Hogs Haven: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: MLB Trade Deadline: Who is available around MLB?

LJP's "Elephant in the Room"


After reading a post by LJP, I clearly see where he's going with this JC debate. We tip-toe around some odf the obvious things, for fear of ridicule or scared that we may be "missinterpreted" for something else. So I'll write this with the love of all mankind at heart. *Sigh*...The Washington Redskins...

Let me first start by saying that I work in media. I'm fully aware of the pyschological dialog that's spread on a daily basis. The basic assumption in the media, is that people will believe whatever you want them to believe if you say it enough and are stern about it. They will condition their thinking and conform to the message of whosoever is in charge or deemed the "alpha-male". The EASIEST thing, is to create a strong dislike for someone, based on propoganda that's not only unproven, but sometimes nonexistent. A smoke screen...You have a theory or a status quo that you don't want changed, so you come up with a ton of so-called "reasons" for why someone can't or shouldn't do something, ignoring every circumstance around them or pertaining to that situation.

Race. An ugly four letter word when wielded the wrong way. And I know some of you are reading this now and are thinking, "oh no, not the "race card"". How can you, when this organization, OUR organization, is still heavily intwined in it? Red-Skin. A derogatory word in itself. We ignore it though, because it has no effect and doesn't pertain to you. We're told that the name's not a big deal because it's not offending a mass majority. How can it, when Native Americans make up such a small number. I guess a small voice doesn't count as a voice after all...

Boston is where our roots are. A place known for it's "strong" racial stance. A place where no African-Americans would ever play for the then owner George Marshall. Yes, we're a long way from 1962, but how ironic that the team that was last to integrate, was the first to win with a black QB...

Behind a lot of the "Jason Campbell dislike", is the not talked about "theories" of the black QB. EVERY LAST ONE OF THEM, is heavily scrutinized more than any other player or position on the field. This is why I laugh when I hear the commentators discuss Jason Campbell. They're only feeding you the propoganda and a lot of you fall for it, hook, line, and sinker. People have been trying to run Donovan McNabb out of Philly for years. Michael Vick, a QB, was supposed to have lost a step after his short stint in prison (running wise). But he was a cheap commodity who wasn't "ever going to start for another team again", so he was signed (to run). Vince Young could have easily handed the ball off to Chris Johnson like Collins did, but it took an 0-7 start for him even to be CONSIDERED the starter again.

Deep in the hearts of men who love this sport, they're not wanted. Eli Manning and Brett Favre can throw 4 INT's in one game, and won't get benched. Jason Campbell throw one, and it's "start Todd Collins". I've watched this happen for many years. Jason's been set up to fail. Period. Everything that he does well, is discredited. Anything that he does wrong, is blown up like he's the worse QB to ever suit up. And yet, what do we see when we watch the so-called "heroes" of the NFL? What do we say when Aaron Rogers does the same thing as Jason Campbell? What do we say when Brett Favre BLOWS an NFC Championship? What do we say when Peyton "the Greatest Thing Since Sliced Bread" Manning FAILS to "come from behind" in the Super Bowl? We say nothing. We let it go because, no matter what, they are who they are. They're "trying to make something happen", right? They are "gun slingers" with a pass, right? Brett Favre, one ring. Peyton Manning, one ring. Doug Williams... 

I know. Some of you won't believe me. Some of you think that "that's all the past". But I challenge you. Watch a few games, and listen to the words really carefully. Then watch another team's QB have some of the same, if not worse plays, and see where the direction of "blame" is thrown. It'll be everything from "a bad play" to the "other teams defense", but not so much the "hero". No. The hero must remain. The leader must remain untarnished. The leader must be given every opportunity to lead. If...he's white. 

Black QB's aren't wanted. And when a team has one, he's gotta be flawless during EVERY GAME, or he'll soon be run outta town. Still don't believe me, ask Warren Moon about the things that he came against. Hell, ask Doug Williams. After he won the Super Bowl, he was a soon forgotten hero. Some say this team is cursed because it's so heavily wrapped in race issues stemming from the owner to the name. I spoke to my father about the team, and before I could mention anything about the QB in Washington, he says to me "this town doesn't want a black quarterback..." 

The fact that we have one, doesn't mean that we've "crossed over". Especially when everything around him was in such disarray to begin with. Again, a setup for failure. Not an "excuse". Not a "card". Just an observation. 

My opinion? If Sam Bradford were black, we'd be more than content to stick with Campbell. But he's not, so therefore he "MUST" be better... or so says the "media".

No matter how much you try to look around it, the elephant is still there.

 

0 recs  |  Comment 260 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

your in the media

then that just goes to show that you are part of the problem , this is where all these race issues get blown outa proportion , I mean really your gonna play the race card ? so JC is being treated this way because he is black ? sorry but this is some of the dumbest shit ive heard in a good while – 1000

'' If we score , we might win . If they dont score , We will win '' Willis White

by skinaholic on Mar 11, 2010 10:02 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

sorry

about the language

'' If we score , we might win . If they dont score , We will win '' Willis White

by skinaholic on Mar 11, 2010 10:04 PM EST reply actions  

Getting riled up for nothing, I see.

I’m not part of the problem at all, and if you read correctly, I’m not pulling any “race card”. What’s funny is, you’re acting as if I’m the first person to ever say this.

C’mon man. Don’t come off naive.

No worries over the language. It’s all good.

by J.Cash on Mar 11, 2010 10:06 PM EST reply actions  

Dude,

I love Campbell and his upside but we cannot put him in the same sentence as Favre, or either Mannings because he hasn’t won anything yet. Those guys get some leeway because they have rings. Since you clearly can’t remember, Eli was going to be benched early in the year they won the SB but the team turned it around and won. Oh and I’m pretty sure Favre was traded from the team he spent years with so he obviously wasn’t as untouchable as you think. I’m afraid your argument has no legs. And Doug Williams is loved around here, more than the umpteen “white” quarterbacks that have been here since him.

by h money on Mar 11, 2010 10:08 PM EST reply actions  

Of course you're going to hear 'racism' in the commentary

if that’s what you’re listening for. Its like Charlie Manson listening to the White album.

by CarverM on Mar 11, 2010 10:12 PM EST reply actions  

Favre was on the fence, and they let him go because of it.

And Eli was an inconsistent QB THEN, as he is now. You can’t be serious. Soug Williams is loved, but how much did that love translate the next season???

So my “argument” has no legs? I guess it doesn’t when “I” say it, huh? But let Daryl Jackson or Michael Irving, or any other former NFL player mention, and I guess they make no sense either.

It’s there. It’s always going to be there. All I’m saying is, stop pretending as if it’s not a factor when you HEAR the same things said about them repeatedly.

by J.Cash on Mar 11, 2010 10:14 PM EST reply actions  

DW's game..

didn’t translate the next season. Neither did Timmy Smith’s but I suppose they let him go too because he is black. According to you thats the case.

And you are correct, when Daryl Jackson and Michael Irvin say that stuff, they too make no sense.

And it might go away if “media” members like you would let it go away instead of dragging it up all the time.

by h money on Mar 11, 2010 10:22 PM EST up reply actions  

You're easily decieved if you believe that.

Listen, as much as I want to say that “it’s gone”, it’s not. Short leash. Short time. Gotta go.

And when you say “dragging it up all the time”, you need to isolate whatever issues you have with the term, and just take into account what was written. This is the FIRST you’ve seen me mention it AT ALL, so how am I “dragging it up all the time”?

Speak to me. Address me. I welcome your opinion.

by J.Cash on Mar 11, 2010 10:26 PM EST up reply actions  

I said media members like you

not just YOU though YOU are dragging the race card up. I am just countering your point that Campbell is not at Favre’s or Mannings level yet. If you cannot see that YOU are clearly delusional. It has nothing to do with color its his skill level. Jake Delhomme is white but that doesn’t make him good. Michael Vick is black but that doesn’t make him bad. One of these players had his option picked up this year…. hint its not the “white” one.

by h money on Mar 11, 2010 10:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Jake Delhomme is another one of them who, in my opinion,

should have been run outta town a long time ago, much like they’re trying to do here with Jason in Washington.

by J.Cash on Mar 11, 2010 10:52 PM EST up reply actions  

but again..

he had some very successful years in Carolina (SB XXXVIII). Better than what we’ve seen from Jason ( so far….)

by h money on Mar 11, 2010 10:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Ufortunately racism is an issue...

But i think with Jason its more or less the fact that we havent had a consistently good qb since theismann and thats a long ass time ago, so our fanbase is just quick to wanna axe the qb and move on to the next one. Im a black man and ill be the first to call a spade a spade if the situation calls for it but i dont really see that playin out with Jason. He just hasnt been as succesfull as people would like and thats why we hear about ppl wanting to bench him and trade him and shit. He has been set up for failure right along with every other Redskin due to ownerships inability to have a cohesive coaching regime over the last decade.

by JONAH 31 on Mar 11, 2010 10:21 PM EST reply actions  

Cool Johan, but

why is his situation any different from any other QB on a losing team? Anyone knowing that he was set up to fail, knows that he’s not the problem. So why are we in such desperate need to trade him considering ALL the things that he’s dealt with that contributed to his play?

Those are the things that I’m speaking on. People like Mel Kiper saying that “this teams needs a QB”, and for what? To come in and do worse than Campbell for 2-3 years while “learning the system”? In the meantime, he’ll have every excuse in the world for his failures, while everyone else is the problem. It’s bullsh*t.

by J.Cash on Mar 11, 2010 10:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Campbell was given those excuses at one point to

remember when all of our problems were a result of not having tall receivers?

by CarverM on Mar 11, 2010 10:36 PM EST up reply actions  

people around the league

are seeing young QBs like Matt Ryan, Flacco, and Sanchez come in and have success in their first years. Everyone is waiting for the next and I think some fans of this team are hoping we get that next guy.

by h money on Mar 11, 2010 10:38 PM EST up reply actions  

I see. So the issue is that fans don't know football

Sanchez sucked towards game 5 and beyond. All of those QB’s fell into a “sophomore slump”. Here’s the difference: They all had O-lines. They all had Running Games. They all were starters when they came out. Jason wasn’t a starter, but that’s because of Gibbs. By the time he DID start, you saw the rookie mistakes that are typical, and people around here were already calling him a BUST. Why?

by J.Cash on Mar 11, 2010 10:40 PM EST up reply actions  

All except Sanchez, that is.

