5 Redskins Players Mike Shanahan is Grossly Misusing
As much as Redskins players say this year's woes are part of the learning process of a new system, there is something bigger we need to highlight - bad coaching. When I spoke with Charles Mann two weeks ago, he told me that Andre Carter had been coming to him all season for advice on coping with a system that does not fit his strengths. Of course, we all know Haynesworth's frustrations on how he's used. Cooley spoke earlier this week on his confusion of why himself and Fred Davis are not being targeted more. Why? BAD COACHING.
| Player | How they're misused |
| Fred Davis | I greatly respect the Football Outsiders, so I was a bit surprised to see that Fred Davis is the 14th ranked TE in DYAR* and the 3rd best TE in DVOA**. Cooley is ranked 26th and 31st in these 2 categories. With as porous as the Redskins offense has been this year, it makes zero sense Cooley and Davis are not on the field every play. We've already seen these guys line up in the slot or off the Tackle, so why not do this more? The 2009 Redskins were not creative at all with their play calling, yet Davis had 6 Tds and 48 receptions (10.6 yards per catch). Why has this guy been riding the pine all year???? |
| Brian Orakpo/Chris Wilson | Every time I see Orakpo standing up for a pass rush it makes me cringe. Rak is not an agile, shifty rusher like Clay Matthews. He's a power rusher than can use downhill speed to get around the edge, often a bonus from a Tackle prepping for his 5-star bull rush. Why not keep Rak on the line and allow the much speedier and shiftier LB Chris Wilson to handle these OLB duties? |
| Andre Carter | There's not much explanation needed here. Despite all summer long hearing from coaches they'd use Andre different than how his coaches used him in San Fran, the OLB experiment had the same result as Bill Gramatica's TD celebration. The Redskins have moved #99 back to DE, but he's struggling in double coverages whereas in a 4-3 he saw more 1-1 opportunites (11 sacks last year). |
| Albert Haynesworth | No one except Peyton Manning or Tom Brady can live up to a contract of that size. I'm over it. Put him in the middle of a 4-3 and let him do his thing for 75% of the plays. What is there to lose at this point? The Redskins have been getting GASHED up the middle on the run all year. Kemo has consistently been getting man-handled by a single OLineman. It's laughable they've been sticking with him at NT for so long. |
| Donovan McNabb | Shanhan has his master playbook, and he pulled a top, veteran QB to run it. The problem is McNabb is not an accurate Quarterback. What McNabb excels at is extending plays with his feet, which allows players to get open for big yardage plays down-field or on screens. Shanny appears to finally be adjusting his scheme, so there is some hope here, but again, what took so long? |
The 3-4 defense was supposed to be that magical turnover defense. Well, I got a stat matrix for you after the jump. Last year's D was about the same or better in most key categories...
| 2010 | 2009 |
| Tied for 8th with 17 forced fumbles (11 kept). | Tied for 20th with 21 forced fumbles (6 kept) |
| 18th with 22 sacks. | 8th with 40 sacks |
| 15th with 10 INTs. If it wasn't for that 1 four interception game by DHall, the Redskins would rank 30th in this category. |
Tied for 26th with 11 INTs |
67 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
OMG!!
I promise I’ve been saying the same thing all year! The coach we should’ve hired is doing the sunday pre-game show (Cowher) and our QB of the future almost led a comeback last week. Jeez our front office sucks. So much for “Boldly Hoping”…smh Here’s 2 mini-Shanny being groomed for our HC position in 2013….
As far as the 4-3 goes – if it’s not broken why eff wit it? Weren’t we like top 5 D last year (I’m almost certain we were top 10)?
Anyway, Kev your a G. I agree with everything you said….and +1 for the use of a table on a football blog post. hahaha
Sounds like he’s in a marketing meeting….
So, looking at this table below
Pride is better than wins in Washington. But bring us wins and we will immortalize you - Ask Mark Rypien
hahaha...i thought that was a little gay when i was typing it...
