McNabb to Redskins -- Bruce Allen makes move of the offseason
As if you hadn't heard, the Redskins acquired QB Donovan McNabb, the quarterback who led the despised Philadelphia Eagles to unprecedented heights for many seasons, on Sunday night for a 2nd round pick this year and a conditional 3rd or 4th rounder next season. The reaction from many fans I've talked to has been split. Some believe the Redskins pulled a Sonny Jurgensen-esque move by getting another franchise QB from the Eagles. Some believe the Redskins just threw away 2 draft picks for an aging player. But I'm here to argue that this was an absolutely amazing move for the franchise and makes them a better team immediately.
To start, a quotation from Brian Mitchell (from DC Sports Bog and the terrific Dan Steinberg):
"He's a proven winner," Mitchell said. "Looking at Mike Shanahan, he knows the success he had with John Elway in John's later years. His last two years, he wins two Super Bowls, and I think he's looking at that same possibility with Donovan McNabb. Although Donovan is not the guy that will run around as he did as a young kid, he's still very mobile. So I think instantly this offense gets credibility, they can go and try to bring some people in to help him, and the receiver corps he has here is probably better than what he's ever had [in Philadelphia] up until they got DeSean Jackson up there....
"I think it's a major steal and it's a great day for the Redskins....I think the Philadelphia Eagles made a major mistake by letting him get away.
"And you know, he may not be exactly like me," [Mitchell on McNabb] but I could hear he had a little revenge in that voice, too. And he wants to go to the Eagles and show them that they made a mistake."
The bottom line is this: the Redskins made a huge improvement by getting a 6 time Pro Bowler for a second round pick and a 3rd/4th next season at the most important position on the field.
I know Jason Campbell has a lot of sympathizers on this Web site, and frankly, I'm sad he'll never get his chance in Washington (unless this is all part of a grand plan that none of us could foresee). But if you had asked absolutely anyone on this Web site yesterday if Donovan McNabb was a better quarterback than Jason Campbell, we all would have said yes. And for that reason, this is a good move.
First, the negatives. Yes, McNabb isn't getting younger. No, he's not as mobile as he once was. And he played for the Eagles for a long time, which probably doesn't help his case in DC.
But Donovan McNabb is a franchise quarterback who has been to a Super Bowl and, what, 25 NFC championship games? He's been a proficient passer in the NFL with less-than-stellar receiving corps for many of those years. (James Thrash was the go-to receiver for more seasons than anyone remembers, trust me.) McNabb is a leader and a guy who throws the long ball as well as anyone in the league still. He isn't Michael Vick in terms of mobility, but he is more mobile than 2/3 of NFL QB's, if not more.
And not only that, but the Redskins just boldly showed that their front office believes they are a playoff contender this season. A team does not trade two draft picks for an aging quarterback unless they believe the future is now. And frankly, with a team that has as good of a defense as it did last year, they do have some foundations for a good team.
The Redskins now have the division's best quarterback with a gigantic chip on his shoulder, along with a top defense, a Hall of Fame Coach and the fourth pick in the draft, which will now almost definitely be used on Russell Okung, who will answer the team's biggest question mark (LT) immediately.
A few question marks remain on this team. They still need some certainty on the offensive line, but last year's injury situation could have been the result of old players, poor off-season conditioning and bad luck. Given the way Zorn ran things and what some players have said this offseason, I believe that. With the top LT in the draft and one more player on the right side, I feel okay about the line. We wonder if Clinton Portis is healthy, if the receivers are going to hit their potential, and if the 3-4 will work out on defense. But with this coaching staff and this good of a quarterback with as much respect as he has around the league, you have to feel better today than you did yesterday about the Redskins.
Every good team in this league is led by a brilliant quarterback. And Peyton Manning is older than McNabb is! (So is Brett Favre, and so was Kurt Warner.) In Washington, quarterback has been the biggest question mark on the roster since 1999, despite an ungodly amount of draft picks used on the position since the Shuler years.
That question is answered. The Skins now have a top-10, at the very worst top-12 quarterback in the NFL. Add that to a great defense and a great coach, the best rookie lineman (hopefully) and you have to think the team is moving in the right direction.
I know that draft picks are vital to a franchise's success. But you don't ever pass up the opportunity to move a 2nd rounder and a 3rd/4th rounder for a franchise QB when you don't have one. Especially in your own division. Draft picks are very important, but let's not overvalue them here. If you thought the Redskins could have gotten a franchise quarterback with either of those picks, good for you. But I certainly don't. And clearly, two guys who know a lot more about Jason Campbell's abilities than we do (Shanahan and Bruce Allen), don't believe he is going to be a franchise quarterback for the Redskins anytime soon.
The Redskins just upgraded at the most important position on the field by a good measure. And for that, we have reason to celebrate. Now, I'm sure many people completely disagree with how I feel about this move. But for now, let's enjoy the best quarterback the Skins have had on their roster in decades. I mean, this guy is a future Hall of Famer, don't you think? And while this is a sad day for Jason Campbell, a player many of us believe has promise, we can move forward. My guess is we'll try to move Campbell to either Buffalo, Oakland, Cleveland or St. Louis for a 2nd or 3rd rounder. (Somewhere outside of the division, right Eagles?) He should have the chance to start there. We do have a backup in Rex Grossman, who knows the offense just as well as anyone and has been okay in the past. Maybe we should just sign Brian Westbrook now, too... On that one, I'm only half-kidding.
This is a good day. Let's enjoy having McNabb. Let the feeling of disgust and uncertainty from the last few years depart. We have a front office with a plan and a coach on a mission to start succeeding this season. The 'Skins wouldn't have made this move if the team didn't believe McNabb could take us to new heights.
Oh yeah, and you may as well carve out at least one Monday night and Sunday night for 'Skins vs Eagles. I know who is going to circle those dates on his calendar... Hail Skins!
PS -- Adam Schefter tweeted this right as I was about to post this. We're happy he made that choice!
Bottom line: Donovan McNabb preferred not to go Raiders and handpicked Redskins, Andy Reid said Eagles wanted to make McNabb happy.
