Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Amateur Mathematics Of Linsanity

How Bout some O.J. (Atogwe)

We all know that the Redskins have a need at free safety. O.J. Atogwe could be a way to address that need.

1) He's extremely physical and is an excellent playmaker.

2) He plays both the run and the pass well.

3) Jim Haslett already knows what he can do, having coached him before.

4) He could allow for Laron to move back to his natural position.

Atogwe has been a pro bowl safety who just hasn't gotten the hype or recognition he deserves. With that being said he probably won't come cheap. He is going to make over six million this year if he signs his offer sheet. He is a restricted free agent but Saint Louis offered him the right of first refusal tender. This means there isn't a draft pick associated with his tender.  It couldn't hurt to at least explore this option. I'm wondering how does everyone at Hogs Haven feel about O.J.

Rams_redskins__t607_medium

Poll
Should the Redskins attempt to sign O.J. Atogwe
Yes, lets get some turnovers
522 votes
No, I like what we have now
37 votes
Unsure (explain)
57 votes

616 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 138 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

not bad

it sounds too much like right…in the viinerato years, we would never see such a great football move. now, with allahan in town, this sounds like the best option. more so then rolle ( eventhough he got signed).

by back_to_the_future on Mar 10, 2010 8:52 AM EST reply actions  

Depends on what we might do in the draft

although I could see getting OJ and a low FS draft pick for backup and development.

Funny, usually it is the overhyped players that reach the Pro Bowl. Like to see who was supporting his entry.

Hope he isn’t just talking to us just to boost his current paycheck a la Clifton.

Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.

by Scott E on Mar 10, 2010 9:22 AM EST reply actions  

I couldn't agree more

I like O.J., and am amazed that the Rams only put the right of first refusal tag on him. He would be a good compliment to Landry, who could move back to SS and be coached back on-line with his talent by Haslett. While, I wouldn’t give him Rolle money, I could see a decent contract with a poison pill that guarantees the entire deal in the event that 5 or more of his games are played in the state of Missouri getting it done. Maybe 5 years, $35M, $12M guaranteed?

by AinAkron on Mar 10, 2010 9:54 AM EST reply actions  

I would absolutely love this signing.

I’m a big Atogwe fan. Love his play, love his ethic, love his intelligence. He and Landry would make a great secondary duo.

I also have a soft spot for him as a fellow Canadian.

by SSBlitz on Mar 10, 2010 10:07 AM EST reply actions  

Yea, he definately is looking for 7M/yr for 5-6 years.

Tough call for the team as they don’t seem inclined to spend money. He is looking for a Rolle type contract. St Louis wants to keep him, but their financial status is questionable. He definately would be an upgrade, but ShanAllen appear to want to rebuild through the draft. He is in his prime, and will have multiple offers and nothing will be settled until late April. I am all for it, but if they didn’t go for Dansby or Rolle, they prob won’t go for Oshio.

by johnnydee83 on Mar 10, 2010 10:54 AM EST reply actions  

TOO MUCH MONEY

ATOGWE IS A BEAST BUT HES GONNA COMMAND MONEY THAT WE NEED TO SPEND ON LINEMAN AND LINEBACKER DEPTH. I STILL THINK A HEALTHY HORTON AT FREE AND LANDRY AT STRONG IS A VERY GOOD SAFETY COMBO…

by JONAH 31 on Mar 10, 2010 11:26 AM EST reply actions  

Horton’s not a FS. He’s a very good SS, though.

by SSBlitz on Mar 10, 2010 11:33 AM EST up reply actions  

WELL..

WITH THAT BEING SAID IM ALL FOR ATOGWE AS LONG AS WE DONT GIVE HIM ARCHULETA MONEY!!!!!………BUT SHIT….HE MIGHT BE WORTH IT….

by JONAH 31 on Mar 10, 2010 11:53 AM EST up reply actions  

lmao

thanx for stickin up for me and my Samuel L. imitation…..the caps are off now so evryone can breathe easy…

by JONAH 31 on Mar 10, 2010 3:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks

That was a little tough to swallow, there, J.

Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.

by Scott E on Mar 10, 2010 3:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Appreciated. Thanks man

“Haven’t you ever seen my movies!!!????”

"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins

by smutsboy1 on Mar 10, 2010 3:56 PM EST up reply actions  

I am all for this

The Redskins have to get to the salary cap minimum anyway and Atogwe is a young 28.