Pride is better than wins in Washington. But bring us wins and we will immortalize you - Ask Mark Rypien
Everyone forgets
That the last few years, we had MANY long boring life killing drives in the fourth to have the other team ice us. It’s like the scene from Saving Private Ryan where Adam Goldberg loses the knife fight in the tower. And how many 10 yard hitch patterns were ran with a WIDE OPEN receiver for the first down.
Our D had the “numbers” but never the heart of a true top D. they folded just like the Offense did in the pre game warm ups. And that is the way it will always be. They fold up tents in november and Danny starts his off season plan to pull the wool over our eyes and has us buy in to his propaganda. Every year this happens. He yanks our downtrodden hearts and fills it with false hope. We naively buy in AGAIN and order season tickets and new jerseys and christmas ornaments and pajamas and what ever we can buy with out hard earned under worth paychecks. SO, Danny Copperfield, what is it this December?
A new frugal “Eye For Talent” GM. Just got one. 2x Superbowl winning Head Coach? just got one. “Out of the box young Genius Offense Coordinator” check, right? he worked magic for the Houston Texans. Trained int eh art of war Steel Curtain Defensive coordinator? Oh yeah. HOF Quarterback? Went straight to the hated rival for that one. Ticketgate? Over. Well it looks like the only trick this off season is the old faithful of overpaying for old veterans to fill holes. We don’t have enough draft picks, thanks to….ShannyAllen. BUT I am sure Danny will pull flame up Haynesworth or get Portis to say something stupid to deflect the media like a professional Magician.
In short. I am screwed until I die. Danny is only in his forties.
thank you
That defense was like the an old, classic car. Sure, it was cool to show off and brag about. But, even though you had a ton of money in it, it only got you where you needed to go about a quarter of the time.
by CJHutch on Dec 2, 2010 4:11 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
so tweak the bitch
make your 4-3 more agressive and mix it up a bit.
I don’t understand why people seem to think that 4-3 is synonymous with Old Man Blache’s Bend but Don’t Break scheme. It IS possible to have an aggressive 4-3, and maybe if Blache would have put the same emphasis on turnovers that Haslett does the team would have been in better shape with TO’s
SpottieOttieDopaliscious
...And
KEEP YOUR DRAFT PICKS!!! I promise that they can be spent on ACTUAL PLAYERS!!!! They are not penny stocks. Honestly I don’t care WHAT SYSTEM IS RUN!!! Just build an IDENTITY!!!!!
I think my life is better b/c of this comment. Thank GOD there are other fans out there with a functioning brain
Pride is better than wins in Washington. But bring us wins and we will immortalize you - Ask Mark Rypien
exactly
We will NEVER be considered an elite defense until we start cultivating our own talent. Elite defense’s have mid to late round draft picks contributing all the time. Meanwhile, we pay so much for our starters, that we end up with other teams scraps, or undrafted guys to fill in our depth.
+1
Pride is better than wins in Washington. But bring us wins and we will immortalize you - Ask Mark Rypien
oh, I'm not talking
about the 4-3 defense, I’m talking about BLACHE’s defense. Truthfully, I do like the 3-4. (I said THE 3-4, not OUR 3-4). But I have no problem with the 4-3 either. I have always been of the mindset that the players make the scheme, and not the other way around. So, while I was admittedly excited when I heard we were switching to the 3-4, I would’ve been JUST AS excited to hear we were changing from a PASSIVE (4-3) defense to an AGGRESSIVE (4-3) defense.
I just wanted a change in philosophy. And I guess I’m spoiled, cuz now I want a different kind of change. I guess I want a change in intelligence. I want someone smart enough to be able to adapt to the opponent IN GAME.
EGO, EGO, EGO!
I guess it goes with the territory, but it seems to me that 99% of all NFL coaches are so enamored with their own, precious “systems” that they really can’t see the forest for the trees….and rarely even TRY to alter their beloved “systems” to suit the players they inherit.
just curious
Does anyone have a percentage of plays we’ve run out of our 3-4 base?
