Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Has JC ruined his chances? Did he really have a chance to begin with?

Now I know there have been plenty of posts on this topic but hey, none of them were by me lol. We all know that QB is a big question mark this off-season. Will Shanahan decide that he likes what he sees and take JC under his wing to take him to a new level, or will he proceed to draft his own QB and start from scratch? Only Shanahan knows for sure and actually he may not know just yet. But most of us have come to the consensus that JC is the best option at QB heading into the next season. 

Now I have seen so many people (not all on here) say that JC is a bust and has had 5 years to prove that he sucks. But how accurate is that statement? Thats what we are here to discuss so lets take a small leap back in time. The year is 2005 and Jason Campbell is drafted. Nothing to really see here as he didn't play. 

New season, 2006. Mark Brunell is the starter but hey we suck, so Gibbs benches Brunell for Campbell. Not really an improvement but it isn't like Campbell did horribly. Our offense struggled and our defense sucked donkey balls. 29th ranked defense I believe. But as far as JC goes he started 7 games, threw 10 TD's and 6 ints, sacked 7 times, threw for 1,297 yards for a 6.3 average, a 53.1 completion percentage, and a QB rating of 76.5. Nothing spectacular but nothing extremely horrible from him for his first couple of starts. 

2007 is the year, And JC is the starter. Not much razzle dazzle here but they did start the season 5-3. But then the team begins to collapse, our beloved Sean Taylor (R.I.P.) passes away, so our team drops to a 5-6 record. The next game Campbell gets hurt and enter Todd Collins who takes and injury plagued and super emotional team to the playoffs but then unfortunately self destructs.  Stat wise JC started 13 games, threw 12 TD's but 11 ints, was sacked 21 times, threw for 2,700 yards for a 6.5 average, with a 60.0 completion percentage and a QB rating of 77.6. There is improvement but once again nothing spectacular except for maybe one performance where he was named the NFC offensive player of the week. But this is where the hating of JC began. When he got hurt, Collins stepped in and got us to the playoffs so many is thinking he is a bust. But Collins had played in Al Saunders (who was the offensive coordinator at the time) system for a very long time so he knew it like the back of his hand so it would have been pretty sad for him not to out perform JC who is doing what? Learning a new system!

2008 comes, Gibbs retires, enter Zorn. Dun Dun DUUUUUUUUUNNNNN!!!!! We all know how that started. First offensive coordinator then magically the HC WITHOUT ANY EXPERIENCE OTHER BEING A FORMER QB AND QB COACH. And guess what Mr. Campbell, here's a new system for you to learn. One that doesn't even accommodate your skill set. Hmmm big arm QB needing to launch the ball down field now has to throw a bunch of quick short passes.  Well let the season begin. We started out pretty hot going 6-2 in the first half of the season. Campbell looking good, has thrown no ints at all, he became the Redskins' new record holder for consecutive passes without an interception, breaking Joe Theismann's previous record of 161 and was being discussed as an early MVP candidate. Not only that but Portis was leading the league in rushing yards. Wow, amazing isn't it. But in the second half of the season everything goes wrong. Lots of injuries came up so now we are struggling and you all know the rest. 8-8 season after starting 6-2. How depressing!!!! But lets look at JC's stats for the season. He started all the games, threw 13 TD's and 6 ints (low number huh), sacked 38 times (ouch), threw for 3,245 yards with a 6.4 average, with a 62.3 completion percentage, and a QB rating of 84.3. So even after having to learn a new system from a coach that only has experience coaching QB's, and being harassed due to an injured O-line, he still manages to put up decent numbers. The amount of TD's kinda sucks but you have to be doing something right to only throw 6 ints in a season. But of course people blame JC for the second half collapse and start talking about how he plays too timid and he is scared to take chances and throw the ball down field.

2009 comes, Zorn is still here, and it is obvious that the FO doesn't believe in JC. I'm not going to go into full detail about this season because it is still so painfully fresh in our minds. But as a summary our O-line sucks, JC looks somewhat lost, people calling for Brennan and Collins, yadda yadda yadda horrible season, and Zorn gets canned at the end. But what do JC's stats look like? Started all games, threw for 20 TD's and 15 int's, sacked a whopping 43 times (its amazing he only had an ankle injury throughout the season), threw for 3,618 yards with a 7.1 average (thats a shock), with a 64.5 completion percentage, and a QB rating of 86.4. His worst season as a starter, yet his best season statistically. Now many fans are definitely begging for him to be replaced because once again the horrible outing is his fault right? Now he is being labeled as inaccurate, a turnover machine, people saying he has no pocket awareness, saying he isn't a leader. The previous season people were saying he is scared to throw the ball, now he starts slingin the pigskin taking chances and people don't like it due to the ints even though thats what they wanted. And obviously having a defender in his face on almost every play would somewhat hinder his accuracy. 

So what can we take from all of these stats? JC has improved every year despite all of the obstacles thrown at him, yet the amount of times that he has been sacked has risen each year. What could be the cause of this? Could it be the O-line? Or maybe JC just decided to hold the ball longer each year that he played. Whatever the answer may be he still improved.

Now after having a HC for 2 seasons that did not even allow him to audible a play, JC and the Redskins have a new GM and a proven HC that seems to have a knack for developing QB's. Even though plenty of people want JC gone, we know he is the best option. Lets let him have a shot with Shanahan and see how he responds. I know many of you will disagree with me, but I am positive that Shanahan can help JC tap into his inner rage and unleash his inner dragon.