He’s just gonna suck for a while. But give him another two to three years and he should be good.

by J.Cash on Mar 11, 2010 10:43 PM EST up reply actions  

you dont

have to convince me. I want JC here. I think he can be great given something resembling an o-line. I think he can be better than all of the quarterbacks drafted since him. I’m just trying to make an argument for why people are constantly looking for a QB while JC is here, because I don’t think it’s because of race.

by h money on Mar 11, 2010 10:45 PM EST up reply actions  

when a team is losing

the first one they look at is the QB. If Campbell had the same win percent as Brady, but with his numbers the same, no one would be talking a new QB.

by h money on Mar 12, 2010 10:17 AM EST up reply actions  

I've heard every eargument from you

regarding Jason Campbell. While I may not have been 100% on all of them, I could support your general sentiment of sticking up for our QB, but I didn’t expect you to jump onto this whole “everyone wants him gone because he’s black” bullshit.

by CarverM on Mar 12, 2010 10:33 AM EST up reply actions  

agreed...

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 12, 2010 10:36 AM EST up reply actions  

No Carver, listen

It’s just a backburner theory. That’s all. Don’t call it bullshit though, because I’m not saying it’s the sole reason for the dislike.

Calm down, dude. These little exercises are good to strengthen our minds. We can’t get over anything until we can openly discuss it, and that’s what I’m doing. Psyschology, remember???

If I speak a word or two and you loose control, then I’ve won. And believe me, this is a game that I’m not trying to win.

by J.Cash on Mar 12, 2010 8:12 PM EST up reply actions  

The Jets

made the playoffs, not necessarily because of Sanchez, but you know as well as I do that the QB gets too much credit on a winning team and a QB also gets hated on too much on a losing team.

by h money on Mar 12, 2010 10:13 AM EST up reply actions  

Very true...

If you are the leader you take the credit good or bad

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 12, 2010 10:20 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Sanchez has only played for the Jets for 1 yr.- J.C. has been there way longer

STOP PLAYING the RACE CARD with J.C. it not because he is black.It is because he is not that good of a QB YET? We Redskins Fans are tired of losing with J.C. can you blame us if we want another starting QB. J.C. should be playing way better by now,not like a ROOKIE QB,FIRST LEARNING HOW TO PLAY! we have a chance to draft our future QB in the draft,and we are going to do it. J.C. time has come and went,sorry LJP.

by CHAOS-BRINGER on Mar 12, 2010 3:59 PM EST up reply actions  

I do remember...

just like I remember the choke hold that an inexperienced coach had on him as well. Still in all, it’s his fault and it all falls on him…

Amazing.

by J.Cash on Mar 11, 2010 10:42 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree with you there...

Zorn, along with Vinny, basically ruined his chances up till now. NOW we have football minds running the show and I think JC will have a chance to prove he is the man for our team.

by h money on Mar 11, 2010 10:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Let's hope so.

I just hate to hear the same thing about QB’s. And like I said, I work in the media. It pays the bills, but I can’t say that I enjoy sitting around watching how people spin words to crucify people for their own gain.

And when I hear these same tactics used over “particular QB’s”, it’s annoying.

by J.Cash on Mar 11, 2010 10:50 PM EST up reply actions  

A LOT

of media members were on Payton this year for choking. Just as many were on Favre. You couldn’t go on a sports news page without someone saying that they choked. No special treatment there.

by h money on Mar 11, 2010 10:53 PM EST up reply actions  

There's a difference though.

When they’ve found “The Golden Child”, he’s untouchable no matter what. I’ve witnessed Favre throw multi-pick games, and no one had the balls to say that he’s a problem.

But when Donovan McNabb does it….

And that’s what I mean. If it’s good for the goose, it should be good for the gander, but it’s not. Certain QB’s get a pass no matter what. Just a coincidence that all the African-American QB’s are in the half that doesn’t.

Call me crazy, I guess.

by J.Cash on Mar 11, 2010 10:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Delhomme...

Pure garbage and should have been ran out of town yrs ago…..racism….idk…..its certainly plausible……I will say this….I totally support your theory when it comes to Mcnabb…that bullshit they been tryin to run on him for the past 4yrs is craazy….no other top tier qb in the league is tryin to be ran outta town other than him and i cant understand that shit to save my life. Hes the best qb in eagles history and currently the 5th or 6th best qb in all of football and they wanna run him outta town for Kolb…..who the f@%k is he??……I cant do nothing but call it racially motivated….

by JONAH 31 on Mar 11, 2010 11:06 PM EST up reply actions  

And that's part of my point

Is there a “lump them all in one bunch” type thing that is spreading? At one point, if you were a black QB, you were a scrambler, and not a pocket passer. The only one who I think blew that whole theory right out of the water, was Warren Moon.

by J.Cash on Mar 11, 2010 11:09 PM EST up reply actions  

its like

everyone comparing Toby Gerhart with John Riggins…….why can’t he be like Jim Brown?

by h money on Mar 11, 2010 11:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Ahhh...very interesting perspective, h money.

So subconsciously, we generalize people or associate them based on their ethnic predessessor.

by J.Cash on Mar 11, 2010 11:16 PM EST up reply actions  

maybe in this case...

and this is an instance where I would agree with your stance. Not necessarily fans that want a winning team and think a new QB is the way to go.

by h money on Mar 11, 2010 11:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Hey, I have no problems with white QB's.

My favorite QB of all time would be Steve Young and Joe Montana (or vice versa. Flip a coin), so I understand the fans perspective. The TRUE fans, that is. But when you hear the negatively, and almost “dumping on” of the commentators and so-called football analyst that just repeat what the last man said or come into the game with apparent pre-conceived notions on a guy, no way can you say that it doesn’t have some other motivation behind it. Fans want to win. The media, wants the drama. Unfortunately, one dictates to the other much more than you think.

by J.Cash on Mar 11, 2010 11:24 PM EST up reply actions  

absolutely...

But at the same time we have to remember that Riggo was the last succesfull white runningback that we can draw comparison to….noone is gonna draw comparison to Jim Brown with a whiteboy runningback from Stanford…when i see Gerhart runnin fools over i myself immediately think “DAMN…he lookin like Csonka out there”….

by JONAH 31 on Mar 11, 2010 11:20 PM EST up reply actions  

touche

So is it a blatant race thing or just subconscious…?

by h money on Mar 11, 2010 11:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Who would you

compare Michael Vick with? strictly a football standpoint, not dog killing….

by h money on Mar 11, 2010 11:31 PM EST up reply actions  

You can't.

He’s a freak of nature. Speed of a RB, arm of a QB.

I’ve never seen anyone like him before.

by J.Cash on Mar 11, 2010 11:35 PM EST up reply actions  

First player I could think of

was Steve Young minus the accuracy. Both insanely athletic, scramblers not afraid to take a hit. Were you not able to compare because he is the first black QB to be like that?

by h money on Mar 11, 2010 11:38 PM EST up reply actions  

I didn't say Steve,

because Steve took hits. I’ve thought about all the times that Steve lowered his shoulders to get that extra yard or cross the goaline, and Vick just isn’t that dude.

by J.Cash on Mar 11, 2010 11:40 PM EST up reply actions  

good call there

I’m starting to forget what the original post was about……

by h money on Mar 11, 2010 11:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Lol, like I said,

I’m not “pulling a card”, just bringing some of my thoughts to the table and talking about what some are scared to.

by J.Cash on Mar 11, 2010 11:48 PM EST up reply actions  

I hear ya

and as we discussed above, you can find some sort of “racial profiling” in the league, but in my opinion, I do not think that is what is happening with the Campbell situation. Or maybe I HOPE that is not the situation. We could go back and fourth all night on this subject and I’m sure it will not change what the ’Skins do in the draft. Though I wish it would because I think Okung in Burgandy and GOld would look fantastic.

by h money on Mar 11, 2010 11:54 PM EST up reply actions  

And I respect that.

I just know the sleeze in the media on a first name basis. Some of these closed door discussions will blow your mind.

Hell yeah. Okung at 6’8" in Burgundy and Gold would be sweet!

by J.Cash on Mar 12, 2010 12:00 AM EST up reply actions  

Thats

Eagles fans for you. Nothing they do makes any sense….

by h money on Mar 11, 2010 11:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Everyone knows Favre throws mad picks… That’s why he set a career record for most picks thrown.

He gets scrutinized for it MORE than Donovan McNabb. McNabb get’s scrutinized because he plays for a philly team, and philly fans are worse than Skins fans when it comes to how they treat their players.

Stop trying to pin this shit on race.

by travisjh86 on Mar 12, 2010 11:07 AM EST up reply actions  

And Philly is predominantly a black community.

I think they want Kolb because they want to go with the youth movement, look at their team. It’s all young players, people are just tired of McNabb because he can’t get them over the hump. McNabb is also wildly innconsistent. He’s a great quarterback who when he’s on, he’s one of the greats, but when he’s off, he’s really off.

by travisjh86 on Mar 12, 2010 11:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Look how easy it is

to get you cussing and being rude….

As I said in the post, psyschology.

by J.Cash on Mar 12, 2010 7:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Ha what?
I wasn’t trying to be rude and I wasn’t “cussing.” I used the word “shit” once, because that’s what I think this is.
I’m a JC supporter, I want him to succeed, but as of now he is mediocre. I know he’s our best option at quarterback and hope he can make the next step to becoming our long term solution. We haven’t put him in the best solution to succeed, but as of right now, what has he shown us to make us believe he is the long term solution?

I just think your claim that people want him out because he is black is ignorant to the fact that he is MEDIOCRE. I know there are still racist people in this world and there always will be, but I’m just not seeing it here.

