Looks Like Someone Has a Sixpack of the Mondays
1. As I said last week, a win against the Titans would prompt the same kind of head-scratching we have engaged in after losses. I don't think we played so well that we should wonder where that kind of performance was a week earlier. But our heart and grittiness on the road yesterday would have been nice to see--for example--in St. Louis earlier this season. I also think that Vick's showing against us has kind of gained some luster since last week and is increasingly being considered as a kind of "perfect game" for the Philly quarterback. Listening to people talk about it, you are left with the impression that the outcome would have been the same regardless of Vick's opponent. My thinking last week was that this team--without any real sense of itself at this stage of the season--could bounce back from the Philly game a lot easier than say, a team that had been rolling and got shellacked like that. It was clear that the loss to Philly was not a factor on the field. Either way, for my 10-6 prognostication to have any chance, I needed that win. (Kevin, I am not budging on my 10-6 call one bit.)
2. The Titans hurt themselves a lot with the penalties. But I would not characterize the outcome as more of a situation where Tennessee lost as opposed to Washington won. The shenanigans in overtime were...helpful to our cause. Tennessee played poorly for stretches and Rusty Smith is not the guy Tennessee wants to give the ball to in a tight game in the 4th Quarter. If you want to point to something that suggests we did some things to win the game and didn't just rely on being the benefactor of a team playing poorly against us, try these:
- Fred Davis refusing to go down after the catch
- Chris Cooley factoring huge in the 4th quarter
- Santana Moss executing a beautiful outside move to get enough space to catch a well-placed throw by Don Burgundy for a score
- Graham Gano staying strong and focusing on the big kick
3. This one is a biggie for me. I understand the concept of winning ugly. We all do. It is pretty much our signature style of winning. I have heard the slightest bit of complaining about this in 2010. I will attribute some of it to the fact that we are just pointing out the obvious. But let me be clear when I say that the Washington Redskins and their fanbase have ZERO right to find ways to poo-poo wins. I will stop short of suggesting we should be happy to play poorly in a victory. But wins have come so hard for us in recent seasons (decades) that winning ugly is not just acceptable, it is joyous. There is something about a franchise like ours having to consistently taste and feel how hard it is to win in this league on a week in and week out basis that we should be embracing. Not every team needs to win ugly on the way up. Ours does. We need to rediscover that ravenous hunger that it takes to win in this league. Aside from a couple of late-season runs by Gibbs in his second tenure, that kind of intensity has escaped the burgundy and gold. Think about the games this season decided not just at the end of the game, but on the last play. Of course you don't want that kind of trend to continue for a whole season or longer, but the ability to come out on top of those contests is something you can build a team around. In fact, I would argue that it is the exact thing we have lacked for a very, very long time.
4. OK..the injuries...wow. So you wanted the Redskins to overhaul the offensive line? Check. So you wanted to see what this team would look like without Clinton Portis, Derrick Dockery, Casey Rabach...Devin Thomas? Check. Kudos for showing up on Sunday with some O-line depth. Dressing more than one backup worked out nicely. This is another positive to take away from the win. This is another thing you can point to and say, "The Redskins overcame some things in this game that could have easily been excuses to lose."
5. Logan Paulsen's hair is really starting to become a story. I have kept it off the pages for as long as I can, but it has caught my attention to the point where I can not be silent on the topic any longer. My only hangup on the hair right now is that it seems to either naturally kind of twirl into a ponytail or he is doing it on purpose. If he is doing the ponytail on purpose, I applaud the bravery but disapprove of the style. There has to be a product on the market out there that causes the hair to look and act crazier than his seems to right now. Logan's hairstyle and his future spot on this team and in our hearts are now officially intertwined.
6. I love the screen plays we ran yesterday. That was good coaching coming to the forefront. Against an aggressive defense ranked near the top of the league in sacks, the screens we worked in were successful. It is a small step in the right direction for an offense looking to figure out who it is. With Fred Davis, Chris Cooley, Santana Moss and Mike Sellers complementing whatever running back is on the field, we have a lot of screen options. This should be a staple of our attack from here on out. And I mean for years...not just the rest of the season. There should not be a drive that ends without an attempted screen. If we are serious about having athletic lineman that move, this play should be right up our alley.