175 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
More Negatives
Redskins need to rebuild. Instead, they again retool by getting an old, oft injured, inaccurate, past his prime QB. In the process, we help Philadelphia – an organization with a proven draft record, fast track its rebuilding by giving them even more draft picks. Dumb, short sighted trade. Skins aren’t 1 QB away from a championship. They’re 5 offensive linemen, 2 safeties, 1 Corner back, 1 linebacker, 2 running backs, 1 wide receiver, 1 punter, 1 placekicker, and 1 QB away from a championship. Dumb, shortsighted trade.
I'm not sure I agree with the count....
But I do agree with the sentiment.
I’m not ok with this move; McNabb iswas an amazing quarterback for many years… and yes, he’s got some gas in the tank. But unless we sign him to an extension NOW, and keep him for at least 5 years, AND he performs well, we just flushed a high draft pick, nearly a first rounder as high as it is, to one of our biggest rivals for squat. We aren’t going to win the NFC East this year… we’ll be lucky to be third, to be honest, unless we seriously upgrade the OL in FA and the Draft. Yes, McNabb may help that… but I’d rather have gone after Bradford, in that case.
Franchise QB?
An old oft injured man with 1 year remaining on his contract can’t be considered a “franchise QB”.
Brett is a freak of nature...
Started every game since, what 1992?….feels like thats about the last time Mc Nabb played an entire season!! (OK exaggeration I know, but I don’t feel like its a valid comparison)…But we will see..
Brett Might Take HGH
as far as I’m concerned, he’s a fraud.
Brad James
by the new Bradfather on Apr 5, 2010 1:34 AM EDT up reply actions
Brett also might sacrifice a goat to Satan every Thursday....
But since I don’t have any evidence of that, I should probably refrain from spreading rumors.
Come on. I don’t like Favre, but unsupported half-accusations like that border on defamation and should have no place at SBN.
Brett is a God
sorry I blasphemed his name. The man can walk in water and he has a hotter wife than he deserves but whatever
Brad James
by the new Bradfather on Apr 5, 2010 6:02 PM EDT up reply actions
Brett is the exception
A VAST majority of QBs aren’t effective past 35.
And McNabb is more injury prone than most.
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
I dont give a FUCK.
This was a horrible move. Is McNabb a winner? Yes. I dont give a FUCK. Is McNabb better than Campbell? Yes. I dont give A FUCK Is he in the downward slope of his career? Yes. I dont give a FUCK. Will he bring invaluable knowledge of a division opponent? Very likely, though the Eagles will protect themselves by changing formations a nd verbage. I dont give a FUCK. What I DO give A FUCK about is this……NO company EVER trades it’s figurehead to a direct opponent without some sheistiness afoot. I smell something rotten and I would have rather traded to move up in the draft and started a rookie, than to go after someone who makes our average age higher. I’m not saying he wont make us better. I acknowledge that. I think I am having a problem with the fact that it’s a 2nd rounder from this year. I believe we couldve gotten much more long term value with using the pick.
by TheOverLordMarshl on Apr 4, 2010 10:42 PM EDT reply actions
bad move
apparently Redskin FO didn’t get memo that this is the 2010-2011 season… not 2006-2007 season… all i can say is for all this without a doubt is WOW… are you Fn kidding me.
“Dear NFL- fan for sale… I will start opening bids at ‘not making dumbass moves’”
JJ Fe
Great move.
McNabb isn’t a very old QB. 33 isn’t that old for a Qb anyways. Warner, Manning, Favre, Elway, and so many others prove that. Our team isn’t bad. With an O-line, we will be Superbowl contenders.
Orakpo!!! Russel Okung next year!
wait and see approach
theres still 3 more weeks until the draft so theres most likely more moves to be made before then. Campbell is as good as gone — maybe for a 2nd rounder? so essentially we didnt lose much, maybe just a couple of spots in the 2nd round.
clearly McNabb is a stop gap, which means Campbell was goin to be a stop gap regardless of this move until a young QB is groomed. i’d rather have the young QB learn under McNabb than Campbell
Good point. I just hope we can get a decent return for Campbell. Unless of course something much larger is in the works.
Поклон перед вашим капитаном!
by Knubles and Bits on Apr 4, 2010 11:35 PM EDT up reply actions
Must be another move in the works
Guessing the 4th overall, JC, and Andre Carter for the 1st overall so McNabb can “mentor” Bradford.
I'm the first to admit when I'm wrong.... except when someone else beats me to it.
by Backhanded Complement on Apr 4, 2010 11:21 PM EDT reply actions
And, fwiw, terrible trade, imo
I'm the first to admit when I'm wrong.... except when someone else beats me to it.
by Backhanded Complement on Apr 4, 2010 11:21 PM EDT up reply actions
That’s giving up way too much to move up 3 spots IMO. We would have to get StL’s 2nd rounder too to make that worth it for me.
Поклон перед вашим капитаном!
by Knubles and Bits on Apr 4, 2010 11:37 PM EDT up reply actions
we're not getting bradford
no way… what do we want, 0 picks in this draft?
The redskins arch nemesis
are draft picks. it makes sense.
We NEED a left tackle at #4
There is no chance of getting a quality, ready-to-start LT in the 4th round.
I’m ok with this trade. Not happy, but okay. But if we blow all chances of filling our most glaring need by packaging our #4 for a trade-up to grab a QB, I don’t think I’ll be able to watch the Skins next year.
Serious business.
One question
Would you rather enter the season with these QBs:
McNabb
Campbell
or :
Kolb
Vick
He’s always open. He catches a lot of balls. He’s un-guardable, no matter how old he is
I would rather have McNabb/Vick. I think this was a horrible move for Philly.
Поклон перед вашим капитаном!
by Knubles and Bits on Apr 4, 2010 11:37 PM EDT up reply actions
As a Philly fan
I think this could likely be a win/win instead of a situation where one got a clear better end of the stick. Kolb is going to be a good QB, and McNabb still is a good QB. This trade made your offense immediately better, and gives us another high round pick to upgrade our abysmal defense.