Now once again I ask, has JC ruined his chances? Did he have a real chance to begin with? Based on what has happened I don't believe he had a real chance to succeed and his chance is now under Shanahan. Now before many of you crucify me with your comments, I have been stuck in the house for what seems like forever due to the snow so of course I had plenty of time to type this lol.

Comment 69 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

A good assessment.

A number of professionals in the NFL did not believe the Skins should have traded to get Jason in the first round. He does seem to have been Gibbs’ pick.

by Jefferson1935 on Feb 11, 2010 9:42 PM EST reply actions  

Thank you.

I don’t really watch much college football except from time to time when a team that one of my friends are on may be playing so I usually just hope for the best. But for the most part I have been pleased with what Jason has shown. I’m sure that if he were with Gibbs a bit longer there would possibly be a completely different JC.

by BrandonO on Feb 12, 2010 12:10 AM EST up reply actions  

We should have traded up for higher pick!!

We drafted campbell right rogers. If we had just traded for a higher pick we could have gotten rogers. Rogers was a complete steal for the packers. The 49ers were debating b/w him and smith with the first overall pick. Gawd that pisses me off so much.

by Ben N on Feb 12, 2010 10:24 PM EST up reply actions  

very wrong

Carlos Rogers was the ninth pick…then Gibbs traded with Denver to acquire the 25th pick and they took Jason

by terpsez11 on Feb 14, 2010 10:20 AM EST up reply actions  

Great post Brandon

and I would like to thank you for your time in gathering JC’s actual stats (and progress) during his first five years in the league. We’ve been throwing around opinions about him now for several months, wondering if the OL was responsible, etc etc, but I believe this is the first time anyone has bothered to actually do the numbers for his stats and post them in an informative format.

Some points I would like to make, and we shall see where this will go with all of the Jason haters/lovers out there.

Firstly, his TD/year and QB rating have consistently gone up, even as the number of times he was sacked, each year—hmmmm. . . doesn’t that speak of a progress of sorts?

Secondly, he has had to adapt to what, something like 5-7 different systems in the past nine years (including college, of course). I submit that most any QB coming into this league has a curve of progress that could be indicative of his eventual ability to be a truly solid performer for the average team. The elements that contribute/detriment this ‘progress’ are work ethic, stability of the system, hardiness, and intelligence (the ability to move more and more rapidly through his reads, understanding the DB’s positioning, etc.).

Work ethic: I would say above average, though this point can be debated.
Stability of the system: do we even need to go into this?
Hardiness: can you say, "Sacked over 40 times this year"? Ouch.
Intelligence: this is perhaps his lowest rating of the four elements that determine, statistically, ‘progress’. He has shown some difficulty in having the speed of thought to consistently read/release. However, he has shown, through the stats posted above, that he is getting better at this over the years.

Some of my, albeit subjective, thoughts about Jason. He threw for over 3600 yards this year, with less than an average of one sack per game, whilst being pummeled repeatedly. Some of his most inspiring playmaking was when he was running for his life, and depending upon his natural athletic ability to make a decision to either run or pass. He has shown a great ability (via media relations) to speak as a part of the team, not as a solo player (shades of influence from Joe Gibbs). His time with the Zorn-meister has improved his former inability to hold onto the ball in a dense pass rush.

And one more thought. Did anyone else out there notice in the game with the Saints this year, that it appeared as if the OC for the skins was expecting an enormous pass rush? Jason had one of his biggest games this year on that day. It appeared (to me) that he had been told he’d only have 3 seconds or so to get rid of the ball every time he dropped back. He consistently did this, repeatedly, and we scored 30 points. Perchance he is at his best when he knows he doesn’t have time to ‘complete reads’ through the 3rd and 4th receiver, but just drops back and fires.

This guy is developing into a complete QB. There, I said it. Give him time. . . at least another year or two to show that he can produce when the game is on the line (which has not been his forte so far). If he goes now, right at the prime of his learning curve, we have just spent another five years teaching someone basic skills who will go on to blossom with another team. Anyone want to wait another five years to be back in the hunt? We can do much under Shanny with a so-so QB, and, after all, 3600 yards a season should be enough to get us into the playoffs.

by landuin on Feb 11, 2010 9:46 PM EST reply actions  

Thanks a lot and no problem.

Since I have so much free time right now due to all of the snow around here I figured I would try to show everyone what the real deal with Jason is. I’ve seen so many different opinions being thrown around, some as if they were actual facts, and some of them have been insane. There was someone on another site that I used to go on that stated that Mark Sanchez has played better in his rookie season than Campbell has played in his entire career thus far. And they actually believed that to be true lol.

But thanks a lot, its nice to see that there are some that see my point of view. I’m sure that Shanny can bring out a part of Jason that he didn’t even know he had in him. It’s kind of eerie how Jason put up the numbers that he did with an obliterated O-line and Zorn. So under a great proven HC that we know has a system that has been successful I know Jason can be.

by BrandonO on Feb 12, 2010 12:25 AM EST up reply actions  

Landuin,

you make some very good points. The only thing I will disagree on is the 1 more year theory. There has got to be enough film and evaluation on JC by now to make a decision on whether or not he is the future of this team. I’ve said this before, but I believe its worth saying again; now is the time to shit or get off the pot. If he is the future, extend him NOW. If there are still questions, let him become a FA, and take whatever picks we can get.

I’m all for an extension. I’m just really sick of him being held in Limbo. Its not fair to JC, and its not fair to us the fans.

by Tiller56 on Feb 12, 2010 7:42 AM EST up reply actions  

how much time is needed?

