What to make of the Redskins 2010 season -- April edition
When the Redskins traded two high draft picks for the NFC East's best quarterback, Donovan McNabb, many of us shook our heads in surprise. Why would a team that finished last in the division last year, and went 0-6 against NFC East opponents, make a play for an older quarterback when they need so much more to even compete?
I wrote originally when the trade happened that the trade represented, to me, a power play that said, "Hey, we're a great quarterback away from competing with anyone in the league." Most of our readers seem to completely disagree that we were.
It should be clear to all of us now that the people who matter most -- Mike Shanahan, Bruce Allen, and others in the Redskins organization -- are certainly acting like the team is ready to compete today, with one of the league's best QB's in the fold.
I want to outline what I think we should expect for this offseason, what the Redskins expect for next season, and what we should expect for next season.
Let's start with the facts. Generally, it takes a 9-7 record to make the NFL postseason. In the last two years, two teams that were considered by many experts to be horrendous, the Cardinals and the Jets, snuck in the playoffs as 5 and 6 seeds with the help of some good luck and ended up taking down a few heavy favorites en route to big-time playoff games.
The reality is that the "best teams" during the regular season, teams that cruise to victory week-in and week-out, don't always dominate in the playoffs. Did anyone have the Chargers going down so early last year after they beat the Titans by about 100 on national television a few weeks before the postseason? When the Giants won the Super Bowl, they were the second team in the NFC East -- but they got hot at the right time and beat the best regular season team in history in the Super Bowl.
There is no possible way, given the lack of quality free agents, having only 4 draft picks, and having a JV offensive line to go from the product that was on the field last year in Landover to a team as good top-to-bottom as the Colts or Saints from last year. It's not possible.
But with an amazing quarterback behind center, is it that unlikely that we could turn into a playoff team led by veterans like McNabb, Moss, Fletcher and some others?
We saw it in Miami, we saw it in Arizona and countless other cities around the league. Sometimes, a team with a veteran quarterback, with a hungry coach, with one side of the ball that is very strong -- sometimes those teams can make runs.
I think that's what Shanahan wants and can reasonably expect (optimistically, of course, but he has to be) of himself and his squad. At this point, I think any of us would take a playoff berth. Because once the playoffs begin, anything is possible.
And frankly, I think that's a reasonable expectation for the team to have. They should expect to be a playoff team with a defense as strong as the one they had last year, with a new quarterback who will lead them to more division wins, and a WAY better coaching system. Not saying we should all expect that, because I don't yet, but it's certainly a possibility.
The main reason for positive thinking is this: the path to the playoffs is through the division. It is my opinion that a division record of .500 or better in the NFC East literally equates to a playoff team. If you can beat the Giants, Eagles and Cowboys once each, you are not only on the way to having a good division record, but you can also consider yourself a contender versus any team in the league. Let's face it, over the last 10 years, at least one or of those teams have been in the discussion for Super Bowl contention every single season.
Now, we have a quarterback who has the 3rd best winning percentage in the NFL behind Peyton Manning and Tom Brady. He's won more games in the NFC East than anyone on a consistent basis since Troy Aikman. The guy just knows how to win games. Of course, the Eagles have long been a good team, and it's not like one player is responsible for scores of victories. But when you get used to winning, you have a habit of continuing to do it. Let's hope that's true here.
But the most underrated attribute of Donovan McNabb is that he straight up knows how to play the NFC East. He knows how to play the Eagles defense and knows the offense backwards. He knows how to play the Giants and Cowboys as well or better than anyone in the entire NFL. These intangibles are going to help the Redskins in the division without question. And if the team can get 3 wins in the division -- just win at home! -- and pull off 6 wins with a schedule that includes the Rams, Lions, Bears, Jaguars and Buccaneers, the Redskins will be in the playoffs. Then, anything is possible.
Obviously, this is a highly optimistic viewpoint given the way the team played last year. It's tough to estimate how much of an impact a coach like Mike Shanahan has on a team that was as poorly conditioned and mentored as the Redskins were last year, but you have to assume that the team will improve. Right?
In order to do so, I think the Redskins now have to make a few moves before September.
- The Redskins need a young body at running back. As long as there is someone who can hold onto the ball and break out some big plays, I think the Redskins will have shored up a really questionable spot on the field. I am one of the few who believes Portis will be relevant this year, at least for as long as his body holds up.