I like the 3-4, but I’m not sure if Haslett’s the man to run it.
I disagree with Donovan...
I’ve seen a lot of bootlegs this year and I think its more of a thing with the offensive line than the play calling. Both have been suspect at times though.
OL def a factor
But how many balls have you seen thrown behind or way low when he did have the time…..too many.
Hogs Haven. On Twitter. And Facebook.
by Kevin Ewoldt on Dec 2, 2010 10:58 AM EST up reply actions
B/c McNabb obviously can’t throw those balls consistently.
Hogs Haven. On Twitter. And Facebook.
by Kevin Ewoldt on Dec 2, 2010 11:46 AM EST up reply actions
McNabb is 5th on this list for a reason. He doesn’t have a lot to work with, and he’s been his own enemy sometimes making bad throws….so it’s not as clear cut as Fred Davis & the others
Hogs Haven. On Twitter. And Facebook.
by Kevin Ewoldt on Dec 2, 2010 11:53 AM EST up reply actions
He did the same thing in Philly
Its that aspect of McNabb you just have to live with. Reid did for 11 seasons.
by hambonejackson on Dec 2, 2010 12:57 PM EST up reply actions
doesnt every qb
especially older ones have short comings . We knew that from the jump but didnt give him adequate protection.
Go Skins
Go Skins
sbredskinsnabb
by sbredskinsnabb on Dec 2, 2010 9:26 PM EST up reply actions
how can you measure this, when one (qb) knows that he is going to be slammed,sacked,hit ....
First acknowledging that DMacs skill sets have deminished…and that some of his youthful flaws are worse now…knowing this….why in the L didnt MS and KS either get him some tools to work with and or Ensure that he had an ol that was capable of basically protecting him…..by now DM is proably shell-shocked and aching in all places.The guy has taken some hits that rbs would have a hard time recovering from. He has been mauled but still has gotten back up , dusted himself off and did his best.
Acquiring an older qb with known limitations and not making sure to surround him with some of the proper tools and an ol is not excusable .That is not protecting your investment / leader. That is my Major complaint with MS. I’m not holding DM blameless…because he shares some of it. However he has been very professional and is a big reason why the Skins are a better TEAM and will be even better next year.So with real weapons (less experiments ) a better ol will decide the real worth of DM
sbredskinsnabb
by sbredskinsnabb on Dec 2, 2010 9:19 PM EST up reply actions
+100
Comment of the WEEK
Pride is better than wins in Washington. But bring us wins and we will immortalize you - Ask Mark Rypien
stats 2010 vs 2009?
So, looking at this table below (comparing key stats from last year’s D to this year’s D), the Redskins are MUCH worse in sacks, much better in forced fumbles, and mildly better in INTs.
Are the stats for 2009 throgh 12 games? or the whole season? they are comparable but we still have 5 games to play this season. i was just wondering if that was taken into account…
that's why I have the rankings out of 32 there
Hogs Haven. On Twitter. And Facebook.
by Kevin Ewoldt on Dec 2, 2010 11:45 AM EST up reply actions
Shanahan made the fateful decision to change to a 3-4
He probably asked Haslett, “Can you do it?” and Jim, thinking he could use hybrids and variations, and wanting the job, said, “Sure thing chief, no sweat”. “Sure, Haynesworth will be great at nose tackle, and Kemoeatu can be backup”. “The best laid plans of mice and men…” How many games did that decision cost us? They ought to just go back to the 4-3, but it’s probably too late.
I'm still unsure why we changed
We are so much better built to run the 4-3, just look at our defense last season.
I am a bear of very little brains and big words bother me.
The switch is done
We’re 3-4 now. They aren’t going back. The time for debating the merrits of the change is over. Looking forward, get some dlineman, they’ll be fine.
Fred Davis, I was pretty much ready to call him a bust. I’ll agree it’s been frustrating that he hasn’t seen the field more.