I emailed Horton about his feelings on moving to FS but didn’t hear back. I don’t think it’s something we can count on being a smooth transition.

"I am excited about starting 2009. We are looking forward to an outstanding year. We're on our way. We have a lot of healthy players this year." - Vinny Cerrato

by Kevin Ewoldt on Mar 10, 2010 11:31 AM EST reply actions  

I’d go crazy if I was a football player and there was this much speculation about my career. He should be avoiding the media and concentrating on his offseason and workouts.

by SSBlitz on Mar 10, 2010 11:34 AM EST up reply actions  

When you have this much turnover with coaching and front office

All players have speculation on their career

"I am excited about starting 2009. We are looking forward to an outstanding year. We're on our way. We have a lot of healthy players this year." - Vinny Cerrato

by Kevin Ewoldt on Mar 10, 2010 11:36 AM EST up reply actions  

That's what I mean.

Guaranteed their agents, families, coaches, friends are all telling them to ignore the media as much as possible until things are more definitive.

by SSBlitz on Mar 10, 2010 11:54 AM EST up reply actions  

ah, yea....totally agree.

"I am excited about starting 2009. We are looking forward to an outstanding year. We're on our way. We have a lot of healthy players this year." - Vinny Cerrato

by Kevin Ewoldt on Mar 10, 2010 12:29 PM EST up reply actions  

The FO has been in pick and choose mode

trying to conserve money, but this is a definite pick and choose and spend some bucks move IMO. This would really stabilize our D for quite some time and be a huge upgrade. Imagine the rest of our D-backs playing 10Xs better to their strengths and with aggressive schemes.

NFC East will rock next year.

Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.

by Scott E on Mar 10, 2010 12:37 PM EST up reply actions  

KevinE

in the uncapped year, there is no salary cap minimum either, thats why contrary to what a lot of people thought, an uncapped year is actually leading to lower payroll at a number of teams as they shed payroll

Pommylee

by Pommylee on Mar 10, 2010 10:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Also helps that half the league is RFA

You can lowball tender tons of guys that would be up for the big bucks.

by RPMontana on Mar 11, 2010 10:55 AM EST up reply actions  

This could be a good move

providing he pans out and that seems probable. Anyone who looks good on the Rams defense must be pretty good. It would free us up from using a draft pick on a FS which would be great.

by aFan4Life on Mar 10, 2010 11:54 AM EST reply actions  

While I like the idea of going after him, the only way this works is if the Skins over pay… otherwise the Rams just match the offer.

And as we’ve seen so far, they don’t seem willing to do that.

by superjuan on Mar 10, 2010 12:02 PM EST reply actions  

I don't think you can make assumptions based on this past week.

They could be willing to pay for players who fit their scheme and philosophies. Peppers/Rolle/Dansby (who all got top position money) aren’t necessarily what we’re looking for. We actually have a plan now…

by SSBlitz on Mar 10, 2010 12:05 PM EST up reply actions  

not neccesarily
the only way this works is if the Skins over pay

The Rams have a weird Ownership situation at the moment, and in an uncapped year, with no Minimum Salary, they could look to shed Payroll to make the books look better for potential buyers.

Pommylee

by Pommylee on Mar 10, 2010 10:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Madden

Atogwe had a 90 overall in Madden 09 and 10. So…. yeah, he’s kind of a big deal.

by SSBlitz on Mar 10, 2010 12:03 PM EST reply actions  

Its good to see Madden scouting back on HogsHaven

there has been very little in the past month or so. While certainly not the driving force of our discussion, it always helps to know what Madden thinks of the players we’re considering.

by CarverM on Mar 10, 2010 12:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Yea, and Laron Landry had a 86 rating.

"I am excited about starting 2009. We are looking forward to an outstanding year. We're on our way. We have a lot of healthy players this year." - Vinny Cerrato

by Kevin Ewoldt on Mar 10, 2010 12:32 PM EST up reply actions  

It's true.

They spread out the ratings. 90 was harder than ever to come by.

by SSBlitz on Mar 10, 2010 1:02 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm all for this.

He’s better than Rolle and would fill a need without using a draft pick.

by BayAreaBullet on Mar 10, 2010 12:35 PM EST reply actions  

Woohooo to that.

Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.

by Scott E on Mar 10, 2010 12:39 PM EST up reply actions  

like the signing but

I dont like moving Laron to SS and sitting Horton. Thats bull****, Horton has proved he should be starting and is clearly our best SS. He’s earned his spot and you want him to give up his position to make feasible for a guy that has been unproductive. Thats non-sense!! If anything…bring in Otogwe and let him and Landry battle it out in camp

by mr.snyderhireme on Mar 10, 2010 12:39 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Horton wasn't exactly setting the world on fire before he got hurt last year

I’d favor bringing in Otogwe and letting an open competition determine the two starters.

by CarverM on Mar 10, 2010 12:46 PM EST up reply actions  

horton won a game for us last year

how many did laron?

SpottieOttieDopaliscious

by Rekka on Mar 10, 2010 12:53 PM EST up reply actions  

-3

Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.

by Scott E on Mar 10, 2010 12:58 PM EST up reply actions  

So he should be guaranteed a starting spot then?

Thought we were past this. Did I even say anything about Landry? Remove your grip from Horton’s sack and try to look at this from the perspective of a brand new coaching staff.

by CarverM on Mar 10, 2010 12:59 PM EST up reply actions  

everybody on this blog

has a player that they would go ape shit over. You just happened to shit on mine.

So how about you go eat a fat baby dick, and try to remember that was has been spouted all over this site lately is that those that work hard should be rewarded.

Does that mean he gets an automatic spot? No. But it’s downright insulting that it’s such a forgone conclusion that just because Landry can’t get his shit together at FS, somebody that’s been working hard gets bumped out of the spot that LL hasn’t played in two years.

SpottieOttieDopaliscious

by Rekka on Mar 10, 2010 1:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Then Horton will beat Landry out at SS

I support putting the best player on the field. Period.

by CarverM on Mar 10, 2010 1:11 PM EST up reply actions  

I can agree on that one
I support putting the best player on the field.

SpottieOttieDopaliscious

by Rekka on Mar 10, 2010 2:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Hell

Horton hasn’t played it in the better part of a year.. He was on IR..
I like Horton and I’m not questioning his work ethic, but Landry did play the whole season..
Moral of the story OJ could be an upgrade, is that a bad thing??

by DoWork on Mar 10, 2010 1:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Horton won the game?

Was that when he barely hauled down Avery on 3rd and long at the end? It was even close to pass interference.

by SSBlitz on Mar 10, 2010 1:04 PM EST up reply actions  

was talking about the forced fumble

that he got when SJax was walking up and down the field on our sorry ass D.

SpottieOttieDopaliscious

by Rekka on Mar 10, 2010 1:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh right.

Ya, that was a beauty play. I really like Horton. But I really like Landry.

by SSBlitz on Mar 10, 2010 1:15 PM EST up reply actions  

You do?

I didn’t think there were any of us left that did.

"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins

by smutsboy1 on Mar 10, 2010 1:20 PM EST up reply actions  

I've voiced on several occasions

that Landry is a beast and will do great things

by DoWork on Mar 10, 2010 1:22 PM EST up reply actions  

when, exactly?

I used to like him too. But that was before he was asked to live up to the expectations of a #6 overall draft pick. Now that he is counted on to actually make plays, he’s awful. In fact, you can’t even count on him to at least not make bad plays.
Now, maybe all that can be corrected through coaching. But what you can’t coach is heart. And Landry has shown me that he’s severely lacking in that area. He’s like the school bully. Yeah, he’ll deliver the big hit – but usually to a guy who’s either defenseless, out of bounds, or not even looking. But when a guy knows the hit is coming, Landry ducks his head and probably winces from what’s gonna come. And the biggest indictment on him was that Atlanta game. He starts the whole melee with the dirty hit on Matt Ryan. Hall goes over to stick up for him. Then Landry melts away while D Hall is getting Raggedy-ann’d, until Big Al comes over to wreck shop. The point is, the whole thing started with, and because of, Landry. He puts out this “I’m a bad ass” attitude, but when the shit hits the fan, he’s nowhere to be found. We’ve got a name for that where I come from.

by CJHutch on Mar 10, 2010 1:32 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree

but he still struggled there when plugged in late last year. He has no tackling fundamentals, which are imperative for a SS.

by CJHutch on Mar 10, 2010 1:59 PM EST up reply actions  

This could just be a ridiculous point, and tell me why if it is

but is there any reason, if we go to the 3-4 that we cant move LaRon to a MLB spot, thus freeing Horton to play SS, the FA signing or Draft Pick to play FS and puts LaRon in a spot where he can unload with big hits, and know there is someone behind him (the Safety) to cover his occasional mistakes,

The reason I thought of this, is I have always viewed (simplistically speaking, I know there are differences) SS as an extra LB and FS as an extra Corner, so would it really be that hard to move Landry to MLB in the 3-4 especially as we are short of LB’s at the moment???