Bonus Floater: Kory Lichtensteiger, you diabolical genius! Your whiff on a block out ahead of a screen play in the second half made me so upset that I had to eat an entire extra rack of ribs just to soothe myself. But your play in overtime where you put your helmet in the way of that guys hand and got us 15 yards was simply brilliant! I don't know if Dockery could have made that play.
40 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I also think that Vick’s showing against us has kind of gained some luster since last week and is increasingly being considered as a kind of “perfect game” for the Philly quarterback.
That’s what my attitude was going into this game. Nobody is going to claim the Redskins played well last week, but there really isn’t a team in the NFL that could have beaten the Eagles with their offense clicking like it was in that game. This week was back to business as usual.
As for the injuries, the O-line put in a great performance without even considering the injuries. They had a tackle at guard, a guard at center, and backups all around, and they handled one of the best D-lines in the league. Then again, maybe it shouldn’t be so surprising that we looked better with Rabach out. I love the guy, he’s a real warrior, but it looks like he’s past his expiration date.
On the point about grit, the team never gave up last week either, even when it was clearly over. Say what you want about the leadership, but this team has guts.
Oh, and speaking of grit, the trailer for True Grit they played during the game looked awesome.
"DOWN GOES RODGERS!" -Brian Orakpo
A couple more
- How ridiculous was that field? Coverages were blown, routes failed, and footings lost on almost every play. We had 7 leg injuries in the first half!
-Vick and the Eagles very could have very easily put up 14 more points on the Giants last night.
- Portis played great in that first quarter. I really wish he could stay healthy.
- How many times did Charles Davis refer to last Monday Night? Must have been around 60.
Regardless of the field, when this many guys have hamstring issues, somebody needs to look at the strength and conditioning program
a life: it's the shit that happens while you're waiting for moments that never come -Lester Freamon
by eastcoastatlas on Nov 22, 2010 12:25 PM EST up reply actions
+1
Same thing when I saw Loax pull up lame.
The world looks mighty different when you're peeking out your belly button
by Skins Fan '77 on Nov 22, 2010 12:38 PM EST up reply actions
But it's one game.
It hasn’t been a problem this season until this game, when the field was terrible.
Torain for a few weeks now, McNabb earlier, and i know there was another but can’t remember
a life: it's the shit that happens while you're waiting for moments that never come -Lester Freamon
by eastcoastatlas on Nov 22, 2010 6:10 PM EST up reply actions
I think it's trouble because
I never want to face a team right after their coach gets fired. It worries me people are kinda taking this game lightly… we usually lose when we think that.
I would think the Vikings have even more inspiration/motivation now that Childress is gone and they got blown out by GB. DON’T TAKE THE VIKINGS LIGHTLY PLEASE.
Yeah...that does suck for us
I was really hoping that would go another week before transpiring.
by Ken Meringolo on Nov 22, 2010 12:25 PM EST up reply actions
It was pretty clear
that some, maybe even most, of the Vikings players didn’t really respect Childress. I wonder how much of that was caused by Favre undermining him.
Trust in the Shana-Plan.
zero on favre
he’s had that rep since he first arrived. remember he had to clean up the mess with the boat and all so he had to be a disciplinarian. he just never stopped.
HTTR!
I really liked that patchwork offensive line
It did much better than our starters ever have this season, let’s keep it that way.
In my opinion, with the players we have now, it should look like this-
Williams left tackle
Liechtensteiger left guard
Montgomery Center
Heyer right guard
Brown right tackle
Backup should be Hicks and Rabach until either cook or capers is ready and they can be added to the roster.
The only two question marks become whether Liechtenstein or is the long-term answer at guard, and whether Heyer really has the proper build to play guard-I worry that he might be a bit too tall and catch a lot of balls in the back of the head.
The world looks mighty different when you're peeking out your belly button
Heyer is 6'6" and most OL are near 6'4". The unusual thing about Heyer is not his height, but the length of his legs.
The Raiders have 3 guards that are 6’6" and Leonard Davis, G, Dallas is also that height.
by Jefferson1935 on Nov 22, 2010 2:25 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
- The biggest thing that stood out to me yesterday (other than all of the injuries) was us converting third downs, I was starting to think we should just punt it away after the first two downs to minimize the risk of us turning it over on third and long.
- I was happy to see Banks get a target in offense, how many snaps did he get?
- That was the Cooley I’ve been waiting to see, I love that they were using Fred too but I still think we can get him more involved in the offense without hurting Cooley’s time.