The average QB career is only about 10 years give or take. What are we in now season 5. When is he supposed to develope? Throwing accuracy is not something that is learned.. Either you have IT or you dont. Pocket awarness is something that is fundamental. He doesnt have that. You are telling em that he needs to be totally rebuilt as a QB and may only have 5 years left on his clock. Putting so much time and money into someone with such a short life span is a bad investment. He will only be around long enough to sustain us for our next franchise attempt.

"When the rich wage WAR its the POOR that die!!!"

by milcmann on Feb 12, 2010 9:01 AM EST up reply actions  

Tell you what...

let him go, and watch it come back to bite you.

Being a Redskins fan, I’ve seen it happen on a number of times. Everything that happened under Zorn should be considered a wash. You can’t possibly get an assessment based off that. The BEST point that Brandon mentioned (IMO), was how he wasn’t allowed to audible. That means, whatever Zorn called, he was supposed to run, regardless. Imagine coming to the line to run a play, seeing the defense, and having to run the play anyway. What the people see is “Oh, that was a bad decision by Jason Campbell”. But what’s really going on is, “we have a dipsh*t running the show”.

You must wait to see what happens under Shanahan. If there’s no improvement by year three, fine. Get rid of him, and groom the next. But you don’t let him go now, under the “assumption” that he can’t get it done considering those circumstances.

Great Post Brandon.

by J.Cash on Feb 12, 2010 1:33 PM EST up reply actions  

im not saying that he needs to be gone now... There is noone on the market now to replace him.

IM just saying that you dont count him as your franchise QB… EVER

"When the rich wage WAR its the POOR that die!!!"

by milcmann on Feb 12, 2010 3:17 PM EST up reply actions  

JC's development has been hindered greatly

We may be in his 5th season but really how much time has he had to develop and soak in everything?Nothing but change before he even left college. If he actually had the same staff and the same system all of this time and was still just showing tiny flashes of improvement then I would probably have the same thoughts as you. He has had ZERO consistency except for 2 full seasons with Zorn without scheme change. 2 years with Zorn thats really something. Shanahan can turn him around. And milc how can you say that throwing accuracy isn’t something learned? Unless it is something inherited from genes almost everything is learned. He had to learn how to throw in the first place right? More practice will improve his accuracy. And I really think it is tough to have pocket awareness when you rarely have an actual pocket to be aware of lol.

by BrandonO on Feb 12, 2010 4:31 PM EST up reply actions  

He has been throwing that ball for how long now?

If you have to teach a QB how to throw a ball then you dont need him as a QB. If you are saying that JC17 needs to be retaught how to throw a ball then thank you for making my point for me.

"When the rich wage WAR its the POOR that die!!!"

by milcmann on Feb 17, 2010 9:10 AM EST up reply actions  

Milc, you waaaaay over analyzed my statement lol

Anyone can simply throw a football. Of course I wasn’t saying he needs to be taught how to throw. You mentioned accuracy not simply throwing. In order to get better at something you have to practice right? Everyone has flaws that they can work on.

by BrandonO on Feb 17, 2010 7:27 PM EST up reply actions  

No i didnt over analyze.

his accuracy has nothing to do with coaching changes. New plays dont equal loss in accuracy. Accuacy is something that is there the whole time. What is going to change for him from coach to coach when it comes to holding and releasing the ball.

Once he plants that foot, grips the ball, and draws back, its all on him. He has been throwing the same way his entire career. The play set changes nothing in his accuacy.

Look at Favre. I know he is an extreme but…. He has been on three different teams in thress years.. Last year he had the best season of his career. Ask yourself. How are these fresh rookies coming out and doing well… New systems! Doing well…

Anyone that thinks that he has not gotten a fair shake in the NFL is just grasping at the best excuss that they can come up with. His is not good but I think he is the best option on the table for the VERY short future so we should keep him a little longer.

"When the rich wage WAR its the POOR that die!!!"

by milcmann on Feb 18, 2010 8:54 AM EST up reply actions  

Your definitely over analyzing

I said nothing about a coaching change affecting his accuracy. I simply responded to your post about accuracy being something thats not learned by saying everything has to be learned and more practice can improve it. And Farve has basically been doing this since JC was learning what a football was lol. As far as the rookie QB’s doing well, look at the teams. Those teams began to build a foundation before they got the rookies. Decent or good O-line, good running game, and a good or great defense. Why didn’t Matthew Stafford do as good as the other’s? Because the Lions didn’t have all of those mentioned already set up for them. Imagine for the past several years you had a new boss basically every single year. You don’t think that would have some kind of affect on you?

by BrandonO on Feb 19, 2010 10:39 PM EST up reply actions  

This is my point...

How much practice is it gonna take? How many years? If all it takes is “practice” then I guess I better start throwing the ball more. Maybe I can get a 6 million dollar contract too. The lions didnt do well with Stafford because they are rebuilding at the same time as they aquired him. The other teams are doing well because they have kick ass RBS, good lines, and (with 2 of em) a good defenses carring the load.

"When the rich wage WAR its the POOR that die!!!"

by milcmann on Feb 20, 2010 2:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Well I can't really argue with you there.

But you have to admit that his accuracy seemed to take a deep dive mainly when he had lots of pressure which is what he had the entire season. The previous season before the O-line collapsed he looked pretty solid. So all of the pressure does play a part as well. I would say maybe he just doesn’t perform well under pressure but that was waaaay too much pressure he was getting to expect him to succeed too much. And if you get a contract I will definitely wish you well, especially depending on the team you get on. And as far as the rookies go, thats the point I was trying to make. Stafford didn’t have everything in place like the others did.

by BrandonO on Feb 20, 2010 5:04 PM EST up reply actions  

I will agree

the pressure deff didnt help him at all…

"When the rich wage WAR its the POOR that die!!!"

by milcmann on Feb 21, 2010 8:12 AM EST up reply actions  

Brandon, nice post.