- The 'Skins are obviously drafting a left tackle at some point in this draft. If it's Russell Okung or Trent Williams or someone else at the top of the draft, they will be game-ready by the time the season rolls around. There's no question. I would also explore, as the Redskins are, the signing of Flozell Adams, if for no other reason than that he is better than Stephon Heyer and that it would make for another person who can compete for a job (and prove something to his old team in the division). He could easily slide over to right tackle. Yes, the man commits more penalties than anyone possible, but those kind of mental mistakes can USUALLY be coached out of someone. This is not an ideal solution, but it's a patch-up until we can address this in future drafts. Not ideal, but we're living in reality.
- The Redskins will trade Jason Campbell for a 4th or so. If they trade him anytime around the NFL Draft, his value will probably be higher because someone will miss on Clausen and feel like they need to make a move for a starting-level QB. A blogger at ESPN suggested that a team like the Raiders or Bills should send a 2nd rounder to DC as soon as possible to get their hands on the best available quarterback that's not in the draft. I hope they agree, but frankly, I'll take a 3rd or 4th for Campbell immediately at this point.
- The Redskins should not trade Albert Haynesworth. It's no secret -- when the guy is playing hard, he is the best DL in the game. We saw it in the Giants home game last year. He was completely disruptive on a defense that had no shot at competing with that Giants offense. We saw him make a few huge plays stuffing the run and creating opportunities for Andre Carter and Brian Orakpo all season. Maybe all this talk about Suh being a beast, the trade talk, the idea that he was overpaid and underproductive has him motivated. But frankly, if your system doesn't fit Albert Haynesworth, you make it work. The guy is just ridiculous. Make the man happy and he will be the most dominant player on the field. He always has been.
This is not an ideal team, nor is it an ideal situation. But the Redskins clearly are competing for a winning team in the next few years. Shanahan isn't going to coach the Redskins for 10 years, and Donovan McNabb isn't going to play for 10 more years. Neither is London Fletcher, Chris Cooley, DeAngelo Hall or any of the players that are currently the faces of the franchise. Mike Shanahan did not come to the Redskins to rebuild. He came to win. And that's exactly what he's trying to do. So let's see what he, and our new quarterback, can do in the world's toughest football division. This blog has felt overwhelmingly negative lately -- but I think we're taking interesting steps towards being a relevant football team. And that's all we can ask for.
62 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I agree
This is what you call “express” rebuilding and as crazy as it seems, it just may work. Its been proven that you dont have to rebuild for 5 years before you have a decent product. Plus the Skins arent as far away as people say. 7 of 12 losses by six points or less(-8 to Chiefs). We wont be dominant, but should be vastly improved. Kind of surprised everyone wants to draft, draft, draft. After losing so much, I wanna win now! Not hope that a draft pick pans out 3 years from now.
"After losing so much, I wanna win now! Not hope that a draft pick pans out 3 years from now"
Pretty much sums up the entire Snyder Era right there.
by BayAreaBullet on Apr 7, 2010 7:28 PM EDT up reply actions
+101
SSDD, even if we do make the playoffs we’ll be in the same situation next off season.
Snyder will never learn, very sad
The world looks mighty different when you're peeking out your belly button
by Skins Fan '77 on Apr 8, 2010 8:51 AM EDT up reply actions
When you're relying on this logic, you truly have no plan
7 of 12 losses by six points or less(-8 to Chiefs).
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
Spot on! I agree with most of what you said.
The one argument I don’t agree with is you cannot have one player above the team, calling the shots as to where he wants to play in a certain scheme; it makes the coaches look weak to the other players. Unless Haynesworth buys into the program, he will continue to be a disruptive force off the field more than on. Also if there is any truth to the rumors that there are some teammates that believe he is above the team and want him gone…well, that does not bode well for him….I think we should trade him if he does not buy in. No one is above the team
by Poname84 on Apr 7, 2010 7:02 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Word!
right on excellent post, great points
by Grand Tanyon Sturtze on Apr 7, 2010 7:31 PM EDT reply actions
The overwhelming majority of HH fans are not negative in their outlook for the Skins.
There is a vocal minority that has come out of the woodwork, but do they know more than the professionals. It is true that the team can not rebuild the offensive line through the draft in one season. Yet it is altogether possible to acquire a respectable roster including the OL before the regular season starts.
A.Gain draft picks for Skins’ players where there is a surplus in their position (Campbell and Landry). It is feasible for a net gain of two picks with these two players. There could be others.
