Washington Redskins Fantasy Rankings
You asked for fantasy football talk, you got it. Before we get into pre-season and start overloading on league-wide fantasy talk, let's rank the Redskins fantasy players. We'll assume that the defense and special teams are one unit (DST), and we'll assume individual players get credit for any return yards and touchdowns.
Draft Picks
1. Clinton Portis, RB- The offense still revolves around the run here in D.C., and Clinton remains an elite athlete in the NFL, capable of dominating an opposing defense with 25-30 quality touches in a game. While he is not injury-prone, his fantasy owners have had their share of heartbreakers the last few seasons. What makes him the top fantasy player on this team is that you know he is going to get the ball, and you know he is going to be featured--i.e. there is no 'running back by committee' here. I continue to hope for more receptions out of the backfield for CP, but if he stays healthy for a full season, 1,500 rushing yards and 10 TDs are very likely.
2. Santana Moss, WR - Santana Clause is an ironic nickname we have for Moss. Ironic because he starts out the year like gangbusters but then opposing defenses shut him down before we get to Christmas. This is of course not his fault, and should the Redskins develop an alternate threat to Santana, other teams will be forced to play him a lot more honestly. Last year in my fantasy league, which holds an auction draft, I picked Moss up for $3. In fact, most would say I got stuck with him at $3, as I was really bidding value at that point. I was shocked when he went so cheap. I think this is the perception Moss is facing now based on the last few seasons of going missing in the winter. The Redskins passing offense has been rather anemic and he has paid the price. Rounding out his value though is the threat that the Redskins will incorporate him more into the return game. He has shown how dangerous he can be back there, and if your league gives you points for return yards and touchdowns, he is definitely a top-tier fantasy receiver.
3. Chris Cooley, TE- If fumbles kill you in your league, then Cooley hurt you last season. But I would be hard-pressed to think a player like Cooley will let that kind of thing happen two years in a row. He continues to be one of the top tight ends in the whole league (83 catches last year), and Jason Campbell continues to rely on him heavily when we need to get a first down (averaged over 10 yards a catch). Because we don't feature two or even three first-tier wide receivers, Cooley's status in our passing game remains high. He is a big target and he understands how to find the pocket in the middle of the field. The big question for Cooley--and the Redskins--is how can the team do a better job of finding him in the red zone. He only hauled in 1 TD last season (which is a problem) but he averaged 7 TD's the first four seasons, so you have to hope this is an aberration, and still consider him on the same level as Jason Witten, Dustin Keller, Greg Olsen, etc.
T4. Washington DST - A lot of fantasy leagues really let a good defensive unit pile on points. In the league I play in though, defenses can either be the top scorer of the week, or can go negative enough to completely erase your top scorer of the week. All of this makes the top DST units in the league that much more valuable. The Redskins added Albert Haynesworth, Brian Orakpo, Philip Daniels, Renaldo Wynn, and Jeremy Jarmon to their pass rush/defensive line. We lost Shawn Springs, but have a pretty good secondary with Horton, Landry, Hall, Rogers and Smoot. There is plenty to suggest this defense can build on what they accomplished last season, which saw them finish as the 4th-ranked unit in the NFL. From a fantasy perspective, the improvement would have to come in the way of increased sacks and turnovers. If that happens, this DST will be the difference-maker come playoff time, in fantasy and in reality.
T4. Jason Campbell, QB- Typically, QB's are the money makers on fantasy teams. Assuming most leagues run about 12 teams deep, it would be fair to say that you would hit 12 other QB's that are more likely to fill up a stat sheet before you came to JC. To me, this makes him a great value draft pick. You can pick up a few other players you need in the initial rounds and pick him up as a backup to your starter late in the draft. His yards and TDs are low, I'll grant you. The upside on him this year is tough to argue though. He is in a contract year, in the second season under Jim Zorn, and by all accounts in a better comfort zone in the current offensive scheme. This offense is definitely more naturally pass-happy than we showed it to be last year. For us to get the points on the board that we need to win games--roughly 24 points per game--JC will need to do things that will make fantasy owners very happy. He is a top-tier second string fantasy QB in my opinion--a starter who will be asked to throw the ball relatively often, supported by a strong running game.
6. Ladell Betts, RB- Fantasy owners have gotten to know Betts over the last few years. When he took over for Clinton a few years back down the stretch, he put up 1,000 yards on the ground in 9 weeks. He is a fresh back, with little wear and tear on the tires. But because of the carries that Portis gets, Betts' value is very low in the beginning of the season. If you draft Portis, you pretty much HAVE to get Betts since if anything happened to Portis, you know they would look to Ladell to carry the ball 25 times a game.
Waiver Wire Additions
7. Devin Thomas, WR- I continue to bet heavily on Devin. He is the kind of athlete that when he has the ball in his hands, anything can happen. But in fantasy terms, from here on out on this list we are talking about depth and backups. Based on his improvement at the end of last season, it is not inconceivable that he could make a move in training camp this summer and give Randle-El a run for his money at the #2 spot.