And another thing, being as it is so easy to get me cussing and being rude, try to read peoples posts without putting a tone on it. I wasn’t trying to be rude, I was explaining my belief on the matter.

by travisjh86 on Mar 15, 2010 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Then I apologize then.

Please, take no offense. I thought the language was a show of your temprement.

by J.Cash on Mar 16, 2010 7:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

to be fair

the McNabb situation is more due to the fact that Philly fans are nuts. He’s probably the best QB they’ve ever had, yet they love to hate him. But I don’t think it’s a black thing there. They loved Randall. They’ve hated McNabb from the start because they wanted Ricky Williams instead. And they’re just too crazy to sit back and rethink that whole scenario (i.e. McNabb turned out to be pretty good, Williams turned out to be either Harold or Kumar.

Like I’ve said many times, I wanna see Campbell stay. But not because of any loyalty towards him, I just think he’s our best option right now, INCLUDING any of the top draft picks coming out.

And, oh yeah, – I know I’m gonna rile some people up here, but I’d trade him for McNabb in a heartbeart.

by CJHutch on Mar 12, 2010 9:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I think the more pragmatic fans

some of which you can find on this board realize that Campbell isn’t the problem. There are also intelligent commenters on here that want to see a new quarterback and have legitimate reasons why. I support Campbell, but you have to realize that the run-of-the-mill, casual NFL fan is going to call for a new quarterback when their team isn’t winning, regardless of who is under center. Ever hear the old saying that the most popular guy with fans on a losing football team is the backup quarterback?

by CarverM on Mar 11, 2010 10:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes, I've heard of that.

I see where you’re going with it. Everything is great, as long as we’re winning. When we’re losing, all hell breaks loose.

by J.Cash on Mar 11, 2010 11:13 PM EST up reply actions  

not saying

its right, its just the way it is

by h money on Mar 11, 2010 11:21 PM EST up reply actions  

I wondered the same thing at the beginning of the season...

They cut chase because he was too ingrained into the wildcat from college… He had too many problems taking a snap under center… Thats why in preseason he took most snaps from the shotgun… It was deff a shame… I thought he had a good ass hell arm…

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 12, 2010 10:05 AM EST up reply actions  

I'll give you that

It baffles me to see all the love for 3rd stringer. He has done nothing yet so many are willing to let him take the reins. We got JC a coach, now get him something that resembles an o-line and watch him succeed.

by h money on Mar 12, 2010 10:20 AM EST up reply actions  

maybe he will

I doubt it that we will see much of a change in his numbers though… He will still average somewhere in the 60-70 completion percentage range… He only had slightly higher averages this year because the running game was a joke and he was required to throw more than normal short passes…. He will have more time to throw the ball but his decision making skills on when to release the ball is not that great…

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 12, 2010 10:25 AM EST up reply actions  

All the answers, huh milcmann?

That’s what I’m talking about, “but his decision making skills on when to realease the ball is not that great”…

Really??? You sound just like Zorn. Or did you come up with that conclusion from listening to the so-called “experts”? When I played the position, my decisions were also based off of what the defense was taking away. If I had time, I checked down underneath. RARELY did I have time, and I was running for my life. But, no one ever sees that from sitting on their ass watching the game. They just hear bullshit commentators speak the same stuff you just did.

by J.Cash on Mar 12, 2010 7:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Its easy to judge when your the observer

Thats why I try not to judge too harshly unless a player is just looking completely and utterly lost out there because in the end to an extent I know they are doing better than I could. Its completely different actually playing QB and watching someone do it.

by BrandonO on Mar 13, 2010 1:18 PM EST up reply actions  

really??? I sound like Zorn?

I dont recall talking about YOGA… Yes Campbell has issues in releasing the ball on time… You got it all wrong… I didnt come to a conclusion.. I called CSI… They did some fancy tests and boom the conclusion. I have watched the entire season at least twice.. Yes he has troubles getting the ball off or he just totally misses opportunity.

Look defend the guy tooth and nail if you like I just want something better than average leading this team… I believed in the experiment for one year too long… He is not going to blossom as you would like him to..

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 14, 2010 10:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

What "expirement"?

A coach with no experience calling the shots expirement???

Men lie, women lie, numbers don’t. I really don’t have to defend him. The stats speak for themselves. And if you say something along the lines of 4-12, I’ll rebute with Chris Johnson. Led the league in rushing…team sucked ass. It wasn’t his fault, but no one is talking about trading him either.

by J.Cash on Mar 14, 2010 11:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

What numbers

now I am a JC supporter, but dont say things like Numbers dont lie, humans still choose what numbers to show.

What about the numbers where JC’s 4 quarter numbers in greater than 2TD losses are fantastic (when teams are giving him the checkdown) but are terrible with the game on the line.

What about his 4th quarer INT’s coming with the game on the line, but his 4TH quarter TD’s coming at times where the game is all but over.

What about his lack of the deep ball, or the one thing numbers dont show, wide open recievers missed,

Now after saying all that, I beleive JC is a QB somewhere between the 8th and 16th best in the leage, in the 2nd Quartile if you will, and this is good enough, I would not take Clausen or prolly even Bradford over him…. BUT these people who talk as if JC would be a top 5 QB if it wasnt for Zorn are kidding themselves,

Pommylee

by Pommylee on Mar 15, 2010 1:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

If you wanna go by the numbers...

Then they prove everything I have ever said… He is a middle of the pack QB… His numbers have not even really increased in 5 years… The only reason they look better than his first 2 years is because he was injust both those years…

Since you wanna go by the numbers..

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 16, 2010 7:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

And Zorn and Vinny were the Coach and FO making the decsions

Chase easily beat out Colt: Just another example of what the last 2 years have been

by dr WNC on Mar 12, 2010 10:30 AM EST up reply actions  

that was all Zorn...

I guess he didnt want to have to totally rebuild a QB to learn to snap under center.. But you are right he hands down played in the preseason games better… A couple of things we as fans have trouble remembering… We only saw him for one quarter a game for 4 games… Plus, he was also throwing against the scrubbs on the other team… My point is this The coaches see them in practice. They know where the players are lacking in talent… Obviously Chase was too much to work with for ZOrny… But he deff has the talent to become a great QB…

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 12, 2010 10:35 AM EST up reply actions  

OMG dude why are you even arguing with me...

We both watched the same 4 quarters of game experience that he played. He did better than Colt and had pretty good numbers for a rookie… WTF

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 16, 2010 7:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

Because you shouldn't make such a statement as saying "he DEFF has the talent to become a GREAT QB"

based off of nothing. What’s with the “WTF” stuff. This is not an argument at all. Just talk.

by J.Cash on Mar 16, 2010 7:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Its just to bad the Daniel is too short, too fat, and cant snap under center.. Other than that he could be a great QB…

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 17, 2010 7:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don't think

Chase will ever play a meaningful down in the NFL. Doesn’t mean Brennan will either, but Daniels is just too small/slow/fat.

by CJHutch on Mar 12, 2010 9:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I dig where you are comin from but....

i just dont see it in this particular instance…not to say that it may not be true to some degree behind closed doors. i still think thats its more or less unrealistic expectations for a guy that has not had the chance to throw the damn football in a proven succesful offensive scheme. That bullshit offensive scheme that Zorn and Gibbs were runnin is a setup for failure. Qbs are always the scapegoat in the league and u get 2-3 yrs to become succesfull or ppl try to run u outta town. Fans have to realize that until we get an o-line that protect him, recievers that can run proper routes, and a proven offensive scheme, we cant effectively evaluate Jasons ability nor any other quarterbacks ability for that matter…

by JONAH 31 on Mar 11, 2010 10:46 PM EST reply actions  

This is what I have been saying

all year on this blog about our ability to judge Jason. One has to think, though: The likelihood of ANY QB coming to the Skins five years ago and surviving as long as Jason has is next to nil. Proof – Ramsey, Shuler, Ferrote. Especially, Ramsey, who practically got pounded out of the league for lack of an OLine. We still call it “getting ramseyed” around this blog.

If anything, Jason has been given a bit of a pass for the obvious failures of the front office in putting together a winning program. Had they not been so truly horrible in putting together a team and coaching staff, more blame would have spread to Jason or whomever the QB du jour was.

If anything, a QB on a losing team should be saying what the GB players used to say about Lombardi, “He’s not prejudiced, he hates us all equally,” or something to that effect. Look at Jake Plummer, a pretty talented guy, but not to the standards of Denver fans who idolized Elway. He got run out of town.

So what it comes down to is, for the fans of losing teams that point to the QB in frustration, what do they really say about their QB and is it categorically different depending on his race? Is the criticism based on the old “athletic vs cerebral” stereotype? I’m sure for some it is. The blatant exception, of course, is McNabb – generally as good a QB as any team could hope for – who has QB’d the winningest NFL team in the last decade – and yet gets trashed for underlying reasons that are most likely racist.

Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.

by Scott E on Mar 12, 2010 10:25 AM EST up reply actions  

Good point.

But if all equal, would they be trying to run “Joe Smith” out of town if he were white and had the same record? Jaws’ record is comparable to McNabb and he is beloved by Eagles fans. Both went to the SB and lost. I can’t believe, having met him, that Jaworski is that great of a personality to account for the difference.

Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.

by Scott E on Mar 12, 2010 10:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Remember, we're talking Philadelphia here

fans that booed Santa Claus and cheered when a guy was paralyzed

by CarverM on Mar 12, 2010 10:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes, when it comes to data it's always good to remember

that some data points will reflect the “lunatic fringe” of any scatter plot.

Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.

by Scott E on Mar 12, 2010 11:06 AM EST up reply actions  

Remember..

the Chargers drafted Philip Rivers because they thought Drew Brees couldn’t do it. The fans were in the same boat then as we are now. And come think of it, all this happened amazingly despite the fact that Brees is white. No racism there just like there is none here.

by h money on Mar 11, 2010 10:51 PM EST reply actions  

I understand the point being made, and realize it is a difficult topic to discuss.