B. Free agency: Pickup FA OT Flozell Adams – highly possible as well as sign Damion McIntosh (was still playing good in 2007-8 for the Chiefs) and Levi Jones (maybe he can recover his 2007 form) – for instance a platoon of left tackles. Chester Pitts, OG, is still available and should be sufficiently recovered from ACL by the end of May. FS: Gibril Wilson is still available and has at least a positive rating on Pro Football Focus.
C. Using the draft picks: 1st- Suh (OK), 2nd – Best OL available, 3rd – Best ILB or OLB available, 4th – Best ILB or OLB available (the position not selected in the 3rd round), 5th – Marshall Newhouse,OG, and 7th – Deji Karim, RB.
D. UDFA and other free agents after the early September cut downs.
These moves would go a long way toward having an OL that is close to or better than average as well as fill many needs in a 3-4 defensive scheme.
Why are you listing so many draft picks?
You do realize we only four right now? And any trades we make won’t get us into any round higher than the third…
There would be 6 picks.
The existing 4 picks plus 2 picks from trading Campbell and Landry. The round obtained with the picks is subject to question rather than the number of picks. On the other hand, “mr.synderhireme” suggest that 3 picks could be obtained by trading these 2 players. See his comments in http://www.hogshaven.com/2010/4/5/1406434/some-random-draft-thoughts-post. Can the Skins get a round 2 pick for either Campbell or Landry? We don’t have an answer to that question yet. The Teams position on trading Campbell, Landry, and/or Haynesworth is not altogether clear at this point. All of these players are involved with the McNabb happening which suggest they might all be moved.
by Jefferson1935 on Apr 8, 2010 8:03 AM EDT up reply actions
Keep drinkin that Danny boy kool-aid
There is a chance that all will go well and we’ll see substantial improvement from last year. On the other hand any one who buys into the whole one player away thing hasn’t been paying attention for the last decade.
Because the Os kool-aid dried up long ago
Redskins is all that’s left, Shanahan did call it a rebuilding.
Fast track Rebuilding
I don't believe in fast track rebuilding
which is why I’ve actually been happier with the Orioles lately. We still suck and made some questionable off season decisions but there aren’t a lot of illusions about where that organization is.
The Redskins hype on the other hand is completely disconnected from reality. I am doing my best to give the benefit of the doubt here but it all sounds too familiar. Now if we can get back a few draft picks for this season and use them wisely I’ll be less pessimistic. McNabb and 4 picks, only one in the first three rounds, is not enough to fill our holes and lack of depth. I’ll be thrilled if I’m wrong but I don’t think I will be. No one is going to convince me of that.
Agreed.
A shit pie is still a shit pie, regardless of how much whipped cream you put on top of it.
by TheOverLordMarshl on Apr 7, 2010 9:59 PM EDT up reply actions
Maybe if you deep fry it...
it would taste a little better. Isn’t everything better deep fried?
+1
We're from the city with the highest murder rate in the country. Why WOULDN'T they call us the Bullets?
by Bullet Nation in Exile on Apr 9, 2010 2:22 AM EDT up reply actions
Agree, especially about the O's
They’ve bought into the youth movement. It sucks for them that they’re in the most top-heavy division in baseball, but they’re doing the right things and should see success soon.
This is a great post Matt, a lot of good points, but I agree with SkinsOsTerps
You’re missing one HUUUGE piece in this argument, which was our downfall last year….the Redskins have no depth in any position except for TE.
If everyone stays healthy, including NT Ma’ake who is not even healthy now, they can be a 9-7 team, but that never happens, especially when the majority of your team is over 30 years old.
"I am excited about starting 2009. We are looking forward to an outstanding year. We're on our way. We have a lot of healthy players this year." - Vinny Cerrato
I was thinking today
that alot of the Snyder downfall is that from the outside looking in they only seem to consider the best case scenario. Instead of planning for the worst and hoping for the best they seem to do their planning based on best possible scenarios. For years we’ll enter a season with obvious flaws and then they seem shocked when people get injured or everything doesn’t go their way A couple years ago they had no viable DE pass rush or depth but they head into the season with just Carter and Daniels. Daniels goes down right away and enter the Jason Taylor panic trade. Same with Pete Kendall. It’s like they just assumed Samuels would be able to play into his late 30’s, or Randy Thomas would come back from injury every year. Sure those things could have happened but you have contingency plans in case it doesn’t. When they do their planning it always seem like in their mind the best case scenario is the only likely scenario.
