Redskins’ Week One Loss Doesn't Matter? I think It Does!
A lot of radio heads and fans have been saying that losing week 1 to the Giants is not a big deal because "we weren't really suppose to win that game," and "there's 15 more games." I cannot accept this as an excuse. Week 1 the Redskins were fully healthy. If there's any time to beat a team that's better than you, it's week 1, especially when BOTH of your opponent's starting corner backs are out!
What's going to happen the second half of the season when the schedule gets difficult like last year and several key starters are out with injuries? We'll look back at week 1 and wish we hadn't wasted this opportunity, especially being an NFC East opponent.
Since 1978, when the NFL adopted the 16-game schedule, and excluding the abbreviated season of 1982, teams that are victorious opening weekend are more than twice as likely to reach the playoffs than losers of an opening game. Of the 442 teams which lost openers...105 went to the playoffs (58 won division titles).
The 43 Super Bowl winners have a 35-7-1 record in the Kickoff Weekend games of their title seasons. I know, I know. Stats are meaningless and meant to be broken. The Red Sox came back from a 0-3 deficit for the first time ever in the ALCS, blah, blah. But let's be real, we're talking about the Redskins. Do I think this is a good team? Of course. Do I think it is poised to be a Super Bowl contender? Definitely not. Year after year week 18 we're cursing the front office saying the Free Agency model does not work. Then the Skins go out and sign that expensive "missing piece" and the revolving door comes full-circle, "Maybe we can win this year if..." The Redskins roster is currently made up of 24 draft picks, which accounts for 45.2% of the roster. Although the Patriots have less free agents on their roster, it's not far off from the Redskins percentage; however, if you take a look at their starters, the majority of them are draft picks. At one point do I say enough is enough?
This week against the Rams is going to be really interesting. If the Skins win, but not decisively, Homeland Security will have to move the terror alert level to Code Red and deploy the National Guard to Redskins Park. We Redskins fans are anything but MEDIUM, which makes the water cooler talk so great, but I don't see this cycle breaking. 17 more weeks until Snyderrato usher in another QB and another Coach, and then the Super Bowl talk for the Redskins can start again.
I look forward to Ken/Sugar's reaction to this piece. I don't like writing it, but the fact is I pay good money to go to the games and I consistently get let down. I often resort to ending my tailgates in the F parking lot much like how that pitcher looks in the picture. Do I hope I'm wrong? Of course.
Image via www.makethemaccountable.com
54 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Dude you're killing me with
picking up the “Zorn and Campbell are on the hotseat” storyline. Clearly they are, but I just don’t want to hear about it until the year is over. Just let them do their job.
Come on Kevin!
It was week 1 and we played the worst we possibly could. You don’t think play will improve? This game has no direct correlation what so ever to our schedule towards the end of the season.
The 1978 stat is rediculous and means absolutely nothing, its bullshit for one that we had to play at the Giants on Week 1 two years in a row, while Philly and Dallas get NFC South cream puffs.
You obviously think this team is going no where by your 8-8 prediction, so why are you surprised and just feeding the fire?
And Boo’s right do you really need to endorse the “hotseat” storyline do you really want to hear about it/write about it for the next 16 weeks?
2008
A team which is 6-2 has a 75% chance to make the playoffs, not the Redskins
and a single game loss is not going to end the season using pretty statistics either.
My concern will ratchet up if the Redskins do not play the Rams very well, it should not be a close game and the Redskins should approaching doing something they have not done in a very very long time which is score over 30 points. Otherwise, I’m moving over to the “spilled pitcher”
I don't get the point of the post.
Is it just a rant.
A quick observation to everyone blaming Campbell for his fumble loss for a TD to Osi. Here’s the video to watch again. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2NoOIi_968 . He does move up slightly, but more than anything it’s a very nice strip from Osi. I still don’t see how he got his hand that far over. He didn’t throw 4 INTs like Cutler, and he didn’t throw a lame duck like Sanchez did, yet he’s getting much more scrutiny from our fans.
Because our friends want Drew Brees
nothing less
I'm to young to Die Danny...don't make me do it tomorrow....
The argument that he should have stepped up looks very flawed. He’s in the motion of throwing the ball, with a decent pocket around him, and no way of knowing that Osi’s 7 foot reach are going to make a highlight reel play on the ball.
Are you serious?!?
Look at that space in front of him! That big-ass open pocket that he’s NOT standing in. Pause the video right at the point where Osi strips the ball and you will see what I mean. Stevie Wonder could see that. It was poor pocket awareness that got the ball stripped. Samuels did his job and kept Osi on the outside. That’s all on Campbell.
Ain't gonna get better VA.
