The Washington Redskins Ten Most Irreplaceable Players In 2009
Everyone loves a good list. But all too often, these kinds of lists turn into a ranking of the team's best players. In today's Top Ten list, the criteria is simple: Who can we simply not afford to lose to injury this season? Better put, who are the top ten players that are central to the success of THIS YEAR'S team--taking into account depth at each position and potential contributions from each player? I have taken some creative liberties with the presentation of the list, and I have made a few judgement calls that I expect some of you will disagree with--I expect you all will not hold back in the comments section.
#10 - Hunter Smith - When I heard the news that Hunter Smith had been signed, I was just slightly less happy than when I heard the news Jessica Biel was doing a nude scene in an upcoming movie. Our punting situation has been a nightmare for a while now. Derrick Frost may have been a Hall of Famer during the week in practice, but he stunk out loud too many times on Sundays when it counted. Ryan Plackemeier was not the huge upgrade that blew up everyone's skirts either. Word on the street was that he was a liability as a holder. However, I heard his personal hygiene was beyond reproach (no need to bury the guy.) Hunter Smith is a pro's pro. While he has enjoyed the dome-life in Indy, his abilities are sure to be an upgrade in D.C. And with our team expected to be led by our defense, the field position battle will have to feature the skills of Hunter the Punter. He is known in the league to be a steady and rock-solid holder, having paired with Mike Vanderjagt to form one of the most accurate kicking batteries in NFL history (and again with Adam Vinatieri when they won the Super Bowl.) Finally, he brought down Deion Sanders in the following video that always brings a smile to my face.
#9 - Derrick Dockery - We are all aware of the less than stellar year the Redskins had on the offensive line last year. Pete Kendall was a band-aid the year before and performed well enough, but last year that band-aid fell off and got lost in the chicken salad, and Jason Campbell ended up eating that band-aid in his sandwich. Let's not mix words here--we brought in Dockery to be an upgrade, not to hold down the position until someone better comes along. He has to perform well, and he has to perform well right away. Early last season we ran left on some pretty important plays. With Right Tackle being up-for-grabs, and with Randy Thomas healing yet again from injuries, the left side is going to be relied upon heavily. Behind Dockery is Chad Rinehart, who we still know very little about. Samuels and Dockery are comfortable and confident playing next to each other. Losing Dockery would hurt us from a depth perspective and would disrupt the chemistry of the left side of the line.
#8 - Fred Davis - I kind of snuck this one in. I won't pretend to be an expert talent evaluator but when I watched him practice this off season at Redskins Park in Ashburn, he really got to me. Like Cammie from the 80's flick The Great Outdoors, played by Lucy Deakins. At first you're kind of like, "OK...I like this girl, but so far she's not central to the plot," and then as the movie goes on, every other storyline becomes meaningless to you and all you can think about is Cammie and how is Buck going to pull this off?!? That is my prediction for Fred Davis this season. At first it will be all about CP, JC, Cooley, the defense, Santana Clause. But by Week 6 (against Kansas City, where Sleepy's stat line will be 6 catches, 78 yards and 2 TDs), Davis will have asserted himself as a legitimate threat for us on offense. And I predict it will be him that becomes the key to our red zone attack.
#7 - Brian Orakpo - Well, I pretty much had to change my shorts when we drafted this guy. I spent all winter clamoring for an OLB/DE player to fill the Merriman/Ware hole in our roster. As a rookie, he will be expected to play like a vet. He will be expected to show up in the stats, and he will be expected to straight-up dominate. So it goes with high first round picks I suppose. Is it fair? Dan Snyder's $20 million bones say it is more than fair. There was an offensive lineman on the board when we picked Orakpo--Michael Oher--so this selection has all the makings of being second-guessed all season long. If he fails to be a force on our defense, it will be hard to hear anything above the fans shouting the f-word: failure. Further, for us to enjoy the kind of success we are hoping for, we need nothing less than a dominant performance from his position.