"EFF YOU, WE'RE WINNING ANYWAY!!!!!!" (Bye, Dawk)
campbell has to be gone now
It’s McNabb/Grossman. Campbell is worthless to us now.
by sofutomygaha on Apr 4, 2010 11:54 PM EDT up reply actions
Here's the thing
My family moved from Boston to Washington DC when I was little. I’m a Red Sox fan and a Redskins fan. If the Red Sox traded for Derek Jeter, I don’t know what I’d do. Yes, he’s a great player. I’ve also been rooting against him for 10 years. McNabb is exactly the same.
This is the ultimate rooting-for-laundry question. Sorry, Donovan McNabb. I’ve got more loyalty to my fantasy team at this point than I would have to the redskins with you at the helm. I was really pulling for JC. I get excited on Sundays to see Brian Orakpo and Casey Rabach because they remind me of Jumpy Geathers and Jeff Bostic.
The burgundy and gold is special to me. I guess I’ll get over it. Right now, though, this is just really disappointing. I hear Marion Barber may be available for the right price. Terrell Owens is on the market. If they win it’s all forgotten, right?
Is this what it’s like to be a Vikings fan?
That's my beef with Shanahan
My two teams are the Redskins and Chargers. Because S-han coached the Broncos for so long I just hate the smug look he always has on his face, and I think his reputation for being a great playcaller is vastly over-rated. If the team buys it and play hard for him for a while I’m all for it though.
my sentiments exactly
The world looks mighty different when you're peeking out your belly button
by Skins Fan '77 on Apr 5, 2010 7:10 AM EDT up reply actions
Only ten years???
I hope you’re young, Jeter’s been a pain in my side for 15
I think this is awesome
I am not a Shanahan fan, but that said, I’m pretty sure he was able to make the playoffs in Denver with Jake the Snake as his QB. The Skins will be fine with McNabb as his QB.
The 2 TE, play action bootlegs with Cooley, Davis, Moss will be nasty. Those 3 are a way better receiving corps than McNabb has ever had.
by flounder2 on Apr 4, 2010 11:47 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I'm still trying to figure this out...
Ugh.
"I am excited about starting 2009. We are looking forward to an outstanding year. We're on our way. We have a lot of healthy players this year." - Vinny Cerrato
Ditto that....
I do think McNabb is an improvement over JC, this year at least, but I’d rather have JC and the picks for sure. McNabb is a UFA after this year anyway, and how much do we really want to invest in an aging QB? Favre is the exception, not the rule, as far as aging QBs go. We’ll see what we get for JC, because I see no way he is on the opening day roster, or that he’s even a Redskin by the time of the draft.
I'm the first to admit when I'm wrong.... except when someone else beats me to it.
by Backhanded Complement on Apr 4, 2010 11:51 PM EDT reply actions
It is a bad day no matter what.
He is the enemy. no more Gaither/ Okung. No more JC making good. Even if we win a ring… It will be with Denver’s coach, a nomad GM and the F-ing eagles QB. not to mention the Chiefs RB. We are sloppy second central. no heart and foundation like the Caps. They were home-grown with a little sprinkles. Just a sad day.
JC
I don’t see how they can expect JC to be the backup. He’s got to be traded. I sure hope we can get a second round pick for him, but maybe they’ll only get a third (if they could have gotten a second rounder, he’d be gone already). A high 3rd rounder could still probably get us a good right tackle to complement Okung. But we need a 2nd rounder to get McCoy or Tebow. I’d be trying to get Gaither for players, and trade various defensive players (where we are fairly loaded) for draft choices.
Would be very surprised
If we could get a 2nd. I’d love it, but would be very surprised. I don’t think the market value on JC is that similar to what it was on McNabb. We couldn’t move JC last year as part of a deal to move up, and I don’t think last year’s performance improved his value. But, here’s hoping.
I'm the first to admit when I'm wrong.... except when someone else beats me to it.
by Backhanded Complement on Apr 4, 2010 11:56 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't see JC going for more than a 4th
He simply doesn’t have much trade value.
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
maybe a 3rd
but id be shocked if we got a 2nd. remember hes on the skins so cant be traded to the skins for a 2nd rounder lol
we have zero leverage in a JC trade
we will get hosed and all the people calling for a trade will be pissed when they find out what we get.
by BayAreaBullet on Apr 5, 2010 12:09 AM EDT up reply actions
Maybe true
But what’s the other option? Get nothing, pay him the 1st round tender (3.1M) to be a backup, and watch him walk next year? And, as much as I dislike Grossman, we didn’t bring him in to be a 3rd stringer.
I'm the first to admit when I'm wrong.... except when someone else beats me to it.
by Backhanded Complement on Apr 5, 2010 12:13 AM EDT up reply actions
If we can get a 4th, do it
but the point is that this talk of getting a 2nd or 4th is just delusional.
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
I was saying people on HH have been calling for a Bradford/Clausen/McCoy draft pick
and then trading JC for a second rounder like that was easy and I think once this trade goes down all the people that have been calling for it will be upset with what we give back.
by BayAreaBullet on Apr 5, 2010 12:29 AM EDT up reply actions
I don't know
It’s not impossible to see teams like the Bills or Raiders being willing to give up a 2nd or 3rd for a known-quantity NFL starter (vs. a rookie or career backup). JC obviously hasn’t put up spectacular numbers, but he’s proven he can be decent in a pretty terrible system.
Serious business.
The Seahawks just gave up
a 2011 3rd and traded down 20 spots in this year’s second for a third-stringer who’s never thrown a pass in NFL regulation. JC’s probably got more value than you think.
Plus for the Seahawks
They want the unknown factor. JC is more of a known. They can delude themselves that he has a career of Pro Bowls in front of him. There isn’t that great unknown with JC. I think he will go for a 4th or 5th. Besides how can you ask other teams to value our guy when we have been pissing on him for years?
by BayAreaBullet on Apr 5, 2010 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions
JC's value
McNabb rated a 2nd and a third or fourth. He’s considerably better than JC, but much older (but still with 3 to 5 years left). It’s hard to believe that an experienced young QB – certainly one of the top 2 FA QBs available now – isn’t worth a 2nd round draft choice. That would put him on a par with McCoy or Tebow.
it's all relative
being one of the top available QBs in a weak QB market doesn’t mean much.
