D.J. Hackett is a Redskin

So we waived Roydell (who really didn't see that coming after the injury) and sign Hackett. Thoughts?

11 months ago Rekka 9 comments 0 recs |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Could this be an indication of their comfort level of Thomas/Kelly?

Bye, Big Stew and JJ :(

by JimmyK on Aug 5, 2009 10:58 AM EDT reply actions

Has Tommy Tupa's dad been cut yet?

by pas493 on Aug 5, 2009 2:11 PM EDT reply actions

hahaha

Happy to report Tom Tupa’s dad is still in the mix

by Ken Meringolo on Aug 5, 2009 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions

didnt we try to get Hackett last year?

The road to Easy Street goes through the sewer. ~ John Madden

by campbell4prez on Aug 5, 2009 6:39 PM EDT reply actions

I believe we brought him in, but he wanted too much money. I think he then went to Baltimore, but it didn’t pan out. This is the same offense he was in at Seattle. If he stays healthy, I think he would have a shot at beating Marko out for the 5th slot.

RAK EM UP!

by VA_Skin on Aug 5, 2009 7:46 PM EDT up reply actions

I don't like it

I liken this to Gibbs-Brunell. Zorn is comfortable with Hackett. he said that before. I think he will go to him at the first sign of struggle with Kelly or Thomas. Especially Kelly. Hackett is not a long term answer, but I think he will retard the growth of the younguns much like Brunell did with Campbell. (and Ramsey, for that matter)

by CJHutch on Aug 5, 2009 9:15 PM EDT reply actions