#6 - Santana Moss - One could argue we have lost Santana Moss during the season every year for the last 3 years. Either by injury or by opposing defenses denying him the ball, Moss has been silenced late in the season. Still, he is one of those "magic" players that has the ability to make a play when he gets the ball in his hands. Whenever he touches the ball, there is a chance the play can end with him scoring a touchdown. We'd all like to think that with Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly in the fold, Moss might be somewhat replaceable. Not so fast. The dude is an elite NFL player and on our team, his value is as much about the comfort and confidence he gives both fans and teammates when he is on the field as it is about his skill set. Here is a highlight video of him ( a little grainy, but you get the idea.)
#5 - Jason Campbell - I fear I will be scolded for either putting him too high or for putting him on this list at all. Truth be told, I am shocked that I am not making him #1. Todd Collins has proven to be more than serviceable, with not only a stellar performance in relief of JC, but also a late-season playoff push under his belt. Colt Brennan is the apple of a lot of eyes, and Jason Campbell has yet to become the "franchise quarterback" you want from a 1st rounder. But he is absolutely central to our success this year. Despite the off season rumors and activity, the investment in JC has only grown greater. Both he and the coaching staff have put in a lot of hours in the months leading up to training camp. Jason has worked extensively with Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly, and he has quietly continued to act the part of "Starting Redskins QB" which as we all know is a position of high honor and visibility. He has the confidence of his teammates and coaching staff (currently), and let's face facts--you pretty much always have most of your eggs in the starting QB basket. If you think like me, and you think JC will in fact be second to the defense among the reasons we make the playoffs, you have to put him on this list, and you probably should put him higher.
#4 - Mike Sellers - This year might be the first year that I fully appreciate Sellers for exactly what he means to this team. I have both underestimated and overestimated his importance and role on this team in the last handful of years. There was a series in the pre-season a couple years back where Gibbs called for like 4 straight hand-offs to Sellers. He busted each carry for 7-8 yards a pop. I thought we were seeing the emergence of a Brandon Jacobs-type of role for Sellers. Then last season, the disappointment of him being (allegedly) unable to punch the ball in against Cincinnati on the goal line tempered that expectation. In 2005, he had 8 TDs (7 through the air, 1 on the ground), but last year just managed 1 score. So how does he land at #4 on this list? Special teams notwithstanding, he has become an invaluable lead blocker. Clinton Portis loves to get in behind Sellers and every time they both make it to the edge, you know a 1st down is a gimme. Players like Sellers seem to get marginalized by their organizations over time (see Lorenzo Neal from the San Diego Chargers a few years back.) Here's hoping the team figures out a responsible way to keep him with the team beyond this year. Sellers has become a destructive force in what has been at times an unstoppable running game. We can ill afford to lose him this year if we hope to keep Clinton Portis from taking on the first and second tacklers at the point of attack. And anything Sellers is able to add in the way of short-yardage situations for us is gravy.
#3 - Clinton Portis - Thanks to fantasy football, I have finally learned the lesson that eludes so many fans and even league personnel men: running backs really do grow on trees. So what is CP doing this high on the list? Because there are exceptions to every rule. Like for example, to those that say "No means No", I say, "Sometimes No means Maybe." ("Reservation for 1 in hell please? Yes, I'll hold.") CP is a stud...a freak of nature athletically that has enjoyed a great deal of success at running back for 7 seasons. That is twice the average career for running backs (somebody call me out on this if I am wrong, but I think the average career of a running back is roughly 3 years.) From an odds perspective there is a better chance Leonardo DiCaprio will star in the Growing Pains movie than a running back becoming highly productive in his 8th year. Yet that is what we are banking on this season. Clinton is the man yet again this year, and without him, the ship loses a lot of direction and purpose. More than anything, the ship loses a lot of identity. For better or worse, the identity of this team and specifically the offense is tied to Clinton Portis.