JC is experienced but hasn’t achieved much and has only had one decent season. He’s just not that valuable of a commodity in terms of 2nd or 3rd round draft picks.
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
And here's hoping I'm wrong about this all...
And that Skins front office is smarter than the average idiot fan like myself. Now, I know that hasn’t been the case for the past, say 10 years or so, but this is a new regime (if it wasn’t Dannyboy still pulling the strings), and we’ll have no choice but to wait and see. He should be an improvement this year… I guess we’ll all see.
I'm the first to admit when I'm wrong.... except when someone else beats me to it.
by Backhanded Complement on Apr 5, 2010 12:10 AM EDT reply actions
As a fan, I don't want improvement -this year-
and that’s why I hate this move.
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
Agreed
Especially since the improvement certainly isn’t enough to make us anything near a contender. Just trying to find any positive in this. Anyone know what Grossman’s salary is?
I'm the first to admit when I'm wrong.... except when someone else beats me to it.
by Backhanded Complement on Apr 5, 2010 12:19 AM EDT up reply actions
I mean, the positive is that I love football and love the Skins and will keep watching.
But the reality is that this is yet another mistake by Snyder, ignoring what it takes to build a perennial winner.
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
Interesting...
Skins offered Haynesworth as part of the trade and Birds said No acc to some reports. Landry’s name was also in the mix.
"I am excited about starting 2009. We are looking forward to an outstanding year. We're on our way. We have a lot of healthy players this year." - Vinny Cerrato
Is anyone surprised?
The Eagles are a well-run team with a good front office.
We have… Dan Snyder.
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
Where's that info from?
I don’t think Albert or Landry are the kinds of guys who would take well to being trade bait. This is starting to smell a little… dysfunctional?
Serious business.
Would you expect anything different
from Snyder? Everyone was blaming Vinny before, but now the common denominator in this whole thing has been Snyder. This isn’t Shanallen’s move, either. It’s all Snyder. SNYDER!
by killianskid34 on Apr 5, 2010 6:29 AM EDT up reply actions
I just really, really hoped that he wouldn't have a say anymore
And things seemed so positive earlier in the offseason, it legitimately seemed like he was out of the loop on football decisions.
Not saying it’s impossible Shanny was behind this. But it sounds too Snyder-like to be true.
Serious business.
wishful thinking
it legitimately seemed like he was out of the loop on football decisions.
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
couldn't see the birds
paying Haynesworth’s contract
"EFF YOU, WE'RE WINNING ANYWAY!!!!!!" (Bye, Dawk)
we already paid most of it
They would get a huge bargain.
by BayAreaBullet on Apr 5, 2010 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions
I think we proposed that before his bonus was due
The question is, now that we’ve paid the 21 mil… Does the team still feel like trading him?
The reason we are offering some of our most talented defensive players as trade bait is because
god damn Haslett or whoever is deciding our defensive scheme is an absolute retard and want us to switch to a useless 3-4 defense when we have the perfect personnel for an aggressive 4-3 defense and absolutely jack shit for a 3-4
Semin = King of Dangle Sauce
by Area 51 Forever on Apr 5, 2010 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions
The Redskins do not by any means have the best QB in the division, don’t kind yourself and to boot a future HOFer is highly debatable.
Two very differing views on JC’s trade value from two different ESPN writers…
“Campbell won’t have much trade value. Teams will likely wait for the Redskins to release him.” — Matt Mosley
“And if I were in Oakland’s or especially Buffalo’s shoes, I would be extremely tempted to send this year’s second-round pick to the Redskins for him.” — Matt Williamson
That’s quite a disparity. My guess is we may get a 3rd rounder in return. Maybe a 2011 3rd rounder.
Oh what bullshit
if the front office thinks we’re a contender next year then they’ve been snorting meth out of Marion Barry’s asshole. We have no O-line, a bunch of used up tailbacks, and an OK but non-dominating defense. Short some serious magic tricks that add draft picks this season is going nowhere. I was hoping for an improved O-line and some help for London out of this draft that returned us to respectability. We are not going on a playoff run. I hope I am being fooled and that some real crazy trade moves are going to make this whole thing worth it but until that happens count me a skeptic.
by SkinsOsTerps on Apr 5, 2010 2:21 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I really dont know what to say.
I wonder how many mcnabb redskins jerseys there will be at games next year. I know for damn sure I would never buy one
by dcchillin21 on Apr 5, 2010 3:08 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Agree Agree
x1000 agree. This move has Snyder all over it. It’s all about marketing and selling merchandise.
by killianskid34 on Apr 5, 2010 7:13 AM EDT up reply actions
LOL
I just thought this exchange was funny:
I wonder how many mcnabb redskins jerseys there will be at games next year. I know for damn sure I would never buy one
x1000 agree. This move has Snyder all over it. It’s all about marketing and selling merchandise.
The move is about selling merchandise that no one wants to buy. If that’s the case, this was an epic fail!
"EFF YOU, WE'RE WINNING ANYWAY!!!!!!" (Bye, Dawk)
Who in their right mind
Would EVER put on a Skins McNabb jersey?
I've slept on it
and I still think this is a horrible move. Getting free agents that are over the hill and trading for a big name is a Snyder move, plain and simple. This is a sad day for the franchise.
turns out the saddest day was
when Dan Snyder gained control of our Skins
The world looks mighty different when you're peeking out your belly button
by Skins Fan '77 on Apr 5, 2010 7:18 AM EDT up reply actions
+1000
Why are so many Redskins fans getting trapped into believing that this was a good move? Have we not seen the exact same behavior over the past 10 years? And what have we achieved? Becoming a laughing stock? Check! Owner’s of a sub par winning percentage? Check! Learned to be master’s of losing draft picks? Check! This is insanity. We need to build … See Morefrom the bottom up and not force our average age higher. I’ve seen this movie before and it has left a bad taste in my mouth 8 out of 10 times….. If we dont WIN the Super Bowl THIS season this was a garbage trade.
by TheOverLordMarshl on Apr 5, 2010 9:01 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
if we win the superbowl
The team got DAMN lucky and it won’t happen again for 10 to 15 years…again, again, again, again, again…..It’s not working and it takes a lot of luck to make something special happen…
man am I glad
Kevin is the only poster on this thread as of this morning whose opinion I value
i love this move because ?
shannahan has a plan to win now and getting mcnabb now means they will for sure draft a tackle hopefully okung plus we can get those picks back by trading campbell who deserves to be a starter somewhere else. and last but not least it prevents us from drafting a bust in clausen that would have set this franchise back plan is win now dont rebuild reload. its a great day to be a skins fan hail to the skins ..