Pommylee

by Pommylee on Mar 10, 2010 10:36 PM EST up reply actions  

I would prefer we picked up Foote

Landry may be there at SS for depth until he can prove he can tackle or use him as trade bait to the Ravens or somewhere else.

Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.

by Scott E on Mar 11, 2010 8:47 AM EST up reply actions  

Landry is a bit

light in the pencil to play MLB, which typically are quite large in a 3-4 because they are asked to take on guards frequently.

by CarverM on Mar 11, 2010 10:18 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes to that

Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.

by Scott E on Mar 11, 2010 10:42 AM EST up reply actions  

do you bite on the double move as often as he does?

by snowburnt on Mar 11, 2010 4:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Twice in one game (Broncos, we still beat them), at least three other times that I can’t remember off-hand all of which resulted in touchdowns burying our chances.

When you’re the last line of defense you gotta keep it in front of you. When you’re the last line of defense you gotta bring the guy down instead of trying to make a big hit.

by snowburnt on Mar 12, 2010 12:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Thank you

I can’t wait to see Landry’s ass riding the bench – his natural position.

by Skinsmaniac on Mar 11, 2010 7:12 AM EST up reply actions  

If we had the

salary cap to think about, I’d say hell no. We already have a logjam at safety, even if we’re stocked with an underachieving prima dona and to overachievers who have probably hit their ceiling. But, since we don’t have to think about the cap, I say sign him to a front loaded deal, then see if you can trade Horton or Doughty for a draft pick

by CJHutch on Mar 10, 2010 1:22 PM EST reply actions  

We are really deep at SS

so we should see if someone will take one in a trade or for a pick as you said. I think a deal could be made with the Ravens for Gaither. They need secondary help and obviously know how to get the most out of what they have.

Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.

by Scott E on Mar 10, 2010 2:02 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm all for that

maybe Dawan can convince Ozzie to bring lil brother up 95. What a heartwarming story that would be. It would bring tear of joy to my eyes. You probably think I’m talking about having the brothers play together. Nope, I’m envisioning the headline “Ravens replace Ed Reed with Laron Landry” – like I said – BEAUTIFUL!!

by CJHutch on Mar 11, 2010 3:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Addicted to FA

This is a repost of something I wrote over at the Antrel Rolle thread:

Trying to cop the best free agents on the market every year shows a striking lack of awareness about what it takes to build a team that has a chance to succeed over time.
http://www.hogshaven.com/2009/2/26/772915/ted-leonsis-shares-his-ten

I like Rolle, I like Dansby (I even like Atogwe). They are great players. But the Redskins need to rebuild the culture of the organization as much as they need to rebuild personnel. Draft young guys. Give them a shot to succeed. If they perform, reward them with big deals to demonstrate your loyalty to Redskins football. Add core veterans when you have a competitive young core that who have played for the Redskins and have true loyalty to the Redskins brand.

Stop writing checks to the hottest new guy on the market, stop coveting the stars of other teams, and only then will people stop treating the Redskins like a team to go to when you want a payday.

by KiranBhat on Mar 10, 2010 3:31 PM EST reply actions  

Here Here

We ate shit in the Archuleta fiasco. We let Ryan Clark walk when all he did was anything you asked of him. Let’s not make the same mistake and alienate the last of the character Redskins worth keeping, a la Horton.
Be wary of why a “great team” like the Rams would put such a low tender on a pretty good player. I know they have an excess of skilled players but….

by RPMontana on Mar 10, 2010 3:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Don’t bring in players that have done well on other teams with high contracts when they’ve done nothing for us, while letting the people that have been here since the beginning that have worked hard and have had success fall by the wayside.

He just used Horton as an example.

SpottieOttieDopaliscious

by Rekka on Mar 10, 2010 4:02 PM EST up reply actions  

RP

I must be looking at this incorrectly, I thought you were speaking in general terms but I must be mistaken.