#2 - Chris Samuels - We spoke to a retired former Redskin a few months ago (who shall remain nameless for now) and he said that there was only ONE player on the whole roster he would label "untouchable"--only one player on the entire roster that he would start all over with tomorrow: Chris Samuels. Whether you agree with it or not, it kind of takes your breath away...wait for it...like Nicole Eggert in Charles in Charge. She was only 15 when she started out as Jamie Powell but I was only 10, so the things I was thinking about doing to her were totally legal (as a 10-year old, this consisted mostly of picturing her in a bathing suit, but by the time she was 18, I was 13, so my dream date of me, her and Samantha Micelli (Alyssa Milano) from Who's The Boss was ON.) As we discussed above, the offensive line was a debacle last year. Samuels is the class of our line. If he goes down, our team's playoff chances disappear faster than a bag of blow left alone in a room with Corey Haim. (It's not fair to beat up on Corey Haim you say? Go back and watch Lucas again. All these years later, and both Charlie Sheen and Jeremy Piven are killing it. Corey Haim has only Corey Haim to blame.)
via p1.hotornot.com
#1 - Albert Haynesworth - If you go to a nice restaurant and order the most expensive thing on the menu, like the Filet Mignon plate, it ain't going to work for you if the steak is undercooked and gives you parasites. A good bowl of mashed potatoes or creamed spinach is not going to save the dish. We paid for the best cut of meat on the market. It had damn well better taste good and be cooked right. Haynesworth has to absolutely dominate this season for the Redskins to both save face and make some noise in the NFC. Is saving face really that important? I think so, because he represents yet another in a long line of high-priced talent brought in by Snyder to win now. This has yet to really pan out for Snyder and has left us coming up with some pretty lame one-liners over the years.
"Mark Carrier could really be the difference this season."
"Brandon Lloyd is poised to break out this season."
"Adam Archuleta should really solidify our secondary."
"Bruce Smith attacking the QB is going to get us to the next level this season."
"Chad Morton is the answer in the return game."
"Jeff George is the right guy for this offense."
OK, you get the idea. Redemption is absolutely chief among the goals for Haynesworth this year in my humble opinion. And the truth is it will come hand-in-hand with domination at the point of attack. If Blache can move him up and down the line of scrimmage effectively and keep the opposing offense guessing, Haynesworth is capable of providing the same kind of impact that Reggie White gave the Packers when he signed there and subsequently led them to a Super Bowl. Without Haynesworth, we lose twice really. We continue to get berated by everyone for trying and failing to "buy a championship" and we would be on the outside looking in yet again come December.
As I review the list, LaRon Landry jumps off the page as the one I wish I would have found a spot for, but I will have to live with leaving him off, despite my constant proclamations that Landry is an elite player. I guess I dig our safety group right now, and am hopeful that a Chris Horton/ Kareem Moore backfield would hold up (if you can't lie to yourself, who can you lie to?)
Other Honorable Mentions: Ladell Betts, London Fletcher, Carlos Rogers, and Ethan "The Red Snapper" Albright.
I expect that London will be the one I get the most grief for excluding, so let me seed my excuse for leaving him out: I love Alfred Fincher, and think that if it came down to it, he would be the feel-good story of the league stepping in and up to replace London. Think Mike Seaver-gets-Chelsea Noble...yeah, that kind of feel good.
1 recs |
36 comments
|
Comments
let me
be the first to say that this is a very good list. I would contend with the order, but the players are right for the most part. There will always be debate (that’s what this site’s for anyway), but those players are hard to argue with. Now let me try.
1st – I DO think Fletcher belongs ont he list. While I think HB Blades (not Fincher) would step in for him admirably, Fletcher is a behind the scenes playmaker. And furthermore, he will probably make a LOT more plays this year behind Big Al. But what he’s most important for is leading the defense. He’s that guy with instant respect and credibility that other guys, young and old, look up to. We haven’t had that type of player on defense since, um, I can’t remember. Maybe Marvcus Patton? Fletcher is key.
2nd – I think we would be OK, without Haynesworth. Not saying we would be near as good, but we would survive. The #4 defense with Orakpo and a full season of Hall added to it is sufficient, to say the least. We just wouldn’t be as scary without Big Al.