I’ll give my opinion on the situation.

Many on HH(I’ll mention no names…LJP) have accused be of being a JC hater. That isn’t true. My problem is two fold.
1) I know JC has some problem with certain areas of his game, but what QB doesn’t . I can live with that. I know he has been under a carousel of coaching changes, dating as far back to his days at Auburn. Again, this is something that happens in the NFL, and QB need to be adaptive. My issue, if you can even call it an issue, is that you need to be able to evaluate a QB before his rookie contract has expired. I am confident the previous, and current staff knows much more about football than the average fan, and there is a REASON that JC has not been given a contract extension. We may never get to know what that REASON is, but some sort od doubt must be present for this not to have happened yet. Obviously the staff can see behind the stats, much like we can. They can see the same thing that Brandon pointed out in his post that JC did have his best season as a pro admist all the termoil and uncertainty; yet still no extension. Make you wonder right?
2) This is sort of tied into the first part, yet stands alone in its own way. If the staff feels that JC is not the long term answer, yet wants to keep him around as a stop gap fro a rookie, then we loose all bargaining power. If JC is going to become a restricted FA in March, we need to make a decision soon o his future. Now is the best time to unload him(if thats what the staff untimately wants to do), as he could gain us valuable picks. Holding onto him a year really does us no good if a CBA is reached in 2011, and he goes on to become a UFA. We basically have to franchise him, or outright loose him. If we are going to loose him in a year, I rather take something for him while we still can get it, than just walk away enpty handed.

These are the reasons I am on the fence with JC. Whatever the staff decides to do with JC, I will be behind the decision 100%.

by Tiller56 on Feb 12, 2010 7:32 AM EST reply actions  

Name me one team in the NFL right now that has 2 athletic TE's like Cooley and Davis.

The only other one that comes to mind is Dallas with Whitten and Bennett. It could be an advantage to get them on the field together.

HOWEVER, if Cooley would bring us a 2nd Rd pick, then the Redskins would be foolish not to at least consider the option.

by Tiller56 on Feb 13, 2010 8:10 AM EST up reply actions  

Thanks Tiller

And I do agree with you 100% on everything. QB’s do need to be adaptive to their surroundings even though it may be hard. But for him it’s something like a fresh water fish trying to adapt to salt water. It can probably be done but it is going to hard hard as heck. I know that probably wasn’t the best comparison but I got a small laugh out of it. But you are right. Once the coaching staff fully evaluates him they will have a better idea of if he can fit into their plans or not, and they are going to see some things that us as fans probably haven’t even thought of. I’m sure that one of the reasons that Campbell hasn’t gotten an extension yet has something to do with Snyder though. As hard as they tried to replace him in the previous off-season and then the team actually does worse despite Campbell doing better probably has something to do with it. As you said there is a reason behind everything.

As much as I would love for them to keep Campbell, if they do decide to part with him then you are right, doing it now is the time. Might as well get a pick for him.

by BrandonO on Feb 12, 2010 4:41 PM EST up reply actions  

a good recap of Campbell

and to me it just solidifies what I’ve already thought which is that with the very weak QB prospects in the draft, we don’t have a better option. Campbell has shown he is better than many QBs but he’s not at the Monatana/Marino level. He’s good enough to win with but not good enough to dominate a game like the great QBs do. The problem with going for a great QB is that the success rate is about 10% of a baseball pitchers batting average. Lots os swings and misses for every home run.

by aFan4Life on Feb 12, 2010 8:48 AM EST reply actions  

I would honestly compare Campbell’s chance to succeed in the redskins’ system to the chances of Akili Smith succeeding in Cincinnati and Andre Ware succeeding in Detroit. I’m sure there’s many examples of hopeful QB’s failing miserably thanks to poor systems. Ask Kyle Boller.

I don’t think Brett Favre could have succeeded behind the skins excuse for an O-Line.

I point the finger at FOOTBALL GOD! Vinny Cerrato. Him and the new offensive systems brought in year after year had to confuse JC more than Favre Watch confused ESPN. It’s hard to succeed when the QB spends half the game on his back.

Please keep Jason Campbell

by Paragon of all that is Great on Feb 12, 2010 1:56 PM EST reply actions  

Nicely written post and well researched.

There is no question that Campbell has gotten a bum deal here in DC. Surrounded by constant change in coaching, personnel, schemes and questions. Yet he has maintained 100% professionalism throughtout, and should be commended for that.
    Shanahan cannot be concerned with any of that, he has to decide what is best for Washington moving forward. He has to make moves that will make the team better, not so much for next year or 2011, but 3,4 and 5 years from now. I believe that is his intent and thought process: ’What moves should I do to make this team a perennial playoff team 3, 4 years from now?" Obviously the goal will be to upgrade every position where possible.
    Shanahan has to decide if 1 of the 2 QBs in the draft will be a better fit for his team in 3, 4 years. If he intends to sign one of them, then he should try to get something for Campbell now, so he can add more upgrades for the team. If Campbell is the guy, then he should lock him up now for the next 5 years. That would give him a few more years to find and groom a replacement while upgrading the other positions. I think we will know his answer in 3 weeks.

by johnnydee83 on Feb 12, 2010 3:43 PM EST reply actions  

Thanks Johnny

That is one reason that I have so much respect for Campbell. Everything that he has dealt with since becoming a Redskin, especially within the last season, and he has handled it so professionally. There are plenty of players that haven’t even gone through close to half of what JC has and they began acting childish over it. Cutler is the perfect example. The new coach just pretty much looks at another QB and boom he goes off. The Redskins try their hardest to replace Campbell and he still acts professional.