Dan Snyder? Is that you?
How can you reload from a 4-12 team from last year? I think this will set the franchise back just as far as drafting a bust QB. It’s basically the same thing that’s been done for the past 11 years and look where that’s got us: nowhere.
by killianskid34 on Apr 5, 2010 7:12 AM EDT up reply actions
the dolphins went 1 _15 in 07 next year drafted jake long and signed chad pennington who was supposed to done but guess what the dolphins went 11 -5 and made the playoffs shanahan must have not been impressed with clausen or bradford . look bottom line campbell sucks he will be traded he had 4 years as our starter 2 years of those was with gibbs as his coach and did nothing he is a mediocre qb at best a backup you should be happy instead of bashing your team look at the track record of us drafting bad qb,s the list goes on from schuler to ramsey to frerotte if this team gets a good o line we can be a playoff team next season..
The Dolphins built their team with a lot of draft picks
We don’t have any of that
Plus Pennington is a horrible example
They had do adopt the wildcat because of Pennington’s shortcomings. He’s hardly a good example if you want to advocate this trade IMO.
by BayAreaBullet on Apr 5, 2010 7:49 PM EDT up reply actions
straight to the insults, huh?
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
what if we don't trade Campbell for anything more than a 4th?
Then what?
We’re stuck with Okung, 2 mediocre linemen, and 2 awful starters.
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
This feels a lot like the Jason Taylor trade. Giving up 2 picks for an aging player. There are differences. People keep pointing to the fact that Manning is the same age as Mcnabb…how many games has Manning and favre missed due to injury? How many seasons has Mcnabb finished? It seems like every other season he misses significant time due to injury.
Why is it that one minute we applaud the team for making moves that appear to be setting us up for future success and then after this move we applaud them for trying to win now? frankly, I’d rather have 2 fresh, young O-Line men than a 33 year old Mcnabb. I guess the only positive I see for this right now is that we’re definitely getting Okung with #4.
Make me eat my words, shanny and allen and snyder, Please, please, please
Suspend Colin Campbell!
I'm not feeling this...
I really don’t think I have liked a single addition the Allen-Shanahan regime has made, We have added two 30 year old RBs and a 34 year old QB when we were in a perfect position to draft both positions,
Garbage Trade
Injuries forced McNabb to miss 17 games in the last five years. So who wants Grossman backing him up?
by TheOverLordMarshl on Apr 5, 2010 9:13 AM EDT reply actions
Completely disagree with you
This is no cause to celebrate. Yes, McNabb is better than Campbell, but for how many years? If we can trade Campbell for a high second-rounder, then maybe we still have enough flexibility in the draft to choose McNabb’s successor. Maybe. But the fact is still that we have questionable WR depth, 3 over-the-hill RBs averaging 29 years of age, and only two guys who we know will be starting on our O-line next year. I’m not sure we even have half of our offensive starters figured out yet (and that’s not because of strong competition, but rather because of weak talent). We’ve got QB, C, LG, TE (plus a solid backup), 1-2 WRs, and maybe a FB (if he can get back to his old form). So that’s, what, 5-7 starters figured out? Still no tackles. We don’t have a team that’s ready to compete right now, and yet we have a QB who won’t be around for more than a few years. Yes, a team can have a huge turnaround in the matter of one or two years, but do you know how they do that? With draft picks. We have four right now, and only one in the first three rounds of the draft. BS move. Right now we need quantity that will turn into quality, not quality that will turn into dead money.
Another thing...
Grossman sucks. Can we please acknowledge that fact? He doesn’t know the offense that well, since he only ran it in practice for one year. He’s barely been on the field running it at all. So we’re going to have him as our backup? Not saying that McNabb will get injured, but if he does, we need better depth behind him. We could stand injuries to Haynesworth last year because we had a lot of talented players on the D-line. So are we going to keep Campbell around as the #2? He would be better than Grossman, but he doesn’t want to be here any more. He’s a starter. If we keep him this year, he walks next year. Back to the point though… Please, please stop acting like Grossman is a capable backup. McNabb has missed a lot of games recently. Therefore, our backup has to be someone capable of playing significant time and even starting games. Grossman is not that guy.
This move has made me stop believing that there is a plan in place.
This move has not erased our need to get a QB of the future
just dimished our resources to get that guy.
by BayAreaBullet on Apr 5, 2010 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Agreed
But it’s the Redskins. We’ll never actually get a QB of the future. We got that in Campbell and then team management started verbally bashing him around the league almost as soon as he became a starter. And once Gibbs was gone… They wonder why he has no trade value. It’s certainly not from his lack of effort to be a good player.
I remember watching McNabb play in Philly
and thinking that the Philly fans are dicks for treating him like trash when all he’s ever done is produce. He’s an upgrade, the 2nd round pick stings a bit, but we’ll likely get something back with JC. Shanahan has some sort of plan. Snyder doesn’t just make phone calls and trade away the 2nd round pick without Shanahan knowing and being cool with it. Everyone has been all over Shanny’s jock like he’s the savior and all of a sudden we’re back to hating on Snyder? Like Shanahan isn’t to be held accountable?
I like the McNabb signing. I was on the fence, didn’t know how I felt about it, but after reading 70 some odd comments from every armchair quarterback and debbie downer who has the internet and likes the Skins, I’ve decided to not be a whiny blogger trying to convince myself that my 2cents matters. The guys who pulled the trigger on this trade know way more than we do, let’s face it.