3rd – Fred Davis needs to go. I like your optimism, and I DEFINITELY hope it comes true, but you said “IRREPLACEABLE” players. To me, Cooley is MUCH MORE irreplaceable than Davis. Hands down. As for your predictions – let them play out before putting him ahead of proven guys.
4th – your instincts are right about Landry. He doesn’t belong on here. He is an absolute stud. He is a versatile safety who can play the pass and the run effectively, and he is a scary hitter. BUT he doesn’t bring it all the time. If he did, he’d be in the Pro Bowl every year. He should be a Brian Dawkins/Troy Polamalu mix. but he doesn’t put in the time. I hope he “gets it” this year. he’s probably a top 7 safety in the league, so it’s hard to criticize him. But he SHOULD be top 3.
5th – and here it is. Let the tomato throwing begin. You are absolutely right – Jason Campbell SHOULD be number one. And for all you jackasses who feel otherwise – you’re nuts. Notice I didn’t say THINK otherwise? because that’s exactly the problem. You’re not thinking. I don’t believe anyone thinks JC is an all pro signal caller. Everyone knows this is his make or break year. None of that is up for dispute. What also SHOULDN"T BE up for dispute is that he’s our ONLY option right now. If Campbell went down, our season would be over. Go back to the Todd Collins well if you want, but that wasn’t a well, it was a mirage. Collins did great for us for 5 games, but it was smoke and mirrors. He knew that offense more than Tom Brady knows his offense. It was 2nd nature to him. He could make the reads in his sleep. AND the line held up for him. Until the playoffs, then the real Todd Collins stood up. The truth is, Collins should be 3rd option at best. As for the “other” option. I love Colt Brennan. I think he will turn into a very good QB one day. And I hope it’s with us. But he just isn’t ready. Simple as that. It REALLY pains me to say this, but Brennan is a lot like Romo. Probably has a better arm though. But still, they are very similar type players. And how long did Romo sit before he saw the field? Colt’s game neesd to be broken down then built back up. He has all the things you can’t teach, now he needs the stuff you can teach. Anyone looking at it SUBJECTIVELY knows that we would be in trouble if Colt was starting this year. Aside form everything else, the whole offseason has been built around the fact that JC is our starter. For that to change this late int he game would be disastrous. Period. (notice my use of periods)
by CJHutch on Aug 4, 2009 5:30 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
OL
I mean, if the Skins lose a SINGLE starting OL to injury…they’re in serious trouble. That was my first thought. I agree with you on Campbell as well.
I also agree with Ken on Fred Davis. Everything we’ve seen from him so far could lead to a TE controversy. Ok, not going that far, but I’ll keep an eye on him at camp today.
by KevinE on Aug 4, 2009 6:42 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The part about Corey Haim?
Or the part about Nicole Eggert?
If you say the idea for the article itself, then you are a little late to the party, since every website and radio show has been doing this forever.
Then again, you may have a poitn about Cammie…I know I am not the only one who wanted to run away from home and find her.
by Ken Meringolo on Aug 4, 2009 9:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
honorable mention...
Sugar… for keeping his insights up-front and foremost! Good read.
JJ Fe
by Rydaddy617 on Aug 4, 2009 8:45 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree with the list.
Completely. Well written. And I like Hunter staying on instead of Fletcher, though HB should be filling in instead of Fincher. Fincher is quality backup for either OLB.
by SSBlitz on Aug 4, 2009 10:06 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I had a dream about Ryan Plackemeier last night
Is that bad?
by pas493 on Aug 4, 2009 10:57 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
that’s wrong on a number of levels.
by smutsboy1 on Aug 4, 2009 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice read.
But Fred Davis(?) – lol. I’m pretty hyped about him too, but he’s not irreplaceable yet, is he? DT/MK are even more central to the success of this year’s team. If one of those two don’t step up, we are right back to being a one-trick pony.
RAK EM UP!
by VA_Skin on Aug 4, 2009 11:28 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
sugar is assuming he becomes the red zone threat we need.