     But, I thnk it does not apply here for the majority of commentators or fans. Of course, Race will always be an issue in life, as it has been since the beginning.
     I can only speak for myself, Race is not an issue for me, only wins and losses. I rooted for Williams, and wanted him over Shroeder, when they won. I was happy with the Campbell pick, and rooted for him over Brunell vociferously. I am fine if Bradford or Claussen replaces him now because I think either one, especially Bradford, will be a better QB to give the team a chance to win championships going forward.
     I also feel that the majority of commentors have been fair with Campbell. I almost always hear them state that: “Campbell could be successful in the right system surrounded by the right players.” Very few outright blast him or say he is not an NFL quarterback.
     I personally would greatly resent someone calling me out as bigotted or rascist because I would be fine with B/C as the starter.
     I also agree on the ‘Red Skin" view point. I do know people who are offended, but feel that they don’t have the “empathy” and numbers to get serious support.
     In my opinion, Race will always be an issue for some people around the world as long as man walks it. Doesn’t mean we shouldn’t keep trying to change it, but realize it is very diificult to overcome.

by johnnydee83 on Mar 11, 2010 10:58 PM EST reply actions  

Dude,

thanks for your honesty. I appreciate your comment.

by J.Cash on Mar 11, 2010 11:02 PM EST up reply actions  

No you are the one that is touching peoples nerves. You’re trying to turn a debate about race into a pointing fingers match. You don’t know what race anyone is on here so don’t say anything before you dig yourself a deeper grave.

by travisjh86 on Mar 12, 2010 2:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Who are you talking about?

I have heard no one on the site talk about ones race. I know I am probably the front runner in the average Campbell debate but in none of the posts on HH has anyone done this. So tell me LJP, Who is racist on the board? Call them out. If you are going to slander someone at least have the balls to call them out and point a finger… Let it be known who these people are so they can be delt with.. Im sure that none of the moderators would tolerate it…

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 12, 2010 10:12 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

mic, have you been reading what J. Cash has been posting on this fan post/ thread. I am sure you have so don't spend time blowing smoke up my azz. You know as well as I do that nobody comes right out and says that they have issues with race.

But they do it in more subtle ways now. Give me a break "let it be known who these people are so they can be delt with.. LOL Good one guy you are hillarious….. Playing stupid really nice of you… LOL

by LETJASONPASS on Mar 12, 2010 11:18 AM EST up reply actions  

No really... That was a serious statement...

Tell us who is racist on this board. How am I playing stupid when no active members of this board have made racist remarks. Ive been on this site as long as you have. I havent even seen anything that could be read that way. I dont even think a racist person could be a true fan of a team in the NFL. The NFL is the probably the most culturally diverse organization in sports.

I certainly hope you are not infering that I am one.

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 12, 2010 11:29 AM EST up reply actions  

He wont say any names or give examples because there were none.. If there had been it would have been questioned then and there.

He gets a rise for whatever reason out of arguing with people… He know that if he can discredit people here that he wins the overall JC17 battle. I mean almost all of the people that comment on HH have already commented here. but yet…

LJP wrote: J Cash, The people that you need to talk to are not posting. They are just reading and cursing. LOL

When he posted that at a 6:45 this morn. Of the ususals on the site there were only a few of us that had not commented. I being one of the ones that had not commented, took offense as if I was the one who he was talking about. Being that I am the person that argues with him most about JC17 know that he is talking about me. Thats why I would love for him to say it.. I would love it… little piss ant

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 12, 2010 12:44 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm just shaking my head on this one LJP

Get off this dudes jock. He doesn’t need you co-signing. J. Cash is making good points whether we agree with them or not, and that’s what the discussion is about.
He made his points, stands behind them and has upheld legitimate thought provoking conversation. Noone needs your peanut gallery BS man, let a good argument be..

by DoWork on Mar 12, 2010 1:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Revolving doors....

It is the best way I can explain a QB situation, the media loves controversy especially at the QB position (Billy Kilmer and Sonny Jurgenson in the 70`s, Phil Simms and Jeff Hostetler in the late 80`s and early 90`s. It goes on but you can win a Super Bowl without hall of fame credentials (Jim Plunket, Jim McMann, Doug Williams, Mark Rypen. Put the best man on the field and if you have the right pieces in place the coach is a genious and then the media have another story. Just like lawyers running to the hospital after a car accident just to get the case and win lots of dough.

by mybluebone on Mar 11, 2010 11:55 PM EST reply actions  

It's there, but there's not a lot of it there ... and it's fading with time

Are some of the people hard on Campbell, McNabb, etc, doing so because Campbell land McNabb are black? Oh, yes – anyone saying otherwise hasn’t spent much time on internet chat boards or listening to Rush Limbaugh. Sophisticated racists use code words like “dumb” or “vacant” but it’s pretty easy to tell. So I hear you on that.

But I honestly don’t think that it’s really true in most cases. Look, it’s an old adage in football that no one is as popular as the backup QB – especially when the starting QB has a penchant for an ill-timed interception. Fans were calling for Delhomme’s benching in Carolina long before the team did it. And Campbell’s performance in fourth quarters, while not at the Jake D. level, have left him open to legitimate criticism. And your other examples are also pretty easily rebutted. I hated Mike Vick as a QB before he was convicted, because I viewed him as a coach-killer. I didn’t know that he wasn’t doing his homework, but I knew his passes weren’t accurate. I loved watching Steve McNair play. If you think that Warren Moon is the only aging QB to discover that a town can turn on you, I give you Joe Thiesman – he went to two Super Bowls, won one, and was NFL MVP in 1983, and yet by 1985 fans were clamoring for Schroeder long before LT ended JT’s career. You’re frustrated about about Vince Young? He was pretty mediocre and got beat out by Kerry Collins. It happens – even if the QB is white, and the young turk may never get his job back until the old bull retires (I’m looking at YOU, Matt Leinart and Kurt Warner). To Young’s credit he used that time on the bench to be a better player. Even in the 80’s most Redskins fans I knew, black or white, were rooting for Doug Williams over Jay Schoeder, and JS was coming off a 4,000 yard season in 1986.

Bottom line, EVERYONE has cognitive dissonance, and I am aware that if I am convinced I will find something I will make the data fit my preconceptions. There are studies that show that when a person is confronted with empirical data that contradicts a deeply held belief, people will tend to jettison the data before the belief (I’m looking at YOU, “young Earth” creationists). For this reason, I tend to laugh at people who dismiss race as a factor in the NFL or in the broader society … but I also tend to question those who see racism in every situation involving people of different ancestries. The world rarely operates in strict clarity.

And for the record, I’m a Campbell backer – I thought that he played at a high level last year. HTTR!

by d_c_guy on Mar 12, 2010 12:01 AM EST reply actions  

Good points.

You guys are making this easier to discuss than I thought.

by J.Cash on Mar 12, 2010 12:06 AM EST up reply actions  

Why are you trying to stir up problems?

by travisjh86 on Mar 12, 2010 11:20 AM EST up reply actions  

thats all he is doing...

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 12, 2010 11:20 AM EST up reply actions  

And why don’t you name the people you’re talking about when you said

J Cash, The people that you need to talk to are not posting. They are just reading and cursing. LOL

by travisjh86 on Mar 12, 2010 1:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Because I’m pretty positive you’re pulling that out of your ass

by travisjh86 on Mar 12, 2010 1:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Stop trying to give Hogs Haven a bad name

by travisjh86 on Mar 12, 2010 3:48 PM EST up reply actions  

well there's a couple of points

1) in all poling that I have seen, the vast (we’re talking well over 80%) majority of “Native Americans” count themselves as Redskins fans. While the word may have originated with very negative connotations, its usage in that manner has been almost obsolete for the last 40 years. The name/monniker/label has its origins in differentiating between the people of India and the people of this continent by British/English explorers. It’s original usage wasn’t inflammatory, it was descriptive and its use has evolved and continues to do so.

2) I’m not a JC apologist, nor am I a hater… I see a guy who has been given plenty of opportunities, not all of them great opportunities, but chances all the same. Do I blame him for all of the offensive woes… no, but he is a part owner in them, just like the rest of the squad that wasn’t executing. Could JC be a viable QB option in the right system. I think so. have we had such a system in place for the last three years, at times yes, before injuries ravaged the line, but there were times when the line was healthy and he sucked. Was that the system? was he executing outside his skill set? perhaps it was a combination of a bunch of different parts that did not mesh into a cohesive unit?…most definately. has jason improved on those areas that are found wanting? quicker progression reads, better audibles, faster releases, more aggressiveness in leading the team? imho No.

so the question remains, has he been given a raw deal by the media and the fan base…. I don’t really see it, I see complaints about the offense not executing and putting points on the board, I see frustration with the ownership and its childish reactions to criticism, I see frustration with the FO in regards to what appears to be common sense moves that could have been made eschewed for the “winning the offseason” mentality.

then again… ymmv.

I used to be disgusted, now I try to be amused....

by piratedan7 on Mar 12, 2010 5:35 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

NOt a good comparrison
What do we say when Aaron Rogers does the same thing as Jason Campbell? What do we say when Brett Favre BLOWS an NFC Championship? What do we say when Peyton “the Greatest Thing Since Sliced Bread” Manning FAILS to “come from behind” in the Super Bowl? We say nothing. We let it go because, no matter what, they are who they are. They’re “trying to make something happen”, right?

All of those QBs you listed above threw multiple 300+ yard games… Farve can throw 4 INTs in a row and get away with it cause for one thing he is 40 another he can throw 4 TDs in the same game to balence it out. Campbell has not done a thing for this team. He has not thrown a single 300 yrd game. He has not ever thrown us to the postseason games. Every one of the QBs listed above could possibly be added to the to the HAll of fame…most will be… The “Race” card is not and issue at least with me.

He is average…. That is why he gets hammered on. It has nothing to do with his race. Its statements like your article above that keep the race issue, an issue… I agree that there are more than likely race issues in the NFL but it it heard of less than many other sports. As long as someone is call foul for bogus reasons the race issue never will leave us.