It is what it is. Donovan McNabb is a Redskin. No sense in being negative nancy and crying all over the blog.
When Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly explode like DeSean Jackson did I want you guys to continue to bitch and moan about having McNabb throwing them the ball.
He’s our new quarterback, just support the man and move forward..
poor characterization
we’re all fans, we all have opinions, Snyder has a terrible track record, we’re allowed to not like this trade and not be called doom-sayers.
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
The posts speak for themselves..
Read back over them, I’m on this site every day and I don’t even want to read these posts anymore, it’s sad. If you cry, what’s the baby gonna do?
and most people around here make good arguments
this is for discussing football, not mindlessly following the team.
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
Mindlessly following the team?
I think there’s a difference between hopping on the Snyder sucks bitch and moan bandwagon and ‘discussing football’
We were arguably going to spend our 2nd round pick on a QB if we didn’t use our 1st on a QB, so minus youth this isn’t necessarily ‘losing’ a pick.
Like, I said, I’m on here daily discussing football. We could have gotten Tom Brady and ’he’s got a bad knee’ or Peyton Manning and ‘he threw an interception in the clutch in the Superbowl’ or Brees and he’d have been a ‘one season wonder, plus he had all those receivers’ I’m just saying you guys sound like bitches complaining and whining all the time about everything.
Everyone agrees that the team we had last year didn’t cut the mustard. So we’re making some radical changes and you’re against that too? Make up your minds. Support Shanahan or don’t. But I don’t think you can support Shanahan and then if you don’t like something he does go over his head and blame in on Snyder. That doesn’t seem fair
Sooo essentially
people have to agree with everything, and not “bitch, and moan” because you’re tired of hearing it? Got it Gestapo.
SpottieOttieDopaliscious
Oh I get it
You guys can all voice your opinions, but when my opinion is different and I put it out there I’m the Gestapo. That makes much more sense, thank you for clearing that up Rekka.
No problem
it’s what I do
SpottieOttieDopaliscious
You started the generalizations, not me.
You called us debbie downers, when in fact me and a few others have reasonably stated why we’re against this move.
Generalizing everyone into inaccurate groups of ‘debbie downers’ is pointless. Blanket rejection out of hand like that is indeed mindlessly following the team.
Respond to specific arguments, leave comments like that out, and I will too.
We should be hoarding draft picks. A 33 y.o QB for 2-3 years doesn’t help us rebuild. It helps us win 7 games instead of 4, and meanwhile means another year where we don’t spend multiple early picks on offensive line.
THAT is why I hate this move.
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
I see where you're coming from
I also see alot of people logging on just to whine and repeat tired statistics about McNabb not finishing seasons. When, if you look at it, he’s been relatively healthy the last 2 years, it was a few seasons prior to that when he was hurt.
When I heard the news I was disappointed, because there are obviously some solid football players available at the 37th pick. But IMO if we were going to get Colt McCoy or Heaven forbid Tebow at 37, this trade isn’t a set back. If we were going to scoop a starting RT, then this trade hinders that and takes us a different direction.
So I do see your points, and i’m not necessaril disagreeing with them either, this doesn’t appear to be a long term building move, but I maintain that your outlook, while backed up, is still that of ‘debbie downer’ lol
chicken and egg
Most of Snyder’s moves suck.
while backed up, is still that of ‘debbie downer’ lol
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
For what it's worth
I think Snyder is a moron myself. I respect the fact that he does what he thinks is best and is willing to do whatever it takes to win a championship. Granted, the general consensus is it would take him disappearing to win a championship, but I do think he means well. As misguided as his efforts may be.
I’m just trying to be positive
I respect your positivity
but I’m not going to be positive about anything he does until we at least make the playoffs in consecutive seasons.
in the meantime, all I’m positive about is loving beer, football and sundays in the Fall.
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
let the church say Amen
in the meantime, all I’m positive about is loving beer, football and sundays in the Fall.
SpottieOttieDopaliscious
McNabb
This trade means nothing if we don’t upgrade the offensive line. Mcnabb has had injuries in the past and isn’t getting any younger. The new Regime has to address the offensive line in the draft. Russell Okung is the only Solid Left tackle who should be considered, but will he be around? Detroit needs offensive linemen. In addition, we will need to spend all our other picks on linemen because we still need a right tackle and right guard an dwith this trade we have 1 less pick. Hopefully, we can trade Campbell for a 2nd rounder along with Andre Carter for additinal picks. We now need Youth for this plan to work!
by A Connecticut Redskin on Apr 5, 2010 9:57 AM EDT reply actions
10 things I think I know
1. McNabb can get through his progressions and is an overall better decision maker than Campbell
2. McNabb will call guys out and be a presence in the huddle
3. McNabb is a proven leader
4. Elway was older than McNabb when Shanahan become the Broncos coach
5. McNabb is roughly the same age as Brady and Peyton Manning
6. McNabb’s rating (92.9) was roughly 6 points higher than Campbell (86.4)
7. McNabb threw for more TD’s (22) than Campbell (20) in 2 less games
8. McNabb threw 5 less interceptions (10) to Campbell (15)
9. McNabb threw for 65 less yards, playing 2 less games than Campbell
10. I’d argue that many of the yards and TDs Campbell threw for were in garbage time (making losses look like respectable losses)
11. It's hard for any QB to do well behind a truly awful offensive line.
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
I'd argue that the benefits McNabb bring at the QB position......
will do more for improving our offensive line than a 2nd round lineman would. Better use of checkdowns, quicker progressions to start.
There is a long way between now and the beginning of the season for them to work on the offensive line
It’s just odd
People on this board 1st complain that the Redskin’s will use the #4 overall pick on a QB. Then it’s "great they are going to use their 2nd round pick on Tebow." Now it’s, "this move smacks of Dan Snyder and the move for Jason Taylor."
Let me say that I think a lot of you are still pretending this is Vinny Cerrato and Dan Snyder trying to turn managing a pro football team into a game of checkers. Bruce Allen and Mike Shanahan don’t play checkers, they play chess.
