Colt McCoy anyone?

i would take mccoy over clausen in a heartbeat but lefvevour is going to be good i just feel it.

It is very possible he drafts him 2nd round.

He really doesn’t have the arm strength to be elite, but if he gets with the right team, he could be successful.

I like Bradford over McCoy, so secret here. If QB is going to be selected somewhere in the first 2 picks, here is my reasoning for Bradford(in the fist) over McCoy(in the 2nd).

This also takes into account the O-line scenerio. Bradford has all the intangibles you look for in a QB. Great size, 6-4 236lbs, above average arm strength, incredible accuracy, good leadership, and super smart. He can make every NFL throw, he is a super athlete, and has played in a pro style offense in his redshirted freshmen year(and did very well too). McCoy on the other hand doesn’t have ideal NFL size, only 6-1 218, has below average arm strength, and has never played in a pro style offense(Texas runs a true spread). He is extermely accurate however, and this makes up for his lack of arm strength. He aslo shows good athleticism. I would give a significant egde to Bradford.

As for LT, Okung has been a 4 year starter, and team captain. He has adaquate NFL size at 6-5 306, and moves his feet very well for a big man. He isn’t the fastest LT, but his speed is more than enough to be able to handle the position. He has elcellent strength to go along with those long arms(38 reps at 225). He may have hit his celing on his ability, but either way, he should be a solid NFL starter from day 1, and a border-line prow-bowl calibur LT(I say border line, because I don’t quite see him in the same catagory as Joe Thomas, or Ryan Clady when they came into the NFL). As a second RD LT option I really like Charles Brown from USC. He is a boarder-line late first, early second rd prospect. He was a 3 year started for USC, 1 year at RT and the other 2 at LT. He has good size at 6-5 302, but there are some concerns on his weight as to see if he can maintain 300 plus pounds during the season. He has great feet, long arms, and is extremely athletic for a OT(he was originally a TE). He shows great ability to pull around the edge and lead a toss, and the ability to punch the DT and get to the second level LB’s on the inside run. there are some questions on his strength, but these can be addresses with an NFL strength plan. I give the overall advantage to Okung, but only by a slight margin.

This is where I see the differences become more pronounced. If we need a QB, then Bradford is pretty far ahead of any 2nd rounder we can pick. If we need a LT, we can get close to 1st rd talent in the 2nd rd.

Hope this helps.

He is a winner and has great numbers, but his skill-set does not translate well to the NFL. The Mack Brown spread offense exploited his strengthes and covered up his weaknesses. His arm strength, size, and system he played under make him a high bust candidate. He would be a Chad Pennington, Jeff Garcia type who could be a starter in a dink-n-dunk west coast style offense. The system would need to be catered to his game.
Not being able to throw the deep ball and deep outs is a ‘QB killer’ in the league now. Defenders are too fast and if they don’t respect the deep ball, you’re in big trouble.

If the choice is Campbell or McCoy for the next 5-6 years, stay with Campbell and draft a different position.

IMO, If you are going QB, take 1 of the top 2. If not skip the position this year.

 If you really want to develope a QB 2 years from now, I would take 1 of these 3:

                      Tony Pike has similar concerns with his size, but has a much better arm.
                     Jarrett Brown has perfect size, athletic ability and arm, but needs to develope.
                     Tim Tebow also has much higher upside, but needs to work on his release.

I’d prefer him over the draftees.

They all test at the end of the month, and that will be the final barometer for true rankings.
It’s possible that Bradford or Claussen could disappoint with their throws, and McCoy could throw much better than expected. That would jumble the final rankings.
Based on 3 years worth of film, scouts should have a solid understanding of a quarterback’s abilities. Still, until the coaches and GMs actually witness a ‘live’ test, the final verdicts are not in. By the 1st week of April, we will know what the coaches saw, and have a clearer idea of where everyone is.
QB play is also system specific, so 1 QB that is 2nd or 3rd on one team’s board could be 1st on another’s. But if a QB cannot make all the pro-tree throws, he likely will be ranked substantially lower.

I’ve bben drinking since long time.