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 12, 2010 8:19 AM EST reply actions  

Milcmann, enough with the bull, okay?

I’m sorry, but I have to call bullsh*t on this one, my friend. I brought up those QB’s because they all started on a shaky team as well. Let’s not forget that Manning’s Colts sucked when he started. No one was talking about him losing his job after three seasons…

Favre wasn’t always a “gem” like you think he is. The NFL loves him for his “dramatics” as much as his ability to throw deep. Give me a break, alright? I’ve seen “great QB’s”. I’ve seen guys who would sacrifice for their team and GET results. Favre isn’t it, and the more you worship him, the more I will EXPOSE him for who he is.

And Rogers is shaky RIGHT NOW. Are the Packers talking about “drafting the QG for the future”? No. In fact, Rogers is AWESOME when he’s playing Detroit and Chicago twice. I guess that’s where he gets the +300 yards from, huh?

AND, our offense isn’t set up to gain +300 yards a game. And if you believe that, I’m SNATCHING your HH membership from you right now, lol. Meet me at FedEx Field so I can tie your fingers together or something and put you in timeout.

And as far as Race, it’s still there when we’re talking about the NFL. Hell, the “Rooney Rule” isn’t something that’s been around for a long time, and the we haven’t stepped that far into the future to say that it’s a thing of the past. Not saying that we’re not making strides, but nothing that you hear about the same ethnicity at that position, is “coincidental”.

It’s only a thing of beauty when we CAN talk about it, and agree to disagree.

by J.Cash on Mar 12, 2010 7:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Ummm...He rode the bench for how many of those years???

He doesn’t have “5 years” worth of work. More like 3.5.

by J.Cash on Mar 14, 2010 11:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Very true

The way some people diss him by saying how long we have had him makes it seem like Campbell was a starter from day 1 when in fact he was behind Brunell

by BrandonO on Mar 16, 2010 5:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

He didnt ride the bench for the years im talking about...

He got injured his second year as a starter.. yes they count… He is 5 years into his career.., Nuff said… He is at his halfway point… My goodness if he were as good as you all think why is there so much drama in keeping him… You would think he is Brady or something…

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 16, 2010 7:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

check again...never

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 14, 2010 10:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe you should check milc

Your going by your opinion and I’m going by facts. I’ve done my research. He had two in 07 (one being against Dallas, the other against Tampa), two in 08 (one against the Saints the other against the Lions), and two in 09 (again against the Lions and Saints). I don’t post comments like that blindly. You could have easily just gone to nfl.com dude lol

by BrandonO on Mar 15, 2010 6:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

I stand corrected

 
Yahoo for some reason does not show them in his career slpit stats… WTF how hard is it to post correct stats..lol. Appologies…

lol… At least it better proves that 08 was his better season…

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 16, 2010 7:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

nope.... Notice I excepted defeat in an argument...

He corrected me, I checked and he was right…. Not the same

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 16, 2010 6:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

I know.....

but you did make a strong argument based on incorrect knowledge…..=LJP! I am proud to see you swallow your pride though……unlike the other ass-clown on here! lol

by shvd98z24 on Mar 16, 2010 7:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Actually....!!!

Im blaiming that argument fail on yahoo sports… If you pull up his carrer stats it only shows one Lions game with over 300… I also am gonna throw it out there that I am under new managment, with a new playbook, new shoe laces on my cleats, got a new hair cut last week, and am not getting a fair shake. Just give me five more years and maybe I will get this argument right. If I could just get paid better than im worth maybe I will argue better.

What do you mean by “OTHER ASS-CLOWN”? It almost sounds like you are putting me on the same level as him!!!!!

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 17, 2010 8:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

my apologies.....

you are actually not even close to be that low! Poor choice of words milc…..I am sorry! Let it slide this once? Won’t happen again….I promise!

by shvd98z24 on Mar 17, 2010 9:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

JC17 Obsessors like yourself ignore any evidence pointed out to them...

I have on several occasions disprove you with STATS. Your only comment was that you don’t buy into stats or some kind of back peddling tactic you like to use… That is if you comment at all.. Every time I back you into a hole in an argument you walk away from it. Just be a man and admit it when someone proves you wrong…

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 19, 2010 8:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

yeah really sorry about that...

I really was not pulling that outta my ass.. Just should not have trusted Yahoo.. Until this post all of their stats have been correct..

this is me feeling defeated…. :(

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 17, 2010 8:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

It's alright

It happens to the best of us. I used to go to yahoo for information a lot too so I understand.

by BrandonO on Mar 19, 2010 6:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

No Elephants

There are no elephants in the room. It’s inappropriate and very divisive to try to gin up an argument about racism in connection with the Redskins. The NFL and the Skins are something like 60-70% black guys, aren’t they? What (white) racist would fall in love with a basically “Black” team? I suggest that you are using the race card to try to intimidate critics of JC, trying to use affirmative action/racial preferences/quotas, diversity, etc to win a football argument. Why do that? What does anyone gain? Shanahan is certainly not going to pick his QB on the basis of race. He’d play a Martian if the thing was a good passer. As for JC, I think the press has been very favorable to him, and on HH, criticism has been very gentle and moderate – all about skill, performance, etc – especially compared to the rather nasty and dismissive stuff written about guys like Colt Brennan, Jimmy Clausen, Derek Andersen (is he white?) and other white QBs. Again, why bring up alleged racism? Hardly anybody cares about race except you, and nobody wants to argue about it.

by Donnio1234 on Mar 12, 2010 10:03 AM EST reply actions  

LJP

learn to spell – it’s “dumbest” (not “dumbiest”) and “none” (not “known”). There are probably some fans who would qualify as “racist”, especially given the many definitions of racism (e.g. some equate knowing of certain stereotypes, or disagreeing with the liberal agenda, as making one a “racist”). But I think that most people who truly dislike minorities tend to drop out as teams get more black. In fact, attendance and loyalty stay high. E.g., virtually everybody in Chicago adored Michael Jordan and the other Bulls. Some “racists” probably dropped out, but most people stayed loyal to team and city and didn’t care about race. Same here – to real fans, guys like Clinton Portis, Santana Moss, Phillip Daniels and others are heroes, and some are obviously outstanding individuals in many ways. So to anybody who initially looked down on Blacks (e.g.) in the past, there is some jarring cognitive dissonance: on one hand, they’re African American, on the other, they’re outstanding people. After realizing the latter, it’s impossible to ever make broad negative judgements about anyone solely on the basis of race. In that way, sports is a great teacher, and the great Black athletes really help unify people. In the current case, it strikes me as preposterous to imply that the press or people on HH are going after JC because he’s black. Among other things, criticism has been very mild and all performance based, nobody has ever attacked him personally (quite the contrary) or with any stereotypical type arguments that played to race, or with the venomous language you use regularly. HH contributors clearly formed a strong consensus that JC, as of now, is an average, pretty good, NFL QB, despite a very disappointing performance in the last 3 years. People cut him a lot of slack, which they don’t give to Dan Snyder or Vinny Cerrato. And my main point about this thread is, why do it? Why try to create a problem or controversy where there is none? Whatever the situation in other areas, there is no race problem with the Skins or their fans. What do you want people to say , or not say? What should we agree to? It’s a waste of time to argue about race vis-a-vis the Redskins. Incidentally, somebody tried to bring in the name by writing the words “Red-Skins”, which could be read as a negative description. It’s “Redskins” (or as I usually say “Skins” – now I’ll get flack from raccoons). I don’t know where the term came from, but in the old movies American Indians were usually called Indians or Injuns (mild joke), not (as far as I can remember) Redskins. I think it has good connotations – brave, strong. It’s is definitely not pejorative – no team names themselves after something bad or weak. The flack is coming from a very very small group of people who are trying to make a name for themselves, and don’t represent most (hardly any) Native Americans. They and their garbage lawsuit should be resisted to the end.

by Donnio1234 on Mar 12, 2010 12:54 PM EST up reply actions  

dang man you couldnt have broken that up a bit

History of the redskins name…. Originally named the Boston Braves for one season because they played at Braves Stadium… The Team was going bankrupt and because a single owner franchise. The owner Moved the Team to Fenway Park and changed the name to the Redskins so that it would not be remembered as the bad Boston Braves.

The name started because they shared a field with the Baseball Boston Braves. They thought it would be a good idea to share the same name if they share the town and field.

Although, George Preston Marshall (original Skins owner) was the most racist owner in football history.. He didnt hire an African American player until the 60’s when they had been playing since the late 40’s.

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 12, 2010 1:22 PM EST up reply actions  

And one of the co-owner claimed, but was discredited, that he was part Sioux.

Marshall said he named the team as a way to pay homage. I’m not buying it, but hey, I’m just a guy…

by J.Cash on Mar 12, 2010 7:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Donnio, you've missunderstood me.

Intimidate who? Win an argument? If I wanted to argue, I’d just tell my wife she looks like she’s gained a few pounds.

Look, the worse thing you can do is not acknowledge that there’s no issue with it in the NFL. Some of the PLAYERS have testified to this. Being in their shoes, you can at least give them that.

But no one is calling anyone “racist”. All I’m saying is, race and “athletic profiling” (see comments above) play a factor in the theories of the black QB. Not just Jason Campbell, but the black QB. Period.

by J.Cash on Mar 12, 2010 7:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Don't do that

If I wanted to argue, I’d just tell my wife she looks like she’s gained a few pounds.

I told mine that last year, and she never stops hounding me about it. Except then she lost the weight, and started in on me. Now I’m pretty sure she’s banging the UPS guy. Sorry, I guess I got off topic a bit, huh? On second thought, maybe not. The UPS guys is black.

by CJHutch on Mar 12, 2010 10:06 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

J. Cash

Maybe I missed the point, so thanks for the clarification. The issue is about theories of the black QB? Negative stereotypes? I didn’t realize it was much of an issue these days, and don’t have any reasoned opinion on it anyway.

by Donnio1234 on Mar 12, 2010 11:48 PM EST up reply actions  

J Cash

Sam Bradford is Native American….

by travisjh86 on Mar 12, 2010 10:58 AM EST reply actions  

Yeah, he said no comment.