As much as I would prefer for Campbell to stay I agree. If Shanahan truly believes that one of the QB’s in the draft would be better in the long run then they should grab one and we can get something for Campbell. If that were to happen I would hope that they still get some linemen as well.

by BrandonO on Feb 12, 2010 4:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Campbell - Put upon?

You guys talk as if JC was treated badly. Baloney. He was given every chance, with the full support of Gibbs and Zorn, despite underperforming. The hoped for QB moves (Cutler, Sanchez) were perfectly reasonable for the NFL, and constituted a warning to Zorn that he better not stick with JC too long (Jim ignored that with grim results). JC was not always so professional – when the Sanchez rumors hit, he said that if Sanchez came he wanted to be traded – a dumb thing to say – he should have just said, “OK, let him try to beat me out of a job” (which is what Sonny Jurgensen suggested). Cutler was far more justified in wanting to be traded. He had had a big season, but lost his coach, replaced by a guy that didn’t like him – he saw the handwriting on the wall, and pushed for what was best for him – why not (Denver didn’t care about him)? (and there could well have been other reasons for wanting to leave Denver and go to Chicago). All this criticism of him is sportswriter garbage and lies, probably based on some proprietary feeling for JC. Cutler is a far better QB than JC, as he will show next year, when the Bears clobber us. In any case all this angst about “poor Jason” is irrelevant. All that counts is who is the best QB to lead us over the next few years. And from my observation – my opinion – is that it is not Jason Campbell. He is mediocre, very limited.

by Donnio1234 on Feb 12, 2010 8:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Dude are you serious?!?!?

You seriously don’t think he was treated badly? Dude how to do have a coach that doesn’t even allow you to call an audible? And wow Campbell saying he wants a trade if Sanchez is selected compared to the childish whining of Cutler. Plus Cutler getting into his feelings and ignoring his new coaches phone calls? Wow Cutler definitely showed more class then Campbell. You really believe all of that non-sense that you just said. Cutler was treated worse than Campbell? Thats basically what your saying. And Cutler is way better than Campbell yet he lead the league in ints? Yup, he seems to be a lot better lol.

by BrandonO on Feb 12, 2010 8:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Audibles, poor old Jason

They didn’t let him call audibles because he couldn’t – he didn’t know the system or defenses well enough. That’s pretty much what Portis said, and why they went to the wrist band (simpler system), and could be part of the reason why he failed to see so many open receivers. A lot of Cutler’s interceptions were early, and were due to the receivers poor route running (per Cris Collingsworth). I saw Cutler beat Minnesota late in the season, and he was great – he can do things JC cannot do, and is a far better leader. And what “whining” ? – he didn’t whine, because he didn’t have to – he was in control. But JC did whine “poor old me, they want to bring in competition”. Ignore his coaches calls – a guy who didn’t like him. Sean Taylor and Shawn Springs ignored calls from the coaches. Sometimes it’s better not to talk, where talk can only hurt. All this over-the-top vitriole against Cutler was just bizarre, since nobody knew what was happening – except that our poor, dear Jason might be upset. So what? All he had to do was do his job on the field.

by Donnio1234 on Feb 12, 2010 8:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Dude, like 90% of your argument just now was pure opinion

If you can prove everything you just said, maybe I can take your arguments and opinions more seriously lol

by BrandonO on Feb 12, 2010 9:08 PM EST up reply actions  

A Wise Man Told Me Don't Argue With Fools...

Let it go Brandon. Some people can’t understand it beyond the hype. Cutler threw way more INT’s and looked extremely sloppy last year. Is he a good QB? I wouldn’t say he wasn’t. But the excuses that are made for so-called “good QB’s” are somehow unacceptable for Jason Campbell.

Peyton Manning threw a pick-6 that cost him the Super Bowl. If that were Jason, it would be “off with his head”. And Manning is arguably the best QB in the game.

Favre threw a pick late in the 4th against the Saints that cost them the game. Yet everyone lovvvveeesss some Brett Favre. If that were Jason…
Sanchez had TERRIBLE numbers last year. But some STILL think he’s better that Jason. And for what??? His college career was not even better than Matt Leinert, and we all see where he’s been the last few years.

Some people just don’t get it.

by J.Cash on Feb 13, 2010 12:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Pretty harsh bro....

Are you sure Cutler’s better? How did Cutler perform in a new system???? How has Campbell done with a new system every year except 1……since high school? I can understand where you are coming from….although I strongly disagree. Are there better QBs out there…..yeah……that we have the ability to get our hands on….NO! What has Bradford, Claussen, Tebow, LeFevour shown that makes you think they are all better suited to run our team? In college? Who cares what they did in college (see Ryan Leaf, Akili Smith, Jamarcus Russell). Campbell was undefeated his senior year! This is a situation….where I know nobody will change you mind….until a change is made…and you get what you are asking for…..and it backfires!

by shvd98z24 on Feb 12, 2010 8:30 PM EST up reply actions  

If he gets what he wants it is definitely going to backfire.