If that’s the case, then he does become irreplaceable.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=laydODN6xVk
by hibachi on Aug 4, 2009 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A leap of faith to be sure
We know someone has to step up and be the red zone threat. I will settle for anyone stepping up. But I have a hunch it will be Sleepy.
by Ken Meringolo on Aug 4, 2009 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just hope Zorn uses him right
because he has some serious potential. Davis was a beast at USC.
RAK EM UP!
by VA_Skin on Aug 4, 2009 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I dunno
I think you guys are overlooking Albright, that guy goes down and both the punting and FG teams could very well suffer and never recover. It’s one of those positions that always gets overl;ooked and taken for granted, but you lack consistency there and suddenly most games can become adventures.
I used to be disgusted, now I try to be amused....
by piratedan7 on Aug 4, 2009 11:57 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
SAMUELS SAMUELS SAMUELS
If Samuels goes down, you can pretty much kiss this entire season and any hopes of reaching that elusive 8-8 down the drain. They would be DUNZO. I’m not sure they have 5 legitimate starters on the offensive line right now; they certainly don’t have a legitimate RT, so depth at the tackle position is pretty much nonexistent. Thomas is often injured and is in the twilight of his career, Heyer and Williams by all accounts have been abused by speed rushers so far in training camp. They have NO depth on the offensive line. Zippy. You can do some things to mask one deficiency on the offensive line (keeping a Yoder in to help, CP/Big Mike are good blockers as well), but you can’t do that on BOTH sides of the line. If Samuels goes down, you can pretty much start the debate of Cowher vs. Shanahan in 2010 as soon as he doesn’t get up.
by DCLance on Aug 4, 2009 12:21 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
1a. Jason Campbell (good luck with Collins & Colt)
1b. Santana Moss (w/o him a 1-dimensional downfield game becomes a 0-dimensional one)
I agree with most of your other assessments, except for Fred Davis and Haynesworth.
I’d definitely add London to the list. He’s loads better than anyone available to replace him. His knowledge & leadership are unparalleled on our team.
by smutsboy1 on Aug 4, 2009 12:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i dont mean to come off harsh but that list is horrible. I mean there is so much fundamentally wrong with that list I dont even know where to begin. So rather than tearing it apart piece by piece I made my own list.
1) CP26 – this team goes as far as CP will carry them (for as long as he can carry them)
2) London Fletcher Baker Candlestick Maker – even with haynesworth here he is the guy that makes this defense work (and the guy that saves you from losing to the lions). To say Alfred Fincher could step up and take his spot is laughable.
3) Santana Moss – the first time he pulls a hammy and ARE is your only WR with any real game time we’ll be wondering if he should be higher on this list.
4) Andre Carter – Haynesworth demanding all that attention in the middle of the line wont mean anything if players on the end cant beat single assignments
5) Chris Samuels – Take it from me… there is no backup LT in the NFC east that wants to go up against NYG or Dallas (see winston justice)
6) Chris Cooley – See Santana Moss
7) Albert Haynesworth – If he comes in and plays up to his 100million dollar contract this defense might be as good as skins fans THOUGHT they were last year. If he goes down you are no worse than you were last year
8) Randy Thomas – He doesnt have the luxury of playing next to chris samuels like dockery does. He is not only going to have to play his best but try to cover up for the deficiencies of heyer/williams
9) LaRon Landry – Interested to see if Chris Horton can live up to his rookie expectations. The key to letting Horton do what he does (play in the box) is having a player as fast/talented as Landry behind him.
10a) Mike Sellers
10b) Colt Brennan – My faith in tom collins outside of an al saunders system is little to none. I think the coaching staff is going to use Colt to motivate Jason (I think alot of the cutler/sanchez talk was to light a fire under Campbell and the FO has for some reason decided this is the best way to motivate campbell).
Honorable mention:
Devin Thomas – Between him and Kelly I think Thomas is clearly the better prospect. One of them needs to step up and If Thomas were to get injured…
Jason Campbell – Who here can say with no doubt in their mind that JC is the man long term and the better option between him and Colt going into this year?? Not enough of you to get him on the top 10.
Orakpo – What do you want I forgot about him until now and dont want to go back. At DE he would be much higher than he currently is at LB though. You do understand as a 4/3 team you really dont have a ware/merriman/34olb hole to fill, right?