Which means he didn’t want to comment on it unless he actually was drafted by us.

by travisjh86 on Mar 12, 2010 11:21 AM EST up reply actions  

travis, He said he was not going to discuss this issue. If he did not have a problem with it would have said so at the time.

Would you have said the same, or said that you don’t have a problem with the name? Thank you . (My point exactly)

by LETJASONPASS on Mar 12, 2010 11:31 AM EST up reply actions  

I would have said the same.

I would of said the exact same thing. Because then you aren’t taking a stand. He said no comment because if he had said he did have a problem with it the chances of him getting drafted here go down. If he said he had no problem with it, then Native Americans would have been pissed. If he does have a problem with it, then he wouldn’t want to come here, right? So he would have said it to prevent himself from coming right?

My point exactly, you ignorant mother fucker.

by travisjh86 on Mar 12, 2010 1:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah my bad, it’s just making me mad that he’s trying to put a bad image on this website by saying people on here are racist. Race is a touchy subject obviously and he’s trying to use it to his advantage in an argument for JC.

by travisjh86 on Mar 12, 2010 2:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah... just dont give him a reason to flag you.

I know thats all he was doing. If this entire post was about Moss instead of Campbell, he would have gone the other way. He obviously didnt pay attention about the Red-skins post months ago about the lawsuit. If he had he more than likely would not have gotten into it with me about the Native American debate.

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 12, 2010 2:07 PM EST up reply actions  

So..

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 12, 2010 11:31 AM EST up reply actions  

My Uncle is full blooded Cherokee smart guy...

I am 1/4… My uncle is probably one of the biggest Redskins fans I know… So yeah he is fine with it. As am I. We already had this discussion on here… Redskin is not derogetory. It was a term to cover all Natives of America in a simpler breath. Look at how the indians display their logo.. Insulting… Our helmet displays a proud man not a goofy bucktooth display…

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 12, 2010 11:40 AM EST up reply actions  

He is!!!!HIs Wife is, His kids are.

You are a fool… You do not raise a family of specifically Cherokee people with out staying true to your culture. He likes the skins because he feels it best fits his culture. He calls himself a Redskins just like I call myself a Redneck. Dont try and tell me anything that you yourself dont know anything about.

The people that created the protest over the name didnt even care if the name got changed they wanted money. This is the primary reason why the case got thrown out of every court of law it came to. Most Natives of America dont even care about the name of a football team. They are more concerned about how to maintain their cultures in a society that thrives on money.

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 12, 2010 12:01 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

You my friend.....

are as dumb as you look……….you are prolly one of the only people in the world that could have mistaken what milc wrote! Wonder what your Wonderlic score would be…..something in the area of a Vince Young I would assume…..around a 6!

by shvd98z24 on Mar 14, 2010 12:50 AM EST up reply actions  

shvd, You are a idiot did you read the thread? Do you know what we have been talking about. My comments are "spot on." Maybe I should now add you to the "guilty dog barking loudest" list.

Hey why don’t you jump in and help carry the banner. According to Milc he is a redneck. Have you not noticed he is the main person marking up this thread. He has spent alot of time trying to explain why race is not involved in the JC hate crap. Opps, I forgot he is one of your butt slapping buddies.

by LETJASONPASS on Mar 14, 2010 3:48 AM EST up reply actions  

I have read the thread......

and I have chimed in quite successfully on this topic, on this same site, in the past. So what if he says he is a redneck? Because he describes himself as a redneck……that means he is racist? That shows your clear stupidity in interpretation. I am a redneck! Do you know where that term comes from???? DO you think it started of as a derogatory term towards blue-collar white America? Redneck is a term originally used to describe farm workers, outdoor craftsman, etc…….literally because their necks are red from working outside! Milcmann is a self-described Cherokee, redneck……..but you think that qualifies him as racist? I can’t even begin to comprehend where you are coming from…..and of all the stupidity you have spread on here…..this is possibly the worse…..bc you are trying to play the race card. Right now….you are essentially preaching hate by not understanding what someone is saying….for you to read anything milcmann, j. cash, or anyone else is saying in this thread as racist…..clearly points that finger the other way. You can go ahead and call me some more names…or a racist….but at some point….we all have to stand in front of our maker…..and I know who I am! Do you?

by shvd98z24 on Mar 14, 2010 9:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

shvd, I agree with J Cash do you? You are hillarious. Just because you are a very small percentage of something does not mean you respect or even adapt to that culture.

Because a person has a very small percentage of Cherokee in their blood, that does not make them not racist ? By the way I know were the term “Redneck” originated from. Now it is more closely associated with racist. If you say other then you are fooling only yourself. Lets take a poll on what type of person a redneck. is. Most would include racist in the discription even the ones that call themselves redneck.LOL

So if i am so stupid. What are you? Why would you call yourself a redneck? When according to what you posted, you know that it is now used for something other then as a description of a persons neck color from being in the sun. LOL

by LETJASONPASS on Mar 14, 2010 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

Because I am a redneck......

come from a long line of proud rednecks. Your view of the term redneck is from a view of somebody whom is prejudiced. One half of my family is redneck…..and fought for the North. The other half is predominately Cherokee. I go to work and bust my ass every day as a redneck while little pricks like you sit on their high horse oblivious to the real world around them. I am proud to be a redneck…..just as I am proud to be Cherokee…….just as I am proud to be white…..just as I am proud to be American. Pride has nothing to do with race. I am with milcmann…..show us an example of racism towards Campbell or anyone…..on here…..with names and links. You want to make a comment like that……back it up pussy bigot!

by shvd98z24 on Mar 14, 2010 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

shvd, What does this have to do with the "price of tea in China." JC 17 is not Native American so what is your point.

Most people that are mixed Native American and White do not claim Native American unless it can be of some benefit. They normally just pass as a white person with a good tan. LOL

We have been debating what it means to be a Black/ African American Qb in the NFL. Hey maybe you have missed the point. LOL

by LETJASONPASS on Mar 14, 2010 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

Was the thread this is in above.....

not talking about Native Americans fucknut? Maybe if you spent half the time working on comprehension as opposed to ways to think you are making people look stupid…..you could actually make a point for once! Is a discussion about Native Americans not a race issue? That has no bearing on a race issue about QBs?

by shvd98z24 on Mar 14, 2010 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

hahahaha

I told him he didn’t want to go there.. I have a ffeling that he will back away from this post, tuck tail, and run.

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 12, 2010 5:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes travis, and you're proving my point.

If Race weren’t an issue, then why was he asked to comment on that???

Hmmmm….

by J.Cash on Mar 12, 2010 7:47 PM EST up reply actions  

because that was the media

The media drives race, and slowly the media is losing it’s grip because of the dishonesty it has presented as fact for so many years. Damn wish I could by a paper,oh right I still can but have no desire to read the crap let’s hope the right things are done and papers are left to go away like the typewriter.

by dr WNC on Mar 13, 2010 6:43 AM EST up reply actions  

Exactly Dr.

And that’s a part of what I was driving at. To the TRUE FANS, it has nothing to do with anything but productivity and end results.

To the rest of the so-called fans who don’t understand football, they fall under the propoganda and “messages” of the media. I’d rather people have undoubted arguments about people like McNabb, Campbell, McNair (R.I.P), and Vick. But a lot of them wouldn’t give them a chance and were ready to get them out of town after their first bad game.

by J.Cash on Mar 13, 2010 2:10 PM EST up reply actions  

You were saying that since Bradford isn’t black, people would think he is a better option at quarterback. You were inferring him to be white.

I was just saying…

by travisjh86 on Mar 15, 2010 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hypothetically, maybe.

But it still proves my point. You know he’s part Native American because he was asked about it regarding THIS team. You just proved my point in mentioning Bradford’s ethnicity. To some, he’s a QB. Nothing more. To the media and people who breed these type “storylines”, it’s about the race of a man.

Thanks for bringing that up though.

by J.Cash on Mar 16, 2010 7:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly... The media will keep race in question to keep the contraversy a story...

Just as it happened here on this post… Civilized adults can have the discussion and then one ignorant a$$ child can come into the conversation and pour some gas on the fire…

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 17, 2010 9:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

I have to say in general folks

this has been one of the best articulated discussions we’ve had on this board. It is a very complex and emotional subject. I’m proud to be part of this discussion as it could easily have degenerated into spiteful name calling or worse. Keep up the good work!! HTTR!!

Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.

by Scott E on Mar 12, 2010 11:03 AM EST reply actions  

Its a calm post because of the nature of the subject

Everyone is trying to be polically correct. To me, the original post is groundless. I hate it when the color of one’s skin,sexuality,or gender are thrown into a debate to win a point… In many cases yes race plays an issue. In campbell’s case its not even in the ballpark. The examples used have no merrit and the post does nothing for the argument in the defense of JC17’s playing ability.. If Eli Manning were here last year and threw the numbers he had in NY I would be asking for his head on a platter as well… I good player plays well reguardless of who his coaches are or have been. I good player plays well when opportunity presents itself..

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 12, 2010 11:19 AM EST reply actions  

YOur just trying to ruffle feather here

Tell me where you see Campbell being racially profiled… Just give me and example.. thats all I am saying… Nothing I have seens shows this…

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 12, 2010 11:45 AM EST up reply actions  

again this is another example of YOU saying starting junk on this site and YOU do nothing to answer simple questions to disprove your claims. If it is trouble you want to start here this is not a smart post to do it.

So keep pushing buttons if you want to but you might want to think about the outcome. This is a serious debate. I know you are trying to bait people into a fight and that is just stupid… You still have not given anyone here an example of a racist statement here on HH.

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 12, 2010 11:50 AM EST up reply actions  

Milcmann

Totally agree – well said.

by Donnio1234 on Mar 12, 2010 12:59 PM EST reply actions  

Well.... It would seem that LJP has lost the use of his fingers.

One small step for HH, One GIANT leap for man kind.