This creates an atmosphere where the team is merely REACTIVE. Constantly trying to plug giant holes after they appeared instead of anticipating them. Just for once I wish we would try and be PROACTIVE and build some depth and have inhouse talent who can hopefully step up. Instead we treat roster building like some insane game of “Whack-A-Mole” constantly trying to plug holes as they hop up everywhere. Of course how can we have fallback options if we never have enough draft picks?
No team has viable backups at every position. The problem for us the only positions we do are SS and TE and maybe OG.
In the spirit of optimism though, things could drastically change. It wouldn’t surprise me if Shanny was so willing to part with those draft picks because he was already planning on trading several people for mid to late draft picks. Maybe he can pull some rabbits out of his hat.
by BayAreaBullet on Apr 7, 2010 11:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Reactive
They always have a 2 or 3 deep depth chart, so it’s not as if they never heard of backups. Unfortunately, some of the backups (and one starter) were named Heyer, Rinehart, Montgomery, Batiste, etc. Joe Bugel’s “projects”.
No other option when the team is run the way it has been
When you blow all your cap room and trade your draft picks for a few players, you can’t have depth. There are 53 guys on every roster, but the more resources you expend to get the few big names, the less resources you have to round out that 53 with solid backups and role players.
Serious business.
these last 3 comments sum it all up
I can’t think of another NFL franchise run this way except for the Bears the last 2 years. I see both these teams finishing 7 and 9 maybe 8 and 8
The world looks mighty different when you're peeking out your belly button
by Skins Fan '77 on Apr 8, 2010 9:00 AM EDT up reply actions
Nice article
I’ll hold off any opinions until after the draft. its still too early, IMO, to see how things will pan out next year.
Rock the Red! Rock the White! Rock the Blue! Rock the Pens!
If this is going to be an optimist thread
then I guess I’ll contribute. We were one non retarded kicker (fuck you shazzam) from being 7-9, no lie. He single handedly lost the New Orleans game, the Dallas game at home, and I think it was the other Dallas game but I’m not sure. Anyway we were also really unlcuky with injuries, and I mean really unlucky, so with some god damn luck we could’ve been just below or at .500 last year. I think the switch to the 3-4 sets us back quite a bit because if we want to get more turnover you set Big Al loose instead of using him as a stop gap (fuck you blatche) and play Osackpo permanently at DE (I don’t want to hear any of that “we can’t stop the run with him” bullshit cause Osackpo weighs 10 pounds more than Carter and we stop the run fine with Carter), and if we stay in the 4-3 than our only needs will be LB to replace Osackpo, FS because we have 4 SS on our roster, and some CB depth since Smoot was cut. If we were to switch to the 3-4 we would need a NT, get rid of Big Al and Carter cause they don’t want to play in it, another MLB, another OLB, still need that FS and CB depth, probably another starting DT since BIg Al would leave, and the players have to learn a completely new system. Anyway back to optimism, I think we all understate the impact of a great QB because we havn’t had one for god knows how long. Mcnabb could be worth a couple wins if not more, and he makes our receiving corp better. We have pretty much stayed the same in the RB department, but personally I think we may have improved because all these guys are (or were but still hopefully may be) immensely talented and have huge chips on their shoulders. OL is definetly the key but we are set at LG and C with Dockery and Rabach. We draft Okung so our left side is set. Most likely sign Adams and have him compete with levi jones for RT. Williams and Hicks compete for RG. Our right side will at best be mediocre, most likely will suck, but it could turn out to be a good power running side with big guys williams and adams. Assuming Gano or whoever the hell is our kicker won’t single handedly lose 3 games, and the imrpoved coaching staff coaches em up and gets them to play hard, 9-7 seems like a real possibility. If you wanna drink that kool aid and go balls out while riding a unicorn you could argue 10-6 with division crown, but thats if like we trade for Gaither and Marshall and everyone goes right, which never does with this team. I’ll give this new regime the benefit of the doubt for this first season and everyone else should because if we didn’t give our beloved skins at least some benefit of the doubt in the offseason then we all would’ve killed ourselves probably around the time Marty got fired.
Kids in the backseat cause accidents, Accidents in the backseat cause kids.
Well, in that case....
THANK YOU SUISHAM…otherwise Zorn, Snyder and Vinny would still be running the show.
"I am excited about starting 2009. We are looking forward to an outstanding year. We're on our way. We have a lot of healthy players this year." - Vinny Cerrato
Yeah in the end i guess it worked out but
those loses were just…ugh don’t want to even recall those memories.