Brian Orakpo is not being misused. He’s rushing the qb, a lot. I just think that there’s 0 other pass rushing threats so he’s getting taken out now. In short, offenses are focused on him. He has gotten sacks both standing and in stance.
Andre carter. No doubt he’d be better in a 4-3. But I don’t think he would recreate last year. He’s old, and I think last year would of been his last hurrah anyway. He would of been better than he is in our current system though. But there are going to be some casualties like this anytime you switch systems.
Albert? Who can say with this fruit. He’s either blowing up double teams and destroying plays. Or he’s lying on the ground taking naps in the middle of a play. I don’t blame the staff for not trusting him more. I used to stick up for him, not anymore. He never shows up when we need him most. I don’t think the coaches are using him incorrectly, they just aren’t coddling their entire defense to his personnal wants.
Mcnabb. Nope, not being misused. The word you’re looking for is ABUSED, behind our shitty offensive line. 99% of our offensive woes are because of that line. Don’t fool yourself. You think that the shanahans all of the sudden can’t figure out the nfl? Kyle was tearing it up last year. Talent, especially at the o line, is the root cause of our teams woes.
So in conclusion I agree that carter and davis aren’t being utilized like they should.
I’d rather have the shanahans and haslet than zorn and blache. Haslet has shown the ability to change and adapt his defense. He’ll get things figured out. Shanahans just need some offensive lineman.
The Beat Box aka skins secondary.
I wish it wasn't the case
We’re 3-4 now. They aren’t going back.
I know this is probably true, but not only are we more built for the 4-3, but we could be going into the offseason with more of a focus on the offensive side of the ball rather than the defensive. We could then target 2 Oline with our first 2 picks or a oline and a WR. But with the 3-4, one of those pick HAS to be for a NT unless we want a repeat of this year. With the 4-3, our defensive “wish list” shrinks down to a future replacement for Fletcher, a safety and maybe a cornerback. A 4-3 makes us a realistic contender next year, which a 3-4 makes us a rebuilding team again.
by Nobetterthenbob on Dec 2, 2010 6:52 PM EST up reply actions
Kevin, you bring up a lot of interesting points
And I think that all of your suggestions would improve this team. A defensive line of Carter-Kemo-Hayneswort-Orakpo would be a lot of fun to watch. Bring in Phillip Daniels off the bench and you have a great rotation at end, still allowing Orakpo to play LB in certain situations in order to stack the line with pass rushers.
With Cooley and Davis on the field at the same time, you always have 2 tough receiving threats while also allowing for multiple looks. The other team bringing pressure? Keep a TE or 2 in to block. The other team blitzing uncontrollably? Run some TE screens or motion one out to the slot for a quick slant. I guarantee the running game would improve if this were our base package. We could still effectively, if not more effectively run play action, allowing for bootlegs which would still open up the deep pass. Teams would be more concerned with covering the middle of the field that it would open things up more down the sidelines.
The 3-4 is a great defense, but only if you have the pieces. We aren’t even close. I like the idea of slowly integrating it as you build your team to fit the scheme, but trying to fit these players into this scheme is just a mess. I thought that maybe they can do it, but it is so obvious that it is a huge fail. The players aren’t going to talk against it. The coaches are too proud to admit they are wrong. Somewhere in the mix of all this, communication has not been happening. Whether Haslett or Shanahan is too afraid to bring it to the forefront, I’m not sure, but someone needs to step up and say listen, we can be a much better defense if we start doing things differently.
This isn’t a bash on the players either. They are playing their tails off. They are just out of position.
+1
Pride is better than wins in Washington. But bring us wins and we will immortalize you - Ask Mark Rypien
Its because almost no one will be back
Next year’s team won’t look anything like this team. Shanahan wants to know who will be on next year’s team. Not saying its right, its just what he seems to be doing
by Hustler of Culture on Dec 2, 2010 12:32 PM EST reply actions
almost comical how easy it would be
to fix the D. You really do not have to think hard about it.