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 12, 2010 3:43 PM EST reply actions  

This is garbage

You’re completely ignoring the fact that he’s been mediocre for 5 years. With a good o-line, mediocre. A bad o-line, mediocre. At Auburn, with two beast RB’s, his performance was mediocre. The city is tired of mediocrity. I defend Campbell quite a bit, but it’s becoming obvious that he needs a very strong supporting cast to get the job done. When Brunell sucked a mean pole for us, we were clamoring for JC to get his shot. He has gotten it, and to this point he’s merely treading water. He’s still an “incomplete” in my book, but many others wish to wash their hands of him, which I understand because they haven’t seen the progression they expected from a former 1st round pick.

It is common knowledge that the QB is always the hero when he wins, and always the scapegoat when he loses. It’s not fair, it’s not right, it’s not fully deserved. But it’s the way it is. To me, this whole point is just as stupid as when Rush Limbaugh said the system is designed to applaud black QB’s regardless of talent level. The average level headed guy sits back and says, “what the f@ck is that guy talking about?”

And if you’ve stooped to Rush’s level to try to prove a point, your credibility just when down the crapper.

by KellRawLive on Mar 12, 2010 5:00 PM EST reply actions  

man oh man do I love this message board

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 12, 2010 5:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Rush Limbaugh?

First of all, I really don’t think you know what you’re talking about when you say “stoop to Rush’s level”. Second, if I were screaming “RACIST”, then fine, call me what you want. Third, stop acting like it’s a “coincidence” that EVERY black QB is asked about his race at some point. Stop acting like you didn’t hear Warren Moon speak at his Hall of Fame induction about the trials of being a black QB. NEWSFLASH That speech was done just three and a half years ago. Not 30 or 40 like you’d want to believe to fuel your thoughts about this topic being “non-existent”.

by J.Cash on Mar 12, 2010 8:06 PM EST up reply actions  

NEWSFLASH

Warren Moon started his pro career in the ’70’s. So yeah he was referring to shit that happened 30 years ago. Now it did carry over into the 80’s? Absolutely. But a lot of the issues he dealt with started going away with the success of himself, Doug Williams, and Randall Cunningham. They were definitely pioneers, and as pioneers, they experienced a lot of racism, stonewalling, and the like.

Just because he made a recent speech, that doesn’t mean he’s referring to recent times.

by KellRawLive on Mar 12, 2010 8:27 PM EST reply actions  

Uhhh, I don't mean to be a smartass, but

who does YOUR math??? We’re not speaking on our granchildren’s children. And since Moon, tell me one black QB that hasn’t at one point in his career had to answer the black QB race issue?

Please, stop acting like it’s not an issue. May not be the sole issue, but it’s an issue.

“The greatest lie the devil ever told was convincing the world that he doesn’t exist…”

by J.Cash on Mar 12, 2010 8:31 PM EST reply actions  

My math?

It’s common knowledge that Moon wasn’t drafted as a QB because he was black. This was the late 70’s. He played professionally in Canada for years before he was given a chance in the NFL. What is there to dispute? Once he came in, he dominated, made the non-believers look stupid, and that paved the way for the guys of today. Hell yeah Moon got disrespected, but do you think he was experiencing the same stuff in 1998 that he was in 1978? No way. The barrier had already been broken. He brought this up during his speech so we wouldn’t forget how he was wronged early in his career, and rightly so. But to compare his situation to Campbell? You’re making something out of nothing.

One QB? Jason Campbell. This is all in your head. Campbell might have gotten some of that noise at Auburn, but in DC? The most politically correct city in the world? C’mon. So you think that when a bunch of white people are at a bar watching the games, they’re thinking racial epithets as they watch? ABSURD!

by KellRawLive on Mar 12, 2010 8:49 PM EST up reply actions  

No, I don't think that.

Don’t assume, dude. Just ask me. And again, you’re getting this whole thing wrong by making it all about Campbell. Go back up and read the second stanza again.

This is about the difference between what is percieved of the black QB. This is about the struggles that they all face and the things that they ALL answer for playing that position. It’s about the same things “assumed” of them before they get on the field. And it’s about the short leash that they have on them and the media propoganda that’s spread to “convince” you that he’s this or that.

Someone mentioned how Sam Bradford is Native American. To which I replied, "yes, and that makes my point more than disputes it. If race weren’t an issue TODAY, then why was Bradford asked to comment on his ethnicity and the possiblity of playing for the “Redskins”?
Think about it. I’m not just speaking out of the side of my neck here. I’m not some looney at the corner store with a bullhorn yelling “racist”. Everything that I have said has weight, whether you disagree with it or not. I respect your opinion though.
Thanks for commenting.

by J.Cash on Mar 12, 2010 9:02 PM EST reply actions  

This is about media
Let me first start by saying that I work in media. I’m fully aware of the pyschological dialog that’s spread on a daily basis.

And doing it op purpose or it’s what “media” does without even realize. It is the media who ask about Race? Because they need to or because it still “sells”.
 
Deep in the hearts of men, Players like Eli Manning? Eli is no better than Campbell, Eli was one Washington game from being rode out of town, He led his team to a comeback win and then caught a genie in the bottle and won a super bowl. Campbell is considered average because he’s been average, Fans are calling for Campbell to be traded or released because he has not won. Good Stats are one thing but it all comes down to the win and loss column.
If the Giants don’t win this year both Eli and his coach will be the firing line, both are white so please provide the difference as you see it.

Media driven hogwash, because it is sensationalism just like the sex, Hollywood stars and other non-news worthy information…but it’s what sells. Racism still sells, Duke lacross players can be accused and found guilty because that what the media wants to be true and it sells. Problem is most people are starting to figure this out and media is not selling…

by dr WNC on Mar 13, 2010 7:02 AM EST up reply actions  

You bring up an interesting point...

I wonder if the Ginats stink this year, will Tom Coughlin be the first to go, or Eli Manning.

My call, it won’t be Eli. He’s a Manning. He forced his way around the league since day one.

Is he that priviledged?

by J.Cash on Mar 13, 2010 2:15 PM EST up reply actions  

I think it depends

If the defense returns to a solid force, but the offense doesn’t score points then in my thoughts fans will start to call for Eli’s head, although I don’t think a change will occur it will be either OC or head coach

by dr WNC on Mar 13, 2010 3:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Coughlin definately.

Eli is still widely loved and adored up here. Not so much because he’s a Manning, but because of that magical run. He has a lifetime pass as a Giant Great. He does a ton of commercials, comes off as folksy and a regular guy and the Manning thing helps.
Even if he never becomes elite, he will always be legendary here. That was one heck of a ride that year, and Eli was a big part of that. People won’t forget.

by johnnydee83 on Mar 13, 2010 3:34 PM EST up reply actions  

J.Cash - Asked about race?

Why is it so important or surprising or bad that many black QBs were asked to comment about race? The question could bring things into the open, and pretty much kill any issue right there. The point of the “elephant in the room” is (I think) that this huge thing is there, but nobody says anything. Once it’s noticed and discussed, it probably won’t be there. Incidentally, your post might be helpful because it brings the issue into the open. I earlier suggested that it was not good to discuss it, but I may have been wrong on that. Not sure.

by Donnio1234 on Mar 13, 2010 12:27 AM EST reply actions  

Two things sell: Sex and Controversy

And it’s especially good when you can involve both of them at the same time, lol.

Outside of the game, is the story line. You think the media hated when T.O. was a locker room cancer? They could have just ignored it. But, it sells papers and boost the ratings. The Black QB questions are another thing that sells because we’re not so far from the Warren Moon/Doug Williams era. It’s not like there are THAT many black QB’s. So whenever one is present, they do what they’ve always done.

Hail them, then nail them.

by J.Cash on Mar 13, 2010 2:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Exactly

So the racism and extra criticism which is placed on the black QB is media driven and not a result of any additional or more racism in actuality.

by dr WNC on Mar 13, 2010 3:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed.

It’s the people behind the mics and the papers that have a preset agenda. No one will come right out and say that that’s the reason, but if you listen to the slanted nature of it, it’s rather easy to see.

A lot of fans play a role in it subconsciously because it’s not easily identified. The NFL is definately Political.

Here’s another example. When New England used to kick the sh*t out of Peyton Manningin the playoffs, he complained to the press that his WR’s were getting roughed up and couldn’t get down the field. That next year, the 5 yard rule was born…

Tom Brady was injured in the first game of the season two years ago. That next year, the QB contact rule was born…

You can’t tell me the league isn’t slanted.

by J.Cash on Mar 13, 2010 7:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Wow this has certainly been a nice discussion

I came all late. J.Cash does have a point though. Black players in general have more on their plate when they enter the league but definitely QB’s since they are the most important position.

by BrandonO on Mar 13, 2010 2:04 PM EST reply actions  

I think Cash has some valid points...

But this is a real stretch. I’ve met a bunch of Philly fan. I don’t think the issue they have with McNabb is a race issue, just an issue of being horrible fans in terms of demand (note to Philly fans, I’m not talking purely about this year, I’m talking about over all).

With JC the issue isn’t that he’s black, absolutely not. It’s more of an issue that we have been a team that has been at the average to below average bar this entire decade. I’m pretty sure fans are sick of it, I know I am. We have a chance to get an elite QB and a lot of people are sick with JCs average play. So what we have is a split between fans and nothing else.

However, there is still a strong racist community in the country and it is a problem. It’s subtle in the media but it is strong on the internet. You can just look at a yahoo article and see the comments made by some of the more ignorant people in the world and tell that it is still alive in this country. It is a problem, but it is not THIS problem.

by Nobetterthenbob on Mar 14, 2010 3:53 PM EDT reply actions  

IF you honestly think...

that vinny drafted teh way he did and snyder picked up the free agents he did because they were racist you are out of your mind. Fans are one thing, but the FO of any football team is going to look at who is going to win them games before the color of their skin. If you think the titans started Collins over Young you are dumb. If you think that Atlanta had a fall out with Vick because of his race you are dumb. The issue of race at QB is purely a fan based issue, not a professional one.