- and of course Joey Galloway gets a few catches after they bump him below Roydell on the depth chart, I understand it’s not nice to cut a guy midseason so here is what I propose: Deactivate him for the rest of the season and activate Austin since you brought him onto the 53 man roster.
- I’m a little upset I’m just now jumping on the bulleted list bandwagon, I have really been missing out
"You're fucking out!"
More screens and less stretch play calls
In the last few games the early stretch plays calls have been getting us in too many 2nd and 12 situations…or longer. I think this is the play call that is also getting Donovan knocked down by our own linemen just after the snap. I like the stretch as it seems to get us many 10+ yard runs, but also many -5 yarders which lead us into all of those 3rd and longs. I’d like to see them call the stretch later in drives/game when the D is has worn down some and slower to get to the outside. They seem to be calling the stretch early in the game to try to wear down the D, but is not working. More screens and inside runs early please.
The Secret to The Skins Success
Each week is top play solid defense, run the ball well and knock out the other teams starting QB.
That was such a beautiful play.
Great inside out route by Santana. You could see the TD before Dono even threw the ball.
Santana Moss executing a beautiful outside move to get enough space to catch a well-placed throw by Don Burgundy for a score
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
Yep!
The team is stashing him. Thats always a good sign about their belief in his future prospects.
by hambonejackson on Nov 22, 2010 4:26 PM EST up reply actions
I'm a MK supporter
but even I found it strange that they put him on IR instead of cutting him loose.
SpottieOttieDopaliscious
They had nothing to lose really, he’s still on the cheap w/ his rookie contract.
Hogs Haven. On Twitter. And Facebook.
by Kevin Ewoldt on Nov 22, 2010 4:46 PM EST up reply actions
still?
I’m not sure. I know Shanahan wished he knew the full extent of his injury at the time so he could have put him on PUP instead of IR.
I haven’t heard anything about him since then. Got any insiders that could give us a clue Kevin/Ken?
SpottieOttieDopaliscious
Didn't he start off on the IR with a strained hamstring?
by hambonejackson on Nov 22, 2010 5:33 PM EST up reply actions
nah
they kept trying to test it, but it never got better.
they actually made it worse if memory serves because they initially diagnosed it as something he could play through when it wasn’t.
Or are you talking about his rookie year?
SpottieOttieDopaliscious
This year. He pulled his hamstring.
And th IR-ed him.
The Biggest Difference
to me was clearly the revamped Oline. Donny finally had some time to throw and also allow the Mediocre Wrs we have a little extra time to run there routes and get separation. I know i would like to see more of Banks lining up on Offense he is a playmaker period. On another note, why is Donny throwing 50x a game??
by True Mastermind on Nov 22, 2010 6:17 PM EST reply actions
#3
“Think about the games this season decided not just at the end of the game, but on the last play.”
- That could also be attributed to a team that has a clear lack of talent but they’re overcoming that with sheer determination and, dare I say, coaching… I don’t think we’ll see this particular group of players taking us to the next level. But they absolutely played an amazing game with all the adversity they faced in that ONE game. It’s rare when a coach will give the quotes Shanny’s been saying. He was just as impressed as us.
HTTR!
Ken love the optimism
Frankly, justified or not, I’ve had about enough of the constant whining, complaining, and crying out of Redskins fans. Constantly bashing our own players for their weaknesses and ignoring their strengths. There are plenty of people from New York, Philly, and Dallas that are more than happy to point out all of the weaknesses on our team, and to bash our players for their mistakes. We’ve cried enough as a collective group, it’s high time we support this squad, particularly the gutsy efforts by Montgomery and Heyer playing terrifically last game out of position to help us get a hard fought win. I love winning, and it’s nice to be winning games again, even if it ain’t pretty. Realize that I recognize the deficiencies with our squad, but I’m going to choose to focus on the strengths and the victories, rather than the losses on here, because frankly there are enough whinny cry babies on hear to point out the weaknesses on the squad. The optimistic side has been sorely lacking.
whining about the whiners, eh?
because frankly there are enough whinny cry babies on hear to point out the weaknesses on the squad.
"By far the worst performers on the team are in the front office." – Sally Jenkins
by smutsboy1 on Nov 23, 2010 11:21 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs

by 




























