ESPN, the Redskins were the oldest team in the league last September, at 28.02 years old. Here is the link to that page. So 29 is already seemingly out of the ballpark since it would not only represent us getting older, but we would be older than every team in the league last year, including our own oldass selves. Damn. I would be screaming about the Under if we weren't on an apparent mission to sign every 30-something player on the open market. If guys like Galloway (38), LJ (30), Fast Willie Parker (29) and Brian Westbrook (30) make the team, that does not help our average. McNabb (33), Artis Hicks (31), Ma'ake Kemoeatu (31) and Rex Grossman (29) are probably locks to make the roster. London Fletcher (35), Phillip Daniels (37) and Casey Rabach (32) are also solidly in the fold today. Don't mistake this as me disagreeing with the way we are building this team. I kind of love what we are doing. I think we will gradually get younger as Shanahan and Allen set out drafting their own players in the years to come. This next season is all about getting some bodies in place that they trust. Maybe the Over/Under should be 30. As it stands now at 29, I am taking the Over.

Star-divide

Who has a better chance of making this team: Joey Galloway or Mike Furrey?
Not the Over/Under variety, but a toss-up of sorts I think. What do we have now...12 wide receivers in camp? If I am Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly I am legitimately afraid that long-term plans may very well NOT include me. Of course, they could always bust their humps and get it done on the practice field to earn their spots too. As for the older vets in camp, the latest signing of Mike Furrey is one I very much like. I remember sitting in my fantasy football draft in September of 2007 as it became my turn to put the next player up for bid. As the words "Mike Furrey" came out of my mouth, I knew something was wrong immediately. Not one other owner in my league placed a bid on him and I got him for one dollar. I said, "Really, nobody wants to pay even 2 bucks for the second leading receiver in the NFL last season?" Laughter was the response I received. I was immediately concerned that he was either dead or dismembered (concerned for his family as well as for the 3rd and Schlong Rough Riders, who needed Furrey to play decently in order to get the proper return on that dollar.) He had an okay year in 2007 (61 catches, 664 yards), but it is his versatility that has to be making coaches love him. He started the year last season as a wide receiver for Cleveland and finished it as a free safety and nickelback. He was one of the finalists for the Walter Payton Man of the Year Award last season so he brings a certain amount of class and character to the party. Furrey has paid some dues in both the XFL and the Arena League, and he set the NFL record for most catches (for a non-rookie) in a season following one in which he had zero catches. To me, Furrey is one of those guys that every good team has: he can play multiple positions, he doesn't need to be the center of attention and he will step up and do whatever he is asked to do. I am going with Furrey here because I believe Thomas and Kelly will do enough to hold off guys like Galloway, and Furrey will distinguish himself at multiple positions in camp.

Turtle does a mean Mike Furrey impression:

 Bunnysuit_medium

Over/Under: Sacks Allowed in Game 1 against the Cowgirls -- 3
Reports out of training camp are mixed on the offensive line to date. I have ZERO idea what that means in June, but since we are talking about it, let's talk about it. The Cowgirls have a pretty substantial pass rush. Ware is a beast and their defensive line is powerful and talented. The one thing we have going in our favor this season is that McNabb is less likely to take a sack than Jason Campbell was. Still, with a rookie at Left Tackle and uncertainty on the right side, it is tough to say how many sacks McNabb is going to have to dodge. Put me down for the Over today in June. But I reserve the right to change my vote after our linemen get the chance to put pads on and show us something.

 

 

Image via nymag.com

Comment 8 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

DeMarcus Ware

He is a great player, but I feel that he has a harder time against us than other teams. Not that we have a great, or even average, O-line, but he does seem to struggle against us. I’m not that afraid of Dallas. McNabb is an elite Qb, better than Romo, and its not like he hasn’t faced them that much. Skins win both games in Texas, starting 2-0.

The Shanahan era is going to bring the Redskins back to Glory! Great QB and an actual O-line.

by Horcasitas4 on Jun 10, 2010 2:11 PM EDT reply actions  

Sweet...