Hall Carter Golston Haynesworth Rak Rogers
McIntosh Fletch Lorenzo A?
Landry Moore
Turns our weakest link on the D right now, the DLine, into a strength. Continue to use LL30 as a strong safety and have him flying all over the field. Lorenzo Alexander and Kareem Moore are the weakest links in the starting lineup but you could do worse.
I still think the offense just doesn’t have the talent. The interior OLine is awful, the WR’s are bottom 5 in the league and we definitely have the worst talent at RB in the league. It would be great if we could go back to a 4-3 and use our off season to focus on O but its not gonna happen, hopefully the D will come back stronger in year 2, obvious needs, NT and OLB.
wow!!!!!
thats easily a top 5 defense right there…..rak was a rookie tearing it up. and we would finally stop the run….i think the main problem is that we really dont and cant stop the run…so our secondary cheats a lot.
by back_to_the_future on Dec 2, 2010 12:44 PM EST up reply actions
I think the entire team is misused
The sign of a good coach and coordinator is to build an offense and defense around what players you already have in place. Try to incorporate your system with what you QB is comfortable with. The defense was built for the 4-3, yes you want to switch, but when you dont have the personnel you have to adjust until you get the right pieces. So rather than sacrificing the season to implement your systems, work with what you have, so they can excel and up their trade value so you can trade them for picks and pieces you really want.
Kevin,
At some point in the future, you should do a comparison of all four DC franchises on how they are run. You know Leonsis compared to Snyder….. I need a good laugh!
I’m actually drafting a post now who’s the worst owner in DC sports right now. neck and neck Snyder and Lerner.
Hogs Haven. On Twitter. And Facebook.
One more thing
The redskins are using the 3-4 this year to personally irritate you
by hambonejackson on Dec 2, 2010 3:30 PM EST up reply actions
I'm just saying based on the path
God the thought of the days of Jim Bowden, Grunfield, and Vinny in the same town makes me cringe.
oh man, u had to remind me of Ernie...
Dude I graduated high school with is dating his daughter, who looks a white Scottie Pippen with long hair.
Hogs Haven. On Twitter. And Facebook.
Lerner took over the Expos
Enough said?
by hambonejackson on Dec 2, 2010 3:26 PM EST up reply actions
Its clear
People who don’t know what they are doing:
Shanahan
Haslett
Blache
Zorn
Gibbs
Williams
Schottenheimer
Schottenheimer
Turner
Casserly
Ceratto
People who know how to draft and coach:
Me
Charles Mann
Kevin Ewoldt
Every Redskin Washington post sports writer
I will add that I think La Canafora
should be voted into the Football Hall of Fame because he is the greatest GM/Coach ever for the Redskins
better than the guy he was writing about.
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
great points
and I agree with all of them. How frustrating.
All head coaches have a system they believe in...
…and they’re gonna stay with that system till the day they give up the game. They may tweek the system, but it’s theirs’ and they’ll stick with it.
At first, when they inherit a team, they try to put the players they have into the most useful places in their system. All the pieces may not fit perfectly, but the system is what they believe in, and they believe they will find the perfect pieces as they go through their tenure. They then go out and find those pieces and rebuild (there’s that word) the team to fit their system.
Successful coaches don’t change their system to suit the players. They change the players to suit their system. This process, when the system is sound, normally takes 3-4 years to become successful. It usually takes that long to find all the right pieces.
oh gramps
Senility has finally gotten the best of you. Sorry my ancient friend, but you couldn’t be more wrong. While there is no doubt that continuously acquiring players who fit the SYSTEM YOU ARE RUNNING is the key to long-term success, (ex. New England, Baltimore, Pittsburgh), it is also true that good coaches can adapt to their players. And there is no greater example of this than one Joe Jackson Gibbs.