There was a huge area for Campbell to step up and look downfield. This has been a problem for him since he’s been in the league. I blame half on coaching and half on him. This team will never make big plays if he doesn’t learn to step up and use his arm or legs to keep defenses honest. I also believe this staff is one of the poorest in the league. Their game plan is pathetic and predictable each and every week, man. When the Skins play teams of equal or superior talent, they struggle to put 7 on the board. When they play teams of inferior talent, it comes down to crunch time and barely get by on a field goal, if they even win at all. Btw. The west coast offense isn’t gonna work in this division. This team is talented and with their schedule, should be playoff bound. Ain’t gonna happen and this staff needs to be replaced now!
Actually
Samuels was beaten immediately and throughout the entire play. That said, the center of the line held up well and Campbell should have stepped up into that pocket. Also, the receivers were completely blanketed that play, no separation at all.
50% Samuels fault
25% Jason
25% WR’s
50%!???!
Unless you pancake the guy (good luck with that), your primary responsibility is to push him around and behind the QB. There was a perfect pocket to step up into.
by smutsboy1 on Sep 15, 2009 5:04 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
ARE, saw it different
If every pass play zorn calls the first reciever is Moss, the team will look like it looked, when the line breaks down. Can’t a pass play be called where the 2nd or 3rd option may be the long ball, instead of always the first option.
ARE about that exact play “We left some stuff out there,” he said. "When Jason [Campbell] got the ball knocked out, we had open guys. The deep guy was covered but the underneath guy was open
Play calling 100%, when options go from deep to short on every play
The short passes, have no options it’s the only option. Which is why those passes net 4 to 5 yards when needed 6 because it’s the only thing available. PLAY CALLING!
Osi got the jump
But Samuels defended perfectly. Textbook actually. The pocket never collapsed and Campbell could have bought another 2 seconds (a lifetime for a WR) by stepping forward.
Oh Kevin...
Come on man…you need to keep the faith man. At least for more than one week!
dude…
Hopefully Pour Some Sugar On Me can put out the fire a little.
by Sugar on Sep 15, 2009 10:00 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Please do...
Kenny, your optimism is great, but take a look back at your “Friday Night Mights” post. I mean, I want all this to be true, and I will always be going to the games…but hasn’t the last few years given me the right to vent every now and then?
The Redskins to me are like my divorced dad who says he’ll come to my soccer games and then never does. All that time I spent in training camp, I was telling people 10-6…boasting about Kelly and Thomas…then that week 1 offense plan comes out.
by Kevin Ewoldt on Sep 15, 2009 10:18 AM EDT up reply actions
Ok, don't treat me like Vinny JUST yet...
But everyone’s gotta understand….I am a very competitive person, and I don’t like losing. Having the 40K NYG fans taunt me on the way out…I’m still bitter, so I need to vent a little. I’m not throwing JC or Zorn under the bust. I hear the ‘JC sucks" from all my NFC East friends CONSTANTLY and of course I’m always the first to defend….but it’s getting tougher every day. But don’t look at this post as a Zorn/JC bash. I’m just asking…REALISTICALLY,..(put the kool-aid/vodka down for one second)…if you were say a Packers fan and were looking at the Skins objectively, would you think the same of the team as you do being a fan? I of course will still be behind my team, but I just have no clue where this team is going…and that is frustrating thing. The Junkies were talking this morning how the Redskins will NEVER be built for a 5-year successful run. How can anyone deny that?
All I know is I’m going to my first game this year since the Jags OT game in ‘07, so I’ll be drinking plenty burgundy and gold Cooley-Aid and Vodka. Finally have some money since recovering from my college years! Will be my girlfriends first FedEx experience too (Don’t worry Kevin you can take a picture).
by Parks Smith on Sep 15, 2009 10:27 AM EDT up reply actions
We'll be doing a post later this week...
but we welcome everyone to stop by the Hogs Haven tailgate…F lot. Two beruit tables…I’ll be back on the burgundy/gold tonics by then.
by Kevin Ewoldt on Sep 15, 2009 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions
Only if Sugar's mom will be there
KevinE are you related to this new guy ScottE? He’s got your back
by Parks Smith on Sep 15, 2009 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions
the Junkies
ar ea bunch of pessimistic pansies. I love listening to them, but they are no good for getting actual unbiased sports opinion/info. EB is a homer, Lurch is a 49er fan, Cakes is fairweather, and JP HATES the Redskins. The problem is, JP can never be wrong, and he keeps the argument going until the other person (usually EB) gives up. As far as the Redskins go, the person who comes to mind when I think about JP is La Canfora.