8. Fred Davis, TE - Again, most fantasy teams don't have 2 tight ends stashed away, and 2nd-stringers are even farther from the average fantasy owner's mind. But Fred Davis is an interesting thought...there probably isn't anyone on this list with more upside than Sleepy. He will not be inactive on many Sundays this season. Zorn likes using two tight ends, and if Davis is on the field, defenses are going to have to make some choices regarding who they want to defend. My guess is that Fred Davis won't get drafted by many owners, but could be one of those guys that is the "Most Added Free Agent" in Week 6 when he blows up against the Chiefs.
via masnsports.com
9. Malcolm Kelly, WR- He continues to be the player that gets the most positive praise from other players when we ask, "Who do you think is in line for a big year?" He has an "ooooh" factor that makes him a quality sleeper in fantasy leagues. But with next to nothing to show for his rookie campaign, and a knee that is unproven in the pros, he is in a deep, deep sleep indeed. We'll call him our "Ambien snoozer" for the upcoming season.
10. Antwaan Randle-El, WR - You hate to list a #2 receiver this low, but on this team, the writing on the wall says that the youngsters are going to get every opportunity to supplant ARE in the starting lineup. Things could change of course as we get closer to September. But as of right now, his fantasy value is at its lowest. Our passing offense is pretty much Moss and Cooley right now, with the best chances for adding onto those two guys resting on the potential of the second-year guys.
Keeper League Potential
11. Colt Brennan, QB- There is always a guy in your league that is not afraid to stash a 2nd or 3rd string QB on his bench. The truth is that every year, at the end of the season, you find an NFL team or two is trotting out a young gun to get some minutes. And that is prime time fantasy playoffs action. Some of you out there must have a story of how some random quarterback either saved or ruined your season. Colt Brennan won't be drafted in many leagues on draft night. But if JC goes down--God forbid--the temptation to play Colt will be great. And you can bet if he is playing on Sunday, there will be a fantasy team or two out there starting him with the thought that he could be blow up for a huge and random fantasy performance.Given all the uncertainty at the QB position in D.C. lately, owning the young gun doesn't seem like that crazy of an idea.
There are a few more guys we could throw on this list: Mike Sellers, Roydell Williams, Todd Collins, Todd Yoder--actually, not Todd Yoder. Sorry Todd. What would you change about this list and what do you hope for from the Redskins players on your fantasy teams?
1 recs |
23 comments
|
Comments
Rankings
I don’t know how the Skins D is not in the top 2..and really #1. Especially b/c of the major pieces they added and how easy their schedule is outside the NFC East.
Cooley’s numbers will be higher, but w/ the emergence of Fred Davis and #11 and #12…I suspect Cooley will have a handful of games with great #s…and most games with only a couple catches.
by KevinE on Jul 21, 2009 1:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Fantasy defenses
Pittsburgh should still be the #1 ranked fantasy D, IMO. I think the Titans (no Albert) will probably drop off. The Ravens (Bart Scott – Jets), Eaglets (no JJ and Dawk), and Bears (Hester is a WR now?) are risky. The Giants and Skins should definitely move up.
RAK EM UP!
by VA_Skin on Jul 21, 2009 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
For sure with the Steelers..
I meant Skins D in the top 2 of Sug’s list on this page!
by KevinE on Jul 21, 2009 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You can't put the Defense above CP
But it is close…I guess if you believe our offense will take the next step this season, you have to rate Moss and Cooley up there because they are going to be the ones to benefit the most.
by Ken Meringolo on Jul 21, 2009 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Springs
I’d like to see what the impact of losing Springs will do to the D. You can’t underestimate that he shut top receivers down last year when we needed it. Rogers will step up a bit and we need to see Hall get it done consistently. I’m encouraged but hesitant about our secondary. I think the safeties may have to play a couple of yards deeper because of it. This may change some things.
Having said that, I think all of your picks past Campbell are wrong and this list shouldn’t have gone past 4.
by monk81 on Jul 21, 2009 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Skins haven't had a good fantasy defense yet.
without sacks, turnovers and TDs they’re not fantasy-relevant.
hopefully that changes
by smutsboy1 on Jul 21, 2009 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good analysis
I will definitely be targeting Devin Thomas in the 2nd or 3rd Round of my keeper league this year. Malcolm Kelly has to prove to me that his knees won’t break down.
I’m also definitely going after our defense this year. With the pressure that Haynesworth and Co. should bring, our secondary won’t be left hung out to dry like last year. And with our ballhawks, Horton and Hall (maybe even Rogers, lol), waiting to make picks, we’re going to see a lot more INTs, turnovers, and even… wait for it… defensive TDs!!!