Everyone equates “Redskins football” with Gibbs. And rightfully so. But he did not come here preaching Redskins football. What people tend to forget was that Gibbs was “brought up” under Don Coryell and the legendary “Air Coryell” offense. THAT’S the offense.(or “system” he brought with him to Washington. It was only after an 0-5 start that he CHANGED HIS SYSTEM to fit his players. He realized he was sitting on (what would turn out to be) a gold mine in The Hogs and The Diesel, so he went from fancy to smashmouth football. Fortunately, for us, he.never looked back. Oh, shades of The Don would return, particularly in ’91, but it was always run first and it down their throats after those first 5 games in ’81.
Make no mistake. If ST. Joe hadn’t “tweaked his system” to.suit his players, then we would be talking about an entire different Redskins (and NFL) history these days.
CJ, CJ, CJ...
You must have been very young during Joe’s first visit to DC, and don’t remember things correctly due to your youth. While he did bring Air Coryell to the skins, it was with his version, which was based on a strong running game to set up the passing game. He didn’t inherit the Hogs, he, along with Buges, built the Hogs, and taught them to block fo his signature Counter Trey. See, that was the difference between Gibbs and Coryell. Gibbs tweeked Don’s system to create his own. Look at the stats from the Gibbs era…always among the league leaders in passing plays and yardage, yet also very strong with the run. Gibbs was not a Coryell clone, he simply took what fit into his system.
Make no mistake, if St. Joe hadn’t believed in HIS system, and run it year after year, THEN we would be talking about an entire different Redskins (and NFL) history these days.
by grandpa grouse on Dec 3, 2010 5:24 AM EST up reply actions
In today's NFL this just isn't true.
Successful coaches don’t change their system to suit the players. They change the players to suit their system. This process, when the system is sound, normally takes 3-4 years to become successful. It usually takes that long to find all the right pieces.
Obviously a coach will bring in some players for his system, and ditch others. But overall, a coach simply has to be able to utilize his given talent as best he can. especially star players with big contracts (Haynesworth) or multi-year, cost-effective contracts (Orakpo).
In today’s NFL, a team can go from last to the playoffs in 2 years or even less sometimes. But not if you completely remake an entire roster, top to bottom, both sides of the ball, while under utilizing your pre existing talent.
In other words, the Allenahan plan.
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
I would hate to trust my success, as a football coach, or any other manager, solely on my employees. I must have a system I believe in to operate successfully…and I will then hire the people to fit my system. Otherwise, if my people fail, my business fails. I must have a more sound business plan than that.
This is what Shanahan is doing. Trusting his system and insisting that his people buy in and perform, or get out…knowing that over time he can find employees who will buy in.
by grandpa grouse on Dec 3, 2010 3:00 PM EST up reply actions
it's not a zero sum equation
you can remake a roster and demand that everyone buys in, but that doesn’t mean you should bench a super star or shoe horn a 4-3 roster in a 3-4 defense strictly for philosophical reasons.
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
It truly depends
on what you believe in…the individual or the system. And, there may be times you believe in one more than the other and vica versa.
by grandpa grouse on Dec 4, 2010 9:08 PM EST up reply actions
poor old Gramps. the nursing home's a'callin
Seriously though, we’re ALMOST saying the same thing. Yes, the Glory Day ‘Skins did rack up the passing yards, which gave birth to the Smurfs and the Posse. (and the Fun Bunch, really) But it all started with the Hogs roadgrading whoever was in front of them for Riggo and his succesors. No, they didn’t inherit the Hogs, but they did get most of them in that draft. And it was only after Riggo and the Hogs went to Gibbs and said to out it in their back that he started playing smash-mouth. Even Gibbs admitted this at Russ Grimm’s HOF induction last year.
Truthfully, Gibbs doesn’t get enough credit for the “Air Coryell” system. He may not have invented it, but he was a huge part of it, applying some of the same stuff he used at San Diego State. Both of those were offenses HE ran. Offenses he lorded over and knew inside and out. Which is what got him the job in Washington. Beathard always said.he thought they were bringing Air Coryell to the East coast.