Some articles indicate that Shanahan and Allen had been discussing this as a potential move since January. THREE MONTHS!!!!! You don’t think they would have done a simple SWOT analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) in that time period and perhaps put in some game tape before making this decision.
Now for you that think this smacks of win now, future be damned; If many of the rumors are true that, once ready to retire Shanahan will turn the reigns over to Kyle, why would he set his son up for failure 4-5 years from now. Answer, he wouldn’t.
Do you know what I think will lead to "long" term success for the Redskin’s……short term success. We need the team to start believing in itself from day 1, not hope for the best, which has been our mantra the past decade or so.
Bringing in McNabb settles down the most important position on our offense, which will in turn, allow our skill position players worry less about, is it him (Campbell) or is it me. They will know McNabb can do his job and it is just time to do theirs.
Nothing can derail a new project or rebuilding project more than early failures that make the employees (in our case players) start questioning the direction their leaders are taking them. Shanahan and Allen seem to understand this, with this type of move. If you set the atmosphere of success by putting proven winners into key positions (coach, GM, QB) that will permeate throughout the organization, which will lead to long term success long after those forefathers (Shanahan, McNabb, and Allen) are gone.
Nothing derails a rebuilding process like not rebuilding
Hence the 24th best record in the NFL since Dan Snyder has bought the team.
We keep going for 1 year fixes, never devoting to the draft like a true rebuild requires.
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
That's my point though
Why are we looking at trading for McNabb as a 1 year fix. Success breeds more success. I think the argument could be made that if McNabb can settle down the QB situation for 3-4 years and we can develop an atmosphere where players expect to be successful, it will do a lot more good than the guy we would have drafted at #37.
a culture of winning is important, but devotion to the draft is more important
it will do a lot more good than the guy we would have drafted at #37.
the draft is a crap shoot, but it’s the only way to build a youthful core of talent.
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
and it occurs every year
I am confident that Shanahan and Allen didn’t accidentally happen onto Vinny Cerrato’s diary that was left behind and look at it as a revelation.
I have faith that there is a master design in use, not “well it seemed to work for the Redskin’s in the past!”
Jamesumd, it's a loud minority that does not like this trade.
It is still running 66% in favor of the McNabb trade, with 10% indifferent, and 24% disliking it. I would have preferred a draft with either two OTs or one drafted OT and a trade for Gaither. Apparently the FO was going to draft a QB with one of the first two picks.
Looking backwards already, it is only for a quarterback like McNabb do I like this trade. Some number crunchers see this trade netting 1.4 more wins rather than the 7 some have mentioned. It won’t take many months to see if the future is now.
by Jefferson1935 on Apr 6, 2010 9:38 PM EDT up reply actions
McNabb
Played in 16 games once in the last 6 seasons. I hope Rex Grossman is ready to lead this team!
That's not totally accurate...
He’s been healthy the last 3 years for the most part. Was benched last year for a bad game.
"I am excited about starting 2009. We are looking forward to an outstanding year. We're on our way. We have a lot of healthy players this year." - Vinny Cerrato
by Kevin Ewoldt on Apr 5, 2010 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions
Nah he got hurt last year.
2008 has been his lone healthy season since(and including) 2005.
by You don't have to be sweet, to be good on Apr 5, 2010 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions
Last year...
When he was “unhealthy” all McNabb did was make the Pro Bowl, throw for 3500 yards, lead his team to the playoffs, throw 20 TD’s and gain a passer rating of 92.9.
And he played for 15 starts, including the playoff game.
Surrounded by talent far better than what we have
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
Not too mention, he won’t get to pad his stats against our secondary twice this year.
Поклон перед вашим капитаном!
by Knubles and Bits on Apr 5, 2010 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions
Plus he was abysmal at the end of the year
I think his body and his skill set has eroded to the point we can’t expect him to compete at a high level for an entire season anymore.
by BayAreaBullet on Apr 5, 2010 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions
over/under on games started by McNabb
for the ‘Skins 2010 season will be?
I’m guessing 9 , maybe 10 IF we get a Quality LT
The world looks mighty different when you're peeking out your belly button
I'd say 10, less if we don't draft a LT #4
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
You know what I can see what Allen is doing (other than channeling his father)
He is acquiring as many talented (albeit aging) players with huge chips on their shoulder as possible, and is trying to mold our team into a bunch of hard playing veterans who have something to prove to the rest of the league. Maybe this is the Over the Hill Gang 2.0 with just as much success, or it could be a Synderrato like disaster, but with savvy, proven winners like Allen, Shanahan, and Mcnabb in our corner I like our chances and prefer to take a very optimistic move toward our offseason moves. However, if we don’t draft Okung at 4 and completely switch to a 3-4 when it doesn’t F**KIN fit our personnel at all, then I will revert to 4-12 misery.
Semin = King of Dangle Sauce
reasonable and fair enough
but what about 2011 and beyond?
The world looks mighty different when you're peeking out your belly button
by Skins Fan '77 on Apr 5, 2010 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions
Two
Kyle Orton and David Garrard. I was joking about getting a QB in the fourth round.
Not many
Out of the 72 QBs drafted in the 4th round or later in the past 9 drafts, Tom Brady, Matt Cassell, Kyle Orton, Derek Anderson, and David Garrard are about it as far as starters go. Marc Bulger was a starter, as well as a bunch of other guys that did some spot starting here and there. A lot of the 72 QBs never saw the field, and others saw very little of the field (Spergon Wynn and Luke McCown are examples of this).
Drafting a QB AT ALL in the draft is a risky proposition. There needs to be a slam dunk sure thing in order for it to work.
by killianskid34 on Apr 5, 2010 9:09 PM EDT up reply actions
I will say this though
(and fuel the fire of people who think we can take a QB in the later rounds)
Joe Theismann was a fourth round draft pick. He was the first QB ever taken in the modern NFL draft in the 4th round… OOOOOOOO Boy!
yes we will eventually
but i believe if we resign mcnabb then we have locked down the QB position for the next few years and we can focus on more pressing needs like O line, free safety, running back, and line backer (in that order)
Semin = King of Dangle Sauce
by Area 51 Forever on Apr 5, 2010 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions
I think that we can increase Mcnabb's shelf life by a lot
if we solidify our O line and keep him standing. If we do that then I think he has at least 3 great years left in him, if not 5.
