Trent Williams and Roster Updates; The Latest Out of Redskins Park
John Keim has covered the Washington Redskins since 1994. Follow his work at WashingtonExaminer.com.
Hogs Haven: How did Trent look in practice yesterday? Did he do a full participation or is he still hobbling a bit?
Keim: Trent was limited, but I did not see him limping so that's a good sign. He said he feels 10 times better than he did a week ago. Mike Shanahan was not yet ready to proclaim him ready, but Williams is very confident.
With Lorenzo getting the starting gig at LB, it's silly to keep Andre on the bench. Is it safe to say we're more of a 4-3 team now going forward?
Keim: Not sure I'd say that. But I do think they'll find more ways to use him as an end, as they did this past week. It's what he does best. The base will still be a 3-4, but they've used a lot of 4-3 looks in each game. They've lined up with two tackles flanked by linebackers; that's basically a 4-3 look. So I think they'll still mix it up. Carter is so much better at this spot. Talked about this a bit in my blog Wednesday morning, but he gets a lot more power when engaging tackles with his hand in the dirt. He comes in lower, making his hands more effective when he tries to slap. As a linebacker, he comes in high and has much less power.
How do you see the RB playing out? If they sign Keiland Williams to the active roster, who goes down? A lot of teams I think could snatch up Logan Paulsen (Rams). Perhaps it's time to cut a WR like Roydell since he adds zero to the STs?
Keim: I would guess at this point it would be Williams. He can offer help in pass protection, something others can't do. I agree on Paulsen; I think he'd be signed. I doubt anyone would give Roydell much of a look. Not sure why they would, really.
With Hicks banged up, they need to sign another OL to the active roster. Is anyone on the practice squad (Erik Cook) making strides or do you foresee them bringing someone in off another practice squad?
Keim: Hicks is OK; he was just sick. Don't think they'll have to do anything there. We don't see enough of practice to know how some of the practice squaders are looking. They seem to like promoting guys off their own practice squad. Shanahan always talks about having a 61-man roster. I'm sure the eight guys on the practice squad would like a chunk of that 53-man change.
28 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
At this point I'm on pins and needles
about bringing Trent back too soon. On the other hand, even though McNabb has avoided the take out hit, if Trent can play, I want him watching McNabb’s left side. Can someone tell me if the Packers have an elite rusher that would command Trent’s presence over Heyer?
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
Clay Matthews. unless he gets Cushing’d tomorrow.
a life: it's the shit that happens while you're waiting for moments that never come -Lester Freamon
by eastcoastatlas on Oct 7, 2010 10:07 AM EDT up reply actions
I don't see Clay Matthews taking on LTs
head-to-head much. He gets most of his pressure on delayed blitzes from all over the place.
by CarverM on Oct 7, 2010 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I watched the Lions game the other night
And he was 1-1 w/ the left Tackle prob 1/2 the time.
Hogs Haven. On Twitter. And Facebook.
by Kevin Ewoldt on Oct 7, 2010 10:15 AM EDT up reply actions
I defer to your analysis
seems every time they show him getting pressure its from somewhere else. I don’t claim to be an expert on the Pack though.
NFL network skips plays on their replays…usually the boring run ones and incompletes…so I couldn’t see where he was lined up for all those plays.
He def did delay and stunt too.
Hogs Haven. On Twitter. And Facebook.
by Kevin Ewoldt on Oct 7, 2010 10:20 AM EDT up reply actions
Stuntin like his daddy
As Deon said. He’s like Orakpo for them, they move him around wherever they like the matchup. A lot on the LT though.
which is why
we’re actually gonna miss Portis. A rush LB is not near as scary with CP in the backfield. God I hope the coaching staff shows these young guys some tape of Portis’ blocking. That’s the one area of his game we’ll definitely miss.
by CJHutch on Oct 7, 2010 12:52 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Ditto that thought.
I have to believe that the Shanny’s are working that aspect hard this week.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
no one i can think of
Their D is decimated. SS out. LB Barnett out. Nick Collins, Charles Woodson, Chad Clifton, and Mark Tauscher all did not practice yesterday…more on that later w/ my Q&A with SBN packers blog.