If they let Campbell go he is going to be a beast on whatever team he ends up on, and when he plays the Skins, he will probably play his best game.

by BrandonO on Feb 12, 2010 8:35 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't know that he will be a beast.....

he merely is an average QB…..don’t jump me because I do like him. I don’t think we need a stud…..and if we do….the timing isn’t right for it. He deserves another shot with a real head coach and a real OL before he can truly be wrote off. I know he has had 5 years…..but he has had the hardest objective of any starter put in front of him for the last half a decade!

by shvd98z24 on Feb 12, 2010 8:40 PM EST up reply actions  

lol i wasnt jumping you, i was just jumping into that part of the convo

He is an average QB right now without much consistency. I may be jumping the gun a bit but I believe he will be a beast with some actual consistency and a real good supporting cast

by BrandonO on Feb 12, 2010 8:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree....

the potential is there….but the clock is ticking! I hope it hits while he is a Skin and saves us a wasted draft pick on a bust. I just don’t like any of this years QB prospects!

by shvd98z24 on Feb 12, 2010 9:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Memory Road

To be fair alot of blame over the years has to be our front office bone head moves over the years costing us stability at wins and position players. We can start and say we had Stan Humphries, Trent Green, Brad Johnson, I think Rich Gannon might have spent time in DC. All were given up on and we paid the price watching their teams go to Super Bowls. I don`t see any super talent at QB available but do you need a top 5 Qb to win playoff games. Todd Collins is not a top 5 but with better protection you can run the ball better and passing will be better. I say give Cambell another year to show that he can win.

by mybluebone on Feb 12, 2010 5:24 PM EST reply actions  

Nice post Brandon....

like everyone else said….well researched….well written! I am in total agreement with you! I am hoping all this QB talk is a smoke screen to make a move they are planning…..but if not….I think we will get good value for Campbell. I just don’t know that they could afford to get rid of him with a rookie under center. You never know until the games are played (Ryan Leaf). There may be some decent vets on the market as a stop gap……I have just pulled so hard for Campbell to succeed here and I know if he goes….it will bite us at some point!

by shvd98z24 on Feb 12, 2010 6:20 PM EST reply actions  

Thanks

I have been pulling for Campbell ever since he became a starter so I wish him well, whether he remains here or not. But I highly doubt that a rookie will perform better. There are too many puzzle pieces that need to fit. All the successful rookie QB’s already pretty much had an offense and/or solid defense. Ryan, Flacco, and Sanchez. We saw how Stafford performed with a whole lot still needing to be fixed around him.

by BrandonO on Feb 12, 2010 8:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Rookie QBs

You’re right that a rookie QB is not likely to light up the league in his first year, and therefore that JC might actually do a little better than a rookie in 2010. If all you care about is 2010, JC is the way to go. But I sort of think in terms of 2 – 5 years., and prefer to aim for the playoffs and Super Bowl, and not just 7 or 8 wins with a so-so QB. The old stock market saying – “cut your losses short, let your winners ride”. Or “if you’re digging yourself too deep into a hole, stop digging”. (Sorry if I mis-stated those sayings). JC is a failed experiment – let’s move on. Wish him well, hope he has great success, except when he’s playing us.

by Donnio1234 on Feb 12, 2010 9:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Campbell

Did you all see the Super Bowl odds? The article basically said the odds depended greatly on the quality of the quarterback – and we were 50-1 (among the worst teams in the league). Depressing. The writer rated JC very low – questionable or erratic. It appears that the experts know that JC is very weak. We must do better!!

by Donnio1234 on Feb 12, 2010 8:40 PM EST reply actions  

Super Bowl Odds

I think I was wrong on that – I believe it was 50-1. They had groups of 5 or 6 at 50-1 and 100-1, and 3 at 45-1 (not that it makes much difference among the weakies). We were behind some real weak teams, like Seattle. Of course, we were 4-12, so that’s not a surprise.

by Donnio1234 on Feb 12, 2010 9:02 PM EST reply actions  

Those odds are based on a static assumption.

After free agency and the draft a firmer basis could be used to assess the Skins versus other teams. I don’t see an 8-8 or 9-7 record for 2010 being that far out of line. Super Bowl is another story as also is play offs.

by Jefferson1935 on Feb 12, 2010 9:16 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't even pay attention to the Super Bowl Odds

All it is is a prediction/assumption of what they expect. Definitely wouldn’t pay much mind to it right now as free agency and the draft haven’t come yet therefore the rosters aren’t even close to being finalized for the upcoming season. As sad 50-1 may seem, you can’t really predict something thats going to happen pretty much a whole year later even though the skins to the Super Bowl is very unlikely.

by BrandonO on Feb 12, 2010 9:35 PM EST reply actions  

JC

Brandon – you did write a nice, persuasive article, well worth reading. But you might consider one thing: as far as I know, no one on HH has ever said that JC was a good NFL QB. Nobody said he was excellent, or close to the top. A number said he was improving, or he was unsuccessful because of the O-line (or various other excuses), or he deserved another year because of the troubles he had, or because he was the best available for next year. But nobody said he was good, and I don’t think anybody ever said that they expected that he would be “good”. Or “above average”. And just for fun, go down all the starting QBs in the league and compare them to JC in ability – how good they are likely to be in the future, given equal circumstances. Rank them. Where would JC be? I say in the lower half, close to the lower third. Assuming you rate things similarly, is it smart to keep him as our QB? Shouldn’t we go for somebody with more promise?