Kids in the backseat cause accidents, Accidents in the backseat cause kids.
by Area 51 Forever on Apr 7, 2010 9:54 PM EDT up reply actions
Very Nice Post.
Agree that McEagle will count for at least one or two wins. My biggest problem with him is how we’ve had his number through recent years—pressure him, and he comes up faulty. Still, he’s an upgrade over JC because of his ability to read/know the defensive players/schemes of the division. Also, he releases quicker than JC, and can complete the long ball much better.
Still, with all the new changes, esp the 3-4, I see it taking some time for us to become competitive in the East.
7 and 9 is optimistic. Patience, Padawan.
The Dallas game at home?
You mean that 17-0 game where Suisham was playing for the Cowboys? I don’t think he lost that game for us.
My bad maybe it was the chiefs game
I just know for a fact that he lost us 3 games by himself last year.
Kids in the backseat cause accidents, Accidents in the backseat cause kids.
by Area 51 Forever on Apr 8, 2010 4:23 PM EDT up reply actions
Just a couple of points
I’m not trying to piss on your parade, because I’m talking myself into a disappointing team that hasn’t made alot of changes yet, but:
-“but those kind of mental mistakes can USUALLY be coached out of someone” After 11 years I’m betting the myriad of Cowboys coaches have tried pretty much everything to fix Fatso’s problems. I’m doubting that a change of scenery is all he needs.
-“They should expect…the defense to be as strong as last year”. I really think that some people are glossing over how much of a transition it will be to switch to the 3-4. New schemes, new responsibilities, etc will be a dificult adjustment, especially with people who haven’t played it and may not be ideally suited for it to beging with.
Homer: Aw, twenty dollars! I wanted a peanut!
Homer's Brain: Twenty dollars can buy many peanuts!
Homer: Explain how!
Homer's Brain: Money can be exchanged for goods and services!
Homer: Woo-hoo!
by bigbluethruandthru on Apr 7, 2010 9:09 PM EDT reply actions
agreed switch to 3-4 is an insanely DUMB idea
there are other ways to “fix” our defense so we start getting turnovers and stop giving up big plays
Kids in the backseat cause accidents, Accidents in the backseat cause kids.
by Area 51 Forever on Apr 7, 2010 9:55 PM EDT up reply actions
I believe this sentiment rings true from everyone on here
The last person anyone should listen to is some punk from yonkers claiming to be from the bronx. I’m not even disagreeing with you. In fact I agree with you entirely! I just dont like your type low order of scum around these parts. I’m going to quote the great Ronald W. Reagan here with a statement he made behind closed doors to Pat Brown after defeating him in the California gubernatorial race in the mid 60’s……“Your mother sucks cocks in hell. I’m prepared to send you along with her.”
by TheOverLordMarshl on Apr 7, 2010 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions
I got lost
who were you replying to?
Homer: Aw, twenty dollars! I wanted a peanut!
Homer's Brain: Twenty dollars can buy many peanuts!
Homer: Explain how!
Homer's Brain: Money can be exchanged for goods and services!
Homer: Woo-hoo!
by bigbluethruandthru on Apr 8, 2010 10:17 PM EDT up reply actions
we're switching to the 34
for the same reason we switched to the west coast offense, because it’s neat-o and the other guys win with it.
makes no sense whatsoever if we’re trying to win now
The world looks mighty different when you're peeking out your belly button
by Skins Fan '77 on Apr 8, 2010 9:14 AM EDT up reply actions
10-6? 3-4?
How firm is the switch to 3-4? Any chance Shanahan will see the light and stay with the 4-3? On the season, it wouldn’t be unusual for us to improve from 4-12 to (e.g.) 10-6. All those close, heartbreaking losses under a guy like Jim Zorn. I have some doubts whether the NFC east is still the best division. Unfortunately, we might be paired with two of the best divisions. Looking ahead to a tough schedule, and assuming major help for the O-line, you could start with splitting with all three divisions (3-3, 2-2,2-2) and beating STL and Tampa Bay, giving 9-7. Guessing, beat Bears and Det, lose to Minn and GB, Beat Houston and JAX, lose to Indy and Tenn. I.e., 9-7. I also could see going 4-2 in the Division, and beating Tenn and GB (for 12-4), or losing to Houston and the Bears, and 2-4 in the division, giving 6-10.
My dream scenario before all this craziness...