SpottieOttieDopaliscious

by Rekka on Mar 10, 2010 4:17 PM EST up reply actions  

yea

that doesn’t make much sense

SpottieOttieDopaliscious

by Rekka on Mar 10, 2010 4:29 PM EST up reply actions  

It could

that would give us 6 safeties on the roster. One of them could be released or traded.

by JeanBaptiste on Mar 10, 2010 8:50 PM EST up reply actions  

It might if the coaches

were determined to move Landry to SS.

by Skinsmaniac on Mar 11, 2010 7:13 AM EST up reply actions  

He's the odd man out

He gets no playing time with the OJ signing. He has the most trade value. He has the most value period. His chances of being traded or just waiting out his contract to get the F out of dogde increase a million fold. I think the consensus on this post is that most people want to see Horton on the field healthy. He doesn’t get that with this signing.

by RPMontana on Mar 11, 2010 11:00 AM EST up reply actions  

Yep, yep, yep, yep, yep, yep, and yep.

Spot on.

Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.

by Scott E on Mar 11, 2010 11:02 AM EST up reply actions  

If he is the odd man out then it is because he is the worst safety on the roster

So your saying don’t upgrade a position of need because it might make the worst player at another position cut? That doesn’t make any sense. I want the best players on the field. If Horton can’t beat out Doughty and Landry well then thats on him. If trotting Landry out at FS is your answer to keep Horton on the field that is pretty ridiculous.

by BayAreaBullet on Mar 11, 2010 12:14 PM EST up reply actions  

To clarify

OJ didn’t cause there to be 3 SS’s on the roster. That is a problem irregardless of him. By your logic Horton is our worst safety. So signing OJ wouldn’t cause there to be 3 SS’s on the roster and Horton to be the worst(not sure if I believe that but it’s what you said) that has already occured.

by BayAreaBullet on Mar 11, 2010 12:35 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm not saying that he's the worst

I’m saying that we can get the most for him. With Landry and OJ starting having Horton and Reed and Moore as bench fodder is a waste. We can’t get a 7th for Reed or Moore but I think we could get a 5th for Horton.

by RPMontana on Mar 11, 2010 4:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Again Just because you don't like seeing Horton on the bench doesn't mean the whole defense should suffer

Landry is not a FS. Period. We can force him to play FS again at the whole teams detriment or we could put the best players on the field.

by BayAreaBullet on Mar 11, 2010 4:29 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm not advocating a Horton trade

I think Horton is class. Him and Reed have passed the starting job back and forth and just vowed to earn it back while congratulating the other. Awesome.
Picking up OJ adds an unknown and disrupts a good chemistry. Something is fishy with a right of first refusal tag on a good player on a bad team.

by RPMontana on Mar 11, 2010 4:28 PM EST up reply actions  

not really.... He is worth a fairly large contract, they have ownership issues, and they keep on shelling out mega contracts to top 5 picks every year

How does OJ disrupt Chemisty? I’m not saying we have to sign him but to refuse to sign a FS becuase it might make some guy move to the bench is really silly. If Horton is a starter he would beat out Landry. Your also assuming Landry won’t be moved to ss regardless this season. I like Reed and Horton very much but want to put a good team on the field.

by BayAreaBullet on Mar 11, 2010 4:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed

I think if there is a FS available that’s not questionable I would jump. Hell I’d advocate a Landry trade at that point. I just want to know what deal is with the low low offer by a team that needs every good player it has.
So I’m saying NO OJ. Not NO FS.

by RPMontana on Mar 11, 2010 4:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Ryan Clark

I’d doubt he’d come back after the way we booted him.
Darren Sharper – for a one year stop gap.
No one – Cause we’re not playing to win it all and this lets us see what our guys can do. Draft next year or FA next year will be loaded with all the RFAs from this year.

by RPMontana on Mar 11, 2010 5:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Cool. I just feel we have 3 decent SS's and need a FS.