The Issues we have with race today are influenced by poverty and political media. Living close to Baltimore, being robbed in towson right outside of baltimore by 4 black males at fucking gun point, I can tell you it is definitely not because the NFL did not give a black QB a chance, but because of poverty stricken areas influenced by drugs, crime, lack of community father figures, lack of education, the list goes on. These comments are “race card-esque” and NOT the issue that these QBs are facing at this point in their career.

by Nobetterthenbob on Mar 14, 2010 5:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

First, I'm sorry to hear about your misfortune.

Second, the FO cares nothing about anything except selling tickets and keeping their names in the paper. They fall in line with what’s media generated. It’s the reason that people like Pacman Jones was even drafted. Nevermind all the red flags that he had prior to draft day, he could still run a good 40. Collins was way passed his prime and on a losing team for weeks, but he started. Vick was a dumbass for what he did, but they said he’d "never “start” in the league again", as if that’s supposed to show some sincerity for the people that he offended. No, if they really were trying to do that, he’d be banned. But as long as he’s not a starting QB…

Things are just reconsealed. And I’m not saying that all “the fans” are this way, but some of them still think that way whether they’ll say that they do or not.

by J.Cash on Mar 15, 2010 12:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

Sorry man

None of what you are suggesting is actually racism. I’m sure Pacman Jones was drafted because he had talent, not because the media said too. Of course he had problems but what does that have to do with racism? Absolutely nothing. Collins lead the Titans close to an undefeated season the year before, of course they are going to start him. Young had problems with depression and wanted to retire only a little while ago. Edge? Collins. I don’t want a QB that can’t motivate himself, depression or not. How can you say a team that started Steve McNair and almost won the super bowl has race problems? You can’t. Vick still might never start in the league again. He’s currently the 3rd string QB on the eagles, looks like they aren’t trading him and unless he somehow solves his accuracy issues he will not start for another team. Has nothing to do with his skin color and they weren’t saying this out of sincerity for the people. It is just an opinion based on Vick’s QB skills and the events of his past and present.

by Nobetterthenbob on Mar 15, 2010 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

Jackie Robinson....Muhammed Ali......etc.....

Obviously race is an issue at times….in McNabb’s case…..a little more so with the Limbaugh BS. I have never heard anything about JC and racism until this post! Racism is alive today because nobody…..even the people trying to get rid of it….will let it go. I am not saying to ignore it necessarily…..but it will never go away until everyone stops reacting to stupid shit like this!

by shvd98z24 on Mar 16, 2010 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Again, you've misunderstood...

Nothing about this is “stupid” and if you read the comments thoroughly, it’s more about racial profiling of the black QB whether you like it or not. Saying “racism exist because people keep bringing it up” is a naive statement. The same “theories and assumptions” are made about black QB’s regardless. When those die, then we can talk.

by J.Cash on Mar 16, 2010 7:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

So what presumptions have been made about Campbell?

My point is……I haven’t heard this as an issue pertaining to Campbell….until you brought it up! Making this a topic when there is no reason other than to bring race on the site is a naive statement! If something had just happened and this was pertinent….yeah…..but nothing has….so the point of this is to bring race up…..with no reason….other than to keep it relevant?

by shvd98z24 on Mar 17, 2010 5:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

See, again, you're not making sense.

I call it what it is, they call it something else, and the SECOND the word “race” is said, people want to say “you’re keeping it relevant”. That’s bullsh*t. We live in a world that tries to be “politically correct”, so all they do is change the wording and the jargon (see second stanza about “propoganda”) as a way of throwing bricks and hiding their hands.

Antagonist. Then call foul when someone calls a spade a spade. So what? The only people with race agenda wear hoods and swatzka’s and burn crosses???

You can’t be serious.

by J.Cash on Mar 18, 2010 8:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just answer the question!!!!!!!

I am not here to be preached to…..tell me where YOU aren’t making this relevant? I am a fan of all your posts and comments…..until this one. Couldn’t disagree more……..I just don’t see it. This whole post seems pretty baseless to me. I will re-iterate……I haven’t felt, seen, or heard any racism or race based criticisms cast upon Campbell…..by anyone/////on here…..or in the media…..until this post. I just want you to show me something tangible to make me see this as relevant…..otherwise….this whole post is a complete reach on your part!

by shvd98z24 on Mar 19, 2010 8:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

First off, please, no exclaimation marks. Lol...

Listen, no one is screaming “racist”. As soon as I mention the word, someone wants to reference a “group” or “person”. If you haven’t seen, read, or heard it, then that’s cool. Just state that and leave it alone. I never wrote this to persuade anyone, and you could just as well say you don’t agree and move on. No harm, no foul.

As far as a reach, that’s a matter of your opinion as well. One thing I can see, is that you won’t understand what I’m saying. Probably don’t care, because, as you’ve said, you don’t see it. And that’s cool too. I’ll just stand by what I feel, and we can leave it at that.

by J.Cash on Mar 23, 2010 7:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's fine....

and I do understand. Like I said….I just don’t see it…..and in my opinion….if you are going to make a generalized post like this about race…….give me some examples or just clearly state it’s your opinion. You wrote this as if there is a factual basis to it…..but provided nothing other than opinion. Then reply as if it is based on something tangible….but yet give nothing tangible. My opinions can be changed…….but this post was opinion w/out proof! If you can get someone to change their mind based on an opinion…..with no backing……prolly don’t want them on your side! Like I said…..I like reading everything you do…..but this one seemed way out of left field for you…..and had no backing to it as your posts usually do.

by shvd98z24 on Mar 24, 2010 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

What is funny is that.

You posing the question about him being targeted because of race only targets him because of his race… In the NFL today race is a mute point. I cannot fathom how someone can be a football fan and also be a racist. Unlike any other sport, football hosts members of every ethnicity and every culture known to man… I am not saying that there is not Bias in the NFL. I am sure that there is. All I am saying is that there is virtually none when it come to Jason Campbell.

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 17, 2010 9:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

That's contradictory.

Football fans have a history of racism. Hello? Do you think ol’ George was the only one to want this team segregated?

You admitted that there is bias in the NFL. That’s good. Now you’re just one step closer to admitting the REASONS for that bias nature when it comes to the position of QB, WHICH pertains to Campbell.

by J.Cash on Mar 18, 2010 8:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Umm dude...

A couple of things have changed since ol’ George owned the team… We have made a couple of strides in history since then..

Yes, I admit that there are some bias in the game of football. Thats called reality. Bias does not equal racism though. There may be favoritism or dislike, but I do not even catch a wiff of racism. I mean if there were any the players would surly blow the whistle. Limbaugh made racists remarks through his history of being a blowharded assclown big mouth and the players stood up and stopped him from buying a team…

UNless you are speaking of the bias from fans then I would have to with out a doubt agree that there is some racism there… That is unavoidable… The world is full of ignorant people. The sad thing is that we keep letting these ignorant people have kids and raise them to be just as ignorant..

" IF YoU Are aRgUinG WiTh ME, YOU ArE WRonG!!!! "

by milcmann on Mar 19, 2010 8:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly......

This post is here just to make us talk about race just to talk about race. It would be more persuasive and relevant….if it was based on something real. Maybe another player where the issue has been relevant….like McNabb or something. That’s really about the only example I can come up with because I just don’t see race as an issue in sports anymore. Does it exist….yes…..but using JC as the shining example……I don’t know man. That’s the part I can’t get past!

by shvd98z24 on Mar 19, 2010 8:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Shvd, is Jason Campbell not black?

See, you want to speak on it because you don’t feel that it’s done to him. But the point is, the same things that they say about him, they’ve said about Warren Moon, Doug Williams, Randell Cunningham, etc..

Athletic profiling??? Maybe so. But it’s propoganda none the less whether you want to admit it or not.

Now, I see you like to side with Milcmann. He just admitted that it’s a “reality”. So stop acting as if it’s not a propability.

by J.Cash on Mar 23, 2010 7:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

I get what you are saying....

but with the way I was raised….and the people I hang with…..I see the criticism as simply because he is the Redskins QB. The same way Romo gets pissed on for being the Boys QB. I don’t see it as “athletic profiling”. He is simply the Washington Redskins starting QB……that’s it…..to me. What QB have we had in the last 20 years…..white or black….that wasn’t ridiculed with reckless abandon…..by the media and the fans?

by shvd98z24 on Mar 24, 2010 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks Milc.

I’m speaking on the reality of what you mentioned in your response. That’s all. As well as the favortism played out by “some” that don’t think that a black QB is qualified to play the position.

All I’m saying is, that a lot of the critisim against Jason Campbell is unfair with “all things considered”. I’ve watched for many years the “promising” QB’s get the benefit of the doubt without any talk of replacing or getting rid of them. And I’ve also watched SINCE Warren Moon, the heavy scrutiny of the black QB. Just because no one comes out and talks about it blatantly, doesn’t mean that we’re far removed. You can disagree. That’s cool. But just the fact that you admit that it’s a “reality”, means I have a point.

by J.Cash on Mar 23, 2010 7:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email hogshaven[at]gmail.com
Start posting about the Redskins »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Niners Nation
Golden Nuggets: New Stadium Stuff
Acme Packing Company
Maybe The Packers Will Sign Bryan Bulaga
Big Cat Country
Training Camp Battles: Offensive Preview

SPONSORS

SBNation.com Recent Stories

San Diego Chargers' Antonio Gates (85) is stopped during the third quarter of an NFL football game against the Denver Broncos, Sunday, Nov. 22, 2009, in Denver. (AP Photo/David Zalubowski)

Antonio Gates Signs Five-Year Extension With Chargers

Photo

2010 NFL Preview, St. Louis Rams: The Sam Bradford Era Begins

Photo +8 updates

No Suspension For Vince Young After Strip Club Fight

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Superbowl_small Kevin Ewoldt

Riggins_small Ken Meringolo

H2_logo_b_small Sugar

Authors

Hogshaven_small Skin Patrol

Small mmford10

Lavarr_small Tiller56

Small Robert Henson