by Donnio1234 on Feb 12, 2010 10:02 PM EST reply actions  

Thank you for the compliment

There have been a few people on here that I have seen say that JC is good before. Not a whole lot, but I have seen a few. The only one I have seen say that he was excellent is LJP lol. Most of what I have seen have said he is average, which he is at this point. But I have seen a few say that he would be good. Me being one of them, he just needs some actual consistency in my opinion. Do I expect him to turn into a HOF QB or anything near? No I do not but we can win with him. For your fun exercise give me some kind of scenario of these equal circumstances, I’d be able to guess a bit better. Without knowing what type of circumstances they are under I would just have to say still middle of the pack like he is now. As far going for someone with more promise I am all for it because I want our team to be the best. I just don’t feel that right now is the time. If we were to bring in a new younger QB I would want to basically take a page out of the Jets, Falcons, and Ravens book and already have some pieces in place for them. Especially the O-line. We do not need a rookie behind that O-line. Don’t get me wrong I already know that there is always going to be some kind of need for improvement for a team but as you know some needs are more important than others. We don’t need to have a new signal caller with an O-line that performed like ours did this past season.

by BrandonO on Feb 12, 2010 11:38 PM EST up reply actions  

JC - statistics, new system

Other points to ponder: One of the most common excuses for JC is that he has had to learn a lot of new systems. Sonny Jurgensen said that was silly, there is only one system. In any case, there will be a “new system” this year. Does his history suggest JC will pick it up really well? Also, on your stats, allegedly showing that JC ranks in the middle: as others on HH have said, a lot of his yards came in “garbage time”. And his stats over his career paint a picture of a very cautious QB who doesn’t throw very often, throws few interceptions, but fails to see a lot of open receivers. I.e., consistent with poor field vision and/or poor understanding of the offense – as CP suggested. Not seeing his receivers, coupled with not having a quick release, and relatively poor footwork, explains, partly, why he got sacked so much. I.e., it was not all due to the O-line. A lot of times, he just didn’t get rid of the ball fast enough.

by Donnio1234 on Feb 12, 2010 10:19 PM EST reply actions  

Sonny Jergensen may be great but I don't really see how you can say that there is only one system

If that was the case then almost every offense would look somewhat the same. Does his history suggest he will pick it up well? IMHO it’s somewhat hard to say just because of the Zorn era. His system already seemed pretty dull and predictable, especially the first year. Maybe it was the actual system or just his poor play calling, I don’t know. We didn’t see too many new things until Sherman Lewis came in, began calling plays, and then also adjusted some of the plays. But I would say he would be able to pick up a good amount of it. He does have a lot of work to, but I don’t think you should really use CP as a reliable source of information at this point. He is taking shots at a bunch of people for no apparent reason, unless it happened recently he still hasn’t even been cleared for physical activities because of his concussion, and most of all he didn’t even do anything this past season so he is really in no situation to be taking shots at people the way he has. He didn’t even have respect for Zorn and didn’t want to do anything which was show cased partially by his performance. Not to mention that after he took shots at JC many other Redskins players began taking shots at Portis. But back to JC. Your right, JC does tend to hold onto the ball longer than he should and all of those sacks weren’t on the O-line. But the majority of them were. I remember in one of the games the opposing defense basically had a 3 man rush and JC was sacked on a 3-step drop. Thats very sad. I’m honestly not sure as to how his footwork is but considering the amount of scrambling first downs he was able to get I don’t think it was that bad. But he definitely does have to get better at seeing the feild

by BrandonO on Feb 12, 2010 11:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Cutler

Brandon – in an earlier post you asked if I really thought that Cutler was treated worse than Campbell. I don’t think either was treated badly. But the situation changed on Cutler – Shanahan left and was replaced by a guy that didn’t think much of him. He saw a bad situation developing, with him basically on a s___ list. He was coming off great seasons, had enormous clout, and took the opportunity to go someplace he was wanted, for a lot of money. Pure self interest, he didn’t want to let his career stagnate in Denver (and there could be other problems there, too – after all, he didn’t pick Denver, they picked him). All of the above is guesswork. All the teams chasing him suggests that he was right about his value. We may get an idea of Jason’s worth very soon, too. Think it’ll be higher than Cutler’s?

by Donnio1234 on Feb 12, 2010 11:02 PM EST reply actions  

None of us remember exactly how everything went down but I remember things a bit differently.

Lets go ahead and say that neither of them were treated bad. I would honestly say that they both were but lets just agree to disagree right there. The only real difference between Cutlers situation and JC’s that I remember are that theirs a different coach and as you said Cutler was coming off of a great season. New coach comes in and wants his own guy at QB. Isn’t that something that is pretty common in the NFL? True it makes it worse that McDaniels was a rookie HC at the time but its normal. But basically McDaniels came in, wanted Cassel since he already knew what he was about since he had worked with him, so he tried to trade cutler to acquire Cassel. Cutler finds out and obviously he isn’t happy about that, and then there goes all of the drama that was in the media. Cutler made it publicly known that he wanted out so then of course teams in need of a QB chased (including our skins). Earlier when you had said that Cutler was better and I disagreed. When I think about it I think they are about the same actually. I don’t have much evidence to throw out there to help that argument though. The only thing that I can suggest even close to that is to compare how he played in Denver to how he played his first year in Chicago. New team and new system right so he didn’t completely look like the same QB. and look at who his HC was when he was in Denver. Now look at who JC’s head coach was. Who do you think would coach up a better QB? A proven offensive minded coach like Shanahan or a rookie coach like Zorn who has only had QB coach experience? And finally do I think that JC’s value will be higher than Cutler’s? Honestly no. Cutler has already been to a Pro Bowl and as you mentioned earlier, Cutler had a big year before he was traded. Those two things would obviously bump his value up. I think JC’s will be high but not as high as Cutler’s. I have read about a few teams that do supposedly have interest in JC. As a matter of fact I had read a few times that there were some teams willing to make an offer for JC last season when the Redskins were trying to trade him.

by BrandonO on Feb 13, 2010 12:16 AM EST up reply actions  

And You Knew I Was Comin, Right?!