Not saying we should sign OJ but I think you are making too much of the tender. It basically says they aren’t willing to pay his market value which is understandable because they hand out AH money for a first rounder every single year and have ownership questions. When their team sucks and they are about to give out one the largest contracts in history to the overall #1 pick they might not wanna pay 6M for a free safety even if he deserves that.

by BayAreaBullet on Mar 11, 2010 5:37 PM EST up reply actions  

You're probably right

I forgot that he wore a Franchise Tag last year and this allows the Rams to say he’s available without scaring off any suitors. Also means if we want to steal him without an actual trade we have to overpay. I don’t think it’s worth the risk he’s declined a little the last 2 years. Could be nothing could be something.

by RPMontana on Mar 11, 2010 6:11 PM EST up reply actions  

actually

it probably would. Maybe not Horton necessarily, but someone. If Landry made the move back to SS, then one of the other SS’s would probably have to go. I doubt they’d keep Horton over Speedbump. Unless they can get something useful for Speedbump. I’m all for the trade to Baltimore.

by CJHutch on Mar 11, 2010 3:12 PM EST up reply actions  

We will probably have to get rid of one of the SS's regardless

I doubt they have any real value in a trade besides a really late rounder(Kerry Rhodes went for a 4th). Trotting out Landry at FS again just to prevent one of our marginal SS’s from having to go would just make our defense crappier for no good reason. Landry should be moving to SS regardless. I just can’t see any logic in making our whole defense shittier becuase someone thinks that might send our 3rd best SS out the door. If he had said “I think OJ sucks” or “FS isn’t a position where a team should spend money” there is a a certain argument for either of those statements. But to say we shouldn’t upgrade our defense because a certain guy might then prove to be the third best and be gone is really silly. If Horton has value he will beat out one of the other 2 SS’s if not then he doesn’t deserve to make the team as he would be the thrid worst. Besides I don’t see a problem with having 5 safeties on the roster.

by BayAreaBullet on Mar 11, 2010 3:41 PM EST up reply actions  

probably should have said Pierce and smoot regarding that year they were “core redskins” and they signed elsewhere

by snowburnt on Mar 11, 2010 4:24 PM EST up reply actions  

All good what you said

but occasionally need and good character and good price = Value and trump limited draft picks.

Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.

by Scott E on Mar 10, 2010 3:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Reply to RPMontana

Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.

by Scott E on Mar 11, 2010 8:48 AM EST up reply actions  

LOOK

I am actulaly all for this new approach brought by Bruce Allen, which is paying free agents salaries they actualy deserve. thats why your seeing guys visit and not sign, they look at years past and think WSH = $$$, but now that we have a very good gm in terms of cap and spending I think we are seeing a turnaround. as far as signing Otogwe i think the guy is a beast dont get me wrong i just think that we have more urgent needs in Oline, RB, and Corner. I think going out and overpaying for Juice#2 (O.J) would defeat the whole proccess of trying to change the culture of the Washington Redskins. now let us not forget how the last Free Agent Saftey signing from the Rams worked out (Abum Mymomcouldplaybetta)

HTTR!!!! Dont get any Better.....ST21 fo life

by Gmoskowit on Mar 10, 2010 4:21 PM EST reply actions  

What is your guys' opinion of Landry?

From what I’ve seen he’s god-awful, but I didn’t catch more than 4 skins games this year. Honestly as much as we are rivals I wish Sean Taylor was still kickin it out there on the field. In my opinion he was on his way to the Hall of Fame and will always be remembered by me as one of the best players of his era.
Back to my point, am I being to hard on Landry in calling him god-awful? And if so could a change in position potentially salvage his career?

My "t" and "y" buttons are messed up so don't bitch at me about misspelling, I'm just saying.

by RadioheadbeatlesEagles on Mar 10, 2010 11:16 PM EST reply actions  

I wouldn't say you are being hard on him

He gave up some big plays last season and has been a liability in coverage. He does have a ton of ability though and if he would stop making dumb mistakes, he would probably be considered a top player in the league.

I think everyone here is a little iffy on Landry but you gotta understand that our defense altogether did not play very well in coverage. Personally I think Blatche’s scheme and play calling was a big part in this so hopefully there will be a big improvement with Haslett coming in.

If worse comes to worse, Landry will make a few big mistakes and get benched. We have capable players behind him who will step up. What we really need is someone who can play FS because we have so many decent SS and very little talent at FS.

by Nobetterthenbob on Mar 11, 2010 12:20 AM EST up reply actions  

Nicely summed

and on target (unlike some of Landry’s plays last year).

Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.

by Scott E on Mar 11, 2010 8:50 AM EST up reply actions  

he out of position dude

he is not a FS but given a license to attack the line of scrimmage, rather than planted in the Blatche zone, 25 yards from the Line of scrimmage and retreating, I think he will be OK

Pommylee

by Pommylee on Mar 11, 2010 12:26 AM EST up reply actions  

that's what I was wondering

sounds like its his coverage skills that suck, and he was asked to do it way too much.

My "t" and "y" buttons are messed up so don't bitch at me about misspelling, I'm just saying.

by RadioheadbeatlesEagles on Mar 11, 2010 4:53 PM EST up reply actions  

It's that his coverage skills are aggressive.

He needs pressure on the QB to be able to jump routes. When Blache decided to play them all far back with a 4 man rush, Landry would jump on a deep middle route when the QB has 12 seconds in the pocket.

by SSBlitz on Mar 12, 2010 12:02 AM EST up reply actions  

I think he covers fine in the sense he can run with a TE

It’s just he has no instincts as a center fielder type of player. He jumps the wrong routes or take horrible angles in pursuit. He can match up one on one fairly well for a SS.

by BayAreaBullet on Mar 12, 2010 12:17 AM EST up reply actions  

He plays a wham lurk zone very well.

And he blitzes better than any safety in the league.

by SSBlitz on Mar 12, 2010 10:03 AM EST up reply actions  

This claim can't really be made at this point.

He’s yet to show this on any kind of consistent basis.

And he blitzes better than any safety in the league.

"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins

by smutsboy1 on Mar 12, 2010 10:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Tell me someone who’s better.

by SSBlitz on Mar 12, 2010 11:05 AM EST up reply actions  

He has 3 sacks in 3 seasons.

He simply hasn’t proven that he’s the best.

You might think he has the potential or ability to do so, but he has not proven it.

Not by a long shot.

Troy Polamalu is better. Mike Brown is a better blitzer. Lots of guys are.

"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins

by smutsboy1 on Mar 12, 2010 11:50 AM EST up reply actions  

I guess Polamalu's 0 sacks over that same timeframe proves he's better?

Polamalu, without question, is the best SS in the league. Great play-reads, great hustle, great coverage, great tackling. But he doesn’t have the speed and he doesn’t explode through a quarterback like LaRon does. Same thing with Brown, he doesn’t have the speed, quickness, or power that Landry has.
One thing I love to see with a blitzing safety is a strong finish. Something that knocks the QB out of his zone for a drive. Something like 3 of the 4 highlights in this video (from LSU) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RvKaO78Ov2I
You’ll notice that those are all plays from the SS position, where he’s closer to the line of scrimmage. We haven’t seen a lot of him there since ST21’s passing, and we haven’t seen a lot of pressure defense under Greg Blache.

by SSBlitz on Mar 12, 2010 12:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Or this play from LaRon’s first game in the NFL (under Greg Williams’ pressure defense – where LaRon is much more suited). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pEHtHy2rIYE&feature=related

by SSBlitz on Mar 12, 2010 12:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Also, Mike Brown has the same number of sacks over the same timeframe. So statistically (if that’s how you want to gauge it), he’s not better either.

by SSBlitz on Mar 12, 2010 12:25 PM EST up reply actions  

In 1/3rd less games

"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins

by smutsboy1 on Mar 12, 2010 1:00 PM EST up reply actions  

How many times has Laron hit the QB in his career? 5? 10?

Laron simply doesn’t blitz that much, which precludes him from being the best in the NFL. He hasn’t been given the opportunity to show it one way or the other.

“exploding through the QB” is an odd metric.

I care how well a guy pursues, sheds blocks, and makes tackles. Laron has not proven that he’s the best at this.

I watch every Skins game and a handful of Steelers games and it’s quite obvious to me that Polamalu is more of a force in the backfield.

"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins

by smutsboy1 on Mar 12, 2010 1:02 PM EST up reply actions  

I didn’t say he was the best. I said he did it better than anyone.

A sack isn’t the only gauge of a successful SSBlitz. If a QB gets up dizzy, he isn’t in the same mindset to be as decisive.

by SSBlitz on Mar 12, 2010 2:17 PM EST up reply actions  

I honestly have no idea what you're talking about.
I didn’t say he was the best. I said he did it better than anyone.