RAK EM UP!
by VA_Skin on Jul 21, 2009 1:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I will let someone else take the skins D in all of my leagues this year. They are going to be a great NFL D, but fantasy-wise not so good. The NFC East is not a sloppy turnover division like the NFC North (MIN/DET/GB/CHI), so unless you get mega points for low yardage/points the skins D will just be average IMO. The NFL averaged 4+ defensive TDs last year with the skins getting zero…..I’d love to get 4 this year. GB got 13 tds last year playing in that joke division which maybe adding more turnovers in Favre.
by liger99 on Jul 21, 2009 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Our defense lacked in two major areas last year:
1) Turnovers
2) Sacks
I think you are underestimating the pressure Haynesworth and Co. will bring and the resulting turnovers that pressure will create, especially with Hall and Horton waiting in the wings.
RAK EM UP!
by VA_Skin on Jul 21, 2009 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Redskins are going to get way more sacks and turnovers this year. They were last in sacks last year and should more up to the middle somewhere. The limiting factors IMO is that they will not be blowing teams away and racking up the garbage time defensive turnovers/sacks/TDs. They also play in the NFC East with teams that have solid coverage on special teams. Plus the Redskins run the ball a lot and control the clock, keeping the D off the field…plus the other teams in the East play a ball control game too.
by liger99 on Jul 21, 2009 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yup. fantasy good and real life good aren’t always the same.
by smutsboy1 on Jul 21, 2009 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My league rewards points for INTs and sacks. In the BEast, I believe there will be the potential for more sacks/turnovers as 2 QBs (Eli and Romo) have both lost their #1 WRs. You are probably right about not blowing teams out this year, but there should be more opportunities for defensive TDs with the decreased time span for QBs to make good decisions.
Plus the Redskins run the ball a lot and control the clock, keeping the D off the field.I seem to recall a lot of 3 and outs last year, but maybe this season your statement will prove true.
RAK EM UP!
by VA_Skin on Jul 21, 2009 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
TOP last year was 31:30 for the Redskins (seems high?). We had 22 turnovers and 24 sacks. NFL average is 28 TOs and 32 sacks…and 4 defensive tds. I think we will hit the averages or a little better. Teams just don’t need to take risks against the Redskins D when they can play conservatively and win the game….it’s not like the Redskins offense is going to beat you. If I was going to draft the redskins d in fantasy this year, I would look to bench them for the nfc east games and try to cherry pick the D that is play detroit or kc.
by liger99 on Jul 21, 2009 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I always look for favorable matchups also (for every position). Greg Blache’s first priority on defense is to take away the run and make teams one-dimensional.
RAK EM UP!
by VA_Skin on Jul 21, 2009 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cont'd.
Teams can play conservative, but at some point, they have to score. I don’t see teams just running out the clock on us every game. Our offense should be a little more organized this year, and our defense should be able to bring more pressure and hopefully force mistakes.
RAK EM UP!
by VA_Skin on Jul 21, 2009 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I always look for favorable matchups also (for every position). Greg Blache’s first priority on defense is to take away the run and make teams one-dimensional.
RAK EM UP!
by VA_Skin on Jul 21, 2009 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Devin Thomas
You will be able to get him in the 7th round…don’t burn one of your first 5 picks on him. my 2 cents.
by KevinE on Jul 21, 2009 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, it’s a keeper league. Everyone’s team is set. Rooks are usually taken in the 1st round, then by the late 2nd and 3rd we are looking for FA sleepers.
RAK EM UP!
by VA_Skin on Jul 21, 2009 1:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Drafting Redskins
I’d love to steal Portis in the early second round this year. I have 9th pick a 12 person league up in PA. Everyone is a Steelers/Eagles fan except me, so I could get him at 16 being they overlook him. His age is bothering me a little and he has been banged up the last few years. I’d be reaching for him at 9 but getting a good value at 16.
by liger99 on Jul 21, 2009 1:59 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
When is your draft?
If you draft during pre-season you might be able to get him in the 2nd round. But if you wait until a few days before the season to draft like we do, you might have to grab him in the 1st—assuming he is 100% healthy and ready to go. He looked pretty good in the preseason last year and I saw him go higher in the later drafts. Also consider that he tends to pile on the numbers in the first half of the season, and our schedule is serving us up some potentially weak defenses. I would love for you to be able to get him at #16…that would be awesome.
by Ken Meringolo on Jul 21, 2009 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The draft is August 30th, so he will be there at #9. The league setup is a little funky though, with 1 RB, 2 WR and a flex plus the qb/te/k/d. I’ve tried to get them to add one more starter, but no go. There are 12 teams so it can get a little thin when the bye weeks hit. Being you can play just one RB if needed, RBs are devalued some. I’m thinking I can get him at 16.
by liger99 on Jul 21, 2009 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 




