I agree 100% with KevinE
We play in one of the toughest divisions in the NFL. We need EVERY win and esp wins over a division opponent. We could have stolen that game with 3-4 plays. Kevs right, their secondary should have been on their heels with all their injuries and yet they dictated to us. We should have gone to a 3 tight end set with Sellers in the backfield and pounded those guys to set up the pass for one thing. But that’s just me. Bottom line, we had an excellent chance to steal an away win over a likely playoff team within our division and didn’t have the cajones offensively to take it. What more motivation can you possibly need?
Alright here's some truth to go with a couple lies on this page.
I’ll start this off by lettin you know I’m a giants fan. No hard feelings.
Ok you said both our starting corner backs were out, not true. One starter was, (Ross), dock is our nickle back.
Second, you guys should stop using the “we had a bad game” defense, the giants did as well which evens out the statement to the point of pointless. As well as the fact that there’s clearly was a facemask on eli’s fumble, not called. On moss when he picked a fight with spiderman, not called. Unsportsmanlike conduct not called. ( yes hitting someone 6 times in the head provoking them to hit back is you’re fault, not off setting.) as well as a couple late hits.
This isn’t me flamming your team, it’s a good one. It’s me asking you guys not to make weak excuses.
Yes and no
Ok with your statement re: who’s a starter, nickleback, etc.
We (well I’m) not using a bad game defense. As I’ve said, our D played pretty well for being on the field as long as they had to be. Disagree on the “non-facemask” call on Eli. Our guy had him by the jersey (but it was close and the rum was flowing).
Agree on the Moss incident. Should have been a pers. foul on us. Although he kinda made up for it by losing his helmet and letting himself be jammed into the turf. I would have yanked him then. Spidy clearly got into his head and he’s pretty much useless after that.
And I still believe
Santana belongs in our ring of honor just for beating the Cowboys just about every year.
Nickle backs aren’t starters. I do understand that he’s our first nickle back, still a back up though.
On the replay showing the face of Eli you can see a couple fingers pulling on his mask. It’s probably on YouTube if you want to check it out.
Yeah though spiderman(Webster) man handled moss. That interception was amazing, he has the skill set of a wr, cb, and a hard hitting safety. Though that may be me being biasd, or it might be the fact that he’s spiderman, who knows?
Good game either way. Next week you guys get to attempt to punish Steve spags for his ex-giant defense.
by ianwestpalm on Sep 15, 2009 11:05 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
don't care
about injuries. They hit every team. Don’t care about missed calls. They happen every game. With the Moss/Webster fracas, this is nothing new. Players get into scuffles all the time, and it’s always the guy who retaliates that gets caught. Since this one covered half the field, and Moss got gang tackled by half your team, it’s obvious they were gonna call a double. But, no, Moss did not “hit the guy 6 times in the head provoking him.” They were hitting each other.
Facemask on Eli’s fumble, pass interference on Webster’s INT. (No, you can’t go through a guy to catch the ball) Again, missed calls happen. Do you REALLY wanna go back and add up missed calls for every game? The bottom line is, you guys won that day. More or less dominated us. Which you should have. Division champs, at home, 1st game, etc, etc, etc. You were supposed to beat us. Maybe you guys showed opening game jitters, but we were just plain bad. And, with all that said, we till had a shot at the end of the game. I can take that, and know that we can get better, and keep my warm, fuzzy feeling for the season going at least another week.
Now, as for the “late hits.” Landry hit was late, and we all know why he did it. But tell me why Jacobs saw him coming and quickly stepped out of bounds?
Oh, and what’s “flamming”?
Nice post
I always love seeing someone showing off their stupidity and ignorance towards a harmless post on the Internet, especially when theirs footage to proove them wrong.
I have no reason to continue conversations with you so this will be my last post directed at you. Cry more.
Can this be your last post directed at anyone on the site?
You know theres a Giants blog, right? And where were you before Sunday?
no tears here
and what footage “prooves” me wrong? The one where Moss and Webster are HITTING EACH OTHER? You were right, it is on YouTube. And I STILL see them hitting each other. I didn’t say Moss wasn’t at fault, what I said was they were both hitting each other.
As for your decision to make it personal, who’s crying? I wasn’t aiming for offensive. Sports talk is about trading barbs. That is, if you’re man enough to take them. Guess I had you pegged wrong.
And before you go calling someone ELSE “stupid and ignorant”, try putting that Stellar New York education of yours to use and figure out how to put together a legible sentence.
especially when theirs footage to proove them wrong.
As well as the fact that there’s clearly was a facemask on eli’s fumble, not called.
For the hundredth time, that wasn’t a friggin’ face mask. Look at it again and you will see it was 90% jersey with maybe one finger on Eli’s face mask. That fits within the new rules regarding face masks and that’s why it was not called.