Anyway, to me the history is pretty clear. “Redskins football” in now way resembles “Air Coryell.” And if Gibbs had stuck to his original system, we never would have gotten “Redskins football.”
We’re saying the same thing as far as execution. We are not about intent. Running to set up the pass was always Gibbs’ intent from the beginning. That’s what made his system different from the one he managed under Coryell.
by grandpa grouse on Dec 3, 2010 3:19 PM EST up reply actions
alright, ya old prune
Since yer one of the good guys, I’m not gonna keep arguing with you about it. I’ll concede that you’re right. At least you’re convinced of it, which is OK for a guy her age. But here’s why I’M right.
While you obviously have the first hand knowledge because you were a LOT older than me at the time, the problem is that you were upwards of 90 THEN. So the accuracy of you’re recollection is easily called into question.
Now, while I was a spry young lad at that time, I have read and watched every bit of Redskins history I could come across. And aside from everything else, I have in my possession the official Redskins Encyclopedia. Without fishing through it for the exact wording, I do recall the essence of one of the statements Gibbs made when describing the story of that season. Again, I don’t remember the EXACT words, but he basically said that they didn’t start winning until they realized “what their players could do”, and tailored the offense accordingly. If that doesn’t mean he tweaked his system to fit his players, I dunno what does. For the ultimate proof, look up the game logs. They were 0-5 before they played Chicago that year. Again, I don’t recall the exact numbers, but starting that game they went from a 2 back to a 1 back set. And in that game, they proceeded to rush for nearly 300 yards, while throwing for less than 100. Which was what entrenched the Diesel as a HALFBACK in the offense, where he would no longer lead block for Joe Washington, but instead share the carries with him.
And so was born Redskins football. ’Twas the beginning of a wonderful new area, as well as your 4th decade collecting social security.
I like you CJ!
You always make me laugh. And you’re also correct in this case. Gibbs did commit to the one-back offense after that 0-5 start, but again, his initial intent was to run to set up the pass.
And about that social security…you just keep on workin buddy…it’s doin me good!
by grandpa grouse on Dec 4, 2010 7:14 PM EST up reply actions
Misused Player TBD!
The most misused players are the ones they never had. The potential players that would have been draft picks. We waste picks and roster spots on antique players. We have gotten old and cannot get younger trough the draft. We give draft pick to a division rival, only to have them have a better QB and our picks…we no longer have picks and the QB is soon on his way out, or back to the bench as a scapegoat.
Look how many better, younger teams have many more draft picks than us. How can we dress better when we can’t go shopping? We get stuck in faddish clothes that are out of style.
The HC is also misused. How many older retreads have been successful? Where did the Ravens, Rams, Falcons, Saints, Phins, Cards, Steelers go for HC? Not the recycle bin. Shanny’s system is old and stale. He had some good years with the Broncos, but he hasn’t adapted his syle or ego to fit in 21st century. How much longer before we are paying the UFL transfer fee for Maurice Clarette?
+1
I like Kyle tho
Pride is better than wins in Washington. But bring us wins and we will immortalize you - Ask Mark Rypien
Someone try to explain this to me
"For Brian to have 8.5 is kind of amazing because people are sliding to him, chipping him – they know where he’s at. You always need 2-3 [pass rushers] to have a good defense."
that quote is from Jim Haslett, talking about his defense. I’m interested in how he expects to get 2 to 3 pass rushers between now and next season.
Had we stayed with a four man defensive line, here’s who I think we could have counted on as pass rushers-
Orakpo
Carter
Albert Haynesworth
Lorenzo Alexander
Chris Wilson
Jarmon
Phillip Daniels
Orakpo Has 8 .5 quarterback sacks and Haynesworth is second on the team with 2.5, this is almost laughable. I’m interested to see how they fix this in the off-season.
The world looks mighty different when you're peeking out your belly button

by 



