Left off list
Hunter Smith – sure it was a great tackle but go back and look at the punt. Hopefully has has some of those short line drives waiting for desean.
Derrick Dockery – From watching lots of vid on Jason Peters I can tell you DD is not the player who left DC a few years ago. He IS Pete Kendall2.0 and definitely not a long term solution.
Fred Davis – The gap between Davis and Yoder is (currently) not big enough to be put on the list
by dt3 on Aug 4, 2009 12:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
pretty fair
but Colt doesn’t belong on the list. If Campbell goes down, we’re in trouble. Again, nobody is saying he’s an all pro, but he’s the only option we have right now, we’ve already prepared to go into the season with him, and we know he CAN get it done. Now we just have to see if he WILL.
The Dockery “vid” you watched of Dockery is with Jason Peters next to him. It’s hard for a guard to look good with a rodeo clown next to him. I’m not saying he is as good as he was when he left, I’m just saying there’s no substantial evidence to prove otherwise. He’s not old, hasn’t sustained any major injuries, and hasn’t missed time otherwise. Short of any of these things, it’s rare for a lineman to just suck all of a sudden. You also have to take into account the system. Some guys work better in different systems. Maybe he didn’t fit Buffalo’s system. Just like Stacy Andrews and/or Peters may not fit Philly’s system. Buffalo is a running team. Philly is not. Those guys will have to do a lot more pass blocking then they are used to.
by CJHutch on Aug 5, 2009 6:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree on Dockery
I watched all of the videos posted on this site and some others and not once did I see Dockery get beat, pushed back, shoved aside, spun on, or generally manhandled. Every play that I saw where Dockery could have been partially responsible for a sack, it was because he (or his wingman) was out of position. The Kendall comparison is just ridiculous. Kendall is 5+ years older and slower than molasses in December. Dockery’s biggest challenge will be mastering our offensive schemes and staying in position, which is why we have the man, the myth, the legend… Joe Bugel.
RAK EM UP!
by VA_Skin on Aug 5, 2009 6:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't mean to be harsh
But your list really sucks ass.
1. You have 11 people in a 10 person list
2. No explanation for Mike Sellers
3. We didn’t sign Hunter the Punter for his tacklin abilities or we would call him “Hunter the Tackler” and that just doesn’s sound as cool.
4. Pete Kendall 2.0, you just made me choke on my lunch
5. Your Cooley explanation doesn’t make any sense b/c if Moss got hurt wouldn’t Cooley be there and vice versa?
6. You mentioned Colt Brennan
7. Who is Tom Collins? I’ll drink a Tom Collins but I don’t know who he is and he certainly does not play on the Redskins
8. Your an Eagles fan
9. You should of mentioned Donovan McNabb b/c the amount of times we are going to sack him and pick him off are really going to be irreplaceable to our Pro Bowlers stats…
by pas493 on Aug 4, 2009 1:12 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
1) there was a tie… get over it
2) all i promised you was a list
3) If thats the type of punting we are going to be seeing this season we will soon be calling him “Hunter the unemployed” (doesnt sound cool either)
4) yeah saying Dockery might be able to play as well as Kendall might be slightly outlandish
5) should have been clearer. Was trying to point out the lack of experience past Santana and ARE
6) I mentioned Colt Brennan (a backup that alot of fans think should be battling for the starting job), the original poster mentioned a free agent punter and a 3rd string TE (has he been moved to 2nd yet?) that has 3 career receptions. What you beefing with me for??
7) Sorry thats an inside joke between me and my buddies who are skins fans. didnt even realize i typed that
8) you wish you could be as cool as me (j/k)… past that i dont see why that matters. I think I was fair with everything written, the closest thing you can find to a lowblow is Dockery and I know lots of skins fans who have said worse, the only time I mentioned the ealges I was hardly complimentary (winston justice). I try to be constructive in any/all of my posts/responses and avoid any redskins/eagles pissing matches, I hope others can do the same.