Semin = King of Dangle Sauce
by Area 51 Forever on Apr 5, 2010 5:21 PM EDT up reply actions
wow
Not sure I can be that optimisitic. We still need a viable in house option to replace him in 2-5 years. Just kicking the can down the road a year or 2 doesn’t change anything. We can’t just shuttle in middle of the road QB’s every couple years. Plus I’d rather give whoever we drafted a year or 2 to learn rather than wait for it to be a pressing need and have to draft one then. Plus McNabb needs a good backup. Over the last 5 seasons he has missed 3.4 games a year.
by BayAreaBullet on Apr 5, 2010 5:57 PM EDT up reply actions
Grossman is compatent
he knows the offense real well and can give us decent production. Yes everyone hates him and he is known for some dumb mistakes, but he has tons of starting experience for a backup and is relatively young. The young QB can come further down the road but I don’t think we should draft one immediately because then we will end up doing the same thing the eagles did with kolb and displeasing mcnabb.
Hi can I order for deliver please? Yeah I'm a Redskins fan I'd like a big bowl of poop
by Area 51 Forever on Apr 5, 2010 6:28 PM EDT up reply actions
yeah that would suck to be able to transistion to QB's instead of flailing around without one for years.
Kolb-McNabb is EXACTLY what we should try and emulate.
by BayAreaBullet on Apr 5, 2010 6:31 PM EDT up reply actions
Not right now we shouldn't
we have more pressing needs, and the mcnabb-kolb situation isnt exactly all rainbows and candyland like you make it out to be. Kolb in reality is very mediocre right now, and the eagles are the worst team in the NFC East now. We can’t just find some QB to groom easily. We should draft one two years from now. We have other needs that are WAY more pressing.
Hi can I order for deliver please? Yeah I'm a Redskins fan I'd like a big bowl of poop
by Area 51 Forever on Apr 5, 2010 6:38 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree with no QB this year
But how can you even asses Kolb like that right now. Yes he has minimal playing time, but his numbers aren’t bad at all…..after a few months of talking the starting reps in TC and practice you never know……frankly, of course, I hope he sucks.
Grossman
He doesn’t know the offense “real well.” He only started learning it last year. He’s really not young; he’s 29, and his best days are behind him.
he's young for a veteran backup
who are usually in their mid 30s. unless he is really dumb he should know the offense real well by now because all he did last season was sit on the sideline and study.
Hi can I order for deliver please? Yeah I'm a Redskins fan I'd like a big bowl of poop
by Area 51 Forever on Apr 5, 2010 8:08 PM EDT up reply actions
Do you learn by studying or by playing?
It’s both, right? So he’s studied it, but he has hardly played it. Todd Collins studied the Al Saunders playbook for a decade, so he didn’t necessarily need to keep playing in it by then. But you don’t know an offense really well by studying it for a year but never putting it to practical purpose.
We don't have the resources to do this
if we solidify our O line
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
We can draft Okung and trade for Gaither
then we will only have one position that is a question makr on our o line
Hi can I order for deliver please? Yeah I'm a Redskins fan I'd like a big bowl of poop
by Area 51 Forever on Apr 5, 2010 6:25 PM EDT up reply actions
We could give up Rogers or Landry or Haynesworth or Carter...
we have plenty of guys we could offer. Hell if he really is that young and good I’d be willing to swallow that 1st round RFA tag if he can lock down RT for the next 5 years.
Hi can I order for deliver please? Yeah I'm a Redskins fan I'd like a big bowl of poop
by Area 51 Forever on Apr 5, 2010 6:34 PM EDT up reply actions
That means we give them our first round pick this year
And we don’t get to pick up our LT. And none of those four guys is worth the second round pick that the Ravens reportedly believe Gaither to be worth. Maybe Haynesworth, but I don’t think the Ravens feel like spending that much money.
what if we do it after the draft?
Hi can I order for deliver please? Yeah I'm a Redskins fan I'd like a big bowl of poop
by Area 51 Forever on Apr 5, 2010 8:07 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah...
But I still don’t agree that he’s worth a first round pick. There’s a reason they’re replacing him. He’s good, but not great.
There might be off field concerns
But on the field he has been Elite.
by BayAreaBullet on Apr 5, 2010 9:33 PM EDT up reply actions
Ozzie Newsome doesn't want our overrated trash
We could give up Rogers or Landry or Haynesworth or Carter…
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
if we throw in an extra pick or two he might
Hi can I order for deliver please? Yeah I'm a Redskins fan I'd like a big bowl of poop
by Area 51 Forever on Apr 6, 2010 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions
um an EXTRA PICK OR TWO???
do you even know what you’re talking about? we have 4 picks total this year and 6 next year
The world looks mighty different when you're peeking out your belly button
by Skins Fan '77 on Apr 6, 2010 8:01 PM EDT up reply actions
you give them mid to late round picks next year
the guy is 24 and can lock down the RT spot (assuming we take okung) for a really long time.
Hi can I order for deliver please? Yeah I'm a Redskins fan I'd like a big bowl of poop
by Area 51 Forever on Apr 6, 2010 10:23 PM EDT up reply actions
when has that mattered
we give out draft picks like candy
SpottieOttieDopaliscious
so, if we trade 1 of those 4 you suggest...
how do we replace THEM? they are all starters at positions of little to no depth
The world looks mighty different when you're peeking out your belly button
by Skins Fan '77 on Apr 6, 2010 9:46 AM EDT up reply actions
defensive players are more easily replacable than o linemen
Hi can I order for deliver please? Yeah I'm a Redskins fan I'd like a big bowl of poop
by Area 51 Forever on Apr 6, 2010 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions
see above
The world looks mighty different when you're peeking out your belly button
by Skins Fan '77 on Apr 6, 2010 8:01 PM EDT up reply actions

by 






