Hogs Haven. On Twitter. And Facebook.
by Kevin Ewoldt on Oct 7, 2010 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions
We need to take advantage
and score on just about every possession – and I mean TDs.
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
More Importantly (imo)
We need long sustained offensive drives to keep their offense off the field. I feel like our success or failure hinges on whether or not we have a productive running game Sunday.
Don’t fail us now ATV!
agrreed
two-fold, we need to keep our offense on the field as much as possible (as obvious “we need to score points to win” I know), but we need to continue that running game throughout the whole game, and even that starts to become ineffective if the opposing offense is sustaining 8 minute drives. You are not going to wear out that D if they get to rest 20 minutes between drives. I think Lozo stepping is going to be huge. AC can come up and play low from time to time and bringing Orapko up…and Landry allows AH cheat to the gap when he lines up a little bit, which he likes…. a lot.
Even when they were fully healthy...
the Pack didn’t scare me as much – McNabb has proven mobile enough to escape pressure against two very athletic defenses. He has twice the arm Shaun Hill has and Hill made the Pack look beatable by throwing a lot of screens and then going over the top to #81.
"No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." - H.L. Mencken
by TerroristFistJab on Oct 7, 2010 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions
But who do we go up top with?
Roydell? Damn we could have used Moss for a third…. (Bite my tongue! Somebody exercise Cerrato from my thoughts!)
if we had a 3rd...
Cerrato would have pulled the trigger for a 1 or 2 for sure.
Hogs Haven. On Twitter. And Facebook.
Anybody...
I’m pretty much convinced that Armstrong can get behind that secondary often enough to hit on at least one or two deep balls. Something to keep Matthews & Co. from stacking the box.
Unfortunately, this is a game where having a guy like Ladell Betts would have been nice – a good blocker, solid runner, excellent pass catcher. The Lions went to Best & Smith when blitzed a few times last week and really picked up some yards that way.
"No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." - H.L. Mencken
by TerroristFistJab on Oct 7, 2010 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions
I never thought of
Betts as a particularly good blocker. I know there were plenty of times when I wished he HAD picked up the block, and it cost us the play. But Betts was pretty good catching out of the backfield. That’s pretty much all they’ve used Williams for, so hopefully he can thrive there fill time now.
I am really torn on whether we should bring back Larry Johnson. Or even give Julius Jones a look. Don’t get me wrong, I think both of those guys suck, but I also think not having a veteran RB is gonna hurt us at some point.
When we were loading up on over the hill backs, it’s too bad we didn’t just sign LT, rather than the two we wasted our time with. Seems he would’ve worked out a tad bit better.
The Jets OL is phenomenal
LT is benefiting from that. Our OL is semi-respectable, but it is nowhere near as good as the Jets.
I'm back. YAY SUMMER!
Whats the point of having a "veteran" back if they can't block or catch
I mean don’t you bring older guys in cuz you feel more comfortable with them blocking or catching and not makiing “rookie” mistakes? LJ can’t block or catch and has looked washed up as a runner so not sure what “veteran” attributes he would bring.
by BayAreaBullet on Oct 8, 2010 1:33 AM EDT up reply actions
I dunno
what Jets games you’ve been watching, but the ones I’ve seen have shown me LT still has something left. Yes, he does benefit from a good line, but he has also grabbed the #1 spot from Shonn Greene, which means they think he’s the best back on that team. Is he the LT of old? Hell no. But my original point was that he would’ve been a better option than LJ or Parker.
McNabb Quote
"I’m excited about the things we can do in this offense," he said. "Once we explode, I tell you, it’s going to be eye-popping."
Okay McNabb, I need to see some eye-popping stuff this Sunday if we have plans to beat the Packers.
I'm ready to see it!
They did deliver on the running game though.
Just did a post not sure why its not showing up...
But Javarris Jones is off the practice squad now…
http://www.hogshaven.com/2010/10/7/1736482/javarris-james-signed-by-colts-skins-pick-up-quinn-porter

by 




