Love the positivity. I hope you’re right about DMac being better than Romo. Romo’s numbers over the last few years are pretty intimidating. It has not added up to any rings, which makes me happy, but I am hoping that Jake Locker comes along and makes them both look like Danny Wuerffel.

by Ken Meringolo on Jun 10, 2010 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd attribute that more to Chris Samuels

than the o-line as a whole

SpottieOttieDopaliscious

by Rekka on Jun 10, 2010 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

agreed

I’ll take the over on the average team age. It’s obvious the team is not in a win-now, or a win-later mode, but a win-all-the-time mode. To that end, they will end up retaining a lot of the vets, perhaps for no other reason than the perceived safety in having proven men on the field. Hopefully the younger guys get a legitimate chance to prove themselves under the new regime.

I’m going with Furrey over Galloway even though I’m not that familiar with him. But if what you say about his versatility is true, it shouldn’t be hard to show up a golden oldie receiver. I’m still hoping this is the breakout year for Kelly and Thomas though. They didn’t get a real shot at breaking into the starting roster year one, and last year, well, let’s not go there.

I’ll take the under on sacks because I feel like McNabb will get the ball out quicker, albeit into the dirt a few times. That was one of my only frustrations with Campbell. I can remember all the times I sat in my chair saying “get rid of it Campbell, get rid of it, get…… dammit”.

by willster on Jun 10, 2010 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

The answer to your question is no.

But Adam Dunn could do better than what they have right now.

Souldrummer stands alone for Miguel Batista. Many want to see Capps save games. Dream big! MOAR RUNZ!!! MOAR BATISTA!!!!

by souldrummer on Jun 10, 2010 2:32 PM EDT reply actions  

I would love to see Dunn on the line

He has the nastiness to play O-line…and the girth.

by Ken Meringolo on Jun 10, 2010 3:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

1) Over, only because:
2) Galloway – Furrey’s been available and no one else picked him up yet, plus it seems like we’ve heard good things thus far regarding Galloway.
3) Under – I think we’ll semi-scheme for the Ware / Williams match-up if it looks like Trent is getting a little too many on-the-job lessons…. I think McNabb’s familiarity with the D will help him avoid some of that pressure.

by KenPat on Jun 10, 2010 4:47 PM EDT reply actions  

Semi-scheme sounds like giving Williams or the RT some help.

Ware has been know to switch from right to left on occasion. Some help would be two TE sets. Right now the team has 3 TEs that are more the blocking variety including Morris, Vickers, and Paulsen. Two of these TEs are rookies (without NFL experience) but have good college recommendations as blockers. Paulsen may end up on the practice squad.

by Jefferson1935 on Jun 10, 2010 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email hogshaven@gmail.com

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Arnold-schwarzenegger-kindergarten-cop_small
Trading Up Is Not The Solution. Here's why.
Super_47_small
I Ran Into Jim Haslett and We Talked QB Draft, Manning, Trading Up
Images_small
SB Nation 2012 NFL Mock Draft

Recent FanPosts

Small
Offseason Position Primers: Defensive Backs
Small
Offseason Position Primers: Defensive Line
Small
Offseason Position Primers: Offensive Line
Small
WR is the key....
Redskins2_small
WR’s the Redskins Should Consider in 2012 Draft
298012_1597734759305_1714091948_855549_1285303626_nedited_small
Would RG3 Pull a ELI/ELWAY
Small
Whats so good about Tannehill?
Small
Who will we be pursuing this FA 2012?
Small
I'm Torn...
Small
Manning to Texans

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Superbowl_small Kevin Ewoldt

Riggins_small Ken Meringolo

Editors

Fb_small Parks Smith

Chalkboard_football-opt403x300o00s403x300_small UkRedskin

Washington_redskins_helmet_small Redskins News

Authors

Badshirt2__2__small fatpickle

Paterno_tribute_small Tiller56

Small Steve Shoup

Defaukt_small HTTR4LIFE

Hh_small Ronnie Adkins