Jason Campbell Set To Reverse the Curse and One Veteran Defensive Lineman Who Might Be In Trouble
I am pretty confident that we have all talked about it this week--the "SI Jinx". Jason Campbell is featured on the August 10th issue of Sports Illustrated and the first I heard of it was from a Ravens fan that thought it was simply too funny. Since then I have received countless emails and phone calls from friends who root for other teams, wishing me luck this year now that the jinx was officially on.
My response has been steady since the outset: What exactly are we worried about? Listen, I have been a staunch supporter of JC's all off-season, and I continue to be extremely excited about the upcoming year. But what would constitute a "jinx" here? We didn't just sign him to a multi-year, multi-jillion dollar contract. Our team is led by our defense. And the truth is that there are 3, maybe 4 starters on the offensive side of the ball that you would list as more important to our season (Samuels, Portis and Sellers, if you believe my last post). Toss in Cooley, Dockery and Moss and you have an offense that, minus Campbell, is probably going to be able to help our defense enough to win games.
Please don't mistake this post as me making the anti-Jason Campbell case. I am just trying to make the argument that there is a better chance Campbell will buck the trend of the SI jinx. After all, he has a career record of 16-20 as a starter, has thrown all of 35 TDs in 3 years, and is south of 60% in career accuracy. This year is his chance to change the way people view him. Remember, this is a player that Josh McDaniels rejected because he liked Kyle Orton better (it still hurts.) What could the SI jinx do to Jason? It is make or break for him this season, but not necessarily for the Redskins.
Campbell will be given the best possible chance this season to get the most important stat for a QB: wins. He won't be asked to win games all by himself. He will be in charge of keeping the offense on the field, moving the chains, and converting inside the red zone. He'll be handing the ball off a lot in the hopes that we will be able to control the clock. I don't think he will be relegated to full-fledged "game manager", but between Clinton Portis and our defense, the pressure should not be resting squarely on his shoulders to put up crazy numbers. For all of these reasons, I believe that Jason Campbell is safe from this particular superstition (there will be plenty of other excuses available, right?)
On to the second issue of the day: is Renaldo Wynn really going to make this team? This is something I floated around right when he was signed. He was immediately valuable as a guy who had just spent time with the New York Giants defensive line. I remember speaking to him at Chris Cooley's event and hearing the respect in his voice when he told me about the way they did things up there on defense (and the complete lack of respect that unit had for our offensive line.)
If you look at the way this roster could come together, he could very well be one of the last guys to make the 53-man roster. Are you ready to believe Cerrato will jettison a young, developing player like Rob Jackson to keep Wynn, if that is what it comes down to? More importantly, as this camp drags on, and the offensive line continues to show its age, will they be forced to carry an extra offensive lineman? I hear Wynn has been having a good camp. I am interested in hearing what you think on this. There are a lot of young players on this team, and the drafting of Jeremy Jarmon added yet another young defensive lineman that in my opinion, is going to make it very hard to carry Renaldo into the season.
0 recs |
18 comments
|
Comments
totally agree
We have a 2nd unit on our defensive line that looks just about as good as our starting DL from about 3 years ago… With Daniels (assuming Orakpo is playing DE), Montgomery, Golston, Jarmon, Jackson and Alexander on the team backing up 4 high-level starters, I don’t really see a need for keeping Wynn. If we let Evans walk, I would hope that it was because we didn’t have space for him, not because we preferred Wynn to him.
We only have so many spaces on this team, and if we want to keep a guy like Aldridge, Hackett, Cartwright, etc… why use a spot on a guy who’s up there in age and wouldn’t see the field unless four guys went down?
If he was on the cover of Madden...
then I might be worried… but the SI jinx… please.
I think that the cover shot should have been reserved for the Front Office smucks.
JJ Fe
yeah
I don’t buy the “SI jinx.” There are too many players that get put on that cover every year, throughout the season. The jinx is with Madden.
I don’t see the space for him, but I can definitely see him making the team and sticking around thats why I voted yes.
What is this “SI jinx?” I’ve never even heard of it, is it a rip off of the madden?
Yeah I’m hoping our line can let cambell and portis do just enough to let our defense win games, good points sugar
I've never heard of it either.
Madden curse – yeah. SI jinx – BS someone made up to have something to write about.
Maybe Florio made it up!
Damn…and I fell for it!
by Ken Meringolo on Aug 7, 2009 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions
with the development of the young guys
It would be nice to recoup some lower draft picks in case someone starts getting desparate for D line talent because we seem to have it. Although I know it’s unlikely, I do like to dream that one day we’ll have a savvy enough FO to make that happen.
I used to be disgusted, now I try to be amused....
Wynn
To old…..Cut……he has not been much help anyway when he played………we have enough young guys now……..we need the extra guy on OL for sure……and it will be interesting to see what we do with the 5th and 6th WR spot……Hackett and Mitchell are my guess……
Tony A
I don't see us keeping 6 WR
Moss, ARE, Devin, Malcolm, Marko…unless they practice squad Marko and keep a guy like Eloi. Either way, I think our OL situation is going to cause us to keep an extra guy there.
by Ken Meringolo on Aug 7, 2009 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions
unfortunately
I think Hackett will make the team. And if he does, he will probably end up leapfrogging the youngsters.
I don't think Zorn is so stupid.
He knows his future depends on JC and one of those young guns maturing together.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=laydODN6xVk
not so much
stupid. He knows his future depends on Campbell having a good year which means the team has a good year. If Hackett looks better than Thomas and/or Kelly, he’ll play Hackett. And there’s a very good chance Hackett will look better since he’s so familiar with the offense.

by 





















