Washington Redskins Enter Season Well-Tested Thanks to Preseason Schedule
As we sit one day away from the home game against the New England Patriots, it occurs to me we have a lot to be thankful for going into this season. The Redskins offense has faced last season's #1 and #2 ranked defenses in the last two weeks. Both the Ravens and the Steelers put pressure on Jason Campbell and our offensive line, and bot the Ravens and Steelers boast world-class weapons in the defensive secondary. Ed Reed and Troy Polamalu are guys who won't let you get away with a bad decision.
The results for both Campbell and our offensive line have thus far been mixed. The numbers paint a not-so-encouraging picture. Jason Campbell's four completions are kind of sad-looking. But when you consider he has taken less than 30 snaps so far, and has just 13 pass attempts, you realize that the numbers can be--and are--misleading.
When the so-called "live bullets" are flying through the air on September 13th, Jason Campbell will be asked to make quick decisions, refrain from turning the ball over, and put the offense in a position to succeed prior to each snap. What better test can you give a man than having him practice those things against the Ravens and Steelers? He has proven an ability to audible out of bad plays in his limited action this preseason, and we have seen him throw the ball away on a few occasions already.
My point isn't that JC is going to be Dan Marino this season. My point is that in a season where so much is riding on his individual performance, there is plenty to suggest that he will be ready to be the quarterback that got us to 6-2 last year. And we have the Ravens and Steelers to thank for that.
On the defensive side of the ball, our biggest test this preseason will come against the Patriots. Even without Tom Brady, the Patriots were the #5 overall offense last season. Our inability to get sustained pressure on the opposing quarterback over the last few years has been an Achilles heel of an otherwise stout defense. Making Tom Brady a little uncomfortable tomorrow night will go a long ways toward proving we are making strides in that department. Against a lesser offense I would be forced to question how meaningful our pressure was, but preventing Tom Brady from doing his best impression of a statue in the pocket would say a lot.
In last season's "dress rehearsal" game against the Panthers, the Redskins got undressed and spanked. I believe the score was something like 47-3. I suppose that the low bar this team has set for themselves in certain situations (the low bar referred to here being not getting beat in the 3rd preseason game by 44 points) works to our advantage. But I think we can all agree that we expect to compete against the Patriots' starters and anything short of getting into the end zone one of the first two or three drives would be considered...bad.
I realize the preseason schedule is by and large a "luck of the draw" type of deal. But for the Redskins, the chance to get reps on tape against some of the best units in the league on offense and defense should prove to be a major benefit. And in a year when so many long-term questions linger--at quarterback and head coach specifically--this particular slate of preseason games could be the difference between discovering an identity in September and discovering an identity in November.
23 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'm probably wrong
But I thought individual teams set up there preseason games rather than the league?
They do
But the contracts are for multiple years. So a team that could be good this year could suck in two years. That was the “luck of the draw” part I was referring to
by Ken Meringolo on Aug 27, 2009 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions
So this year we just happen to get pitted against teams that were all rated at the top last year
by Ken Meringolo on Aug 27, 2009 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions
Got it, thanks...
Can we schedule a UFL or CFL team next year?
by Parks Smith on Aug 27, 2009 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions
It's only
beneficial if we show well against the Pattycakes. If they stomp us (like last time) then it’s no good. All it will do is destroy our psyche.
What I found funny, listening to NFL radio yesterday, they said we will struggle against the Patriots because the have excellent LB’s, and they play the 3-4. Forgive me if I’m wrong here, but I think Baltimore AND Pittsburgh have better LB’s and BOTH play the 3-4.
Good article.
I’m glad you pointed it out.
Remember when the Pats run up the score on us last year? Here’s hoping Haynesworth and Orakpo pay Brady back (though neither were here then).
Remember when Steve Spurrier beat the Pats
probably one of the most epic upsets in NFL history
by Parks Smith on Aug 27, 2009 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions
That was against Gibbs
and it was Bellicheatz disrespectful way of letting everybody know he was the new top dog.
RAK EM UP!
Brady
If this game ends without Brady limping over to the sideline, then it’s a failure.
I'm to young to Die Danny...don't make me do it tomorrow....
class went out the window with that ass whoopin they gave us back then
I'm to young to Die Danny...don't make me do it tomorrow....
by Rekka on Aug 27, 2009 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
the crux of the matter
is right here:
Will a QB who “make[s] quick decisions, refrain[s] from turning the ball over, and put[s] the offense in a position to succeed prior to each snap” be enough for the fans and the owner? I continue believe that the running game & ability to control time of possession will be the keys to ‘Skins success. It’s certainly possible for the offense to run it well & keep it for a long time without Campbell putting up big numbers. What’s more important at the end of the season — the team’s record or Campbell’s stats?
I hope it will be enough
the record is of course the more important thing. I pray that if we are a winning team, people will embrace what makes us a winner.
What sucks is that fans and teams fail to do that all the time. Remember when the Ravens told Trent Dilfer to take a hike after they won the Super Bowl?
by Ken Meringolo on Aug 27, 2009 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Ok…Agreed and Fair enough…. but Sugar……We’re talking about Trent muther-f’n Dilfer. I know he was a “serviceable” Qb (i use this term loosely). But everytime i hear that name, i chuckle. Im glad he got a ring over the midgets, but still its dilfer….. I dont blame the Shytimore Crows for dumping him. He’s a living joke.
by TheOverLordMarshl on Aug 27, 2009 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions
I pray that if we are a winning team, people will embrace what makes us a winner.
I have to agree on this point, specifically regarding Jason Campbell. The man has received a ridiculous amount of hate for quite some time. I’m not going to act like I don’t have some doubts about JC myself, because I definitely do. But IF JC steps up and continues improving like he has done year in and year out & IF JC leads us into the playoffs… then we need to embrace what makes us a winner and extend Jason Campbell and continue building around him offensively.
RAK EM UP!
Nice point
And I said last year that the Panthers game would be a tell all of how the team will fare during the season, but it was all forgotten with the 6-2 start, but then the collapse and the Panther preseason came back to be a true telling.
The Pats game will be again, and on both sides of the ball.
I also think the regular season with the first half being easier than the second half sets up in Washington’s Favor, if the Redskins break out to a 6-2 start, all the praise will be controlled because of the 2-6 collapse from last year.
Schedules do make a difference as well as winning the games which are to be won, look at Filthydelphia last year, they tied the Bengals, did not lose and then proceeded to the NFC championship game.

by 