Nein
I think your point on the Moss altercation is completely bias. Moss might have started it by blocking/jabbing him in the facemask but I’m pretty sure the penalty should go against the Giants after Webster ripped off his helmet and then planted him on the ground. He should have been ejected imo. Point is moot anyways since we punted the next play.
Also, no one here has said the Redskins were a better team, simply that we had a chance to steal this game and that’s pretty accurate. I think if it weren’t for all the circus catches on 3rd and long, Skins win, so once again I disagree that your team played poorly. That is probably the best your wr’s will play all year. Good luck sir.
Another thing...
I think the D did a good job and showed good intensity, but the O is not on board with this program in my opinion. Compare the Pats, who simply willed themselves to win last night. I don’t see it. Hate to be a sore sport and a whiner, but it is frustrating to the max when you invest so much emotionally and cash-wise into this franchise only to be let down time and again. And it’s not magic. What happened to the expanded playbook with everyone more comfortable in the scheme? D Coordinators around the league say we have the plainest vanilla offense, EVER. They don’t even stay up late trying to out game-plan us. I’m just sayin….
Yea it really felt like no one on the offensive side of the ball had any faith in the game plan, including Zorn. I was so disappointed to see the screen pass to Moss when we finally got in the redzone. When you haven’t shown that your playbook is any more expansive than it was last year, then proceed to run the play that every team knows is your go-to, its not going to work.
I hate to be bashing Zorn so much, especially after giving Kevin crap for it, but I just think that if he called a more aggressive and straightforward game, instead of the same slow developing trick plays that we ran last year, the offense would have responded with more intensity and more confidence. Even if you run the plays and they don’t succeed, it still lets the offense get a little more comfortable. We saw this towards the end of the first half and in the second half.
Amen Brother!
hate to be bashing Zorn so much, especially after giving Kevin crap for it, but I just think that if he called a more aggressive and straightforward game, instead of the same slow developing trick plays that we ran last year, the offense would have responded with more intensity and more confidence. Even if you run the plays and they don’t succeed, it still lets the offense get a little more comfortable. We saw this towards the end of the first half and in the second half.
The more and more I see quotes from Zorn the more and more concern I have for him and the head coaching job. I’m not so down on Campbell as I am Zorn, this is his offense and his game calling…he needs to bring it with confidence not scared trickery
Except for the last 3 minutes of the game
The Pats looked just as bad if not worse than the Redskins did. Just an interesting thought. Football is a funny game.
I think the D did a good job and showed good intensity, but the O is not on board with this program in my opinion
The D was mediocre in the first half. Couldn’t get off the field and thus the O did not have as many chances as it should have. I thought our O played decently but run blocking was suspect and Campbell made a couple bad plays that resulted in turnovers.
Most worrisome aspect of the game was weak secondary play on third downs. Probably correctable.
Overall, just didn’t have a good enough all-around game from O or D to beat a good team on the road.
Wow
Birds fans not happy today.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4474988&campaign=rss&source=NFLHeadlines
Peters was rewarded by the Eagles with a six-year $60.5 million pact. The deal is worth $21.5 million in the first year alone. $$ down the toilet.
Shawn Andrews not Jason Peters
but still, injuries have hit the Eagles so hard this year. Their fans were so high on the OL, too.
In terms of this being a statement game
I also think this loss mattered. This was a perfect opportunity for us to come out strong and send a message to the league that our team is for real. Instead, it was mostly déjà vu.
But as far as our overall record goes, we are still on track to be 6-1 going into the bye!!
Giants are a Superbowl contender Redskins are Not
The Giants ARE a superbowl contender. The Redskins ARE NOT a superbowl contender. Once you except that fact this loss is much easier to take. The Redskins have a lot of work to do. So, put the Kool-aid down and let’s enjoy the next 5 games before we have to start playing superbowl contenders again.
Your Stats
“Of the 442 teams which lost openers…105 went to the playoffs”
I don’t think that means as much as you do. Of the 442 teams which lost the second game of the season, how many went to the playoffs? Each loss lowers your chances to get in, the first game isn’t any more important than the second. If you only meant it in the context that we need to get some division wins to make the playoffs, then I agree, but I still see us losing both to the Giants, beating the Eagles twice, and splitting with Dallas.
by Palace of Good Play's Golden Toilet on Sep 15, 2009 2:05 PM EDT reply actions
but since the NFC east is so random
redskins will probably go 1-1 against giants, get swept by eagles, and sweep dallas
I have to ask this question:
(since this is the negative nelly post)
Did anybody else think my boy Clinton Portis looked like he just came from a Thanksgiving Dinner?? As in – kind of slow and lethargic?? Is he alright?

by 

