First off, I just want to say that I respect JC and wnat the best for him but as a football fan I cannot ignore alot of the basic tangibles that he lacks. Those were great stats and I don’t think anyone has ever broke it down like that but stats can be very deceiving at times. From my perspective, I look at things like does he make defenses fear/respect him and they don’t. I feel as though every QB mediocre, good, or great has to respected on the field. Even if you have to throw a couple picks trying to go long, atleast it keeps the defenders on their toes. When I watch the skins, I see defenses relaxed playing us, not really worried about much. I also see defenses blitz us at will with no hesitation. Although partly is because of offensive line play, the QB has to make the defense pay atleast sometimes. Usually when the ball does get thrown in that situation, its not down field, it’s a short pass to a rb or te. So what is there for the defense to fear? Nothing. As far as the audibles, they already said JC wasn’t ready for that which I beleive because if he could audible I’m sure he would have instead of taking the punishment he has taken. Overall i think alot of you are being too soft and are making too many excuses. As far as him going to another team, that may be what he needs to get his career on track which would be good for him. I hope he succeeds.

by mr.snyderhireme on Feb 12, 2010 11:54 PM EST reply actions  

Welcome my nemesis for the past few days lol.

Mr.Snyder. After going back and forth with you the past few days, I have to say that it somewhat pains me to say that I agree with you right now. Of course it is to an extent because there are some things that I don’t agree with but overall I do agree……which kind of scares the crap out of me right now. Defenses did play relaxed against us. Was it all because of JC? No I do not believe it was. The offense as a whole was struggling for most of the year. There is no need to be afraid of a struggling offense. And defenses blitzed us like crazy because they knew they would get penetration, so of course JC didn’t have time to go through all of his reads due to pressure so bam, short pass to the TE or RB. And last but not least, I don’t think we are making excuses. Our offense sucked this year mainly because of the O-line situation, plane and simple. Thats no excuse. All of the different system changes can somewhat be argued. Would that hinder a QB’s development? Definitely but there are some things that a QB has to do in all systems. And I do agree that if he is let go his career will be better with a different team. (Oh my goodness I think I’m going to be sick).

by BrandonO on Feb 13, 2010 12:29 AM EST up reply actions  

Finallly you see the light

And yes like stated above, the offensive line is partly to blame but if I’m not mistaken, a west coast offense is made for quick passes not withdrawal with the football in hand

by mr.snyderhireme on Feb 13, 2010 12:36 AM EST reply actions  

idk about seeing the light, theres a slight difference between this one and the other post

But with the way that you worded everything there was no misunderstand. And there are different versions of the west coast offense but for the most part yes it is suppose to emphasize a short, horizontal passing attack. All of the short passes are supposed to open up opportunities for the big plays. My main question when it comes to this is exactly how valid was Zorn’s version? The offense started to come alive when Sherman Lewis came in and began altering some plays and doing the play calling. I still want Campbell to stay because I think he can up his game under Shanahan, but if he is let go I think he will do better on a different team. Especially if it is a team that uses him to his skill set. He isn’t really meant to be a west coast offense QB. But I think he would do well under Shanahan because his version involves heavy running which would somewhat open up more opportunities for Campbell.

by BrandonO on Feb 13, 2010 1:06 AM EST up reply actions  

I was surfing the net being really bored and I came across something interesting

http://blog.redskins.com/2010/02/06/clinton-portis-vs-man-vs-food/#continued

One of the videos on this link was a interview with Clinton Portis. Apparently he is going to work his butt off for Shanahan. But more interesting is that he said Shanahan can definitely help Campbell and provide him with more opportunities.

by BrandonO on Feb 13, 2010 2:14 AM EST reply actions  

The Offense

Brandon – can’t disagree with anything you said. It’s a tricky situation – let’s just hope Shanahan figures it all out. On Snyderhireme’s comments about the offense: I’ve always been a little puzzled about it too. The way I understood a classic west coast offense, Jason should have thrived – just “three steps back and zoom” to a predetermined receiver, no complicated and time consuming choices, or much dependency on the O-line. But it appears that Zorn didn’t run a WC offense (I think that one time, when asked what kind of offense it was, he said a “run first” offense). I think that, in fact, Jim didn’t know what he was doing, and didn’t use his people right. That’s a point in JC’s favor – he and the others should do better when the coach knows what he’s doing. That comment from Clinton was interesting, and sounded good.

by Donnio1234 on Feb 13, 2010 3:37 PM EST reply actions  

I'm sure Shanahan can turn this franchise around, especially since he has had a year off to prepare and come up with new ideas.

And thats another thing that makes everything a bit confusing. Zorn’s offense didn’t really seem like a west coast style at all. We had no idea of what to expect from his offense at all since he wasn’t even an offensive coordinator. And I was surprised at myself for liking what I heard from Portis, especially after everything he has been involved with lately. If he is starting to sound positive hopefully positivity is coming.

by BrandonO on Feb 16, 2010 10:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email hogshaven@gmail.com

Managers

Superbowl_small Kevin Ewoldt

Riggins_small Ken Meringolo

Editors

Sb_small Parks Smith

Small Steve Shoup

Chalkboard_football-opt403x300o00s403x300_small UkRedskin

Washington_redskins_helmet_small Redskins News

Authors

Badshirt2__2__small fatpickle

Family_in_disney_small Tiller56

Rg3super_small HTTR4LIFE

Hh_small Ronnie Adkins