"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins

by smutsboy1 on Mar 12, 2010 2:19 PM EST up reply actions  

And he blitzes better than any safety in the league

by SSBlitz on Mar 12, 2010 2:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Is different than
He’s the best blitzing safety in the league

by SSBlitz on Mar 12, 2010 2:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Retyping the same words doesn't help clarify.

The difference in your statements is mostly semantic, not substantive.

"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins

by smutsboy1 on Mar 12, 2010 2:26 PM EST up reply actions  

And yes, I realize that a definitive statements like “the best” can obviously be argued.

by SSBlitz on Mar 12, 2010 11:07 AM EST up reply actions  

Sorting Pro Football Focus for safeties

By clicking on the header for specific categories such as quarterback (QB) sacks, quarterback hits, or quarterback pressures all of the safeties can be ranked. When sorting by QB pressures Roman Harper had 10 and also ranked highest in QB hits and QB sacks.
http://profootballfocus.com/by_position.php?tab=by_position&season=2009&pos=S&stype=r&runpass=&teamid=-1&numsnaps=25&numgames=1
He also tied for 5th in run defense and yet he is not that highly ranked for overall safety performance. PFF is a powerful tool for such analysis and can be applied to the series of post by SSBlitz, BayAreaBullet, and smutsboy1. (You can’t do any of this with Madden.)

by Jefferson1935 on Mar 12, 2010 1:17 PM EST up reply actions  

There has to be a way

we can do this with Madden. Come on now..

by DoWork on Mar 12, 2010 2:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Man, that's great

I was trying to find those stats. Guess my google skills aren’t up.

"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins

by smutsboy1 on Mar 12, 2010 2:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Man, they rated Laron 84th.

ouch

Alson, forgot to mention earlier, Adrian Wilson is a better blitzer, better everything.

"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins

by smutsboy1 on Mar 12, 2010 2:11 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree on that.

Adrian Wilson is the best blitzer in the NFL.

Give LaRon as many chances, and keep him at SS, and we’ll see how they compare.

by SSBlitz on Mar 12, 2010 2:13 PM EST up reply actions  

According to that site, Laron has hit the QB 5 times in his career

2007: 3
2008: 1
2009: 1

"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins

by smutsboy1 on Mar 12, 2010 2:15 PM EST up reply actions  

NFL career.

08 and 09 were played at FS in a passive Greg Blache defense.
You’re proving a different argument. What I’m saying is that when he gets the opportunity to blitz, he does it better. Fast and quick, big and strong, hits like a freight train.

by SSBlitz on Mar 12, 2010 2:21 PM EST up reply actions  

So, back to my original point.

It’s all potential.

He’s proven almost nothing in the NFL.

"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins

by smutsboy1 on Mar 12, 2010 2:24 PM EST up reply actions  

They rated Reed Doughty the 7th best safety in the league.

ProFootballFocus does not mean anything.

Comparatively, LaRon has one of the highest speed/pursuit/hit power ratings in Madden. Whoopdie Doo.

by SSBlitz on Mar 12, 2010 2:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Indexed formulas like that are obviously flawed.

And should only be used as a rough guide

"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins

by smutsboy1 on Mar 12, 2010 2:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email hogshaven@gmail.com

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Arnold-schwarzenegger-kindergarten-cop_small
Trading Up Is Not The Solution. Here's why.
Super_47_small
I Ran Into Jim Haslett and We Talked QB Draft, Manning, Trading Up
Images_small
SB Nation 2012 NFL Mock Draft

Recent FanPosts

Small
I'm Torn...
Small
Manning to Texans
Orange_moon_at_nationals_park_small
Solve QB; I almost don't care how!
Small
Are we Really Mortgaging the future with a trade up for RG3?
Redskins2_small
Rocky McIntosh to Rams?
Desert_small
The GM's plan to turn it around in 2012
Pcinoz_1__small
2012 Salary Cap Position
Small
Does RG3 Start from Day 1?
Redskins_logo_small
My agenda as Redskins GM
Small
More Clarity on Peyton's Injury

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Superbowl_small Kevin Ewoldt

Riggins_small Ken Meringolo

Editors

Fb_small Parks Smith

Chalkboard_football-opt403x300o00s403x300_small UkRedskin

Washington_redskins_helmet_small Redskins News

Authors

Badshirt2__2__small fatpickle

Paterno_tribute_small Tiller56

Small Steve Shoup

Defaukt_small HTTR4LIFE

Hh_small Ronnie Adkins