Suh would fall to us, and we’d pick him and gamble on a high 2nd rnd LT along with someone who came available in FA (like Flozell did) to fill out the O-line. Shanny/Haslett would have wet dreams about a D-line of Carter, Suh, Haynesworth and Orakpo and shelf the whole 3-4 thing.
Of course, now that’s all boned because we don’t have a second rounder, and waiting until the fourth round to take a tackle would be insane. Oh well.
Serious business.
that front 4 is scarey
and we would have had depth too
The world looks mighty different when you're peeking out your belly button
by Skins Fan '77 on Apr 8, 2010 9:43 AM EDT up reply actions
Haynesworth needs to be dealt
If we could get a 1st rounder for him, we could replace him with a rookie DL with the 4th pick or whatever 1st rounder we get for him. This draft is apparently riddles with stud DL’s, so we could take the best available in the 1st round and still get an anchor at OT for McNabb’s blindside, whether it is Okung or whoever.
If we could get a 2nd rounder for Campbell, it would be the best situation for us, because then we could get a really good RB or OL with that pick. Either way, we’d be solidifying the offense for the year to sort of offset the ‘rebuilding’ that is going to be happening to the defense. BTW, Haslett should run whatever defense he is good at. I think that if 3-4 is what he knows and is the best at, thats what we should run. He knows the schemes and the kinds of people he needs at the various positions, and with the amount of talent we have on the defensive side of the ball, he’ll find people to fill those needs.
I’m not saying I’m drinking the kool-aid, and I don’t have high expectations after the multiple years since Snyder bought the team that we’ve been absolutely awful, but I’m the most excited about this team since they got Gibbs out of retirement.
This year is whatever.
I am O.K. however it turns out… But….2011 is going to be SPECTACULAR!!!! 11-5!
What 30+-year old RB is a free agent next year???
Buy a Redskins jersey with his name on it now!
"I am excited about starting 2009. We are looking forward to an outstanding year. We're on our way. We have a lot of healthy players this year." - Vinny Cerrato
by Kevin Ewoldt on Apr 8, 2010 10:44 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm not buying it
Adding a QB is a good move when you have a good surrounding cast and with our OL and RBs we don’t have that.
Personally I don’t just want to “make a run”, I want a team that perenially has a winning record and has a shot to go all the way every year. I don’t see that happening with this OL regardless of who is playing QB.
Yet another year where we avoid facing the reality that we need to rebuild.
by aFan4Life on Apr 9, 2010 8:19 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I am remaining positive
Draft day is still almost two weeks away, we have only seen a small part of the Shannaplan. If our OL still looks the same in month I will start bitchin’ as well. We have lots of time to make some moves. Now that the shock has worn off, and I have had enough beers to wash the taste out of my mouth, I think the Donovan trade could be an excellent move, He has been a perennial winner and brings that feeling in the huddle….confidence is contagious. I think he will do wonders for our young receivers (a la Favre in Min.). We have a “football smart” disciplinarian for a coach with two Super Bowl rings. (are there any other active coaches, other than Belichik, with multiple rings?) Does anybody doubt Shanny’s ability to produce a good run attack? If the geriatric three can’t cut it, they will be cut….running backs can be found, not an end of the world position to use “plug ins”. Other than OL, which I think we will be addressed , is special teams. We talk about being competitive this year….we were competitive last year….we were competitive against the worst teams in the league and we competitive against the bast as well (Saints, Chargers at least one of the Dallas games) we just lost them all. We have a better team already, but also a much tougher schedule. Am tired of losing close games.
The NFL is made up of close games.
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
points and field position
assuming the defense is allowed to play the whole field, and not just inside our own red-zone
I think the McNabb move is a gamble but it might work
When Shannahan took over Denver, Elway was thought to be about done at age 35 with too many int’s and unable to win big games
They drafted T Davis in the 6th round and won 2 Super Bowls with a QB in his late 30’s and a late round RB
Mike always got his offensive line to gel and found RB’s in odd ways that produced on the field
I think he can do it again in Washington
But the Redskins biggest problem is they are in a tough division where all the other teams are playoff contenders every year – tough for any team to win in the NFC East
He’s always open. He catches a lot of balls. He’s un-guardable, no matter how old he is
It's possible this works. It's just as likely that it doesn't
…a late round RB…
Mike always got his offensive line to gel and found RB’s in odd ways that produced on the field
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins

by 

