9) we shall see
by dt3 on Aug 4, 2009 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
By inside joke with you and your friends, you mean you and your mom, right?
by pas493 on Aug 4, 2009 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
no. i mean me and your boy… peter king. We were discussing mr collins as he put the finishing touches on his albert haynesworth voodoo doll.
by dt3 on Aug 4, 2009 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
o word, tell him good job on stu bradley
by pas493 on Aug 4, 2009 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who is the more important coach this preseason?
Bugel or Blache?
by Ken Meringolo on Aug 5, 2009 9:55 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Blache
But I say that b/c at this point in their careers I think Blache is a better coach.
(sorry Buges)
by smutsboy1 on Aug 5, 2009 10:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
BUGES
A blind monkey could run this defense haha (not really). But I do think that unless Campbell speeds up his game, this offense will go as far as the OL and CP takes it. And it sounds like Buges has a lot of work to do in order to get these guys ready.
RAK EM UP!
by VA_Skin on Aug 5, 2009 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What are we asking JC to do this year?
IMO we are setup to be a defensive team that forces others into mistakes. We will play ball control and field position…..lots of running and a low risk passing attack. I think we are asking JC to limit mistakes, take less sacks, hand the ball off, and hit the open receiver. JC has a strong arm and is fairly mobile, but we are not asking him to throw it down field much, nor are we asking him to extend plays with his feet (he rarely throws it away…but needs to more). I’m counting on JC to take a step forward this year…quicken his release, read coverage better, get to his second and third option faster (he is slow at this, leading to some sacks), improve his timing (release the ball prior to the wr making his break…stop holding it and throw it to the spot instead of waiting and using his arm strength to get it there after the break), and learn to slide or run out of bounds. JC had just 13 tds and 3200 yeards last year, and I’m thinking 20 tds and 3500 this year is enough to get into the playoffs. I dont think we are counting on anything more than that, are we? If JC went dow, IMO we turn to TC and ask him to limit mistakes, throw the ball away when needed (avoid sacks to play field position), hand the ball off, and hit the open man. Kinda like trent dilfer/ravens or brad johnson/TB style. I’m sure TC has mastered our 58 play offense…he is a vet so I’m sure know knows every route a receiver can run and knows every defense you throw at him…his arm strength will be limiting, so I’d give him more 3 wrs sets and take advantage of his ability to read the defense at the line and get to the third option…he is most likely better at this than JC. I’d also ask him to not force throws and throw it out of bounds. I’d still take 2-3 shots down field with his moon ball to kelly and thomas to take advantage of their ability to adjust to the throw in the air….a pick in this case is like a punt….it is lot like JC has a huge success rate on these throws anyhow. Are we asking JC to win games for us or just not to lose games for us? IMO we are asking him to not lose it for us and TC can do that. The only thing I think we will be missing if JC went down would be the potential that he explodes and puts up a 25-30 td year, but I’m not counting on that.
by liger99 on Aug 5, 2009 10:14 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
+3500 & 20
But TC needs to prove that he can run this new offense.
RAK EM UP!
by VA_Skin on Aug 5, 2009 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Sellers
I still don’t understand why the Skins don’t use this guy more to run the ball. I remember that series of runs you are talking about in Preseason and thought the same thing. The probelm is that the few chances he has had lately have been from the up back postion rather than at tailback. The sucess you reference was from a deep eye. The big guy needs some room to get up steam. If you give him some room, he’d be great on short yardage or even for a couple of series to wear down the defense in the 4th. Plus he can catch!
by skins76 on Aug 13, 2009 1:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I still don’t know what the hell happened last season in that must-win against the Bungles. How many times did Sellers NOT punch through their line, 1 yard away from the end zone?
RAK EM UP!
by VA_Skin on Aug 13, 2009 6:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
true
I say its because he was in the fullback postion. He needs to be deeper in the backfield to get up steam
by skins76 on Aug 14, 2009 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Like the Juggernaut from X-Men
RAK EM UP!
by VA_Skin on Aug 14, 2009 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 



















